Science hate thread

prepare your puke bags fa mi li a

youtube.com/watch?v=7NPC47qMJVg

>type dik civ
>2:00 scientifically multicultural proven tolerance and globalism
>muh STEM is legit and you should trust what I say

why is science so feminized and gay?

Those are low paid, low skill McLab techs, not scientists.


Lol #ILOVESCIENCE

The Muslim woman in the middle just discovered a bacteria that eats cancer

How long does she have to live?

They could also be students

>America
>actual science
Nice try

bah-dum tsssss

Feel free to hate on Bio and "social sciences."
Physics and to a lesser extent Chemistry are fine as far as disciplines go. Although lots of people in those fields are libcucks who need govt. gibs for funding, it doesn't affect their work because their work has nothing to do with their ideology. Almost no "social science" results can be replicated, and almost no one tries to replicate studies. That would never fly in actual fields of science. Hell, often enough people try to replicate experiments in an attempt to show that something published is bullshit.

Women in STEM isn’t a mem-

Social science experiments aren't meant to be replicated genius, humans and societies aren't atoms governed by maths formulas

JFC stem girls are always ugly as sin

>michio kaku
>meme pop culture "scientist"
>even worse and more irrelevant than black science man and bill nye the science goy

>Women get vote in west
>women become half the electorate
>women vote for welfare state
>welfare sate is bigger government
>bigger government requires more taxes
>welfare state incentives single mothers
>government becomes surrogate fathers
>single mothers raise niggers
>niggers cause more crimes
>niggers create more single mothers
>bigger government creates mandatory gibs spending
>women will never vote away welfare state
>every solution to problems caused by welfare state = more welfare state
>families destroyed and birth rates plummet
>immigration to replace births
>men loose incentive to support system
>social collapse

>huh when I asked 20 people if they had been raped and 5 of them said they didn't like it when they got kissed I guess we have a rape epidemic
>no its totally valid. Just because 6 out of 100 people in your study agreed means nothing. Humans aren't formulas!

Link me to an actual paper with those premises or you're just a faggot that's strawmanning and deserve the same scourn as the people you're pointing your fat greasy amerimutt finger at

>Physics and to a lesser extent Chemistry
Chemistry is a top tier degree with a metric fuckload of applicable careers. I have no need to shittalk Physics, but don’t think Chem is a less reputable field of study

>touching the floor in a medical lab
women are fucking retarded

Can we all put aside our differences and just nuke the USA.

kek. here's your (you)

Off yourself, that is a regular occurrence in social science publications. That isn't a strawman, that is actually the course of events in the 'American campus rape epidemic.'
Also, numerous meta-studies have found reproducibility rates of 10-20% in social sciences. I don't blame you for not being familiar with American campus rape studies, but the latter is common knowledge.
>ad hominems
Nice try twink baguette. If something can't be verified or reproduced, it almost never deserves publication. It is truly unfortunate how far peer review has fallen in the social sciences.

"scientists"

Michio Cucko is a full on autismal sperg and shouldn't be talking about problems in society

he should just calculate if we can get some clay from a meteor or if it's save around certain radiation levels or not, number things, not people things.

>Chemistry is a top tier degree with a metric fuckload of applicable careers.

it's not in actuality. i mean i'm not dizzing chemists for the effort involved but a guy on youtube discussing 'pointless' degrees was right when he listed chemistry as one. lots of the jobs are going / have gone offshore. the pay is SHITE by comparison with the effort involve; i've seen adds for phd level chemists with £16-£18k salaries. it was the same in my last job at a pharma R&D, they used to take ppl with very little qualifications, now they expect you to have a phd for entry level, ultra basic jobs and remain at that position for ~a decade.

physics is by far the most applicable pure science as you can also get jobs in things like data science / mining / algorithm development; anything requiring precise logic / decent maths. it also spills over into engineering a lot.

i wouldn't be too fast to dismiss some of the soft sciences personally. if you check the salaries of ppl conducting 'user surveys' (e.g. user psychology / social studies), they can be fucking sky high not just in relation to other careers but also in terms of the actual critical thinking / effort required

>Social science experiments aren't meant to be replicated
then it's not a science, is it? and all your "experiments" just boil down to shitty anecdotal evidence due to non-replicability

>lol guise in this one experiment i totally travelled backwards in time and shot my grandfather and then ceased to exist and then talked to god and he fixed it lol but im sorry you cant replicate my findings hehehe wheres my nobel

Yet you haven't produced a single one
Thanks for admitting you're a massive retard unable to back your own bullshit statements, that's nice to know for your following posts
If you could tone down the autismo and the homoerotic bullshit for a second, you would realize, as I stated earlier, social sciences do not deal with the same set of controlled parameters physics or chemistry do.. I really can't make it any more obvious and clear, yet it seems to go over your stupid head again and again

I just meant as far as research papers and academia are concerned. Chemistry is dope as a degree. I have a friend graduating with a chem degree who is going to go work doing some sort of surveying, working in a place he really likes. A buddy of mine's gf just graduated in ChemE and works for a major brewery.

>why is science so feminized and gay
>michio kaku
It's actually not really science. To start, he's a physicist without any education, training, or experience in public policy. He has no more standing than a baker or fisherman to make these claims. That's the thing that bothers me most about "scientists". Virtually every one you encounter with a government-approved opinion on immigration and tolerance and all the rest of it doesn't work anywhere near the field. Some of them, most famously Bill Nye, aren't even actual scientists. And when you actually look at the real relevant science, even just restricting it to stuff generated at elite institutions like Harvard, the stuff produced by Bruce Lahn or Robert Putnam, its findings are exactly the fucking opposite of the bullshit pushed by Kaku and Tyson.

Though he's less widely known than Tyson, I actually hate him much more, because he has a much cuntier, superior attitude. He appeared in this clip a few years ago, where he TOTALLY SMACKED DOWN this sociologist (who admittedly wasn't working too hard to defend his position). The topic was education, and why it's "failing" (in the US). We already know the answer: demographics, in particular Mexican immigration. In 2010, our national average IQ fell below 100 for the first time since such the statistic has been measured. But Kaku ranted and raved about American reality TV (ignoring the much more dubious quality of Japanese programming) and sports (ignoring the European obsession with association football) and all this other irrelevant, edgy bullshit, and it looked cool and sounded rad, and super-pumped up the crowd of bugmen and faggots and other human garbage who don't know how to think, but it's fucking wrong, something anyone with the slightest understanding of human cognition and psychometry can tell you, and it makes the problem that much more insoluble. This society has to wither and die so that guy can feel cool and edgy and pious.

>why is science so feminized and gay?

they've caught onto the idea that they need to task the other 50% of the population with something 'useful' to do, that being, paying into the GDP, and that women actually aren't going to be too great doing any kind of heavy physical work and that selling cards / soap = not good enough.

i worked in a pharma company not too long along. they are very, very actively following the effort; e.g. trying to create as many examples as possible of 'leading women' in the hopes that it'll encourage others to wage slavez it.

i would go as far as to suggest if you're male and currently following a purely scientific jobs, you may want to expand your horizons; e.g. how can you apply science to a field currently dominated by womenz; e.g. e.g. ?maternity?

you'll get your ass handed to you promotion / salary wise atm in a purely scientific environment by the mudslims girls

>social science experiments aren't meant to be replicated
You're a fucking moron, dude.

> Men politicize science
> WE CHOOSE TO GO TO THE MOON

> Women politicize science
> Post virtue signal to social media for the likes

You mean you love scientism.
Science is when you do the experiments and study the world around you for YOURSELF.

NOT READING ABOUT IT.

Fucking kekled at this

I'm not going to list the colors of the rainbow for you, this is basic shit.
You seem to be too dense for the point, but the fact that so many "social science" studies are not reproducible is not because they deal with volatile humans, but because they rarely design a good experiment, as evidenced by the quality of their results. If people in social science devised good experiments, which they sometimes do, then they would find reproducible results. Please stop trying to argue about something about which you know nothing.
Also, p-hacking lmao.

>Some of them, most famously Bill Nye, aren't even actual scientists.

richard dorkins is somewhat similar. even though he is an actual scientist, academically, if you look into his own publication records its not very impressive at all and he's obv's butthurt about that = tantrum

Bretty good

I for one like it when women get on their knees.

If your argument revolves around poor methodology in publications yet you do not show an example of such a publication I'm pretty sure you're the one that's full of shit
Reproducible results would imply equivalent samples and conditions which is hard enough to get in hard sciences, and also the reason you take a COMPREHENSIVE approach rather than a purely empirical/logical one in social sciences
Don't try to school people if you're too thick to make your own damn homework

I’m on mobile and can’t recall what university did it, but that’s literally jow the study was done. Hey claimed that America colleges had 1/4 women getting raped. Turned out that they would ask if someone ever made an unwanted advance (meaning kissing, touching, ANYTHING) and then called that rape. Hell, my college did a similar survey. It had like 50 questions about fingering and how many times you’d had stuff in your ass. Was weird as shit, but it was very clearly designed to give results of mass sexual assault.

All of these studies are bullshit and always draw conclusions that are barely even related to their results.

>that grip
>giant rock on her finger
>wearing lipstick in a tech lab

There is objectively nothing wrong with soldering like that. Soldering is a man’s craft. if you can’t smile through the searing 3rd degree burns on your hand then you really need to cut down on your soy intake.

>>that grip

just noticed that and kek

We'd be at least 10 years more advanced if the Axis won the war.

They are lefty because funding.
That is the entire reason, funding.
If they don't follow the cult, they don't get their gibs from Shlomo.
Any individual thought gets them blacklisted by Shlomo, Shlomos BIG PHARMA corps and by other scientists who want to stay in Shlomos good books.

>Arguing with toothpaste
Lol

keep swallowing faggot.

Ever use a polymer in your life? Chemistry is pretty useful in the refining and oil industry. Which pretty much powers the country. Both physics and chemistry go hand in hand. Which is why I pursued materials science.

Soros runs a couple bio labs in india

>don't praise hitler goy, remember the 6 gorillion
>hitler was anti-science goy, race isn't real goy and he said god's chosen were subhumans (how could he say that about most intelligent race, btw race isn't real)
>hitler wasn't redpilled goy, his ideology was called socialism

>Chemistry is a top tier degree with a metric fuckload of applicable careers.

so is mechanical engineering, unless you live in Bavaria or 1920s Detroit ALL JOBS FOR IT ARE IN CHINA

I know so many unemployed or shitty employed mech engeen its rediculous.

TRANSHUMANIST SCIENCE WORSHIPPERS BTFO

This is true, they are based on biased questionnaires that are made by some midwestern women studies departments which where written to prove a rape epidemic.