Declining birthrates

Can someone explain to me why declining birthrates are even a bad thing?
>countryside dying, cities getting harder to live in due to overpopulation and migration
>harder to find jobs, new technologies killing jobs, foreign workers and job outsourcing killing local work market
>constant talks how there aren't enough resources for the growing global population
>crime rates always rising
>not enough schools
>healthcare, centralization, super cities....

>overpopulation and crowding was the no1. problem around 2000's
but...
>oy vey, we need to import niggers, declining birthrates and stuff...

overpopulation is only an issue in places like india/middle east/africa/undeveloped asia
the western(ised) world has the capacity to support a (productive and advanced) population about 5-8 times the current size without issues not including japan

Because society is a ponzi scheme, you need exponentially more people for paying for healthcare and retirement for an aging population.
A had an argument about that with a colleague a few months ago, my point was that we should let the birthrates drop and take the brunt for a few decades aiming to have a sustainable and optimal population. I would argue that 3.5 Billion to 5 Billion would be an optimal world population for comfortable living for everyone. No-one agrees, people say it will stabilize at 10 billion, but imagine how shitty it will be if it is like this right now.

>Because society is a ponzi scheme, you need exponentially more people for paying for healthcare and retirement for an aging population.
only a modern capitalist society because it's the only kind based on presumed infinite growth

PENSIONS FOR AGING POPULATION.

Taxation should be progressively reduced for additional children.

Because social policies were put in place years ago that depend on continual economic growth and a younger generation to support an ever aging population (eg. Social Security/retirement, healthcare costs, Medicare). Basically a ponzi scheme.

It would be more manageable if people were less tied to the state. However, by introducing all these costs you've essentially made your children and future generations slaves to continually increasing economic growth and population demographics. If you've decreased the birth rate, you need to have greater economic growth to make up for the added economic pressure. Otherwise, something is going to give. Eventually the bubble will have to burst or slowly weened off of it as reality sets in.

It’s too hard to get the retard shitskin races to stop reproducing. If we put out anti-population propaganda (and the kikes already do) the only people who follow it through will be the conscientious races, so I don’t see the point in us stopping having children if all the shitskins in Latin America and Africa won’t.

i would have at least 10 babies with that specimen if you know what i mean

Because welfare queens pop out 10 kids for govt welfare, meanwhile, productive people in society have less than 2 kids, we are devolving.

>Can someone explain to me why declining birthrates are even a bad thing?
It's not. Not anymore.
You wouldn't want it to go too low though. Right now it is too low. It would be OK to make up for it with some immigration. But right now there's an insane amount of immigration and it's not necessary.
Investing in our own people and automation would be *way* better than what we're doing now. But it wouldn't be as profitable to the elite.

Because beaners pop out children for entertainment at an alarming rate and expect those with declining birthrates to pay for them

The problem with declining birthrates is that every government has been running a Ponzi scheme, which depends upon a constantly expanding base of victims to be bilked. If the base contracts, the entire scheme collapses.

because its only white and asian birth rates that are declining

the two ethnic groups that arnt niggers are not having babies

middle eastern shitskins and african coons are exploding in population

this will ultimately lead to the destruction of our planet and extinction of our species unless we manage to get mars colonised or create great underground vaults free from the coonery

These are all intentional and have nothing to do with overpopulation.

Digits of truth.

They wouldn't be, if it weren't for the jews who look at anything except exploding increase as a decrease.

Jews go against nature. It's just who they are as a race.

Capitalism doesn't presume infinite growth, central banks do and they exist in plenty of socialist countries. There's nothing capitalist about quasi-governmental institutions with unlimited debt-selling rights.

That's the conclusion I've come to. Only a Ponzi scheme require more people buying in each year. If our leaders are doing everything they can to import millions of uneducated presents, we must be in a Ponzi.

Wrong, any government which engages in deficit spending is running the plan. You do realize that inflation is a tax on savers, and a benefit to debtors, right? Socialist countries run even larger debts than capitalist ones.

Because birthrates aren't declining in population of 60 IQ niggers in Nigeria. They're down for everywhere that is white and several Asian countries, even including the Chinese. Essentially everyone on the planet with a high enough IQ to make some sort of useful contribution to society is not making babies and genetic throwbacks who have taken 20,000 years to master mud huts and sharpened sticks are pumping out kids like its nothing.

>Sociey is a ponzi scheme
Thank you, I couldn't have said it any better. Bernie Madoff is your politicians.

Because
>the only countries with declining birthrates are the ones with people worth preserving
>politicians use declining birthrates to push mass immigration

Pents of truth.

wow

>society
The welfare state you mean

Low iq people are the ones having a shit ton of children.

we wouldn't have over population if the jews would leave us all alone, we would have the technology to clean up the planet and those in 3rd world nations would become civilized or die off.

Get rid of all welfare - BOOM, nigs stop having babies or their babies die from starvation, white people take over the demographics again. No need to thank me.

Amen to that. They say we need to take in immigrants so we can fix our declining population yet they simultaneously say that blue collar jobs are on the way out and we have no need for unskilled/uneducated labor. Then they drill it into (white) peoples' heads that having kids is bad even though they just said in the previous sentence that immigrants are necessary because, again, of our declining population. It's (((their))) typical tricks.

The welfare states of all western countries are predicated on an ever expanding population. They can only continue to function if breeding is above replacement levels, or immigration covers the shortfall.

Declining birth rates wouldn't be bad if we simply had basic fucking control over our borders. It would be even ideal if we could shift the fertility ratios, giving people with good genes a better chance at social stability in the developed world and providing various forms of birth control to the 3rd world.

I would argue the US government is the most corrupt in the Americas desu. We don't have anywhere near the low-level Mega City One tier corruption of Brazil. But the upper echelons damn sure make up for it.

Many reasons, but this is an important one.