NASA teams include whites, Jews, Asians, blacks, Indians, Hispanic, etc

>NASA teams include whites, Jews, Asians, blacks, Indians, Hispanic, etc.
>NASA continues to venture further into space and is prepping to land on Mars, then reach Alpha Centauri

This entire board's views regarding race and the state of the United States is irrelevant. Enjoy being on the wrong side of history.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Launch_System#Funding_history_and_planning
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA#Recent_and_planned_activities
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Launch_System#Program_costs_and_funding
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares_V
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_program#Budget
youtube.com/watch?v=2sznGuUZgS4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

fpbp

Russian team is slavs and more slavs and they can actually get to space. Tbf getting a Russian in space is a lot easier than getting an American there.

It goes much deeper than that, you ignoramus. The existence and success of NASA's space programs confirms and validates the existence and success of Western democracy and its economic developments over the last ~50 years. Nothing you can say changes that fact.

>and is prepping to land on Mars
No they are not. They have been talking about doing something bigger and better ever since they went to the Moon in a german rocket, and they never did.
In 2023 it will be half a century since the last Saturn V launch, and NASA will still be talking about some project that is the next hot thing.
First it was the space shuttle. It was in every way worse then the Saturn V and costs went up. It got more expensive to go to space, not less.
Every rocket that has been designed and built ever since the Saturn V has had higher costs to go into space, not less. Every single one. Think about it. In 2023 it will be 50 years ago since the last Saturn V launch, and the conclusion is, it would have been cheaper if NASA had never tried to develop new rockets, but had just keept using Saturn V. Think about it.

Spew more bullshit, Satan.

threadly reminder black women literally built nasa

I feel like you don't understand the definition of bullshit.

Looks like niggers are seriously underrepresented.

Don't improve rocket technology despite 60 years of advancements in tech. Sounds reasonable.

Your conjecture is complete bullshit and is missing the point entirely.

You don't present any arguments, only ad hominems. You suck, hope your mom dies tonight.

Just because a few niggersows did some math with a calculator does not mean they built nasa, Le'monjello Al-Detroiti

...

>Reach Alpha Centauri
Lol sure. They can barely get to the edge of the inner solar system and it takes us a decade to do so (0.0006 light years), but somehow Nasa is "prepping" to launch something to a star 4.36 light years away.
Unless they've got a warp drive stored under naphtalene somewhere that's just not gonna happen and implying it is shows how ignorant you are.

Also, NASA has done some pretty amazing things back in the day but nowadays they're struggling to send out simple probes, due to perpetual lack of funding, and yet their rockets keep getting MORE expensive per unit mass to LEO, not less.
Elon Musk with his cheap rockets has done more for NASA than they have done themselves in the last 3 decades.

People still believe NASA is a legit organization and that space is real??

>You don't present any arguments
I really don't need to considering how retarded his post was. It refutes itself.

>No they are not. They have been talking about doing something bigger and better ever since they went to the Moon in a german rocket, and they never did.
Clearly does not pay attention to the news, ever.

>In 2023 it will be half a century since the last Saturn V launch, and NASA will still be talking about some project that is the next hot thing.
Again, ignoring the news, ignoring other shuttle launches, ignoring their change in plans and approach in reaching deep space targets, ignoring that they continue to do work in space yearly.

>First it was the space shuttle. It was in every way worse then the Saturn V and costs went up. It got more expensive to go to space, not less. Every rocket that has been designed and built ever since the Saturn V has had higher costs to go into space, not less.
This happens in all tech industries, tech advances and becomes more expensive. It also isn't a refutation of the simple fact that the NASA space program continues to be one of the, if not the, leading space program in the world, and it exists in the modern democratic West, not in any other economical political environment.

NASA hasn't put a man in space in almost a decade. When it was white and (((white))) men exclusively they put men on the moon and were budget cuts away from Mars.

I know this is bait but the death of NASA triggers me something awful. Niggers and women should be exterminated.

Do the blacks clean the desks or are they just mascots?

...

>NASA hasn't put a man in space in almost a decade.
Orbital layer doesn't count as space? And why do you think there hasn't been a recent far-reaching human launch and just drones? Because it would be unnecessary for research at this time, which is the primary goal.

id be scared as fuck to be in a rocket guided buy a bunch of femminist and niggers

>NASA
part of their job is sabotaging Soyuz launches, so that Elon Munter can shoot off his little rockets

>two black people in the whole picture

I wonder how they got those jobs.

>Clearly does not pay attention to the news, ever.
Sending some shitty probe to Mars is not impressive.
>Again, ignoring the news, ignoring other shuttle launches, ignoring their change in plans and approach in reaching deep space targets, ignoring that they continue to do work in space yearly.
Then provide a link. Their latest gimmick, the SLS, Space Launch System, is just a worse version of the Saturn V. Think about it, they used billions of dollars developing a worse version then the blueprint germans already gave them.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Launch_System#Funding_history_and_planning
Billions of dollars, almost half a century, and they still can't come up with anything better then the Saturn V. Well, it makes sense once you realise this is actual rocket science...

>picking the best out of every racial group
>disproving race realism
kek
fuck, like
>this plantation makes very good apples and >the average apples are very good
>there are others plantations with less good average apples,
>this is disproven by picking the best from all plantations so averages don't matter

Hi kraut

i fucking love the V3 even with those wrong colors on it

When will nasa send people to Mars?

>that one lone nigger

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA#Recent_and_planned_activities
"On December 4, 2006, NASA announced it was planning a permanent moon base.[126] The goal was to start building the moon base by 2020, and by 2024, have a fully functional base that would allow for crew rotations and in-situ resource utilization. However, in 2009, the Augustine Committee found the program to be on an "unsustainable trajectory." In 2010, President Barack Obama halted existing plans, including the Moon base, and directed a generic focus on manned missions to asteroids and Mars, as well as extending support for the International Space Station"

"In September 2011, NASA announced the start of the Space Launch System program to develop a human-rated heavy lift vehicle."
>to develop a human-rated heavy lift vehicle.
Think about it. Billions of dollars. Millions of manhours. Thousands of men. All over the place, and the US has nothing! You can't even go there!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Launch_System#Program_costs_and_funding
"NASA SLS deputy project manager Jody Singer at Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama stated in September 2012 that $500 million per launch is a reasonable target cost for SLS, with a relatively minor dependence of costs on launch capability.[4] By comparison, a Saturn V launch cost US$185 to US$189 million in 1969-1971 dollars or roughly $1.23 billion in 2016 dollars adjusted for inflation.[95][96]

On July 24, 2014, Government Accountability Office audit predicted that SLS will not launch by the end of 2017 as originally planned since NASA is not receiving sufficient funding"
Now the first launch is december 15th in 2019, and that is unmanned. And it will not be cheaper then the Saturn V. Because you can't pay your way out of it. You can't simply hire the highest iq people around the world. You can't just throw money and brainpower at all problems. And the dear "SLS deputy project manager Jody Singer at Marshall Space Flight Center" has absolutely no clue on how to build a better rocket then the Saturn V. No clue at all.

And before the Space Launch System(SLS) it was the Ares V....
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares_V
The Ares V (formerly known as the Cargo Launch Vehicle or CaLV) was the planned cargo launch component of the NASA Constellation program, which was to have replaced the Space Shuttle after its retirement in 2011. Ares V was also planned to carry supplies for a human presence on Mars. Ares V and the smaller Ares I were named after Ares, the Greek god of war.

>The Ares V was to launch the Earth >Departure Stage and Altair lunar lander for >NASA's return to the Moon, which was >planned for 2019. It would also have served as the principal launcher for missions beyond the Earth-Moon system, including the program's ultimate goal, a manned mission to Mars. The unmanned Ares V would complement the smaller, and human-rated Ares I rocket for the launching of the 4–6 person Orion spacecraft. Both rockets, deemed safer than the then-current Space Shuttle, would have employed technologies developed for the Apollo program, the Shuttle program, and the Delta IV EELV program.[5] However, the Constellation program, including Ares V and Ares I was canceled in October 2010 by the NASA Authorization Act of 2010. >In September 2011, NASA detailed the Space >Launch System as its new vehicle for human >exploration beyond Earth's orbit
Really contemplate this. Ever since 1973, when the last Saturn V was launched, NASA has been trying to make it cheaper to get to space. They have been trying to build bigger rockets. And they can't. They simply don't know how. The Ares V was even supposed to be unmanned(they never even build the damn thing), and it's just a worse version of the Saturn V. It's not that NASA does not want to go to the Moon again, they do. They just can't build better rockets then the Saturn V, and for some reason, after almost half a century of failure, they can't admit it and just build the Saturn V again.

Janitor?

NASA uses government subsidies to undercut any attempt to form private space carriers.

They're a fat, bloated, inefficient government scam full of almost as many parasites as the tech industry.

African Americans, Hispanics and Indian Americans are for more based than Yurocuck cumskins.
Seriously, fuck Yuropoors

Really, at the crux of things is that we need the science to be able to get around the need for chemical rockets. No idea what the fuck we're going to do about that, but it is 100% necessary.

>T. Another faggot Christian boomer

Sides of history meme hahahahahahahaha oh my sides are history!!!!

When the americans were competing with the USSR in the space race, US wanted to make their own rockets with their own scientists, but their rockets were not good enough. They only reluctantly turned to the german team to win. Well ameri-mutts, do you want to win?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V
The Saturn V was launched 13 times from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida with no loss of crew or payload. As of 2017, the Saturn V remains the tallest, heaviest, and most powerful (highest total impulse) rocket ever brought to operational status, and holds records for the heaviest payload launched and largest payload capacity to low Earth orbit (LEO) of 140,000 kg (310,000 lb), which included the third stage and unburned propellant needed to send the Apollo Command/Service Module and Lunar Module to the Moon
>To date, the Saturn V remains the only launch vehicle to launch missions to carry humans beyond low Earth orbit.
Or just keep throwing billions of dollars away on projects that for the past 44 years has amounted to nothing? Where is the outcry from all the pussyhats wearing lovers of space?
At the crux, as it stands right now, is that immediately stopping all projects and switching over to Saturn V as the only rocket NASA should build, will save money in the long run. It's not only the tallest, biggest and most powerfull rocket, it is also the cheapest as long as you carry full load every time. Satellites are here to stay, whether you develop better rockets or not.

Is that why Nasa can no longer go to space and has to ask racist Russia for help?

Everyone on this board openly acknowledges that Asian, Jew and Poo IQ is higher than whites. The spics working in NASA are undoubtedly 80 or more per cent European by the content of their genes. Janitors and mess hall workers do not count as mission-essential NASA staff. Hell most spics consider themselves white Europeans, they trip over each other to claim whiteness or show off their whitest phenotype over there. Spic identity in the USA is an invention by Cultural Marxists and Liberal Democrats. The majority of their workers are most definitely white. Add on white Hispanics and you’ve got an even larger percentage of whiteness. Asians and Poos give you the high IQ Asiatics and the token niggers are there because they’re exceptional or diversity hires.

You’re also ignoring the fact that the groundwork for all of NASA’s advances were laid out by German scientists scooped up after the fall of The Reich. Ever heard of Werner von Braun?

You’re the ignorant one here, Schlomo. And before you call me a racist, do know that I’m Asian.

Except none of that shit will happen

There's nothing worse than a nazi cuck who sincerely believe in Sup Forums tier memes.

...

Even as the Apollo missions were happening, the American public had become bored of NASA and space, and started demanding that tax dollars stop going towards space travel and technological development.

The loss of ability comes down to a lack of upkeep and overall societal decay.

Give me 10 billion dollars, a year, and the freedom to break pretty much every international law and I could get us back to the Moon.

These sheeple are pathetic. They will debate this sci-fi bullshit all day long too. It's niggerball for nerds.

Most of nasa advance technology was stolen from the Nazis during operation paperclip

The NASA female astronauts are all fucking masculine trannies and their "space missions" are cuckholdry cooked up in a low-budget hollywood basement.

Who believes in this retardation anymore?

Anyone who tries to get in the way of humanity ascending to colonize the stars deserves to be put in a cage. For they are not just a traitor to their species, but rather they are part of a more primitive subspecies.

this is also probably the reason why they haven't done fucking jackshit since the 70ies
/thread

I want to have sex with those muscle girls.

Why do you save videos of dudes flexing on your computer?

>Even as the Apollo missions were happening, the American public had become bored of NASA and space, and started demanding that tax dollars stop going towards space travel and technological development.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_program#Budget
>Early during development of the space shuttle, NASA had estimated that the program would cost $7.45 billion ($43 billion in 2011 dollars, adjusting for inflation) in development/non-recurring costs, and $9.3M ($54M in 2011 dollars) per flight.

>The total cost of the actual 30-year service life of the shuttle program through 2011, adjusted for inflation, was $196 billion

>Per-launch costs can be measured by dividing the total cost over the life of the program (including buildings, facilities, training, salaries, etc.) by the number of launches. With 135 missions, and the total cost of US$192 billion (in 2010 dollars), this gives approximately $1.5 billion per launch over the life of the shuttle program.[24] A 2017 study found that carrying one kilogram of cargo to the ISS on the shuttle cost $272,000 in 2017 dollars, twice the cost of Cygnus and three times that of Dragon

The US spent, after the public "started demanding that tax dollars stop going towards space travel and technological development.", 196 billion dollars to make it more expensive to get to space. Really think about it. The money and manpower spent on making it more expensive to get to space. And they keep doing it. The Space Shuttle was just the first, also the Delta rockets, the Ares rockets and now the SLS rockets. Taxpayers money being wasted, instead of just building the Saturn V. It might get close to a trillion dollars if you add it all up.

And yet, you cannot even into orbit. $10 bn is what Israel gets for "aid" in 4 years from you btw

Is that why Israel's IQ is 94 and India's 82?

No.

That shit is expensive considering the infrastructure you have to build, the "private sector" doesnt want to go into space unless its heavily subsidized because its-not-protiable, got it? we are talking about sinking cash in something that will go out of the red after a decade and these days "long term" is the fucking day after.

The problem with NASA is that being a government they have to play ball with all the crazy shit that comes from Congress, Senate and the President, this is why they are forbidden to deal with China because those damn crazy communist can build a ICBM, never mind they already have then so thats one door closed and all the shit that goes with Russia affects then so co-development doesnt happen because damn Russian Hackers and stealing our erections and then you have the ESA that is a joke.

Here.

Because I'm a raging homosexual.

Something something Eisenhower. Something something military industrial complex. Something something price-gouging treasonous chrony-capitalist bastards.

this is what traitors to their species look like

...

>Is that why Israel's IQ is 94 and India's 82?
>Ashkenzim are not Jews.

>>NASA continues to venture further into space and is prepping to land on Mars, then reach Alpha Centauri
Reality check: last moon landing was in 1972 by Russians

NASA has been in major decline since political correctness

Notice there's white men too, better prepare the gulags just in case one of them decides to wear the wrong shirt to work.

>pinky snags his pocket
>conspiracy
6/10 bait

> prepping to land on Mars
this is the problem
they could already have done so if they didnt spend so much time virtue signaling

based norwayanon is based

What is this supposed to be? Because the two in front are chromakeyed in front of the rest of the shot.

>And why do you think there hasn't been a recent far-reaching human launch and just drones?
Because we lost our soul and we're spending all our money on GIBS ME DAT

...

And yet Amerimutt astronauts are traveling on Russian rockets.
So where's that 60 years of advancements in tech faggot?

The Space Shuttle could carry 23 tons into low earth orbit. Each launch cost 1,5 billion dollar.

The Saturn V could carry 150 tons into low earth orbit. Adjusted for inflation, each launch cost 1,3 billion dollars.
Think about it. The next time you see a rocket launch, think about how they did it bigger and cheaper 44 years ago.

>40% Arab population.
>25% Arab population
>still beats white countries with none.
Ffs Hans

>they're still mostly white and Asian

Asians and Indians are quite competent. Hispanics and niggers on the other hand should be gassed.

For the US, especially the US government, this place is surprisingly White. 5 non Whites I count.

All they ever do nowadays is launch probes into space. No wonder we can't get back to the moon we have a bunch of shitskins in NASA

They have suspension cables.
They are not in space.
Why would they lie?

Are they too cheap to send people to space and record it? Or maybe we've never even been to space and that is all bullshit to cover up the truth?
Is earth really a big ball floating on space? Is it flat? Is it hollow?
Are aliens real?

Hispanic isn't a race faggot

Why should pure spaniards be blamed for mexican mestizo crimes?

You're a nigger jew

>Poo in loos are better than Spaniards

what

I wish these two would subjugate and rape me to death.

Do you know that Nasa got to the moon because of nazi scientists?

>be Peter Hyatt
>FBI analyst from Quantico
>believe the moon landing was real
>get paid to analyze one of Neil Armstrong's interviews
>come to the conclusion that he's lying
>become more open minded

youtube.com/watch?v=2sznGuUZgS4

niggerball i like this one. better than spinning ball. have some art in exchange.

>Say the astronauts are lying
>Say the government is lying
>Millions of dollars changed hands arguing the Earth is flat and space isn't real
Put your retarded convictions where your mouth is and fucking prove it. Start a space program. Get your own satellite. Prove it. Prove it. Shut the fuck up and prove it.

The b-52 bomber was introduced in 1955 and is planned to remain in service to 2045. 90 years service for a military bomber. But for some reason americans spent 5% of the yearly budget winning the space race and developing the biggest, baddest and meanest rocket ever, only to give it a service time of 6 years and then switch over to something worse and more expensive.

>poo iq is high

hav you ever been to india you fookin idjit

the only reasons you think they be so smart is because all their expats that go to the states are the smart ones

think about it, only the smartest chinks and indjuns can get into amerika, and thats why yall niggers think they all be so smart, when really most chinks and shitskins are just stupid fucks

Look how it sways back and forth when it gets suspended by the wire.

Here's the NASA that actually accomplished things on a timely basis.

...

...

...

...

Okay. So prove it. Raid the building. Find the evidence. If you're able to pick this shit out it's not like it's a high budget production. Prove it.

Prove your claims. You're nitpicking things. Prove it.

nope. it's fresh new project starting up. always exciting. i wonder what's their endgame. probably lambos on the moon.

>prepping to land on Mars, then reach Alpha Centauri
>implaying that is good thing
Enjoying you tax money turn into nothing

You dumb shit. The Saturn V was specifically designed to send a payload to the moon. You need MASSIVE power to do it. It's a one-time shot each time, nothing reusable.

The Shuttle otoh is designed to carry payloads to LEO only, or retrieve them, and be reused. It's more expensive because it needs a unique impulse requiring a very expensive solid fuel system utilizing ammonium perchlorate, aluminum, and various polymers as fuel.

You anti-NASA faggots know nothing about either the shuttle or the Saturn V. You can't even figure out the laws of motion FFS.

Exactly one nigger, two indians and the rest is made of whites and high IQ Jews and Asians.

We are proven so wrong.

Airbubbles in the vacuum of space.

>Hey, you, did you know that 3 people did the job they were paid to do?
Yes, and?
>They were blacks!

Listen up faggot. They spend BILLIONS a year in propaganda. We do this shit for free. You think it's easy to find holes in their stuff? It's not, but we still do it. Open up your mind and stop being a plugged up little shit, user. Not even trolling, just read between the lines and let go of your reality... THIS is a major redpill. Why would they want to deny the fact God built this world, why would they have killed Jesus and DENY that Jesus was ever here on Earth. What do they get out of that.
Good luck and God bless

>Enjoy being on the wrong side of history.
That's literally Sup Forums's slogan

>We are proven so wrong.
Considering you've dedicated your life to generalizing about broad groups of people, yes, yes you are.

>Why would they want to deny the fact God built this world
What makes you think God built this world? What empirical evidence do you have?