Tell me an argument that you find hard to counter.
We'll try to help.
Tell me an argument that you find hard to counter
Other urls found in this thread:
linkedin.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
"OP is a faggot." How do I respond to this?
I want all races to have a homeland, why can't whites?
>so u want to forcefully prevent people from mixing?
>homosexuality is natural, therefore you're a hypocrite if you are against it
seems like there is an obvious counter but I always stumble
That women should vote. I know in my heart it's wrong for the government to try to divide a family and bribe a wife with free money to become a whore.
Naturalistic fallacy.
>x is natural therefore x is ok
>cannibalism/rape/incest is natural therefore cannibalism/rape/incest is ok
We all should give our guns away.
Your opponent has the burden of proof that voting is good. Attack any and all suffrage.
humans are not animals and therefore they are expected to know better than to murder eachother or stick dicks up their asses.
>"Intelligent black men should be killed if caught dating intelligent x race woman that is not black"
how to refute this
that's a good one. thanks user
What do you mean there's no more gravy?!
this
not even all men should vote
>prevent people from mixing
if you can't find a partner in a room of 100 whites you're probably a fucking racist sweetie
why not our cars?
why would an intelligent woman risk painting her child with the universally recognised Ink of Sin?
Saudi Arabia has a lot more control over the world than Israel and Taqiyya Muslims can pose as Jews.
Suicide
Saudi leadership are not ethnic Sauds.
Why does the rest of the world hate Israel if Jews have so much power?
saudis have a lot of money
but israel has ppl at the top of every bank corporation and media outlet
doesnt even come close
>a bundle of cells does not equal a human
>potential of life does not equal life
I literally cannot counter this without going full brainlet MUH BIBLE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I can’t defend my right wing views because my family keep using ‘muh NHS’ and ‘muh charity’ to shut me down.
Struggling here m80s.
Keep asking what it is that defines human life for them. If they say consciousness, ask if retards are humans.
They say hearts ask if amputees are human. Keep going.
You either have to say conceptution or nothing
Charity is good
NHS is a failure and kills the economy to keep it afloat.
Everything is relative.
Saudi owns $117 billion of U.S. debt, has large shares of twitter and facebook, controls it's controls media and is shoving millions of muslims into western countries and accepted zero refugees themselves.
How do you know they don't have operatives in the media.
Human life is defined as being a homo sapien that has been fully birthed from a womb by another human
Come on fellas, do something Socrates couldn't.
"I don't care."
How do I respond to someone who agrees that something is going on, but doesn't view it as a problem/ wants to encourage it?
If the fossilized remains of single human cell was found on Mars, what would the headlines say?
Rape is also natural, but you are against that, no?
NHS isn't charity, nothing paid for through taxes is charity. Charity by definition is voluntary, when you are forced to pay it by threat of men with guns coming to your house and putting you in jail, you are not talking about charity.
> There is something wrong with polygamy for chads
Refute it without talking about a beta-uprising, we all know that'll never happen.
"Fossilized Human Cell Found on Mars", I hope.
That's not an argument, it's a question about your views, and the correct answer is yes
There is something wrong with polygamy as a whole, regardless of who engages in it.
linkedin.com
That would get a couple of clicks.
What's the definition of the human life cycle?
>Okay all people deserve a homeland but where do people that are mixed race go? Define White as while.
Still thinking about this.
Tell them you're gonna join a gang and get shot but it's okay because they already paid for your spare blood
>cesarean and premature babies BTFO
Also nice thread idea but it would help if you'd stick around after creating it, just saying.
>no, i'm not going to fuck you
>all cultures and identities are worth preserving, peacefully. there are numerous peaceful practices that can be followed.
>rape, murder, disease, etc is natural. you see it every day in the animal kingdom. saying something is natural is not a good argument.
consenting adults. let people do what they want.
Sensationalist media isn't always correct. Though, I understand why you would certainly be entertained by such articles.
The human life cycle is birth, adolescence, adulthood, elder years
retards have consciousness though, not elevated consciousness, but still consciousness, not unlike low IQ people desu
this is a tricky one because both the notion of consciousness or conception could be seen as valid and are entirely arbitrary
the thing about conception is nobody considers the morning-after pill to be abortive, just like nobody considers jacking off to be a "waste" of potential humans; the thing about consciousness is it's difficult to stablish a line between potential of life and actual life in the development stages of a fetus
this is why most people go full brainlet mode either MUH BIBLE REEEE or MUH BODY REEEE when discussing the issue
Eternity is absolute and therefore not relative. Check mate nigger. Alternative answers for theists: God, Yahweh, Allah, ... is absolute and therefore not relative.
They have been born, have they not?
>White People Forgot To Clean The Mars Rover Have Caused Possible Extinction Of All Martian Life Yet Another Example Of Their Collective Arrogance by sally goldberg
A counter to free college, costs a lot to the taxpayer etc etc but what else
If getting your shit pushed in was natural then faggots would secrete petroleum jelly in their asshole instead of buying it at the dildo store.
We should put more funding in the space program
They were not birthed. If we create artificial wombs could we use those beings as slaves?
Kek!
(1/2)
How can a bundle of cells not be human if it has perfect human DNA and is living?
Potential life? It is living. "It can't survive outside the mother's womb" a newborn can't survive without care either. "Its a drain on the mother's resources" so are all children, can we kill them?
The argument "why should a mother be forced to maintain a life she doesn't want to" needs to be countered with the question "how did the fetus come into being?" This is because, excluding cases of rape, the mother is the one who made the decision which brought the fetus into being. Thus, she cannot reasonably blame the fetus, because the fetus did not choose to come into existence. She cannot blame the man, because she could've said no. She can't say "I didn't want to get pregnant so its not my fault" because the only way to not become pregnant is to not have sex. If consensual sex is what brought the child into being, the mother is responsible for the fetus now using her body for resources. She has no one else to blame, and thus, can she claim the right to kill a child? That would be akin to killing an invited guest for tresspassing.
That was long, but essentially, you need to explain how the mother is responsible for the life of the fetus. The fetus is not an intruder who can be expelled at a whim. If the opponent argues the contrary, ask why a mother can't toss her child out of the home and into the street at will. If the opponent asks if this line of reasoning prohibits adoption, point out that a mother would not be responsible for the life of a child if there was a way for the fetus to live outside of the womb.
Breakdown:
1) A fetus is human and living. We know it is human because it has the full and replicating DNA set of a human being. All human functions are merely products of DNA, so if they try to say, "but a fetus doesn't have x" point out that it has a full set of replicating DNA, and that is all you need to be human.
"Sorry user, i can't. I have a boyfriend."
117billions its less than 0,5%
they have no control in facebook nor twitter
the refugee crisis is more the fault of us and israel
they can have operatives jews own the media
>Saudis were given a monopoly over an oil producing region. All their oil manipulation, terrorist exports, etc are done at the behest of the various leaderships in the US. Whatever the saudis pay to US politicians and media are merely tributes.
>Israeli zionists exert influence over US politicians and media. They not only do their bidding, but are zionists themselves. The vast majority of people that want jewish dominance are christians themselves and don't need any bribes.
But they were born. And no, those "beings" were born as well.
(2/2)
2) The mother cannot claim the fetus is an intruder, because it is her actions which created the fetus and its accompanied burden. Killing it would be akin to killing an invited guest for tresspassing. Be sure to emphasize that if there was a way to remove the fetus without killing it, then that would be a possibility. Until then, the mother must accept her responsibility, she cannot blame the fetus or the man (unless she was raped).
Let me know if you've got any more questions.
Actually, the human life cycle begins at conception. Even common core acknowledges this.
...
nothing
you let posterity forget he was ever your countryman
remember 90% of people are lemmings
“Don’t worry i’ll only fuck you metaphoricaly.”
>Human life is defined as being a homo sapien that has been fully birthed from a womb by another human
You should change your definition.
This picture.
>lets solve our social and environmental problems at home before we export our toxic humanity and literal toxins to other worlds. what's the point of space exploration if we end up in the exact same situation that we're trying to escape from?
>once we solve problems at home, then there won't be a need to explore and escape.
>it has a full set of replicating DNA, and that is all you need to be human.
your liver is not A human my friend
Say encourage, not force. The same way women are encouraged to join the workforce.
>It is living. "It can't survive outside the mother's womb" a newborn can't survive without care either. "Its a drain on the mother's resources" so are all children, can we kill them?
False equivalence.
>She has no one else to blame, and thus, can she claim the right to kill a child? That would be akin to killing an invited guest for tresspassing.
False equivalence, and improper usage of "child". This so called "child" has not been born, and therefore cannot be considered "alive" to "kill" it
enforced monogamy is the product of a beta uprising so unless you're discounting the bulk of western glory it's already happened and can happen again
>he's a very lucky guy. I hope he treats you as the special person that I think you are. I'll see you around.
>all life is sacred
"abortion is homocide" I'm prochoice, but it is killing your baby.
If it was natural then life would not reproduce. Humans don’t have a monopoly on unnatural behaviour.
The morning after pill has destroyed a unique and complete set of replicating human DNA. It has killed a person.
Jacking off does waste potential humans, but they are not living. Ending a potential life isn't murder, otherwise cockblocking could be considered manslaughter, or something along those lines.
Again, the question on, "is it living?" is answered by "does it have a full set of replicating DNA?" If the answer is yes, it is living. If the answer is no, it is not.
>humans are not animals
Were you smoking crack during biology 101?
>Implying that race mixing is okay
GAS IT
I disagree. Common core is also fundamentally flawed. To cite it is also a flaw in your argument.
I haven't changed my definition. I fail to see what you're getting at?
(btw, I don't actually believe in any of this shit. just simulating)
If white people are the master race, how can they be subverted and had their culture torn apart and destroyed in less than half a century?
Ask why a murderer of a pregnant woman is charged with 2 counts (or swap with the terms from your own country)
Humans are mammals, not animals. Practice your English.
I better not cut my hair or nails then
The nation is mans creation, his ‘child’. His responsibility to nurture and direct. The household and children is what a woman is responsible for nurturing and directing. There can be involvement between men and women in these realms but man must not give birth to children and woman must not decide the fate of civilisation.
If you're proud to be an American you're a fucking sub-90 IQ moron in terms of intelligence. There is hardly anything good about this shitty nation.
Facts about America:
- Gini Coefficient (i.e. income inequality) has reached African-tier levels
- Over 20$ trillion dollars in debt
- Infrastructure is in poor and dilapidated shape and received a -D overall
- Health care system ranked 50 out of 55 nations assessed by Bloomberg
- Almost 35 nations have a longer life expectancy than America. Costa Rica has a higher life expectancy than America.
- Most Americans (52.1%) of the people in the United States live in areas with harmful levels of pollution
- Majority of cities in America are 3rd world shitholes infested with Negroes. Cities like Detroit, St. Louis, Baltimore, and New Orleans are some of the most dangerous cities in the world.
- Most Southern States are 3rd world shitholes infested with rednecks, white trash, and niggers
- America has 50 states yet most states in America are irrelevant shitty flyover backwater states
- Infant mortality rate on par with Botswana
- HIV more common in America than Somalia
- 35% of the population is obese
- General population is stupid as fuck
- Value of the dollar has decreased precipitously
America is a borderline 3rd world shithole. If you're seriously proud of being American then you should fucking kill yourself.
thats like calling insects animals
sure in the big picture they are.
but humans are levels above in the evolutionary line.
The fact that common core is retarded and they still understand is my point.
Your definition says birthed by another human. Artificial wombs do not require a human to birth the child.
Indians were first people to find North America.
All the mines and oil should belong to them, since they were first.
Idiot
lmao you're retarded
Give them their own homeland because they literally are their own race
Diseases and illness naturally exist within any given populations. When environmental conditions and social barriers that usually keep these in check change or break down, the sickness spreads unchecked beyond it's traditional confines, and the results are almost always disastrous with high mortality.
Will your nails replicate and grow into a full human being?
>A full set of replicating DNA
>Ending a potential life isn't murder
good, you're reasonable
> "does it have a full set of replicating DNA?" If the answer is yes, it is living.
I don't think you understand biology my friend, a single replicating human cell may be human (as in part of a human, like blood) but not A human; a group of replicating human cells may be human (as in part of a human, like an organ or a fetus) but not A human; you need a more sophisticated definition if you're going on the biological route
but would the murderer be charged with 2 counts of murder if he killed a 2 month pregnant woman? 2 week pregnant woman? 2 day pregnant woman?
nobody doubts a 7 month pregnant woman is carrying another life, but there's a line somewhere
>linkedin.com
That is a really poorly written article and the only point it makes is that it sucks for the older wife if the man takes a younger one.
Easily resolved by making divorce for the women easier so they can leave the marriage if they want.
>proof
Your argument... BTFO
Regression towards the mean (ie it takes many generations to raise, say, average IQ scores).
I would argue what I mean by "by another human", that would also include through ways invented by humans. While in the womb, however, it is not a child.
And a faulty source acknowledges a faulty non-fact. Not surprising.
>Amerimutt education
Kys yourself muttard
Charity is voluntary and right wing.
Nationalised healthcare should only be available to nationals. I regard the NHS the same way I do the military or police force. It should be for serious conditions only and used in the promotion of living a healthy life. Non life threatening and temporary illness should be felt with privately. Atm i think it is being run as an international health service.
Why can't it be considered alive? Life doesn't start outside the womb, even the staunchest pro-choice advocates don't got that far.
Unless you have an A priori definition of living as outside the womb, that's not an argument.
>False equivalence.
You watch a lot of Bill Mahr don't you? Care to say more than just "FaLsE eQuIvAlEnCe?"