Trump sycophants flip over SJWS but turn a blind eye to this
Trump sycophants flip over SJWS but turn a blind eye to this
Jaxson Moore
Elijah Lee
Who cares if we control a few of the things that can be said, it's not like we're totalitarian monsters.
Hunter Adams
Fake and gay
Joseph Bailey
>implying the slippery slope is actually a fallacy
Look at the state of liberals and the LGBTOMGWTFBBQ movement. Clamp down on authoritarian measures before they have a chance to settle. Otherwise you'll end up like us.
Josiah Lopez
>Banning Leftist newspeak
>bad
Michael Sanders
You're thinking of infowars
Elijah Rivera
Then Installing your own news speak
Good?
Jacob Kelly
How would banning those words at all affect the CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL's ability to ask for money so they can CONTROL DISEASE.
Blake Fisher
If I must have totalitarianism, it had better be far-right totalitarianism.
Joshua Perez
>infowars
If I had a dollar for every time CNN+the rest of the MSN flat out lied I would be living in one seriously decked out igloo
Sebastian Morris
Nigga please. What they are calling for is the elimination of grey area, buzzterms to justify things.
>implying we need to do X because of diversity!
>implying fetus isn't used to compartmentalize away that they are aborting a unborn human child
>implying Transgender isn't a buzzterm for gender dysphoria
>implying vulnerable isn't an emotionally front loaded buzzterm
>implying entitlement isn't an emotionally front loaded buzzterm
>implying science-based means the same thing as scientific (Movies are made "based" off real events that do not accurately reflect the real events)
>implying evidence-based is the same thing as based on evidence(see above movie point on things that are "based" off of something else)
Logan Baker
Who the fuck is the president to determine which is which? All the the points you made could be reversed. Allow people to use the words they want. Fuck. You people are brain washed
Jaxon Ward
>literally censoring speech
>not bad
Owen Reed
Has anyone besides the clinton news network reported this?
Jason Sullivan
The president?
Ian Adams
>censoring speech
fake news
Grayson Price
>all the points could be reversed
No, they couldn't. Objectivity versus subjectivity in a federally funded agency. You don't have a leg to stand on in this argument. You're the one that is brain washed.
Grayson Hill
>just keep letting Marxism chip away at society or your just as bad my guy lmao im tiny riiick
Levi King
Name three times CNN lied. Not just be biased, but flat out lied. Meanwhile, Infowars actually lies every episode.
Hudson Rogers
...
Joshua Ward
How can you not see why no one takes you seriously
Try, it'll be hard for you, but just try to imagine if Obama came out with a list of words you couldn't say anymore. You zealots would've been all over his case
Connor Garcia
Well diversity and transgenderism are both diseases, so I could see it being hard controlling them without being able to identify them. Of course I know I'm being obtuse, and bureaucrats would never do that.
Adrian Johnson
>context
shiggy
Evan Morgan
>Getting rid of the word vulnerable will mean old people die.
Horse shit. That word is used every time they want to push the victim narrative on minorities. They use vulnerable ALL THE TIME.
The left is just angry they cant use certain buzzwords anymore to shut down arguments.
Ryan Peterson
I'll just leave this here..
pbs.org
Jackson Reyes
No, 0bammy came out with a long list of thoughts you couldn’t have anymore.
Jonathan Williams
This actually is fake and gay
twitter.com
At best, CNN is stretching the truth about not having words in budget docs. At worst, they’re flat out lying (again) to the public.
Brayden Cox
This apparently bans words from budget documents, not all the work they do (let's be real though, it's CNN and therefore has a good chance of being fake news). King Onigger on the other hand banned words dealing with Islamic terrorism from all aspects of national security continuously. FBI agents couldn't even refer to jihadists in their reporting or even think about looking at the Islamic part of the equation, where the radicalization comes in.
Gavin Morgan
yes!
Bentley Brooks
but it isn't censoring speech at all. how low iq are people who interpret this as speech censorship. it's simply stating that if certain words are used in budget documentation, the documentation will be ignored. it has nothing to do with what people are and aren't allowed to say.
Jason Diaz
Brandon Ward
>not finding communist propaganda with stolen money is worst than censoring the internet and trying to get 1000s of political dissidents fired from their jobs
liberal logic
Julian Martinez
This. Why is OP always a faggot?
Juan Miller
Beat me to it user
James Sullivan
The only lie i see here is the "look at WikiLeaks". The others come off as conspiratorial.
John Gray
name three times infowars lied, nigger.
but anyway this question is easy as hell: Nayirah testimony, Powell's presentation of "evidence" of Iraqi WMDs to congress, and their covfefe of Benghazi.
Austin Howard
Elijah Ortiz
This is what drumfphies actually believe
Gabriel Cruz
>liberal logic
No user they have gone it full-blown nigger logic such as this:
youtube.com
Cameron Allen
>diversity
>entitlement
Why would those words be used in CDC documents?
>fetus
How are they supposed to refer to fetuses? lmao
Wyatt Harris
>How are they supposed to refer to fetuses
Future none-binary gender indeterminate persons SHITLORD, or probably most like just nigger