So a bunch of soyboys were whining about net neutrality at our christmas eve party...

So a bunch of soyboys were whining about net neutrality at our christmas eve party. They told me that they are gonna make me pay to use Google and Youtube. And those evil Republicans are gonna throttle our bandwidth

I asked "Why would companies that support muffling freedom of speech on their platforms and that censor you would ever care in the first place about you"

I dont get this stuff becuase I just dont care. But I know this whole net nutriality thing is just a bunch of liberal fear mongering. How do I combat these faggots swiftly?

Other urls found in this thread:

mansionglobal.com/articles/45834-celebrities-renege-on-their-pledges-to-move-out-of-u-s-on-the-back-of-trump-win
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>So a bunch of soyboys were whining about net neutrality at our christmas eve party
this is your first problem

fuck off, meme flag

They are sadly marrying into our family. I cant do shit except annoy them with my obvious patriotic nationalism.

One of these fucks got drunk, at a family party... And this was my first impression. He drank 2 bidwisers and fell over

which one of your ugly bitch relatives is marrying a soyboy

Most people who campaign on twitter posting shit like "everyone NEEDS to call congress to not end net neutrality" just simply don't understand what net neutrality actually is. i've found that simply explaining it to them gets them to shut up about it.

>calling people soyboys at xmas
> can’t even be assed to know anything about popular topics
> whines to Sup Forums to learn shit because he’s a dumbfuck
Gee whiz user maybe you should educate your fucking self before looking down on others

Ps there’s a bunch of fucking retards that just meme things without knowing anything on pol

What is the simple way of explaining it? I have tried but my explaination gets to complex and I dont wnt to sound idiotic or clueless

The arguement that comes from the left is that net neutrality prevents ISPs from charging extra for more bandwidth. it forces them to treat everyone equally. So that's why we have this far reaching legislation that governs how the internet will work. The left elite only tells a fraction of the story to their useful idiot base. the fraction that suits their needs.

the full story is that Net neutrality is about making money. On the internet the biggest user of bandwidth is netflix. youtube and all of the other video streaming services like hulu, pornhub etc.. make up another large portion. the extreme majority of internet traffic is ton on a small handful of media sights. They use a ton of bandwidth and thanks to net neutrality don't have to pay comcast any significant amount of money. Netflix has essentially offloaded their operating cost entirely onto comcast. they are making money hand over fist now and want to keep it that way.

net neutrality was introduced in the year 2015, the internet existed just fine before 2015, better some would argue.
the fear that ISPs might abuse their power is a legitimate complaint but we don't need some far reaching law that was constructed by the heads of google and netflix behind closed doors, entirely for the benefit of google and netflix to decide the course of things. if we were going to have some blanket law like net neutrality then it should be designed by elected officals, out in the open, for the benefit of the people.
but i'd argue we don't need that either. the internet was not complete anrachy before 2015, we have the FCC and the power of lawsuits that could settle a potential case with ISPs abusing their power that can be done on a case by case basis. that is far less intrusive than some massive blanket law.

The South is an actual place, Maori nigger.

Thank you :3 if I was a girl id show you my tits

One important thing to add is that as a consequence of net neutrality, developers of various internet-related technologies(from streaming methods to simple webpage design moneys) stopped giving a shit about the amount of data they have to transfer. So you get a webpages(pages, not sites!) that are 5-6 MB big - in the past they were much, much smaller. That's not a "huge" thing but if you're on phone and you have limited data transfer, welp, divide it by those 5-6 MB's and think how many of those pages can you visit. Now think about the likes of google(youtube) streaming barely compressed video - how much transfer are they wasting by doing it?

All that load requires proper infrastructure, and NN doesn't allow the ISP's to offload the costs of it on the big datahogs, instead they have to offload it on the end users. Obviously American ISP's are a cartel which needs to be broken up but it doesn't require any additional regulation - you have those since the days of Teddy Roosevelt.

new frogger looks good

>How do I combat these faggots swiftly?

Ask them how they liked the patriot act

That’s more to do with hiring a million poos to do web dev instead of local professionals

>free market principles
>statist overreach

Regardless

it's just wall street vs silicon valley, jew/wasps vs cia jews. Verizon and comcast want to charge faggots like netflix more money because they use more bandwidth and netflix wants to keep their money. it has nothing to do with you unless you have some stake in the companies

Ask them why non-users of content providers should have to pay for their costs of content delivery?

Net neutrality is about allowing the biggest megacorps, primarily Netflix, Google/Youtube, and Facebook, to freeload their content delivery costs off ISPs and *every* ISP user, including non-Netflix subsribers. Why shouldn't hugely profitable megacorps have to pay for some of their enormous content delivery costs?

le bought the shill talking points

>local professionals
The soyboy shitlennials are even worse in that regard.

le brainwashed salt

Tell them they've being gaslit to defend the profit margins of megacorperations (Netflix, Google/Youtube, & Facebook) and ask why shouldn't those megacorps who consume the overwhelming majority of bandwidth & content delivery infrastructure needs of ISPs, pay for (some) of their content delivery infrastructure backend costs to hook into ISPs?

>I'm sick of the U.S. Government, I'm moving to California

Disfruta México, maricón. No te extrañarán.

Dont worry faggots
Russia has announced its plan to create a worldwide ...interweb 2.0
It will be fast free, no virus or spyshat

Russiaweb is best web. Fuck capitalism.

>Trump wins

>Handler not moving to Spain
>Schumer not moving to Spain
>Dunham not moving to Canada

mansionglobal.com/articles/45834-celebrities-renege-on-their-pledges-to-move-out-of-u-s-on-the-back-of-trump-win

>muh Word

Acknowledge that there are good arguments for both sides (because there are) and then ask him if the internet was a throttled wasteland pre 2015 or if virtually all tech companies like Google, Pornhub, youtube etc actually built their business during that dark era.
You can even say you agree with their worries in theory, but in practice almost all infrastructure and platforms were built before NN. And on top of that, post NN in the US the investments in infrastructure has gone down. It seems that NN is good in theory, but in practice it kills smaller ISPs and brings no growth in services.

Wait, how much alcohol is in one can and how big is the can?

Hey youuuuuu guyssssssss!

Here the bottles are 300ml and around 4% so fucking nothing

Youd get a better hit from 2 cans of matataki