Thoughts on this fellow?
>Botched circumcision results in him losing penis
>Gets a sex change operation under doctors advice when he's still an infant
>Raised as a girl and given hormones until he discovers the truth
>Offs himself 20 years later
en.wikipedia.org
Interesting read desu, i have no idea why he didn't murder his parents and everybody involved.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
horrible.
God I feel so fucking bad for him.
The doctor was insane and believed SJW bullshit that genders were taught and used him as a guinea pig to prove it. His circumcision botch wasn't even that bad in comparison to how they mutilated it. The tip was injured so the quack told the parents the best thing to do was to go all out and cut off his balls and dick and make it into girl genitalia.
Because after a doctor ruins your offspring the next step is to remove their ability to reproduce and pass on your family line.
I'm proud of the kid that as a toddler and little boy he still tore off any dresses put on him, threw girl toys and only played with boy toys. Even after they kept lying to him that he was a girl.
As a kid they regularly the quack as their psychologist until it was obvious they wouldn't prove their little theory and became mentally stressed and unstable. The doctor ended their study before he offed himself so they wouldn't look bad and their study was "inconclusive"
Poor dude
Holy shit.
>Reimer said that Money also forced the children to take their "clothes off" and engage in "genital inspections".
>On at "least one occasion", Reimer said that Money took a photograph of the two children doing these activities
>This method of circumcision resulted in several infants having their penises missed, with at least seven male children being reassigned as female
Do I have to cut my dick off to get that kind of facial structure?
Dude's head is built like a block of granite. Goddamn.
(((John Money))) jew'd him hard
That kike tradition should be illegal
checked true
Although in this case he and his brother were referred for circumcision after being diagnosed with phimosis. His brother got it fixed nonsurgically, apparently. But I mean why burn off foreskin as the immediate alternative if a nonsurgical approach doesn't work at first? And then turn him into a girl? Utterly sick.
I'm a Jew and I oppose circumcision.
Maybe it was useful before antibiotics.
It sure is not now.
Not even in Brazil I've saw cases of botched phimosis operation. How can a doctor burn a penis beyond repair?
Apparently like this:
en.wikipedia.org
That seems unnecessarily dangerous compared to the usual devices.
The doctor was also sexually abusing him and his brother pretty intensely.
Money actually wasn't a Jew, but his greatest influences were Jews including Magnus Hirschfield who invented tranny surgery in Weimar Berlin. Fun fact: the modern concept of gender is entirely derived from Money's perverted and evil 'experiments' on those kids. Prior to that there was no difference between the idea of gender and the idea of sex, except that gender also referred to word gender in linguistics. All modern gender studies is built on child rape and mutilation. And of course you have freaks like Alfred Kinsey who based his idea of sexual norms on his own perversions and the 'sexuality' of faggots and pedophiles. All of this stuff is built on preying on children.
Yeah, they probably wanted to avoid give antibiotics to the child at six months but still...
Imagine one of those things in the hands of a Muslim doctor out to burn a vagina off? Jesus.
...
Another redpill: Hirschfield's 'Institute of Sexology' was an early target of the NSDAP. The single largest 'book burning' by the Nazis was the burning of Hirschfield and his circle of perverts' collection of pornography, cp, and texts on how to psychologically and physically abuse people into thinking they should be the other sex. The destruction of the Institute by the Nazi student organization was extremely popular and helped propel them to victory in elections.
Poor bastard but if I was him I would have murdered all involved parties. All because a jew wanted to snip his dick
At least if he were circumcised normally, he could restore his foreskin. But losing his penis entirely? That's a tragedy on a whole other level.
His parents were tricked by some kike doctor to get them to do that.
I wish he could have found some peace in life before getting to the point of suicide, but I cant blame him.
it would solve so many problems in the US if it were banned with extreme prejudice.
Can't really restore what's been amputated, but it does leave you wanting to see what they did to it that was so bad as to consider it to be beyond salvaging. I mean, they figured what was left could be turned into a workable vagina for some reason. This is just nuts.
This dude had an absolute shit life and I feel terrible for him. Entire life fucked from birth
it makes you wonder if he was botching it on purpose so he could run experiments. twin boys would be the ideal target for this kind of experimentation.
>>This method of circumcision resulted in several infants having their penises missed, with at least seven male children being reassigned as female
Yeah, right? With the stuff Money was doing it does seem like that. Makes you wonder how they fixed the phimosis on his brother without circumcision and why the same process didn't work on him.
True, but a restored penis does regain a great deal of the sensitivity lost from circumcision, and functions in just about the same way as an intact one (minus the frenulum).
Perhaps the doctor was drunk in this poor individual's case. Whatever the reason, the result makes a powerful case for banning the practice unless deemed absolutely necessary. Once the child becomes of age (say, 16) it could be performed only with his consent. I don't care if religious groups complain; if they don't like it, they can do it in another country.
Agreed. And it's increasingly relevant now that we have FGM to worry about as well, which is already an issue in Sweden, where it's illegal even if they travel back home to get it done and then return.
US law is not particularly tolerant of child abuse even if it happens in a different country, so the legal precedent should probably apply.