Why does this man cause such immense butthurt to normies?

Why does this man cause such immense butthurt to normies?
I mean, internet worked just fine without NN in the past.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countering_Foreign_Propaganda_and_Disinformation_Act
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

amerimutts gets scared to lose their internets

He hss a great shit eating grin

Leftists are butthurt cause they might have to pay an extra dollar or two per month for their Netflix subscription.

>worked fine without NN

Till Comcast figures out how to fuck the shekel out of you.

because lefties are racist

Comcast has absolutely no shortage of ways to fuck the shekel out of you, NN or not.

Because normies are totally dependent on Netflix by this point. They need it to survive. They will actually go crazy if they dont have it, and they are worried that no NN will mean their addiction gets taken advantage of and they pay more.

Because they'll believe anything a commercial, CNN, or an advertisement on the internet tells them. This guy gave us memes, this guy gave us memes that trigger the normies. The ultimate gift.

>internet worked just fine without NN in the past

Organized crime has no shortage of ways to fuck with society, but that doesn't mean we should give gangs rocket launchers.

>nn is from the mid 90s
>mutts think its purely obamas creation

Whatever, im not invested in this meme of a legislation.

Dumb liberals literally thinking to give the power of the internet to the government is better than corporations competing each other. Government is absolute control so fuck NN

>>nn is from the mid 90s
No, it's not.

Tech companies and lobbyists spent millions on propaganda to convince normies that NN being repealed is the end of the internet

they always could charge you anything they wanted you fucking dufus, but if they did they would be breaching laws already in place

laws used to decimate them in court multiple times by 2013

That actually sounds like a great idea. Considering blacks commit crime mostly against blacks they'd go extinct in America within a decade

Don't be so sure about that. American trends have the habit of swapping over to the continent.

NN was passed in 2015
when were you born skallywag

Net Neutrality was about bolsheviks seizing control of all information and censoring the spread of all conservative leaning or far-right websites. Tomorrow, twitter is going to start tracking and banning/blocking it's users whom they've tracked from places they don't like and they are starting with "neo-nazi" material. If you use twitter, and they track you off-site from an alleged "neo-nazi" platform, then they will block you from twitter on-site. They've announced this, and all companies like Google, Twitter, et al had planned to swing all of this in motion in lockstep with one another. No one is being informed, and media outlets are just astroturfing.

>2015 was over 20 years ago

He literally did nothing wrong

net neutrality was a principle until 2015
in 2015 a law was passed under the same name
400 pages of laws to describe this concept:
treat all data the same

yeah....

also this is the same logic they used to make sure that cable companies didn't become monopolies in the 70-80s

what do you think happened to the cable companies? (they are literally the ISPs now)

Are you claiming that throttling didn't happen before 2015?

He is a smug little bitch, desu

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countering_Foreign_Propaganda_and_Disinformation_Act

pass NN requiring companies to get a license to operate from the government

then 1 year later pass a law that creates an agency that operates from the white house that has the freedom to control what information is allowed on the internet

ISPs now have to do what you tell them or lose their license

the best thing about him is that he's non-white. if you noticed, leftists have made practically no race attacks on him, scared to be thought of as racists.

imagine he was white lmao. actually, thinking about it now, might have been better if he was.
>t. accelerationist

is using more than your fair share of bandwidth a net neutrality tenant?

if you are for treating all data the same, what gives you the right to pummel the network just because you can?

how is that neutral?

worked just fine with it too

In general you do not need to regulate a free market. But the internet service providers have created a cartel, divided the nation among each other and basically have a monopoly on providing service. To have an unregulated monopoly to a service that today almost is a basic human need is not a good place to be at. Sure, de-regulate, but then you must apply anti-trust and split the large ISPs into several.

You're not American, why do you care?

if you got throttled it was because you were using up more than everyone else, causing disruption to the service for others

oh they did
>pic related

It did on a few occasions, taken care of every time. Notably the biggest and most famous case was with Netflix, and it turned out that Netflix was throttling themselves to garner support for the upcoming NN law.
Get this straight, net neutrality is a good thing that we've had for 20 years. Net Neutrality is a 400 page attempt by the Obama administration to prep the internet for total control under the Hillary administration using the same name.
It's a case of twisting language, a classic leftist technique.

if you had a site you would know that DDOS attacks have become a common occurrence
I have a few very niche sites, they get pummeled every day all day by bots

why? because an ISP can't do anything to fuck over robots or similar attacks

that's not an argument
we have netflix

cry more until you get an argument

>they always could charge you anything they wanted you fucking dufus, but if they did they would be breaching laws already in place
There's no law saying Comcast can't wake up one morning and suddenly decide to raise the base price of every internet package by $5.

that would be like saying just because you pay for power doesnt mean you can plug in as many vibrating anal plugs as you want.

If Comcast wants to fuck your ass then it can. But repealing NN is like you pulling your pants down on top of that.

anti-trust laws already exist and they dealt with each problem with existing law and it worked fine. the ISPs stopped doing shit and paid fines.

giving control of the internet to the government isn't a solution, it's just giving control

there are laws, follow the laws. the government doesn't need to approve of companies

you pay for power by your usage

are you for paying by bandwidth used?
that's not net neutrality

>repealing NN is like you pulling your pants down on top of that.
the FTC is still in charge, anti-trust, anti-monopoly etc laws are still in effect

these are laws that were used effectively before NN was introduced by obama in 2015

the government doesn't care about you, they just wanted leverage over ISPs

God, I wish my county was ruled by Multi-billion dollar companies such as Facebook, Google, and Apple. You can see (((them))) trying to convinces everyone. But we know too well.

there was no law about that with NN

do you even know what NN contains?
it has nothing to do with pricing

Burgers, how do you allow this POO IN LOO ruin your internet?

and of course yes, if you strain the grid the utility company will come
they will say that your usage is above what they have allocated for a residential area

and in most countries electricity usage has brackets with increased pricing, so that if you go over certain milestones you pay more

do you think you are free to ruin the grid for everyone else just because it's public you fucking mongrel?

>ruin
It’s perfectly fine.

Normies think government regulation makes everything better.

>Why does this man cause such immense butthurt to normies?
because they are normies. They don't think, they don't do research, they are sheep. They hear net "neutrality" is repealed...OMG, internet is no longer neutral. fucking NPCs, i swear.

>fucking NPCs, i swear.
hahahahaha

>net neutrality was a principle until 2015
Literally doesn't mean anything. Legal aspect matters, not some principle. It worked just fine before 2015 and it will work now.

Problem is the repeal simultaneously made many of those laws ineffective, thanks to internet not being counted as part of necessary infastructure like say post offices or telephone cables. Anti-trust laws aren't going to do jack-shit for innovative start-up companies and they're not going to help you when Comcast starts taking ideas from its colleagues in China and South America and starts charging you extra depending on which site you visited.

>good goys, it's not fair netflix has sheckels!

exactly, it was a principle and it worked as a principle

whoever tried to subvert the principle got sued
fined by the FTC
etc

NN is 400 pages of legislation you mongrel, it's leverage over ISPs, not protecting your precious pron

...

What the f[sees a cap flag]

Reddit told them to get mad; and poorfags are afraid of paying extra for Netflix and kikebook, which will never happen, unfortunately.

they already have you mongrel
if they do these things again - things that have been won in court cases
they are asking to pay you millions

2005 - Madison River Communications was blocking VOIP services. The FCC put a stop to it.
2005 - Comcast was denying access to p2p services without notifying customers.
2007-2009 - AT&T was having Skype and other VOIPs blocked because they didn't like there was competition for their cellphones.
2011 - MetroPCS tried to block all streaming except youtube. (edit: they actually sued the FCC over this)

Comcast fucked everyone even with NN.

2011-2013, AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon were blocking access to Google Wallet because it competed with their bullshit. edit: this one happened literally months after the trio were busted collaborating with Google to block apps from the android marketplace
2012, Verizon was demanding google block tethering apps on android because it let owners avoid their $20 tethering fee. This was despite guaranteeing they wouldn't do that as part of a winning bid on an airwaves auction. (edit: they were fined $1.25million over this)
2012, AT&T - tried to block access to FaceTime unless customers paid more money.
2013, Verizon literally stated that the only thing stopping them from favoring some content providers over other providers were the net neutrality rules in place.

all before 2015

Him being a poo and not a white man pisses them off even more. I loves it.

dang, if only the goys had to pay extra for our honorary shoah lanes!

It's not netflix, it's the pirates. They're worried they'll have to pay an extra dollar for downloading 700 gb of movies, music, and video games every month.

Anything that makes Facebook and Netflix's CEO cry and screech is a good thing.

its literally everyone on the internet you dumbass

the only people so far that don't like NN are a small group of drumf shills on Sup Forums that would literally drink their own cum and smoke their farts if blumf told them so

Notice how all those things got resolved WITHOUT NN? You fuckers are retarded.

>0.2 shekels have been deposited to your account

Spotted the blueshare shill

I know
someone posted them to me saying that these were somehow proof that we needed NN

meanwhile all I see is the system working without handing over any control of anything to the govenment

>I suck jewish cock, but you're a shill!

how does Drumf cum taste like?

I would love to see an internet with less niggers and libtards screeching about social justice and communism. Reddits worst case scenario would legitimately make the internet great again. Unfortunately it's hysterical nonsense based on mobile package jewry, which also existed under NN.

I wonder if it has anything to do with suicide. Like if you kill yourself you don't get reincarnated properly

The depressing part is liberals win in the short term no matter whether nn exists or not. Net neutrality exists, Google and other leftist tech firms censor on behalf of the left. Net neutrality is repealed, at&t and comcast or whoever is accused of racism until they begin censoring on behalf of the left.

Drumpf

pretty sure big companies hate right wing tards like you guys more than lefties.

Expect Sup Forums, breitbart, infowars and other dumb alt-right sites to get buried by comcast

Fair enough, I mistook you for another NN shill due to the meme flag.

FCC specifically targeted this kind of censorship, not counting the two required dems on the comittee

not having an argument for 400 pages of legislation that gives leverage to the government over ISPs for no particular reason

the best you have is
- netflix might need to pay for using 37% of the infrastructure
- porn might be slower and also get a package deal
- ISPs might censor things

- netflix is the reason this was repealed, one company hogging the network isn't fair
- get your self together man
- facebook, google and youtube are already censoring literal text and video

ISP see packets, they don't go through the text that would allow them to censor content by it's ideological leaning, but only by it's packet profile

Right wing people work and can afford higher prices, niggers and libshits cannot.
Unless you're going for the censorship boogeyman, which lefty data barons like Google engaged in daily under "net neutrality."

>hurr durr but facebook censors too!!

you really are that dumb? nobody is forcing you to go to facebook, there are millions of websites on the internet and you can go to each one of them, ISPs on the other hand are less than 5

basically you give more power to a very concentrated few ISPs instead of millions of websites

ISPs see packets, origin and destination, they can't censor based on the content of those packets, only the profile of those packets (streaming, p2p etc)

and they can't do that either without being sued

facebook google et al have access to what you write on the internet and censor based on actual content

which is more troublesome? why do we want these left leaning organization to brute force their dominance over the web?

NN did nothing to stop that in the first place, but you would know that had you actually read the law.

>rednecks are rich now
LMAO sure buddy

...

Nobody is forcing you to pay for internet service at all. Stupid argument.

We should give everyone rocket launchers.

SHALL

>eternal PAgit ai

>heh the free market? you know that only works or jews right, which is why they push it? national socialism is the way to go, it doesnt degenerate society like capitilism
>wait, net neutrality? one of the rare times where being pro-capitilism is anti-mainstream? heh, well, dont you know how inefficient government intervention in the marketplace is? what are you, some sort of statist?
>*gets website you get your entire sense of self from shut down because it's enemy #1 to all the neoliberal globalist multinational corporations you usually hate*
>*about to hang self*
>a-at least I disagreed with reddit h-heh

you are right, facebook is gonna be fine. Its other sites like breitbart and Sup Forums that will get fucked

most ameritards have only 1 ISP to choose from, so you get what they give you or have no internet

Right to insults, the final tactic in the book of liberal debate. Great to see you're out of steam.

And now all of that shit will continue and they will keep poking how far they can get away with it. Its like taking out the house alarm because your neighbours haven't found your safe yet despite multiple break-ins. Of course they won't start underhanded prizing and all that bullshit right now. When things calm down and people are busy paying attention to some other drama (like say the next election media-circus), thats when they start all the bullshit again. Except this time theres less laws preventing them from doing so and when the public outcry is not there, they can get away with more bullshit than before.
And you're fine with this. You're basically asking for that dick in your ass from a company with a history of slapping your buttcheeks with its member. This doesn't even begin to touch the problem of ISPs suffocating innovative new tech in the US industry. Where do you think the next new "Netflix" will go if Comcast charges them too much extra? Their innovative new tech escapes to the rest of the world, most likely euros.

Are you fucking retarded? You logic is laughable. 40% of all web traffic to one site or another has nothing to do with pummelling the network. Being able to legally slow that traffic would be pummelling consumers.

you are completely ignorant and delusional. Red states are by far the poorest and most underdeveloped

you are an idiot

companies that hog the network bandwidth will have a problem

what problem will they have? will they lose customers to other companies..? OH WAIT, THERE ARE NO OTHER COMPANIES YOU FUCKING MORON!

As a libertarian, Net Neutrality confuses me. Of course, I want less government regulation, but at the same time, I'm all about private corporations doing whatever they want to generate revenue. So if Comcast wants to charge me $4.99 to access Facebook each month, then I would feel bad as a libertarian to say that I wouldn't want to pay it. They're a private corporation, they provide a service.

the question is, though, will the invisible hand of the free market allow lesser companies to gain influence if they don't throttle speeds or charge additional fees? Or is America so entrenched in their top five ISP's that we'll all pay without question?

To be determined.

what is your opinion of Trump?

NN gives Trump leverage over the ISPs

the
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countering_Foreign_Propaganda_and_Disinformation_Act

gives him control over what can be said over the web as well

do you like the combination of these two?

Not true at all, there are 2 or more ISPs in most areas, including mobile options. Most people whine there is only one ISP because they only want faster cable or fiber and don't consider slower DSL or wireless mesh networks to be an option.

of course it does
bandwidth isn't infinite
if it was we wouldn't need NN

>t. delusional cunt
flag checks out