So does this mean rich people will get more benefits?

So does this mean rich people will get more benefits?

Yes. But so will most other individuals, and most companies and businesses

it means that OP is a massive faggot for eating CNN lies

No. Learn basic arithmetic. Rich people still have the option of getting more benefits by buying lawmakers, same as always though.

Hopefully, they pay more so that would make sense.

Ok dude, let me get this through your head:

You are a bussiness owner, hiring thousands of employees and making 100 000$ per month.
Suddenly everyone in the bussiness receives a tax cut. What do you do?
YOU LOWER PRICES/PAY HIGHER WAGES.
Also taxation is theft.

Essentially it sets the stage for the GOP to cut Social security and medicare because of the "budget deficit".
Old ass Republicans that rely on those programs will get fucked in the ass with no lube. I've never been happier my grandparents are long gone.
Enjoy living with Nana and Gamgam!

>Suddenly everyone in the bussiness receives a tax cut. What do you do?
>YOU LOWER PRICES/PAY HIGHER WAGES.
Do Republicucks actually believe this? The prime directive of a business is to make money, which means keeping wages the same while distributing the tax cuts to share holders. If you know your customer base has more money, then you raise the prices to meet the new demand.

Literally none of that money is going back to its employees and you're a filthy cucklord for believing so.

You're a fucking idiot if you don't know that the main force of the free market is competition.
Why aren't we paying 100$ per toilet paper?
What are prices? How are prices formed?

> Gets rewarded with table scraps
> Boss laughs all the way to the bank with brand new 911 Turbo S
> Act grateful for this

Found the massive cuck who takes it up the ass. Daily reminder that unions pay up to $20/h more around here. Employers don’t even dare to complain. That’s $40k a year in your pockets. Meanwhile you’re impressed by $1,500 a year. Keep eating the Fox News bullshit and stay a brainlet.

>America
>free market and competition
nice meme.

you don't even live in my country so nothing you say has any merit. Republican tax cuts have never, EVER jumpstarted the economy the way that they say they will. Reagan raised taxes more than 10 times after his initial break because they were such a failure.

Keep sucking that corporate dick for your table scraps, cucklord.

i would raise prices and cut wages because it would make my next quarter earnings look REALLY good.

>Leftists
>No argument
Why am I not suprised?
Also the socialist left pushes against the free market, not the capitalist right.

If your employees heard you cut their wages after a tax cut they'd be vividly mad. Also raising prices in such a competetive market as the western civilization is not a good idea.

no senpai , i get the benefits

>they'd be vividly mad

who cares? they're the ones that have to look for a new job if they quit.

>If your employees heard you cut their wages after a tax cut they'd be vividly mad.

and what would they do? nothing! if they don't like it they can go find another job. besides, i could get the accountants to draw up some bullshit about how we can't afford christmas bonuses this because of reasons. no goystation 6 for the kiddies this year.

>competetive market as the western civilization

LOL

The middle class will see a menial benefit, which they will use to pay for basic necessessities, and maybe a little more. The wealthy will see a greater increase, which they will use to influence politicians and elections. Actually, the rich will not even notice the extra money, because theyre already rich.

Much of it is reshuffling deductions and benefits.

Some are taken away, some are doubled and some new ones added.

One of the big visual changes is the repatriation of funds at half the former tax rate which puts us much more in line with the rest of the world.

Hence, companies both domestic and foreign could opt to park their money here.

That is unless Democrats get a elected to all three branches with a super majority again.

If the tax code looks set in stone it's likely a lot of potential investment is going to pour into the country.

This is exactly my fucking argument, you'd loose employees and wouldn't immedietly hire new ones... Jesus how economically illiterate.

Lots of truth here too.

Middle class spending (and available credit) is also the biggest driver of the economy.

companies don't like parking their money in the usa for reasons that have nothing at all to do with taxes.

you're illiterate in reality. there is a shortage of JOBS not PEOPLE. if i fired a thousand people i'd have ten times that many looking for one of those spots.

not all businesses are public companies with fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders...

They're losing part of their mortgage deductions, they're losing part of their state and local tax deductions. Both of those hit them pretty hard, and they're complaining about it loudly on other web sites, but you won't see that in the media or on Sup Forums.

the great Keynesian claim. Your theory is not yet proven.

Not related, but also: what if i would rather we have a slower growing economy that is built on manufacturing , tech development instead of consumer consumption?

if you think there is a shortage of jobs, remember we could hire a lot more people to dig trenches is we used plastic forks instead of shovels to dig...

It means the federal government will have to slash gibsmedat programs and spending and operate within a budget

>we could hire a lot more people to dig trenches is we used plastic forks instead of shovels to dig...

we should do that. stop abusing the ellipses.

a better edit would be to keep ellipse and cut to dig, but go fork yourself in any case.