Why capitalism?

>open borders
>rampant consumerism
>materialism
>outsourcing
>globalism
>multiculturalism
>low wages
>waste
Why would anyone support this degenerate system?
>inb4 calling me a commie
I'm a third positionist.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3NqG2lAojNQ
youtube.com/watch?v=KNPzlFivd3M
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I actually like the idea of capitalism. Just like reading Nietzsche. The problem with both of them is that they're too far ahead of their time and don't take racial and cultural divides into account (or presuppose a purely white society, if you wanna go that far)

Read Trotskys "Facism. What it is and how to fight it" lel, I guess you won't. Care MIDF watching lulz

Lots of things can work hypothetically but in practice it's been a detriment to the European races.

Why would anyone want to fight fascism? And why would anyone want to listen to that faggot Trotsky?

Shameless self bump.

>Lots of things can work hypothetically but in practice it's been a detriment to the European races.

True.

I think national syndicalism would be a better solution. Distribute profits between workers, managers and the state. Nationalize subversive corporations that are engaging in unethical practices and subsidize small business under a national guild/employee training system.

>I'm a third positionist
So a commie in denial. Gotcha.

If you're going to take a stance in politics you should read the literature of the opposition too as to argue better against them.
National Syndicalism is literally a patrician tier ideology.

>open borders

Literally nothing to do with capitalism. Socialists advocate for this shit as well

Well I didn't say you shouldn't read their literature. I've read everything from Nietzsche and Heidegger to Marx and Lenin.
>National Syndicalism is literally a patrician tier ideology.
This is true.

Markets are borderless. Socialism isn't just one ideology, there are Marxist socialists but there are also others socialists. Look into Sorelianism.

Just because I want to trade with someone doesn't mean I want to live with them
In the same way, there are OB capitalists like lolbergtarians but also natcaps like paleoconservatives.

Open borders as an issue clearly exists independently of economic systems

Than why does it happen under capitalism?
There's a reason the rich lobby for open borders. It's because they like a nice big pool of cheap brown labor.
youtube.com/watch?v=3NqG2lAojNQ
>Sorel
Nice to see someone who gets it.

This.
>If you're going to take a stance in politics you should read the literature of the opposition too as to argue better against them.

The hardest part is "stare at the abyss". But totally agree, makes me realize how much of a newbie we all really are until we get to understand -at least- the basic theory of any opposition. Also the best way to promote third positionism is to avoid the use of the same terms of the echo chambers of the past.

It's beneficial to companies to import cheap labour though since they work for much cheaper than the whites and work longer hours.
It leads to more profits.

Why does it happen under socialism? Aside from the fashy goys, your socialist compatriots are almost universally open borders types.

Just because companies want cheap labour doesn't mean we have to give it to them. They should run businesses, not the country

>says the edgy teen with the meme flag

Because out of all the things suggested so far it's been the most successful
And aren't at least half of your points more tied to Globalism? Open borders is a leftist/globalist stance anyway, and that's what drove wages down - access to foreign, cheap labour

Ideally there would be Capitalism within a State. The state wouldn't allow open borders and mass migration, therefore the businesses wouldn't have access to cheap labour driving down wages, and the competition aspect of capitalism would be more to do with finding new ways to offer goods/services at a lower cost rather than just
>dude get the browns to make it for pennies lmao

> low wages
False. Pic related.
> globalism
Globalism =/= globalization, mental, midget.
> waste
Efficiency
> open borders
borders are in the realm and the issue of the state
> rampant consumerism
> materialism
See Mises:
> [T]he critics who speak in this vein show only that they have a very imperfect and materialistic conception of these higher and nobler needs. Social policy, with the means that are at its disposal, can make men rich or poor, but it can never succeed in making them happy or in satisfying their inmost yearnings. Here all external expedients fail. All that social policy can do is to remove the outer causes of pain and suffering…It is not from a disdain of spiritual goods that liberalism concerns itself exclusively with man’s material well-being, but from a conviction that what is highest and deepest in man cannot be touched by any outward regulation. It seeks to produce only outer well-being because it knows that inner, spiritual riches cannot come to man from without, but only from within his own heart. It does not aim at creating anything but the outward preconditions for the development of the inner life.

> [T]he relatively prosperous individual…can more readily satisfy his spiritual needs than, say, the individual of the tenth century, who was given no respite from anxiety over the problem of eking out barely enough for survival or from the dangers that threatened him from his enemies.

So why Capitalism? Well we first need to understand it before we unfairly criticize a system of voluntary interactions, trade and property. Find out why these concepts exist, why they are important and what their actual effects are not these memes.

>what are lobbyists?
you really don't know how powerful corporations are, do you?

Only because we allow money in politics and therefore crypto-corporatism. Lobbying should be banned and the statesmen audited regularly

Allowing money in politics is part of a capitalist system though. The wealthiest prosper.

Ayyoo might makes right and sheit

> be Trotsky
> get an ice pick in the side of your head as a friendly gesture from your old comrade from the “great” revolution
> mfw

>implying Stalin and Trotsky were ever comrades
They only fought together because everybody was against them. After the revolution was successful, they were constantly at odds.

Regardless of Trotsky’s politics you should read his book since even (((they))) elimated him from “history”

That's not capitalism, it's corporatism. What capitalist school of thought advocates for money in politics? Which literature? Sowell? Rand? Rothbard? Smith?

>implying that's corporatism

user pls you're triggering my autism.

'Corporation' in 'Corporatism' doesn't mean businesses, it means collectives of people in general.

>third positionist
Great, another Statist.

I think you need to read up on the definition of corporatism

>open borders
>>rampant consumerism
>>materialism
>>outsourcing
>>globalism
>>multiculturalism
None of that is true
Free market capitalism is logic at work, if some does something I don't support I stop buying from them or someone else has a better cheaper product I buy them them instead. It's about giving the people the choice of what and who they give their money to.

That's "collectivism"

lmao only way I'm touching anything filled with Trotsky is an ice bucket I'm filling a mustard glass with

A rare wild sighting of a true Homo Economicus

>tfw you will never get to march with Mosley for a greater Britain
Why even live?

In all seriousness though, Mosley was years ahead of his time, he is the man we need right now but don't deserve and can't have.
All Mosley's policies should be put into a new society or party (Not retarded and shit like the NBU) with a new layer of paint to carry on the flame.

>False. Pic related.
>Using China as an example
China is a formally communist economy that is under rapid industrialization. The United States is a formally industrial economy becoming a service economy. Your argument has no bearing on the United States.
>Globalism =/= globalization, mental, midget.
Same thing you subversive little faggot.
>Efficiency
>Planned obsolescence is somehow efficiency.
kek
>borders are in the realm and the issue of the state
And the state is influenced by corporations who want cheap labor.

Stalin killed him and he was as Jew. He literally was (((them))).

Listen to the classic redpilled speakers like rockwell, pierce, and Dr duke and all of them recognise capitalism and communism for being part of the same Jewish globalist scheme.
It's only nu-pol Trumper kekistanis who love individualism and capitalism to subvert us into a spiral of doom with nice toys

youtube.com/watch?v=KNPzlFivd3M

*sobs* We will carry the flame Mosley.

Don't confuse capitalism and consumerism. Consumerism is what happens when you live in a capitalist society and give women rights. Giving women rights in general will fuck things up but with regards to capitalism it transforms it into consumerism. Think about it, capitalism incentivizes efficiency on both the producer and consumer. If a women were to buy her dog a sweater she would get the shit slapped out of her by her husband for so frivolous an expenditure. Men understand money since they earn it and can think long term. Women are childish and will spend money they didn't earn on anything they fancy. Since hitting your wife is a crime no one can stop them. Thus your economy shifts from producing things that will last to things that are useless.