Why not look for an Asexual woman if you want a Virgin?

Many virgins aren't actually found in Churches but in the asexual scene. The key is to look for a greysexual or demisexual. It means they are against the hookup culture. An asexual virgin is a bonus.

Other urls found in this thread:

whale.to/b/sigmund_freud.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Asexuality is the biggest shit test. These are the women that will enjoy rape the most

>greysexual
fuck this gay earth

There's a significant number of women who don't enjoy sex in and of itself, but they use it as a currency. Asexual women just realize they can get their beta provider without needing to do the deed at all.

Those city folk & college townies are fucking weird.

They wouldn't invest so much time in making "asexualism" a lifestyle if it was a shit-test. I bet you think feminism is a shit-test too. Fucking imbecile.

Shit-tests:
1. Feminism
2. Lesbianism
3. Bisexuality (especially this)
4. Women's suffrage
5. Pretty much everything else
They basically just want to goad us into going full Sabine Women on them. Only then will they be satisfied. Not that that matters.

Or just raise a virgin in a artificial uterus, like any sane person would. Imagine you get to influence your future wife from the day she's born.

Fine by me. As long as I can fuck her feet, I'm good to go.

Looking for sex among asexuals is pretty devilish, and I think it might work, I suspect a lot of these people are actually sex maniacs.

Asexual is just something woman claim so they can keep their beta bucks around wile fucking chad on the side without raising suspicion.

This shit is fucking STUPID. Feminist policy after feminist policy has been made since the Seneca Falls convention, imprisoning men and destroying families, and here you are saying it's a "shit test." Absolutely outrageous and preposterous. How much longer can you push the narrative that feminism is a shit test? When they start rounding men up in concentration camps? "They secretly want us to break out and rape them dude lol." Maybe when they reduce the male population to 1/10th of what it is now? "They're just filtering out the betas man just wait xD" So dumb. Honestly. Get your head out of your ass.

Do most women even enjoy sex? Seems like most of them just do it to feel like they're part of something but could care less either way

>Maybe when they reduce the male population to 1/10th of what it is now? "They're just filtering out the betas man just wait xD"
Truly wonderful user, also checked

>Do most women even enjoy sex? Seems like most of them just do it to feel like they're part of something but could care less either way.
Whiteboi detected

I truly don't understand people with your mindset. Were you just rusing me?

Yes, I thought you might be a woman, sorry

Women are a defective design. A majority of women do not have their clitoris stimulated during vaginal sex. Some do, THOSE are the ones that like sex a lot.

This is all because a women's pleasure was never essential to reproduction during evolution. The clitoris is the equivalent to male nipples. It's only there to develop into the penis, if the person has a y chromosome.

If you don't believe me, go to a porn site and search for women with enlarged clitoris. Looks just like a penis with foreskin and glans.

Yup.
And it's a BYOB party
Bring your own (paper or plastic) bag

>Women are a defective design.
Cenk, we told you to stop posting here

See I wondered about this, but they honestly don't seem to be fucking. Asexuals are usually in the 7 range, entirely pleasant to look at, but they tend to lust for male 9's. When they realise they might have to lower their expectations they just drop out. Kinda strange but whatever, it's their business.

Why is she holding a sign bearing a statement that is plainly untrue, while pulling a face like a spastic and doing devil horns? I'll never understand city people.

>Why not look for an Asexual woman if you want a Virgin?

Because they won't want to fuck ever?

>The key is to look for a greysexual or demisexual.

Right, because guys who frequent this board would get along so well with a girl whose sexual identity is a fad and falls under the LGBTQ umbrella.

This senpai.

The essence of traditional societal roles is not self denial but delayed gratification.

Nothing about humanity, not the desire to fight, to have sex, to rest and to be active, nor to eat or drink alcohol is wrong. There is even a time and place for sadistic cruelty.

You have to integrate your shadow as the Jungians say. I prefer to just say everything in moderation.

>tfw cucked by asexual gf

> There is even a time and place for sadistic cruelty
Can I come?

I keep meaning to read Jung, I think it might help with the anomie. What do you suggest to start? The Archtypes and the Collective Unconscious?

The main reason men have big dicks is that women have selected for them. Part of the reason our dicks are so large is because women have such large clitorises (and this makes the male genitals larger by proxy because we share a genotype). If women weren't sexual, we wouldn't be a species that has sex for procreation.

Women having difficulty orgasming through regular PIV sex doesn't disprove this. In a time where all men are beta soyboys with cut dicks (circumcised men give women FAR less pleasure than uncircumcised men), and where women are constantly taking hormones that disrupt their endocrine system, it's not unimaginable to think we've disrupted the natural sexual balance that would normally allow for women to achieve orgasm.

And even if they can't cum, that isn't the sole joy in sex. Especially for women. Women can see more colors, smell more fragrances and hear a broader range of sounds. They have better tactile senses than men. They also feel a broader range of emotions (owing to their nature as baby caretakers and social beings). Sex is probably richer for women in many ways than it is for men.

>call the beta a beta and you will be surprised at how he recoils "I've been found out!"

Jung and Freud are soc-jew nonsense. Don't even bother with either.

whale.to/b/sigmund_freud.html

Their philosophy presented as psychology was designed solely to jew goys out of money and to overthrow Christianity.

>The main reason men have big dicks is that women have selected for them.

That doesn't make sense. Most women decide to have sex with a dude before they see his dick.

Our pre-human ancestors probably didn't wear loincloths.

Jung wasn't Jewish you fucking brainlet, and his ideas are radically opposed to Freud's in almost every respect

>Freud took great pains to ensure that a gentile, Jung, would be the head of his psychoanalytic movement—a move that infuriated his Jewish colleagues in Vienna, but one that was clearly intended to deemphasize the very large overrepresentation of Jews in the movement
Read the Culture of Critique by Kevin McDonald you stupid little snot. I never said he was.

Numbers confirm, an excellent point. Society would be very different if we all walked around with our dicks out.

Jung split from Freud, although I agree the Jews would've been keen to promote a shabbas goy, the number of Jews in psychoanalysis was embarassing. You can't say all Jung's work is Jewish science, and I don't think McDonald does either.

>Jung split from Freud
To conjure up more abstract etiology to explain neuroses. Think about this shit critically and you'll see that Freudian psycho-analytics (which Jung was a part of) is just abstract art applied to psychology. It's a fucking Jackson Pollock painting!

It's designed to have a thin veneer of complexity that dupes morons into thinking there's something below the surface. Brainlets hear about something like the Oedipus complex and they go "Oh, that sounds interesting! It's really complicated sounding, so the guy who thought of it must be smart!" In reality it's just abstract nonsense with zero basis in neither empirical science nor common sense.

OK, I need to go away and read some Jung. The Freud I've read I thought was very impressive, but in the way that a novel can be impressive. It's literature pretending to be science. Creating and presenting a model of how humans are is meant to be what artists do, not scientists. Unfortunately some people decided it was like gravity, and it gradually wheedled its way into our culture.

>gravity
Don't even get me started on (((Einstein))) ;^)

Asexuals make good friends and that’s it. They aren’t interested in sex so why would you marry one? By definition they are sexually dysfunctional.

Are their genitals dysfunctional though? Sexual arousal and stimulation comes from what's basically part of the spine. Isn't asexual just a lack of attraction?

The most common cause of erectile dysfunction is low testosterone. I assume for sexually disinterested women, the problem finding sexual attraction is rooted in hormonal deficiency as well.

I did't think hormone deficient people are considered asexual.

Asexuals are just people who lack sexual interest. Lack of sexual interest is very often caused by an inadequacy in sex hormones.

>You want a virgin to marry?
>Here how about this girl that has zero sex drive, perfect no?
Every thread today has been retarded.
Every one. OP you should kill yourself immediately.

You idiots say that philosophy is presented as psychology as though that is a grave insult because somehow philosophy is not a form of genuine inquiry.

Philosophy is the study of such things as epistemology and ontology and has as much validity as psychology does. I think you guys get confused because of ancient philosophy back when all qvedemics were called philosopers.

What's worse is that you are obviously wrong. Freud does not make any statements that fall outside of psychological study. If you think he has not been genuine or if you question his methodology than say what you mean.

>Philosophy is the study of such things as epistemology and ontology and has as much validity as psychology does
Philosophy has MORE validity than psychology thanks to frauds like Freud. Since its inception, Freudian psycho-analytics has defied the scientific method in favour of pseudo-intellectual navel-gazing.

If you think the etiology behind the notion of the "death drive" is scientifically valid then you're just an idiot. Zero research was put into this hypothesis and it was accepted a-priori by jewish intellectuals.

We think they just haven't met the right man

>Every thread today has been retarded.
>Every one.
You have a point user, I'm going to give it until New Year and then fuck this, quality has collapsed even in the last month, let alone the last year, two years etc

Most psychology is not science, and does not have repeatable results. I agree that some is, but not Freud and the other Jew stuff. It might be true (although I don't think so), but it isn't science. The problem is that science has attained such a stature in our society that everything has to pretend to be a science, even things which plainly aren't, like economics. Here's a good joke: "Political Science"