How accurate is this Sup Forums?

How accurate is this Sup Forums?

Commie propaganda

accurate in portraying the creator as severely autistic

left: tasteless normie election newfags
right: intellectual oldfags

Whats propagandistic or communist about it?
What is autistic about it?

My bookshelf is mostly Greeks, Nietzsche, classic literature, and a few modern history books

it's an anecdotal appeal to authority and decidedly not an argument

the picture on the left is more r/the_donald than Sup Forums

Fuck off both of those book stacks are trash.

Ths republic is literally #1 on almost all pol reading lists. Fuck off leftypol.

>me commie me smart u not commie u big dumb dumb
pretty fucking accurate in that it's more proof leftypol are insufferable pseudo-intellectuals.

How is it an appeal to authority and how is that not valid?

>the leftists bookshelf is filled with intellectual muck that sources itself off of other intellectual muck
>pride themselves on reading words on pages from people who think just like them
>can never think critically for themselves, instead allows someone else to do it
>ooh my political science professor said I should read this one
>even after reading multiple books echochamberig radical leftists ideas, they’re so socially awkward and autistic that they can’t see how it doesn’t have a place in real human life

>the other guy
>a meme photo taken by an American

Tell me when leftypol reads The Gulag Archipelago and The Culture of Critique

>Reading books because you are not smart enough to figure out everything yourself.

did you create the OP image because you're window licking retarded

>Implying someone with intelligence has any physical books instead of having them on the computer to reduce their physical space and use that for something else.

They have to show people what kind of books they would read if they weren’t watching anime

This actually isn’t true. I’m a /lit/izen and while it isn’t as hardline as Sup Forums, it’s a very Catholic board and very right leaning of the center, with it’s left most members being centrist

not at home, but my library is mostly business analytics and leadership books. Lots of John Kotter, Quint Studer and Atul Gawande.

If you don't have any John Kotter in your library, get on board. Good stuff.

Is there really a difference?
whats communist about those works?

all i see on that Sup Forums is cuckservatives so no
also sage this you idiots

pic related is going everywhere when someone asks for redpilled books so i call it bs

this is incorrect...ring wingers cant read

>whats communist about those works?
they were printed by sweat shop labor?

/leftypol/ is communist which has been around for a long ass time and thus has been written about alot. Sup Forums is alt right or "new right" which consists of mostly white nationalists but we also harbor alot of ancaps, nazis, MAGpedes and everything in between. The only people who have written about "new right" ideas so far have been shitty E-celebs and wannabes. If you really want a fair representation of Sup Forums's reading list you'd need a much wider topic than the general memebooks from controlled op e-celebs

>thicc with annotations
because they can't think for themselves

>Lefty/pol/ isn't a echo chamber

Try posting a fascism thread in lefty and a communism thread in Sup Forums and see what happens

Why does Gulag Achipelago need to be read?
Does someone not know about the Soviets crimes?
Are they in doubt? Debated? Do people try to mitigate or rationalise them?

No.

Now on the other hand you try and talk about what America has done in the world, overthrowing governments, installing friendly dictators, fighting proxy wars, aiding genocidal counter insurgencies, etc
Well that generates a great deal of dissension
If people even know the history

Why is that?

>you have to do your own original research combing through government archives and interviewing survivors to be smart and right

>read marx, goy

at worst, that would apply for both honestly

does one have to go through all of these books to read Nietzsche? I am not interested in politics all that much, only History and (partly) philosophy.

dont Forget, sage goes in the Options field

>if you think for yourself a work doesn't need to cite where it got its quote or statistics from or what it is referencing
>if you can think for yourself you can just somehow know what other works it is citing

>Sup Forums is the same person

I began with "Beyond good and evil" and it's pretty difficult. i guess you don't have to but it makes it much easier.

>echo chamber of projection and blaming others
Just like the goy who made that pic.

You need to put a Zoology Textbook in there otherwise people might argue that niggers are the same race as you.

I think the entry core books are pretty important to give someone the initial “oh. Things are really different than what I was taught at school” moment that causes someone to go on a sort of political journey. However, the modern right wing is less about politics and more about history, culture, and myth. It would be more important to read stuff like the Poetic Edda and non fiction about historical events. Or if you don’t go the pagan way, then to read Christian literature

Inaccurate, all that Leftypol does is just copy Sup Forums memes and add a small twist to it in an uncreative way

>/leftypol/
>not a single socialist work
>not even Das Kapital or The Communist Manifest
>not even Mao's Little Red Book
Pretty accurate.

I thought an user here posted that "/leftypol/" picture in some "rate my books" thread...

Yes, nietzche is not easy to read. IMO, TSZ is the easiest to pick up and read but there’s still a ton you’ll miss if you don’t really train yourself to read philosophy

Those are all burger books.

This means you can bu7rn them nothing of value would be lost

>starts with the Greeks
>leftypol

Really jogged my noggin there bud.

Where's part 2?

>kant
>part of Sup Forumss journey

i wonder if you even read what kant has wrote.

super accurate, and a thread proving this is up at this very moment.

pearls cast before swine in full effect here.

also bookshelf on the right is complete fucking trash.

just give up People, Leftypol is just too powerfull.

I'm just irritated that Sup Forums is full of people that deliberately avoid reading. unless it's dinner party tier shit like plato aristotle and faggot nietche. these losers read machiavelli but the prince, instead of Discourses on Livy. they're plebs. I try to drop knowledge and they'd rather troll eachother with their half-wits

I'm not even close to have finished all those books, i just had the pic saved and thought it would fit kek

suspected as much, thank you!

typical burgers - having less than 50 books and call themself """"""intellectual"""""

We both know /leftypol/ doesn’t actually read any books aside from stirner and Marx, and even when do read those books they skim like a mother fucker. Most watch a couple wisecrack videos and think that it’s the gospel.

evidence:
an entire thread of ignorant shitflinging, while the relevant information is IGNORED. some of the dumbest fucking shit I've ever seen. Embarassing.

trash.

>is there really a difference?
It’s time to stop posting and lurk moar.

if I were a fucking jew and I saw this shit. I would feel secure as fuck. You people are D U M B

>"oh, I read plato"
what the fuck are you gonna do? talk about plato?

Fuck I hate ALL OF YOU

SO fucking ignorant. OHHHH you read history of the pelopponesian war... GREAAAAAAAAAAAT.

Fucking IDIOTS. It's not even complete. The DUMBFUCK who put this together doesn't even know you have to read Xenophon's HELLENICA to get the second half of the story.

FUCK FUCK FUCK F U C K FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK. NONE OF YOU READ SHIT

>muh white genocide
YOU DESERVE IT. YOU STATUS SEEKING FUCKING RUBES.

It’s a brainlet concept where people think that reading political philosophy will make them smarter to other people. If you read philosophy, you should do it to better yourself and the people that you’re able to interact with. It genuinely can provide pretty sound advice on things in your life and can usually be pretty motivational. It also has historic value. I get what you’re saying though

You only need 10 authors to gain the entirety of human knowledge. As long as you know the right ones.

IN THIS ENTIRE THREAD, not one mention of Torah, no Bible, no Koran, no Havamal, no Bhagavad Ghita, no sayings of Confucius? But fucking Nietzche everywhere.

Your point?

> not having your own mind
I feel sorry for both desu.

Green book by Gaddafi is possibly the best socialist book. Antifeminist and antiglobalist, and racially aware.

Holy shit this guy is 3000% quantum butthurt.

You're GOD DAMN RIGHT I am

>thicc with citations and annotations
i will never understand why the left and academia are obsessed with this idea. in the end, you accept and use the philosophy you read on the merits of its key thoughts anyways, whether it has citations from 9000 different authors or none at all. i have observed that this is merely a rhetorical tool for the left, you can say that some book you use as your basis cited from over 9000 different authors with the same views - this number must appear enormous and convince your opponent of your point because well, why else should over 9000 authors agree with that?

or to be concicse: its the faux intellectual way of the argumentum ad populum.

> 6000 citations
> all of them pointing out the shit idea someone wasted paper on
Such is the life of a marxist.

this is a woman Thing if you think about it
"lots of People liked what this said, i have to like it too"
pretty much a herd mentality

I'd say I'd have to make an infographic to get you idiots interested in reading... BUT YOU DONT EVEN READ THE ONE YOU SPREAD. IF YOU DID YOU'D KNOW THE PELOPP WAR ISN'T FINISHED. THUCYDIDES DIED BEFORE COMPLETING HIS WORK.
NO ONE KNOWS.
YOU LITERALLY SPREAD THIS SHIT TO APPEAR SMART TO PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET AND NO ONE ELSE.

Yes, Sup Forums is fucking cancer.

Hey faggot. New Testament was mentioned in the thread already.
Also
>Torah
>Bible
>Koran
>Bhagavad Ghita
You want religious shit talked about in a political forum? FUCK OFF. What concerns me is the fact no other faggot but me has text books its like your all fucking brainlets.

Friendly reminder than most larpers here are Oldfags who absolutely despise videogames

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKK

>implying word "accurate" suitable for my bookshelf

Somewhat agree. The basic idea should be that more citations = subject to more (hence statistically better) scrutiny, marketplace of ideas and whatnot.
But in fact, having plenty of citations more often than not just means your shit is/has been trendy and underwent preferential attachment bias.

u fag

did a librarian rape you in the ass ? or why are you so fucking butthurt ?
Getting mad about People not reading or reading the "wrong" stuff is the best way to the asylum

>leftist cuckolds starts with the Greeks yet become leftists

Yeah, nope. If you had read Plato and Aristotle you wouldn't be a leftist. If you actually read them and understood them you would be forming RWDS. Fuck off memeflag

LMAO the guy who posted his shelf labeled /leftypol/ was far right fucking retards.

Where is part 2 nigga

messy aesthetic is the best aesthetic friend

>tfw shitty camera phone and no huge HQ hipster camera to take pictures of inanities to post on the chon

Book ain't learn a man nothing. Real world asperianses what a man need.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
ARE YOU HAVING FUN TALKING ABOUT READING? HUH? HUH? ARE YOU? YOU NEVER DO IT
IS THIS THREAD ENJOYABLE? I BET IT MASSAGES YOUR EGO

>ctrl+f nietzsche
"2 results"

dumb.

Is the Diplomacy book any good?

From the preface and the fact that he makes so many people butthurt it'll be enjoyable but I haven't gotten into it yet, trying to get through all the volumes of the Decline and Fall on the right mid shelf.

I remember the book thread where the shelf to the right was posted.

He was far-right, with a particular interest in historic CIA activities.

>halo 2 limited edition with the platinum case

Nice. Probably a BK though, I would BxR you so fast

I'M GOING FUCKING CRAZY. I HAVE THE ENTIRE KNOWLEDGE OF MAN AND NO ONE IS INTERESTED

pls dont take methamphetamine before browsing Sup Forums next time

I DON'T USE DRUGS AT ALL. KNOWLEDGE IS MY ONLY VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICEEEE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

you're scaring us user

I completely agree. There should be more emphasis on scientific evidence, facts and logical thinking.

everything's fine now.