Monarchy? Yes or no

Monarchy? Yes or no

Other urls found in this thread:

thecounterrevolution.org/
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_inequality-adjusted_HDI
youtube.com/watch?v=K8VzecmAyQI
thedarkenlightenment.com/moldbugs-gentle-introduction/
gutenberg.org/files/3600/3600-h/3600-h.htm
strobertbellarmine.net/books/Bossuet--Politics.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Sure, I'd be fine with 50 years of Obama.

Republican salt would be worth it.

Yes

8 chan /monarchy/

Yes.
1,000 times yes.
The modern president/prime minister has much more authority over the gov't than any monarch ever dreamed of.
Distributism is the name of the game.
>inb4 wealth distribution. not the same thing, kiddos
What can be handled at the local level should not be handled at a higher level.
Think about it.
1000+ years of Christendom gave us Western civilization.
200 years of secularism gave us children confused as to which bathroom to use.

I would much rather a monarch that believes he's going to go to hell for ruling me badly than a temporarily elected buffoon that is in it for himself.

Totally agree with this

Do you know how we got to where we are today?

i agree

>I would much rather a monarch that believes he's going to go to hell for ruling me badly than a temporarily elected buffoon that is in it for himself.

Is that a charles coulombe quote?

I'm inclined to agree, but at the same time my Ameriburger pride, like for enlightenment philosophy, and affinity for early American history has me torn

Why do I like Bismarck AND Andrew Jackson

I truly do not fucking know

That most certainly is a Coulombe quote sir.

Albeit probably a bit deformed and adapted.

good man!

Look up, "The Royalist Revolution."

Interesting, thanks.
thecounterrevolution.org/

Some founding fathers liked the idea of monarchy I believe

Sweden is a monarchy and see how it helped them so far.

there are 8 monarchies in the first 25
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_inequality-adjusted_HDI
doesn't seem to be an issue

A monarchy is objectively the best form of govt.
Best aesthetics, keepers of tradition, efficient bureaucracy; All wrapped up in a nice package, and answerable only to God.
>Tfw you realize the (((purpose))) of ww1 was to neuter the monarchies of Europe

MONARCHISTS KEEP OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

...

This.
Yet it must be understood that liberalism has always targeted monarchy.
Theological liberalism in protestantism fractured Christendom and gave the princes an excuse to steal Church property and wealth.
Philosophical liberalism came from theological liberalism in the Endarkenment; the descendants of protestants who became disillusioned with the sectarian and relativistic nature of protestantism.
Classical liberalism came out of philosophical liberalism, all sharing the foundation of private interpretation which protestantism gladly provided; this was the actualization of the overthrow of altar and throne.
American revolution; first secular, godless State founded in recorded human history.
French revolution; etc.
Napoleon played his part in spreading classical liberalism across Europe, emancipating the Jews.
Socialism and Marxism grew naturally out of classical liberalism, as even Gramsci of the Frankfurt school said
>pic related

500 years of revolution.
1517-2017

1517: Protestant revolt
>Christ yes, Church no
1717: Freemasonry
>God yes, Christ no
1917: Bolshevism
>God never existed
But remember, there is no slippery slope.

>monarchy

this: youtube.com/watch?v=K8VzecmAyQI

fuckin kikes

Except people like Locke, Hume, and Voltaire would despise Marxism

Anything less than absolute monarchy is socialism. Divine right of Kings.

Yes, but revolutionaries always stand on the shoulders of prior revolutionaries.

ONE GOD
ONE CHURCH
ONE KING

Yes, monarchy by divine rule is the only way. The state must be reunified with the church. I am not saying the religion must be Christian but the separation of faith and government was one of many masonic failures. The people need one unified system, a single hierarchy, with the supreme creator at the top.

Yes for all eternity

You should be careful who you are loyal too. She has ruled over the destruction of her people and not said a word nor raised a hand to prevent the mongrelazation of her homeland. She is nothing but a crypto-kike who has abandoned her people and thus her right to rule. A good aristocracy, still loyal to their kin, would have removed and replaced her by now. Sadly I fear they too are corrupt.

If she had done anything Britain would have just removed the monarchy and kept on course, her hands are tied.

Better to go down fighting that is what I expect of a good monarch. To just sit by and watch your people destroyed and do nothing because you are a prisoner of the bureaucrats is disgusting. Last I checked she still nominally controls the military, who not make a go of it? The worse thing that happens is she quickens the eventual collapse and that would only benefit her people in the long run.

she is playing the long game, she knows that nothing can be done in her lifetime and her nigger loving son will only make it worse, all hope lies in William or George

only if the king is an ai

check out the josias
they have a lot of good writings on the concept of the gelasian dyarchy and the subordination of temporal power to spiritual power
here's their definition of integralism:
>Catholic Integralism is a tradition of thought that rejects the liberal separation of politics from concern with the end of human life, holding that political rule must order man to his final goal. Since, however, man has both a temporal and an eternal end, integralism holds that there are two powers that rule him: a temporal power and a spiritual power. And since man’s temporal end is subordinated to his eternal end the temporal power must be subordinated to the spiritual power.

Monarchism is the final redpil

Real monarchy you upside down koala. That cunt you call a Queen is a filthy fucking tapeworm. She gets all of the wealth and prestige with none of the responsibility. In the states we call inbreds on government handouts, white trash. Also, no self respecting man ca let himself be ruled by a woman.

Bump for the King of Kings

Christian Monarchies, yes.

Monarchs are more or less irrelevant to the growth of populist right movements at this point and clearly not necessary based on what we see in E. Europe. That being said a reactionary Monarchy would be infinitely better than any Democratic Socialist regime. I would like to see Carlists come to power in Spain, Bonapartists in France or a revival of Imperial Germany. Never happen though.

thedarkenlightenment.com/moldbugs-gentle-introduction/

Everyone knows having an enlightened despot at the head of a government is the best form of government, it's just that it's pretty unlikely you'll consistently get one with monarchy.

That because the right peddle a half assed version of the same shit as the left. The populist right is still dumb enough to believe you can change things by voting or protesting. America will have a king in the not so distant future. Its just a question of if it will be by bloodless coup or civil war.

More likely than you think. The problem is, the global cabal only props up corrupt ones they control.

checked

In Spenglers theory a nation begins the process of fragmentation with the onset of Empire which then culminates in crisis and the emergence of a strongman.

I'm not sure about a King in the U.S but we are definitely approaching the Rubicon if we haven't passed it already.

Democratic Monarchy

>The Monarch may still determine their own heir
>but
>The Monarch must surrender the throne to that heir as often as the people command it

Fascist Monarchy is the most ideal form of government.

The Orthodox Nationalist podcast has made some pretty convincing arguments about it. Check it out.

There is a MOUNTAIN of guns and ammo in this country just waiting to be put to use. There are a lot of Christians here who know who this country really belongs to. Most of the military would be sympathetic too. With that ensign you've hoisted, I bet you might know something about that, huh?

gay

Not really a choice.

KILL THE QUEEN!
FUCK THE MONARCHY!

England's beheaded a king before. so what's taking so long?

That's a pretty shitty logo

no

question and reject all forms of private tyranny

And? Common thing, in the US there was a town so inbred they all turned blue.

Very interesting, I've never seen this bit of information explained like this before.

>no self respecting man ca let himself be ruled by a woman.
I agree with this entirely too. The 'monarchy' should be passed down solely paternally.

No. Your monarchs are all globalist pedophiles.

Thats obviously photoshopped.

Prove it, faggot.

Only Japan has the most stable monarchy in the world.

No No NO

Yes under the condition of copying America's first 10 ammendments to the constitution and eliminating parliament because there should be no room for democracy to corrupt the perfectly fine system of Monarchy.

>copying America's first 10 ammendments

What the fuck is the point of that? How are you going to make your king follow them?

>Divine right of Kings.
Jew speak for "Bow before the Chosen, filthy goyim!" Jew globalists all think their bloodlines go back to David.

No.
There is nothing more cucked than bowing down to people on basis of their birth.

It is better than democracy because it is usually closer to God. However true authority comes ONLY from God.

>no gurlz allowed
Posts like this have convinced me that the real reason hillbillies and fascists (to be redundant) hate Muslims so much is not because they are so different, but because they are too much alike

Bumping as well for the Prince of Peace. I pray for Russia to be consecrated.

all monarchs are now sold to jews, once they defended Christians from them.

Well, they all hate niggers so maybe you're on to something, Tyrone.

Pretty much this

Not unless you can secure the ruler is a moral and smart person.

>bowing down to people on basis of a literal popularity contest instead

The problem with monarchies isn't the good kings. It's the bad ones.

Ey coulombe my favorite historian dude. I know where he goes to mass

what would a modern constitutional monarchy look like? with some moderate libertarian influences?

No.

Talk about being a cuck.

it wouldn't last 9

I'm an anarcho-monarchist. Voluntary monarchs via free association.

Yes, Anglosphere should unite under King William once its his turn, and we should gas all nonwhites and then retake South Africa/Rhodesia for whites also

forgot pic

nothing is new under the sun. bible says they shouldnt have pleaded for an earthly king they could see. but whatever. since YOU strayed so much. might as well have at least some kind of say and debate over who rules you. the thing about nostalgia is that nobody remembers the bad parts. rulers are sent either to bless or to punish. if divine right is over (it is) then what does that say about your distinctions between morality and choice over leadership? youre a huge jew basically

Undercover Jesuit detected.

This universe is the property of Donald J Trump, and anyone or anything who challenges that claim is an enemy who must be destroyed.

>satan rules the air
how interesting

>She has ruled over the destruction of her people and not said a word nor raised a hand to prevent the mongrelazation of her homeland
she does not rule just rubber stamps things she has power on paper but cant do or say anything

If anything it is a symbol of hierarchy and even the importance of family. Not an embodiment of the nation's genetics.

If there were more even constitutional monarchies, then world politics would head in a less egalitarian way.

Why do you insist on putting it off for the foreseeable future, user?

Papist, please go (back to a third-world, Roman Cathoic cesspool).

Well, my country basically already has the shit aspects of it anyway. So I wouldn't object to also getting the positive aspects of it.

You do understand that Charles 2 reign was so poor it basically collapsed the Spanish empire and his death started another European War but yeah it's totally fine

>implying your denomination is "orthodox" for more than slavs and greeks

ESSAYS OF
MICHEL DE MONTAIGNE
gutenberg.org/files/3600/3600-h/3600-h.htm
BOSSUET
Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture
strobertbellarmine.net/books/Bossuet--Politics.pdf

swine: meet pearls.

our last king died quite recently
and yes monarchy is the true form of government for europe

Democracy isn't working, user.

Wake up.

>That's a pretty shitty logo
Fuggoff rexist wre cool

The only true german kang - the kang of bavaria

World isn't black & white, you can like multiple different things while still understanding that they all have their own shortcomings. There's also no universal best political system, it all depends on the current circumstances in the country and how they go along with the advantages/disadvantages of the different systems.

Procreating with your third cousin is actually the healthiest thing you can do.