What can we do about the net neutrality repeal?

Since Sup Forums is such a powerful force on the internet, it is safe to assume that Sup Forums will be the primary target of censorship. Change.org has petitions we could sign, but what else can we do?

Other urls found in this thread:

ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1054963/ohlhausen_cotechjournal.pdf
ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws
beta.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?two_year_transaction_period=2016&disbursement_purpose_categories=other&committee_id=C00578997&min_date=01-01-2015&max_date=10-05-2016
docquery.fec.gov/pdf/318/201607159020655318/201607159020655318.pdf#navpanes=0
dailystormer.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Sup Forums is completely for the NN repeal because it's made of cuckolds who can't get enough of Trump's dick. The rest of Sup Forums isn't interested in activism. Look elsewhere.

They're not going to go out of their way to block this site. It's super cheap and worth less than $1 million dollars. People are worried about shit like JewTube and Faceberg.

That's exactly why they can and will block it, brainlet. "They can't afford to take us to court to fight us, gimp the fuck out of their stupid amounts of bandwidth usage"

What are we going to do, user? I'M FUCKING SCARED!

Because it's one big massive meme, read what they're trying to repeal before listening to scaremongering hired by google, there will still be regulatory laws against just locking down shit for no reason.

>there will still be regulatory laws against just locking down shit for no reason.
Such as what?

For everyone who supports the net neutrality repeal; what good do you see coming from this?

CELEBRATE

wow i love soros now

>ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1054963/ohlhausen_cotechjournal.pdf

>ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws

>there will still be regulatory laws against just locking down shit for no reason.
you actually think there are regulatory laws for the internet. lol. there were some rules this morning but not this afternoon.

This. Sup Forums has been reduce to an /r/The_Donald colony of contrarians so retarded that they will vote against their own interests if they thing it will trigger a liberal.

some of Sup Forums support trump so they support repeal
some of Sup Forums are contrarians and memers so they support repeal
some of Sup Forums are libertarian, ancap etc. so they support repeal
and you're a statist cuck

Nothing, honestly if somehow Reddit and Sup Forums, and facebook were killed by this, the world would be a better place.

>YOU LE STUPID Sup Forums FUCKS VOTING FOR LE EBIL HITLER CORPORATIST DRUMPF AND SUPPORTING LE REPEAL OF LE REDDIT MEMETRALITY
>ZOMG Sup Forums HELP SAVE REDDIT MEMETRALITY, YOU'LL BE LE FIRST TO HAVE YOUR PRO-CORPORATIST OPINIONS SILENCED I PROMISE YOU THAT
A Pyrrhic blow has been struck against Google, YouTube, Netflix, Twitter, Facebook, reddit, tumblr, etc. I guess you missed the part where we heralded Trump as the chaos candidate.

>ancap
Argument dismissed.

Internet wont be subject to interstate commerce clause due to being under title 2 regulations

...

>WAAAH my ISP is going to block my access to degenerate loli porn

>it is safe to assume that Sup Forums will be the primary target of censorship.

You have no clue what this place really is, do you?

>when a corporation wants to infringe on your daily functions

I love that one. Ancaps summarized so perfectly.

and what does that accomplish?

pic related: things that never happened

Well
Deserved.

I don't see a downside to ending net neutrality. It gets rid of amerishits for good and we'll have a comfy internet just for the real human beings.

>Sup Forums is completely for the NN repeal because
because Sup Forums is contrarian and always has been

it's not left or right or them vs us, it's just going against the grain to cause a much chaos as possible

Deal with it, leftards. We're free.

less needless intervention by the goverment, free market

>amerisharts consider it freedom to be oppressed by corporations

So this is the power of bad education.

it will be treated as information instead so it can't be censored completely

...

You've got it ass-backwards. "Net neutrality" doesn't stop ISPs from blocking websites, "Net neutrality" enables a leftist-controlled government to force ISPs to block websites for thoughtcrime. Which is why the left is shilling into overdrive on this issue. Net neutrality enabled them to "shut it down" and now they're mad they won't be able to.

>when they re-use the Patriot Act campaign and the left eats it up

desu you retards deserve it. Your fault for electing a moron.
Good fucking riddance ameritards.

i dont thing so

Sup Forums will unironically be more popular with the repeal. Educate yourself, reddit.

>net neutrality repeal includes a "blocking websites isn't allowed" clause.
>implying they now won't simply do both things

this

Net neutrality is a trick name like the federal reserve bank

Yup. Pretty goddamn sad. I had hope for the alt-right... But...

I think this won't last long though. Intellectual whites are actually becoming more racist from what I have seen from those around me. These alt-right brainlets just need a few more IQ points and they will be golden.

This. We "do" nothing other than sit back and enjoy the ride.

do you guys purposely get it backwards? you must because the actual shills i assume have packed it up.

I'm not going to do anything, because I live in a civilised country. Well, other than point and laugh at all you seppos getting what you deserve.

saged fucking faggot thread

why dont you amerifats get jobs.

Sup Forums hasn't been chaotic-aligned since moot was kill. Don't get me wrong, it was fun while it lasted, but you can't look a present-day Sup Forums and realistically call it "anti-establishment" anymore.

Sup Forums an heroing Sup Forums "to trigger the libz kek~" is going to be pretty funny, I admit.

did they push the 5/10 to the front on purpose to hide the uglier ones behind her?

It really is a wonderful thing. I am excited to see what's next.

Pretty much this.

Sup Forums has the foresight of a goldfish when it comes to cause and effect.

>reddit faggots still butthurt over this
THIS IS THE END OF THE INTERNET NOTHING WILL SURVIVE WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO PAY THOUSAND OF DOLLARS PER MONTH TO ACCESS ANYTHING THAT ISN'T ISP CREATED CONTENT *passes out from hyperventilation*

So SOPA/PIPA is back again. What's the actual changes here? Seems like the same rhetoric as last time just more shilling.
What makes this different?

Having net nuetrality repealed means we won't get censored.

Fucking hell, do you faggots not even listen to the oppositions arguments?

The FCC struck against net neutrality, which was put in place in 2015 may I remind you to stop monopolies censoring wrong-think websites and social media posts.

The absolute worse case scenario, the internet goes back to how it was prior to 2015. It's actually retarded that Sup Forums believes the 'chicken little, the sky is falling down' narrative.

Just made this.

Sup Forums IS FOR NET NEUTRALITY, MORON!

Hope you're happy paying an extra $50/m so you can watch at speeds greater than dialup!

Be grateful that this thing was repealed. Besides the anti-trust aspect to it, (((they))) were trying to use the NN and the NDAA to take complete control over the internet. If you're some reddit-tier retard that is worry about muh freedom of speech or muh netflix you can fuck right off because you deserve whatever you get for supporting this thing. It would have created a government controlled propaganda net that would use broadcasting licenses to blackmail companies into agreeing with government policies and at any time would give the president the direct power to appoint someone to the FCC in order to remove the license for any company that did not comply.

Sup Forums is for net neutrality.

Sup Forums is not for Net Neutrality™

Learn the difference, it could save your life.

>s, "Net neutrality" enables a leftist-controlled government to force ISPs to block websites for thoughtcrime.
This is literal blatant bullshit. How have you even come to this kind of conclusion. Net neutrality has zero to do with the content of the websites.

>Sup Forums blocks my ISP
Or
>Sup Forums asks me to beg my ISP from blocking them

Pick one

You should probably ask a board who doesn't have their collective moms pay for the internet.

He's right. I might go out and have these discussions with real people and actually make a political change happen .

>newfag doesnt know Sup Forums has been blocked by ISPs multiple times in the past

SHILLING FOR MEGA-CORPERATIONS PROFIT MARGINS

Oh no Google, Facebook and Netflix will have to pay some of their content delivery costs! Somebody think of the billionare share holders!

Get fucked you golem faggot

And did you read the 313 pages of legislation?

Or just a headline?

Sup Forums =/= /ptg/

Don't you have a feminist primer to finish reading Leaf?

>Having net nuetrality repealed means we won't get censored
Given that you can't actually spell 'neutrality' correctly, I have to assume that you're genuinely this fucking stupid rather than just shilling. In which cases: haha, oh wow.

Twitter too. Social media is a cancer.

Fuck reddit

I read all 313 pages.

It's not worth the controversy it generates dumb ass. You're talking about a technologically underdeveloped website that uses up such a minuscule amount of ISP resources that the potential financial gain is non-existent and the pr nightmare that would result would place any offending ISP squarely in the cross-hairs of a bunch of poltards. Look what has happened in the two years since net neutrality. Facebook, Amazon and Google has monopolies on social media, news, search engines, video services I mean damn man. Censorship on the internet has never been this bad. YOU are fighting against your own interests by supporting net neutrality. It is a government takeover of the internet initiated by Obama and the UN. Trump and Based Poo just saved all of our asses. Watch Google, Facebook and Amazon scale down/back because of the increased cost they incur from ISPs. Also, expect faster development of internet infrastructure and competition across NA.

Safe to say the repeal is good, it even got the Jews scared

This. The Donald cucks are absolute retards. Sheep will always be sheep no matter which side they pick

ISPs blocking sites is a fucking lie. Google and tech lobbyists pumped a billion bucks to support this meme because NN is a huge power grab for them and ensures no smaller companies can rise up to ever rival them. You pay your ISP more money for your tiny bandwidth because huge tech pays the same fees regardless of their usage. NN is anti free market and hurts small companies but will not effect you at all.

hi shills
paste this in their threads, they hate it

The CTR/Shareblue Shills and Payments:

beta.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?two_year_transaction_period=2016&disbursement_purpose_categories=other&committee_id=C00578997&min_date=01-01-2015&max_date=10-05-2016

docquery.fec.gov/pdf/318/201607159020655318/201607159020655318.pdf#navpanes=0

>Net neutrality enabled them to "shut it down"
DO PEOPLE ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS?

THIS IS ALMOST THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT NET NEUTRALITY DO.

It forbid ISPs to filter website regardless of its content.

Am I being baited? Without Net Neutrality, ISPs are free to block whatever contents they don't like.

how can you be so fucking stupid?

I thought pol was going to be shut down- damn libtards are cucked as fuck! poor snowflakes, they really let george whorehouse soros down by not fighting hard enough. HAHAHAHA - what faggots!

>everyone ITT that wants NN repealed because "muh libtards be but madz XD"

>Implying the consumer isn't going to eat that cost.
Exactly. The billionaire share-holders like their stacks of wealth. As would I, if I was insanely wealthy. You think they're going take a hit and not try to recoup some of that loss?

why is reddit so contrarian to everything Sup Forums agrees with?

This. NN is in fact a threat to us.

>This is literal blatant bullshit.
I know cause websites were doing it without govt requests here in the states to suck up and virtue signal. See stifled speech on places like twitter, facebook, and reddit.

>Sup Forums is not for Net Neutrality™
Except the NET neutrality text of 2015 as there are are actually doing net netrality.

But it allows them to control access to the medium which is just as important. It doesn't matter if a library has completely uncensored books if they won't let anyone in, or if they only let you access them at a very low rate.

Dude this whole issue is bipartisan. You really think all those people who support net neutrality really know what the fuck it’s about? This whole argument is essentially shill worthy and continues to work against everyone on this board.

They'll pass the cost directly on to the consumer. Do you not understand how capitalism works, convict?

>signing petitions

You're better pissing against the wind

The she thing is blown out of proportion by plebbit and Netflix and Google.

Basically Comcast was giving ahitty service because Netflix takes up 80% of its bandwidth do they wanted to charge Netflix for sending its product to customers because they were looking bad because their service was shit in areas.

Netflix and other Jew corporations decided that Comcast should have to deliver their product for free and that they wanted the government to force them to do it.

The memes about a social media package are complete fabrications

what cuck? Then how did that never happen before 2015?

Net Neutrality Shills BTFO. Make copies pls.

...

which corporations you talking about?

They deregulated the net. Why would Sup Forums be censored? If the censor one they have to censor many, how is that profitable?

>free to use sites pass down costs to the consumer

Net neutrality has nothing to do with website owner filtering the comment of users on their own website. Net neutrality is about allowing equal access to website that still allow those kind of comments.

You know fucking nothing.

Hasn't Sup Forums been blocked by ISPs multiple times pre-2015?

Sure, if you ignore the title 2 loopholes that lead to: Did you think it was magic coincidence that censorship of badthink became totalitarian after enaction? That Google drops "Don't Be Evil" within a couple months of it being enacted?

You are falling for Patriot Act feels.

>It forbid ISPs to filter website regardless of its content.
Anti-trust laws do this.

It's not ISPs that censor content, it's Google and Domain Registers. Case in point:
dailystormer.com

I know nothing about this but I'm curious. Why is bandwidth not unlimited to ISP's? Do they only have so much and is that why some throttle customers?

>European net neutrality

>A proposal for more comprehensive and stronger net neutrality regulation was adopted only recently in 2015 and came into force in April 2016. This introduced further net neutrality protection: It required ISPs to treat all traffic equally, meaning that blocking or throttling of traffic for purely commercial reasons is prohibited. But, crucially, reasonable traffic management is allowed and so are special services (e.g. fast lanes for business purposes), the latter only as an addition to the regular Internet, not in competition with it.

>reasonable traffic management is allowed

>the EU
>reasonable

>The governing body that allows millions of niggers to walk across the border into their country can be trusted to control ISPs
>implying an ISP can't block whatever (((they))) want in Europe

loving every laugh m8