Will Net Neutrality being repealed tomorrow be for the better or worse?

Will Net Neutrality being repealed tomorrow be for the better or worse?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/iFkzJc7kJKc
youtu.be/JucFpDhuF98
youtu.be/wQtiIazfoQM
youtube.com/watch?v=OHvzxZXATr8
youtu.be/aVVsDJUt1EM
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Yes it will be and its a good thing.

Jews support Net Neutrality. What else do you need to know?

>botnet neutrality

Better.

Less Americans posting on this board = leafs own Sup Forums now

...

I've never seen someone actually refute the top post.

I won't... actually lose this place, will I? I'm middle class. I want the internet, I want to access torrenting and streaming sites, I want to purchase hipster soap from small businesses. I don't want to lose all that.

You'll have to pay $39.99 extra for your Reddit/Memer/Sup Forums package from comcast with a post limit of 250. After that, it's $0.10/per post extra.

Meanwhile leafs get to shitpost all over your board F O R F R E E

No, it's fear-mongering
Most of the arguments that people make about companies doing unfavorable things for the consumer would be retarded from a free market standpoint

The phone companies should have a say in who you can call.

...

>muh free market
>c-companies exist to do favourable things for the consumer and not make money for shareholders!!
lmao amerisharts actually believe that Comcast/Verizon/Charter/AT&T aren't all the same shit

he actually thinks they will compete on the free market!

you deserve every bit of abuse you get from these companies lmao

Comcast users will probably suffer the worst. Perhaps AT&T will offer much cheaper prices!

Moreover, chances are they don't fucking care
The same thing would happen if anti-discrimination laws were repealed. Companies aren't going to willingly turn away profit in the name of discriminatory practices.

People are trying to meme this into being the next SOPA

You will be able to buy an unlimited package or a pre determined amount of gigs. 10, 20, 50, 100, unlimited.

That is my prediction.

Ohh yeah and 25 cents a mb of bandwidth an hour to visit sites like Sup Forums.

Bump

the other day i read that google is blocking youtube on amazon devices, its already started ppl!! fight back

Expect right-leaning websites to be permanently slowed or blocked entirely. Look at who owns the liberal msm. CNN owned by Time Warner, MSNBC owned by Comcast. There isn't a conservative ISP to protect rightwing content.

I'm going to call up my isp and ask them to ban from Sup Forums for life so I can leave this terrible addiction behind.

They care because they can charge you more shekels

Comcast/Verizon/AT&T is going to charge you $39.99 extra to visit websites like Sup Forums because that's what raises earnings and pleases the board They probably know exactly how much they can charge to maximize revenue without losing too many customers. and you're going to sit back and take it like a good goy and even defend them as they do it!

Americans are truly the most pathetic people on the planet.

>company does thing
>company gets slapped into obeying law
>all before NN
A

Like someone else said let’s get Sup Forums to keep Sup Forums running for free in the US

Net neutrality was de facto policy of FCC before 2015 shill. you comcast shills spout all the same talking points, you're so easy to spot!

It's fine. We were okay without it for years, and all the Chicken Little "THEYRE GONNA CHARGE US FOR EVERYTHING NOW" shit is all talk.

We'll be fine, lads.

Who does AT&T own?

>Chicken Little "THEYRE GONNA CHARGE US FOR EVERYTHING NOW" shit is all talk.
>Surely a publicly traded company with shareholders to answer to won't attempt to charge us more in order to increase earnings, it's all talk!!!

Why are you so butthurt? Is it because we mocked your effeminate prime minister for years?
That's what I thought. Well, kinda.

it will actually lead to lower prices from the big players in your image. for example, NN led to customers NOT being able to stream movies for free on t-mobile.

Again, you just come off as a retarded salty leaf.

I'm not salty lol, I get to still shitpost for free while you pay $0.15 cents per post to your comcast overlords
hilarious

Is it a garauntee that it's getting repealed? Everyone acts like it's all over. Especially now that Alabama is blue, i figured democrats would be for NN and this would almost split the vote

I don't use Cumcast.

>he thinks his ISP won't do the same shit once they see comcast getting away with it
lol

There is an off possibility the whole thing will be shelved and demoncraps will rub their ass on the computer screen as always.

>we need a communistic internet system
>these companies are immune to our anti-trust and monopoly laws
>how dare you suggest I simply use another provider

Net Neutrality resulted in online oligarchs like Google running the entire goddamn internet because they have a monopoly you retard

And even if this bullshit hysteria was true, it's probably for the good of society. Free internet for everybody resulted in widespread degeneracy across America, just look at all the freaks it's created. Good fucking riddance.

At competitive prices!

Seriously tho, the fearmongering from you, people like you, and the libshits is exorbitant. Calm your tits.

Why is it an off possibility this time as opposed to before?

shit will get worse
youtu.be/iFkzJc7kJKc
youtu.be/JucFpDhuF98
youtu.be/wQtiIazfoQM

its too late now.

the paid shills came, and went already

the corporate propoganda machine used its right wing tools to push a narrative about free market solutions, and bad regulations.

votes tomorrow, its game over.

welcome to the shitternet

They're about to own CNN, since they're merging with Time Warner.

Your a fucking drooling stupid idiot.
If you Bing dumbass.... there is a picture of you.

we had a good run

>the paid shills came, and went already

90% of the shilling here was pro-NN, though.

>fear mongering
>saying that comcast will attempt to jew their customers like they have 1000 times in the past is fearmongering

Because congress doesn't vote on it. A board of five FCC commisioners vote on it. At this time the board is three Republicans and two Democrats.

Hmm...

NN doesn't stop comcast from raising prices, I dont get the argument. The market will set the price, period.

>some gurgling sounds I couldnt understand due to the corporate dick too deep in his throat

I guesse there are still some of this shills around

two scheckles in your account for excelent shill work goy.

How do you know one of those Republicans isn't a KEKservative? You know damn well those Democrats will vote no.

>70% of the US has a single service provider.
>Remove all incentive for competition.
>B-b-but the invisible hand!

Net Neutrality stops them from charging based on whether you visit reddit vs Sup Forums, though.

Enjoy being throttled to 128kpbs since Sup Forums won't be a "whitelisted site" in any default subscriber package. You'll have to pay extra for that goy!

>i dont want a comcast monopoly but ill pay taxes to ensure there always will be one

Comcast jews people eternally, Title II or not. There's virtually nothing Title II does to stop this

Good lord I'm eating my nails for this shit.

No one in that room understand the shit they are voting for.

They literally can create such tiers under the current rules

And not "throttle access" but create tiered packages

>better shill for less regulations so they can jew us even harder then!

yes if kikebook or twitter bans us for calling people niggers they get fined millions of dollars

NN dies.

The FCC chair is a total puppet who is colluding the service providers. Hell to rub people's noses in it, they even had a ridiculous fucking sketch where this shitheel makes jokes about colluding with the industry.

"In collusion, I mean conclusion... sorry"
youtube.com/watch?v=OHvzxZXATr8

The shills here are painful.

yes goy, remove the rules that keep us from fucking you over, we promise that we wont fuck you over if you remove the rules.

I can't understand why people think that prices will skyrocket immediately. The idea of companies that are already making billions in profits choosing to spit in the face of their consumers makes sense in some lib fever dream but it will never happen. Remember when Xbox tried to do the bullshit with single use disks and additional dumb fees? Customers had a bitchfit and they scrapped the whole plan.

That is actually the debate because websites have taken it to court, Comcast spent hundreds of millions getting this to pass so that Comcast/NBC/Universal can get an advantage over other streaming services.

You realize the far larger corporations are on the side of NN, right? That argument doesn't really make any sense.

>The CEO of a publicly traded company cares about the consumers and not meeting performance incentives to get his fat bonus from the board

ISP's are already charging as much as they can without losing too many customers or opening them up to competition. I don't get it either, I guess capitalism is hard to understand.

oh yes goy, all us corporations want you to trust us, fight for us against eachother, trust us, we want to help you goy. Trust us.

Giant nothing burger.
>ADSL

>Remember when this console tried it?
Remember that you are still throating corporate cock for games? Or that Battlefront II only changed because governments caught wind?

Ajit Pai is surely playing some 4d chess desu

The regulations do basically nothing as is to stop them and discourage competition. They're are anti-competitive and price gouging laws in place.

>better shill for government funded monopolies in Facebook!!!

Are we just admitting that 4d chess means comically replacing your eyes with dollar signs and fantasizing about your Scrooge McDuck vault?

>leaf
Like I said, Xbox tried to jew their customers and customer backlash forced them to pull back. And when cell companies tried throttling people jumped ship en masse.

Yeah, I don't know shit, I just don't hop on the "evil corporations" train

do you not have a job or a 401k? Its a good thing when businesses succeed and the economy is good.

So how much are you willing pay comcast per post on Sup Forums?

Do you think service providers will actually defend your racist deplorable ass?

Or do you think that service providers will listen to the libtards and just ban shitholes like Sup Forums.

Remember... libtards threatened advertisers and foxnews pulled Glenn Beck. When the corporations on in control, all that matters is the bottom line. When the cucks threaten the purse string... the corps will do the censoring. Notice stormfront is now hosted in a third world country.

What rules are stopping them now from creating tiered services? The removal of Title II doesn't allow internet throttling

>performance incentives depend on not deep sixing your company by outpricing your market.
I want the unemployed to go and stay go.

to understand why net neutrality is retarded all you have to do is think what do you have to do to make everything equal on the internet,simple the government must create regulations and place stress on the internet in order to make everyone the same it is literally socialism for the internet by creating regulations you restrict the voluntary actions of businesses and you restrain any competition from existing businesses those existing businesses will become monopolies overtime or die out,not to mention the fact that the corporate Elite you know the people who actually own monopolies support net neutrality it's almost like they're lying about what net neutrality actually does because if it in fights monopolies then why in the hell would monopolies support it.

The only problem with neutrality being repealed would be that the government can easily just create more regulations that'll be even more strict than net neutrality,a net neutrality 2.0.

youtu.be/aVVsDJUt1EM

>Ajit Pai
works for a fucking cable company you retarded monkey. He gets this passed and he gets to cash a check so big he will give zero fucks how many people it hurts. Besides, he gives no shits about you people, he is a minority and he will just say its what you evil racist faggets deserve, while he buys a private boat and sails off into millionare retirement status.

the whole thing is a corrupt circle jerk but you faggots thing youre fighting for "free markets" while you fuck yourselves over left and right.

I dont have comcast and that's literally not how it would work if Title II were removed. You realize you ensure Comcast as part of an oligarchy via government regulations?

>He thinks moving the regulation to the FTC is going to change any of this

...

>he thinks comcast offering tiered packages will deep six his company
Majority of people who use the internet use it for normie shit like facebook, instagram, reddit, etc and nothing else. They will be fine if they just block all other websites like Sup Forums or charge extra for them and it will maximize revenue. Good goy.

neither benefit the average person
it's just jews fighting other jews

But he was appointed by Barack Obama, the man of the People.

>corporate propoganda talking point getting repeated by a retarded monkey

neck yourself fagget

That’s not how the economy works user, and 401Ks only got screwed because a lot of the real estate market. If you make under $380,000 a year your wages have been rising at the lowest levels in industrialized US history while executives and the investor class see all the benefits of the economy.

So why aren't they charging $200 or $500 or $1000/mo now? Why aren't they capping bandwidth at 1GB and then charging huge overage fees? It's not like they have any competition, or that anyone is stopping them.

>Amazon propagandist still has yet to refute the argument

Kek

You don't even know what a business model is or how it even works. Most people are in yearly contracts with their providers. You think those contracts can just be changed without notification? And you think people won't just cut it off if it's priced too much for what they want? You'd be amazed what consumers are willing to live without when you charge too much for a product.

>Sup Forums is actually defending this
I know you guys love to be contrarians but this is just ridiculous

>thread
This is the only actual sensible truth here.

overall its going to lower my bill. the only reason I am on the 60 mbps tier is so we can stream netflix. post NN netflix will pay the ISP to put in a fast lane and I can drop down to a 15 mbps tier, or maybe even cancel my internet completely if verizon offers unlimited netflix data.

The bit in the NN about "not allowed to discriminate based on content", doesn't mean what people think it means. It doesn't mean that ISPs can't throttle or block webpages because they don't like your politics or ideas. It means they can't block or throttle data based on whether the content of the data is text, pictures, audio, video, torrents, video games, etc.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the content of a video, but whether or not the content of the requested data-packets are video or not video. It's literally not an anti-censorship measure. It's a "you can't block or throttle the data I requested just because it contains (content) high definition streaming video". It's not talking about the content of the video, it's talking about the content of the data.

Repealing NN means they'll just have the top 20 most popular websites in their basic subscriber package, just like cable.

Normies won't give shit because they're fine with paying $29.95 just to browse Facebook, but retards like you and all non-MSM gets fucked. LOL

>61 KB
>Anonymous (ID: RRQhYl2O) 12/13/17(Wed)20:21:09 No.15318

my 401K is up over 20% this year, I'll take it

I doubt it'll make much of a difference to the end-consumer, it's mostly gonna be business to business deals because neither the internet service provider nor the services benefit from raising costs and losing customers.

>And you think people won't just cut it off if it's priced too much for what they want?
You really think the majority of people don't use the internet for incredibly basic shit like browsing Facebook and CNN? They're not gonna notice if NN gets repealed, but Sup Forums and all right-wing news sources will certainly get BTFO.

Yes, when Obama was accepting major cash from Comcast and other ISPs and stuffed the FCC won their lackies. The first NN battle was during Obama’s term because he took ISP money, now they are doing it again with the new dupe in office.

Yup. Just a big slap fight between ISPs and the big net companies. No different than when stations fight with cable providers and threaten to block channels.