Why

do cities/urban area generally swing left while rural areas go right?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM
thedailysheeple.com/california-legislators-appear-to-spend-every-waking-hour-finding-new-ways-to-tax-their-citizens_122017
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because Urban areas is the place and center where there is no order in things. There are countless minorities, people speaking countless languages and overall urban areas tend to be more multicultural. If you get exposed to that sort of shit every day, eventually you get used to it ( and I'm not justyfing that in any sense now, it's just conclusion I came to )

Niggers and homos need gibs.
Democrats promise gibs.
Not that hard to figure out.

High IQ people live in cities/urban areas while rural and suburban people are retards. Are you new on Sup Forums?

yes, read history of the kikes. they are city dwellers

People in urban areas are better educated and have higher IQs

Behavioral sinks

...

City people are smart. Retards live in rural areas.

Cities and urban areas are where the tax dollars get SPENT, so they love big government. Rural areas basically get taxes for shit they don't even see. Where's the money from your gas tax going? It's to fix the roads in the city. Where's the police force you're being taxed for? The city. Where's all the homeless fucks, cash for 'low income housing', new subway system, etc.? All of that shit is in the city.

Rural areas basically would be fine with like 1/100th the tax money spent because that's all they actually see.

Gibs. The more gibs the more the infestation can breed to get more gibs and so on.

Cunts who live in urban ghettos are too smart to have money or live in a proper house.
But they get that smug sense of satisfaction you can only get with malt liquor and a hillary bumper sticker with no car to put it on.

city's make people care more about social issues, and the democrat party is the party of social issues.

because of the retreat of whites from urban areas as soon as they have children and want to put their kids in schools/neighborhoods where they aren't the only white kids. globally, you can see that non whites generally vote for bigger governments and socialist policies. that corresponds perfectly with the demographic makeups of large cities and their voting patterns. the real question is, if the white people are so horrible, why is their a one way road to everywhere white western culture (white patriarchy) has been established?

High population density leads to low social trust, which means that the people have no social capital - that is, there are no local organizations that can handle regular little problems like dealing with litter or something. Thus the only solution is a large, apersonal government to serve as the arbiter in all disputes.

This is why even 70+% white cities like Indianapolis are still overwhelmingly left wing. Cities have always and everywhere been more left wing.

>low intelligence niggers crowd cities
>cities are high intelligence
are you autistic

>NUH UH, WERE THE SMART ONES!

>lets spend a billion dollars on city infrastructure
>i dont live in the city
>i vote against it

The left are mentally ill.
youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM

Now, after 3 full years of studying various methodologies for tracking mileage, from requiring a “plug-in” for each vehicle to tracking your smart phone movements to more manual systems that would track odometers, the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA), according to a newly filed report is officially ready to declare a mileage tax ‘feasible’. Here’s what they found:

The Road Charge Pilot Program successfully tested the functionality, complexity, and feasibility of the critical elements of this new potential revenue system – road charge – for transportation funding
thedailysheeple.com/california-legislators-appear-to-spend-every-waking-hour-finding-new-ways-to-tax-their-citizens_122017

Read Genesis, particularly ch. 11 and 15- 19

>live in city
>grocery store is a few minutes away
>job is a quick walk or commute away
>there's a store for whatever hobby you have not far away
>if you ever forget anything you can just run down to the store real quick, no big deal

Think about it. When you live in the city your entire life, you're training yourself to never plan ahead or be self-reliant. You never have to think about a snowstorm blocking the only road to the store and needing to stock up in case.

It's basically self-reliant(at least thinking-wise) people in rural areas vs infrastructure and big-government dependent people in the cities.

>Rural areas basically would be fine with like 1/100th the tax money spent because that's all they actually see.

Rural areas receive fuck ton of gibmedats with agricultural subsidies, way more infrastructure spending and basically all government services (police, rescue, healthcare..) would collapse on countryside without government subsidies cities. If it wouldn't be government spending and regulations. There wouldn't be proper communications infrastructure on countryside aside from main transport corridors between larger cities. Things like healthcare are far more expensive to produce in low population density areas.

This desu

Cities are inherently inefficient

>Rural areas receive fuck ton of gibmedats with agricultural subsidies
Which only the mega farmers receive.
>way more infrastructure spending
doubt

Maps like the OP make it seem like everyone in a given area went red or blue, when it's really much more of a mix. The reason red states tend to be far right is they have a lower education level with in the people who vote in that area. You can say anything to a midwest voter and they just believe it.
It's why the mid west constantly vote against their own interests and don't seem to catch on that the GOP only notices them for a few months during election runs. I also suspect there is an issue of pride there where a broke farmer in midwest shit nowhere just feels if he was 100% left alone he would be better off. The problem is the GOP don't do that either.
Keep in mind this is all magnified by the very low turn out voter wise. We hardly break 60% in presidential elections, only break 40% midterm.
so the mid west red states are all clearly dumb fucks but years of the coastal elite kind of spitting on them resulted in a last gasp move with Trump. So in a way, the coast brought this on themselves. So we have this joke of a president now.

trips don't lie..

No intelligent person would waste their life in some small town hellhole shovelling shit and smoking meth for the rest of their lives, so those people whose lives are actually worthwhile move to cities and, being intelligent and hardworking, vote Democrat.

>doubt
Without government subsidies electric and phone companies wouldn't maintain their networks in rural areas that are far away from main transport corridors or few high value industries in rural areas like mining. Lot of the infrastructure in rural areas simply wouldn't exist without government paying or coercing companies to build it.

>Rural areas receive fuck ton of gibmedats with agricultural subsidies,
You're a fucking retard. First off those 'subsidies' are often in the form of REDUCED taxes. So it's not just 'hurr free cash' it's just 'they take slightly less if you do this'. Second, those 'subsidies' are to KEEP FARMERS FROM CHARGING WHAT THE FOOD COSTS TO GROW. They give you 'subsidies' to grow corn, which keeps corn prices low, which keeps food cheap FOR PEOPLE IN THE FUCKING CITY.

Fine, stop giving these 'subsidies' to farmers. They'll just charge what the food costs to grow and the people in cities will freak the fuck out. You aren't helping farmers with that subsidy you dumb fuck, you're helping the people who buy that food.

non-whites like cities.

>actually facing the problems and putting an effort into solving them
>looking away and minding your own business
Choose one.

...

Keep in mind this isn't limited to the US. It seems to be common across the world AFAIK. Cities vote left and vote further left the bigger they are. Rural votes right and further right the smaller they are.

Remove farmer subsidies and rural infrastructure and watch what happens to cities.
>where all da food at?

This is actually wrong, a larger group of people using shared resources (school, police) drive down operating costs per person, a smaller pool of people to share a common resource drives up the cost for that resource.

its bizarre how many people don't know that rural counties receive a disproportionate amount of money per citizen in most cases

That said, I'm moving back to the country when I get a chance.

This so much

Exactly

Look at your typical US city.
>the 1% that have a good life and dominate the "omg this city has so much culture and is so vibrant and multiculti" meme but live in a segregated area never have any kind of contact with people below their satus beside spitting on the hobo
>19% doing ok middle class that gets along and pretends to be part of the 1% or at least not complain as long as they can get their starcucks double hazelnut whipped cream shitoccino per day, again locked away in their containment zone
>10% can get away living a normal life but can't actually save a single dollar or a simple broken leg would send them down to the shitter but they knwo they can't and never will the luxury shit and do everything to not go down to the absolute trassh they can see on the other side of the road
>70% below the poverty line shit that depends on handouts and wants to be like the upper 20% with no sense for reality. Entire live revolves about shitty 1%er sneakers or "omg if I ever could afford a shopping spree at Zara..." while they can't even afford rent or a bus ticket

you tell me...

Thats why city people are smart

>when your political views are based in ad hominem
must be a straightforward life you lead

/thread

Because the cities are filled with niggers. Then hipster white kids move into nigger areas and set up these little liberal paradises in the middle of them, like some sort of island surrounded by a sea of black. Usually these kids are the children of upper-middle class with zero life experience, so of course they'll be liberal.

It's really bizarre how these liberal areas sprout up in nigger areas. If you want a good example look at the Baltimore riots. It wasn't a big deal when niggers were burning shit down in their own areas, but they only had to walk across the street and they were in white liberal territory. It's like a whole different neighborhood right across the street, they even have nicer police cars.

city people thrive on corruption..other people like fair play and not getting robbed and raped

On top of that, (((rich whites))) in the parasitic financial/government sector that benefit from big government and the system, as oppose to us "suburban and rural retards" out here who create real wealth, build businesses, farm, work with our hands.

Washington D.C., Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit, LA, all need to be nuked. You would create a whole host of new red states.

I mean, yeah, but it's because people are dumb so they think less traffic will be solved by killing everyone off with either communism or abortion or what have you. the upper eschelon knows the city is actually the most environmentally efficient way of life it's just crowded so they tend to be right wing but the rest yeah, they want vengeance.

>that pic

The damn Jews in the Rat Party bred an Army of nigger footsoldiers to do their bidding. 5 generations of people who have never seen a paycheck are enough. Time to end it.

No

Urban areas aren't white

Brown people

>This is actually wrong, a larger group of people using shared resources (school, police) drive down operating costs per person, a smaller pool of people to share a common resource drives up the cost for that resource.

Probably the most economically efficient country in the world is Singapore. They do things like healthcare cheaply because they can centralize all services few huge hospitals. Downside massive population density comes when few roads have to be closed due to repairs or improvements, as traffic density is massive cost for things like road repair per meter can become quite absurd.

>its bizarre how many people don't know that rural counties receive a disproportionate amount of money per citizen in most cases

They get federal or state level grants for things like local police or fire department buying patrol cars or firetrucks, especially when need for such item is acute and unpredictable.

Big ticket items like new subway line in a city can sound massively expensive, reality is that entirely new subway lines are built only rarely and financing plans for such things usually run for several decades.

Now lets think about something like small regional airport near to some small town, if there isn't some tourist destination that may drive traffic volume up seasonally. Those often receive just couple flights a day, in such cases most of operating costs are paid by someone other than local government, some maybe covered by local businesses, but most of it is subsidized by state or federal government. Even when airport staff is tiny, just couple traffic controllers and couple guys running the terminal, staffing expenses may become very expensive on long run.