Do you ever worry that giving unlimited power to the government could backfire?

Do you fear a 1984 scenario? What happens if the fascist dictator doesn't love his country like Hitler did but is actually a power-hungry psychopath with no regard for the people?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-kcAgVN1wGo
youtube.com/watch?v=QAVRu5OcOWE
youtube.com/watch?v=T7O6PBL-Rbg
youtube.com/watch?v=0Pgnng3bVlc
youtube.com/watch?v=Da8BwRsoA7A
youtube.com/watch?v=8vMypCinkRk
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>What happens if the fascist dictator doesn't love his country like Hitler did but is actually a power-hungry psychopath with no regard for the people?

You can watch it right now I guess.

Based kim, exposing how cucked the rest of the world is.
Cunts launching missiles n shit, and everyone else is just waiting until one of them hit to retaliate. Nice preventive measures cuckbois

Without a strong goverment North Korea would have surrendered by now.

You're also really fucking stupid if you "fear a 1984 scenario". Because most of us are already living it. UK are tapping into all internet connections to their island and have placed CCTV cameras everywhere. They are hilariously inefficient when it comes to using that power, but that's only a question of time and new agents and managers who grew up with the web instead of getting handed that task and being unable to grasp what they are into.

What about the starving populace? Isn't that one of the main criticisms of Stalin?

So would it be better to go full fascist and make the country an authoritarian dictatorship?

If most people suddenly redpilled they'll topple the dictator or die trying
Like what happened to us during 1997 asian financial crisis

Since we aren't all bug-people like the Koreans I'd like to believe we'd revolt against such a naked tyranny (as our ancestors did to free themselves from feudalism). The real danger is the endpoint of our current trajectory wherein we are bound by ever-more subtle chains while our neighbors are all replaced with swarthy strangers that we cannot not trust.

youtube.com/watch?v=-kcAgVN1wGo

Easier said than done. It also never happened in the U.S.S.R. despite millions of deaths.

Personally I believe in the Wise Ruler scenario, yes. A true king or caesar who was educated from birth to take that position, with all the up and downsides.

Yeah. Getting rid of feudalism and slavery was such a great move for your country. Now you got the former slaves run around and commit crimes, and you're trying to play king of the world to copy that exact system you came from. Bravo.

But for every Wise Ruler in history there are two tyrants it seems.

...

Shit's complicated. But it's the same for non feudal politics. With a proper king at least you get a chance to get a guy who got decent training for the job, that's my train of thought.

just give all power to the jew corporations ;^)

saved. got more?

True, but if our only other option is to "accept demographic dilution and displacement" then eventually taking our chances (no matter how remote) with the dictator will be the clear choice.

I'm not saying what they did throughout our history was absolutely correct in hindsight, I was just noting that our people have fought against what we believed was 'tyranny' many times before.

I believe that the slaves should've all been sent back and I also believe that we should've stood against globalism rather than fighting for it.

youtube.com/watch?v=QAVRu5OcOWE

...

my sides are in orbit and supplying internet to starving children in Africa via satellite.

more?

...

It really depends on the case, and that's where this whole revolution thing went wrong. I absolutely understand and embrace getting rid of degenerate fuckers like Louis XIV like we die in Europe, but during that happening a lot of good and highly educated people lost their head (literally) just for being acquainted with royalty. That was bad, and set us back for centuries.

I don't want to be an asshole, but ultimately, what good did this muh freedoms stuff do to your country? That you're allowed to carry a gun to shoot the nigger who tries to mug you? Cool.

Why is it either or? Why not just institute policies within the republic to preserve the white nation. Republics throw out people all the time.

What do you think communists and democrats are? The Leaders of the EU and North Korea have more in common than you might think.

>implying that any person of real character should be content under ZOG
youtube.com/watch?v=T7O6PBL-Rbg

There is a middle ground between authoritarian dictatorship and anarchy.

So did Stalin and Hitler. The primary difference between the two countries being the degree of industry privatization.

I think we should return to the root of the word dictator. In ancient Rome, a "dictator" wasn't a bad guy or a tyrant, he was a man given absolute power FOR ONE YEAR to do the shit that needs to be done, but that can't be done in the regular political system.

70% of the problems facing most democracies can be easily resolved by a single year of dictatorship followed by a return to democracy. Of course, the key part is finding a person who won't be a collosal dickhead and will actually relinquish power after the year passes.

Absolutely, but you see, if we don't establish a government with authority to enact pro-white policies, we're going to go fucking extinct and mudblood. This future mud society is going to be inferior to what we have and progress is going to flounder. We'll revert back to what niggers and mestizos and arabs already have in their own lands and what they naturally are as people; second-rate citizens in second-rate at best shitholes overall, that are pretty much going jack nowhere and only suck very mildly less because Whitey invented electricity and such decades ago, and wants to buy their shit.

So it's the only option to fash out. In fact even if you want Freedom, it's the only option, because it's inevitable that nogs et al will only want authoritarian welfare states and strong welfare state socialism. So want freedom down the road, you gotta go fash first.

I disagree. All you have to have is a pro-White government in power. If American Whites wanted to establish an ethnostate, it could be done. No need to lose all freedom for Whites in the process.

>what good did it do, allowed to carry a gun to shoot the nigger who tries to mug you
Exactly, we can't really say the same for most the Bongs whom we revolted against. That makes our revolution a victory, even if it's only a small one.

Wishful thinking m8, it seems that you're still stuck in the 'Bargaining phase'....it'll pass.
>vid related
youtube.com/watch?v=0Pgnng3bVlc

If he turns out to be a dickhead, just kill him? After all we're talking about a special scenario here. Why were our ancestors smarter than us? FFS, human life is here for millions of years an we still have to deal with utterly trivial an basic problems.

Uh huh. Go try to start a revolution like your constitution entitles you to. Good luck.

It was easier to do in Rome. They'd just stab the guy repeatedly, and even then fags like Sulla abused the dictator office so bad the Republic degenerated into almost constant civil wars until Octavian rekt everyone and crowned himself emperor.

It's a delicate balance, but could theoretically be constitutionally regulated (ie the dictator can do whatever during his tenure with full legal immunity, but if he steps out of line/tries to fuck with the constitution/tries to make himself a permanent fixture, then the law would give every citizen the legal right to kill said dictator and the first one to do it gets to claim all their property and assets)

>It's a delicate balance
That's my point all the time, during this discussion. We did have this system, a wise ruler with some failsaves, but we abandoned it for career politicians who are corrupt as fuck because they care more about their money than the country they are supposed to rule.

>Wishful thinking m8, it seems that you're still stuck in the 'Bargaining phase'....it'll pass.
Nope, I refuse to cut off my nose to spite my face. Why you people implicitly trust men t o hold absolute power, I'll never understand.

I'm not all that optimistic either m8, but as long as we never let go of the muskets I believe that there will EVENTUALLY be a confrontation and at that point we will have a chance to reshuffle the deck.

youtube.com/watch?v=Da8BwRsoA7A

They already hold absolute power user. Our chains have just enough wiggle room to keep us passive but they're being tightened a bit more each day.

youtube.com/watch?v=8vMypCinkRk