Why do poor people have more kids on average?

Why do poor people have more kids on average?

Other urls found in this thread:

thesun.co.uk/fabulous/5142746/benefits-mum-claire-young-hits-back-six-kids-presents-christmas/
anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-theory/rk-selection-theory/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because poor people are not that smart.
Because kids are an investment.

because kids won't make them poorer

nothing for entertainment except fugg

No contraception, no access to abortions, no entertainment other than sex.

>they can't afford contraception
>they can't afford abortion
>they have nothing better to do all day than drink and fuck
There are probably other reasons but those are the main ones I can think of.

because money is the gonna bring you happiness but the love of your family is priceless...
HAPPY HOLIDAYS EVERYONE GO SEE YOUR FAMILY

r/k selection. Most of those won't live to adulthood.
That's how low quality stock breeds.

The (((pope))) keeps telling them that using condoms is a sin and prevents help organizations from providing them with contraception.

In first world country, it's because of gibsmedats. Poor people are poor because they can't do basic arithmetic, so they think the gibsmedats they'll get to feed their child will be enough to buy them flatscreen TVs, too.

They will thanks to western medicine and foreign aid. Why do you think Africa has the fastest growing population of any continent. If the trends continue they will soon outnumber even Asians.

>they think the gibsmedats they'll get to feed their child will be enough to buy them flatscreen TVs, too.
And they're correct. Even poor single mums on benefits have iPhones and flatscreen TVs.

There's a huge no man's land between poor people's conception of the minimum amount of resources required to raise a kid - i.e. literally almost nothing, and it's provided by welfare anyway, so why not have 10? - and more well off people's conception of the minimum amount of resources required to raise a kid (we need a nice house in a nice neighborhood with a nice car and we need to send the kids to good schools and have money to buy them this and that and...)

Non-poors struggle to gather together the time and resources to raise even a single kid to the standard that they think is called for. Poors just shit out half a dozen kids and the government pays for feeding and clothing them, and they're content with that because they don't have high socioeconomic expectations.

At a civilization level, level of wealth = attainable and usable resources / number of people.

Go to some place like haiti that doesn't have shit and is over populated; notice they're all poorer than dirt. Go to northern europe, relatively abundant resources and relatively low population.

Couple that with IQ and ability to use/sell those resources and it all starts to come together.

>And they're correct. Even poor single mums on benefits have iPhones and flatscreen TVs.

Well yeah... that's when they're total subhumans and malnourish their children with the cheapest shit money can buy and spend all the money for themselves. Guess those kinds of subhumans exist, too.

Niggers still havent figured out that fucking causes kids.

Free food

Good post. This is the truth. It would be unthinkable for someone who was raised in a middle class family to have kids on benefits, but poorer people just don't care. They've never had any money so why not take free handouts when they're offered them.

Ironically, middle class people's reluctance to have kids is one of the main reasons why we keep needing to import immigrants.

If your kids have an arbitrary large chance of dying or ending up in prison before reaching adulthood, you gotta have heaps of children to compensate.

>malnourish their children with the cheapest shit money can buy
Maybe in Germany but in Britain they seem to be doing very well.

thesun.co.uk/fabulous/5142746/benefits-mum-claire-young-hits-back-six-kids-presents-christmas/

Fuck. The situation is much worse than I thought.

they have plenty of time to fuck

Most normies are working, taking care of things
When you don't work, don't have a car and can't afford to go on vacation, you fuck for entertainment

The father is not educated that he can buy some pills for his dumb cow and not go deeper in poverty because of a few fucks

...

Values, user. Some people don't care about material wealth, and would rather have a big family and be happy than be a good little goys and chase happiness through a career.

While bugmen get dogs and dress them up in stupid outfits, real men are raising a generation of whites aware of the forces aligned against them.

Being a good father is the pinnacle of masculinity.
Your ancestors are watching.

My face when I realize her benefits equal more than my take home pay and I have a "good" job

In fact, dumb people usually have more kids. It just happens that poor people are usually dumb.

It's the rabbit x wolf way of breeding. One will fuck and breed as much as they can in the hope some of them will live, while the other will have less offspring but will put more effort on their upbringing.

research
r vs k genetics

By your theory, the people smart enough to realize that they can have more free time and live with a higher standard of living by using the welfare state to their advantage instead of working themselves to death and not having kids are the exception?

Because white people pay them to

I like to call this the "shotgun" method of reproducing

Blacks do this a lot.....have 8 kids and hope that one survives and makes a decent living
Therefore the parent can live off of the kid
Encourage them to play sports so they will take care of mama
Never mind the other 7 that are killed or deal drugs or go to jail....let society deal with them
Just hope one does good and helps the parent

its one of the good things the pope does. if you cant afford to have a kid (and therefore need to use condoms) why are you wasting your effort having sex instead of better your conditions?

In the old days, when many children died before reaching adulthood, churning out kids made sense in the short term. Children were used as farm labor. When those kids grew up they were cast off.

r/K strategy

anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-theory/rk-selection-theory/

>have 9 kids
>6 die before adulthood
>succeed in keeping your family alive

Better survival of the family

...

Poor people tend to think with their MUH DIK only without caring about the consequences. They don't plan for the future and live in the moment. Since MUH DIK feels better without using a condom, they naturally refuse to ever use one.

How much of an autist are you?

Do you think that people's sexual urges have anything to do with their financial situation?

Poor people are actually more likely to fuck since they have nothing better to do with their time.

Correlate with iq, go ahead.

Good read user thank you

More money = more degeneracy.

Fucking is free and they don't have internet porn yet.