What do you guys think? Does he know that he redpills people enough for them to go NatSoc? Or is he oblivious?

What do you guys think? Does he know that he redpills people enough for them to go NatSoc? Or is he oblivious?

hes trying to become the leader of the alt-right, for controlling the opposition.

He's a fucking shill, and a CIA one at that.

So, go fuck yourself, Peter Wiggan.

I had a shitty father. I started listening to Jordan Peterson after I stopped using drugs for a few years. He is incredible.

I think I learned a lot of things from him that fathers teach their sons.

I hear you OP; after I started listening I realized that a lot of the unpopular views that I had were "right", or maybe, not unkind.

I'm not sure if he knows the scope of his persuasion or not.

Good post; interesting.

pimping yourself for coin, huh jordan?

He's a merchant Liberal.

nice vlog

oh and nice reddit spacing too btw

gb2 back to r/the_donald

faggot

same, I had a relatively shitty dad who also died young because of his drug habits. He was a craftsman and very good with his hands, so I at least got to see glimpses of what it is to be a man, but I was never taught anything.

Peterson is a lightning bolt for guys in our positions. I actually think it's incredible how he manages to stay as opinionated as he is but never feels the need to 'denounce' his far-right supporters. I guess he wants to try and change as many people as possible, even if he would hate their politics

What's wrong with Jordan Peterson?

Can you see how any intelligent person would find "reddit spacing" much more decipherable than your reply?

Do you see the intelligent post in response to mine below?

Do you also see that we add value to this board where you detract value from it?

Do you see how OP, the other poster, and myself leave people like you behind in every measurable facet of life?

daily reminder that NatSoc is a socialist cuck ideology for conservative cuck snowflakes who run to daddy gubmint to protect them from liberal cuck snowflakes. cucks

Go back

not sure why Sup Forums hates Jordan Peterson
he's as against the postmodern PC morons as this board is

Pol is against everyone because its funny

>absolutely bucko'd

That's where you're wrong bucko, he's only against postmodernism in non-whites.

what kind of brain damage did you receive to interpret that short passage so wrongly? do you know what postmodernism means?

He went after "the alt-right" and some basic ethnonationalistic positions on twitter a few weeks ago after a year of not punching right. He did this after kicking some alt-lite slut off a talk or something, I don't really know all the details.

Realistically he's right about everything in his realm of competence: mythology and psychology. When he gets into the civnat garbage, and general progressive liberal politics, he comes off as a moron. But on the whole he's pretty good about not spouting off and revealing his ignorance.

No he's not. Watch some more of him. He is a walking contradiction of thoughts. And it's because he is one of those intelligent people whom are extremely emotionally unstable that subsequently cannot face the truth.

>whom

Prolly because he's explicitly anti-Nazi and anti-totalitarian, which puts him directly opposed to both national (fascist/nazi/whatevs) socialists and international (comintern) socialists.

but he's not wrong
human history doesn't point to race identifications until the modern era
up until that point we identified by our body politic (Rome), our faith (Christianity), or our tribe
often this group identifier is some sort of transcendent principal that lasts beyond the body
that's because ethnonationalism is fucking stupid, why do you think Heidegger thought Hitler was a retard? Hitler was doing the same body politics/ethnonationalism that the Jews did
Nazis are the Jews but for a self-constructed white identity rather than a self-constructed Jewish identity
ethnicity which did not even become a developed system until the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade
yeah that's what I'm getting here
the people here need to read Heidegger

quints off truth???? MAGA

IDK how the fuck you'd arrive at Nat Soc from his teachings. He explicitly rejects it, in addition to it being mutually exclusive to all his teachings.

He's a different strand of individualist than Rand, but he's just as ardent about it