Why are conservatives anti-science?

>The Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation’s top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases — including “fetus”, “science-based" and “evidence-based” — in official documents being prepared for next year’s budget.

I don't know how to interpret things like these other than blatant willful ignorance and disregard for the main thing which gives us prosperity: science. Are all conservatives this retarded, or is it just the loud ones?

Other urls found in this thread:

cnn.com/2017/12/16/health/cdc-banned-words/index.html
miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article12983720.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

trump is a dumb nigger, no wonder he thinks vaccines are the devil

They aren't banned from general use, they're just forbidden from using those particular buzz words to pad their budget proposals. If the content of your proposal contains real falsifiable evidence you don't need to label it evidence-based, evidence speaks for itself.

Why don't you go pump some grade schoolers full of female hormones hoss

Evidence-based is a buzzword to you?

>Communist deny biology, nature, reality
>call others anti-science for not wanting to be stuck with Commie needles

Any good research going to be fine.

Any trasgender and diversity research going to be fucked, if they cant say their buzzwords their papers going to be 3 lines long.

yes, they use it to imply that they are stating a fact but know that they can't get away with that

The earth is flat according to an "Evidence Based" study. What the evidence was or the study for that matter isn't of your concern.

Shitlibs call mentally ill men in dresses women. Spare me your fake outrage about science.

Because science is anti human

only morons believe in ((science)))

If satanic scientists think for a second they are capable of winning the war against God they have another thing coming. This isn't backlash, this is the tide turning for the better

This is some of the fakest of all the fake news I've ever seen, is there any end to the insanity of democrats?

Trump is most certainly NOT a "man of science" (like 99% of the population), and this is a flaw. But this story is garbage, literal hot wet garbage.

Also this, “science” now is all about technologically transforming people into otherkin. also if you look into gender dialectics, they are making it a point to separate “women” and “people with uteruses”

This is FREEDOM and WINNING for the FREE MARKET of ideas!!!!

because its bullshit when people use evidence and science to contradict my opinions and religious beliefs

> words and the things they describe are the same thing

cnn.com/2017/12/16/health/cdc-banned-words/index.html

if you aren't including valid rigorous evidence it is

the fact that they felt the need to ban it at all indicates the term was being used too loosely for the executive branch's liking.

Science is one massive elaborate fraud. Not even kidding. You will see it someday, God willing.

>this movie is based on actual events
>this study is based on actual evidence
>this study is based on actual science
it means it's got a lot of made-up shit in it

diversity is undefined and obfuscating

They should ban “feminism” and
“people of colour” next.
Focus on actual science instead.

>words not to appear in budgets for the future
>banned words

ew insanity

>be me
>registered republican
>be 4th year cell and molecular bio undergrad
>level 2 research associate at biotech firm
>researching trapping nucleic acids in liposome for novel drug delivery methodology
>peers are all anti-crooked hillary
>...but why u so anti science hurrrdurrr

seriously tired of this meme

Technically peer review is, and ironically you have the Jesuits to thank for that one still existing. So ultimately it's not that science is a fraud, it's that religious frauds are false-flagging to reverse and/or undermine the enlightenment.

having this level of a peanut brain
lurk /sci/ sometime

At this point “Science-Based” and “Evidence-Based” have become have become worthless catch phrases that are likely used like “multitasking” is/was, and other now bullshit terms like “Green-Energy” and “Clean-Energy”. There are also a large number of “scientific studies” that contradict each other, or that were done on such a small, non representative group that you could probably have them say anything. If you want to write a proposal for something sight the actual studies supporting your proposal, as well as ones that might refute your proposal.

Current administration is 100% correct on this changes. These changes encourage facts and not cultural bias reinforced by lies like "settled science."

Yes, 'evidence-based' is a shitty buzzword that adds nothing. Whether or not something is based on actual data or conjecture is immediately obvious, that phrase is nothing but a bad attempt to sound objective.

Remember that consuming aluminum is bad for your health, and it is present in most vaccines nowadays

BUT REMEMBER GOYIM THE (((SCIENCE))) IS SETTLED!

>trump is a dumb nigger
I'd rarher be $7bln-dumb-Trump than poor af polandfag.

>Evidence-based is a buzzword to you?
Apparently the budget verbiage must be competing with unscientific proposals from the anti-science agency heads Trump has appointed. It's just like the way creationists desperately try to make their nonsense look like legitimate science.

>Current administration is 100% correct on this changes.
So you're pro-censorship?
Rick Scott did that in Florida already
miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article12983720.html

I won't be part of the Republicans insanely stupid war against legitimate science.

To Drumpf supporters, facts and evidence are left wing constructs

>Why are conservatives anti-science?
The scientific community has been infiltrated by an unknown number of commies. The average 100-110 IQ man knows he cannot expect to magically find out when 120+ IQ phd jews are lying to him and when they are really doing solid science and being objective, therefore he avoids fruit from the poisoned tree altogether. For a conservative it's better to not know something than to believe a lie propagated by the enemy

evidence-based = assumptions
vs.
evidence = facts

how to know when you are being lied to 101

>transgender
>science based
k

Wow, the alt right is just as delusional as the SJWs. Suprise suprise.

Yes.

>Just as delusional

Mmkay sweetie

>(((diversity))) is now a banned word.

About time. Someone needs to stop the Jew from committing White Genocide.

Anti-Trump is code for Anti-White.

I'm forming an evidence-based conclusion that you are a faggot.