What was the fucking point of getting rid of Gaddafi?

What was the fucking point of getting rid of Gaddafi?

Libya sounded like a great country with him as a leader

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=K1GK9KhooTY
ibtimes.co.uk/colonel-gaddafi-kidnapped-raped-hundreds-girls-boys-1433861
foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/06/new-hillary-emails-reveal-true-motive-for-libya-intervention/
ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-884508
emirati9.blogspot.com/p/marriage-benefits-in-uae.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

To plunder resources and flood Europe with Africans a la 'Camp of the Saints'

Libya didn't have a kike-run private central bank under Qaddafi, and he threatened to cut off the West from investment in Libya's oil/gas industry after beating back the initial "moderate rebel" overthrow attempt backed by America another other zionist occupied govts

They should create a special cheese in lybia and name it gadafi

Sounds like a cheese name
I think they got some goats over there !

Gadafi string cheese

Halal but not kosher

he was on the verge of creating a gold backed currency for all of Africa. a libyan dollar would grant you a certain amount of gold, which could be redeemed by the libyan bank.
this would have killed the US petrodollar
after the invasion, France stole all his gold.
our world will never know true peace until every kike is eliminated off the face of the earth

I'm up for this

>national socialist type who shunned jewish international banking
>country gets conquered, he dies
Seen this story before

And now you know why the deepstate must be purged. Hillary was making jokes about having gaddafi killed.

They killed him and took all of Libya's money. Why do murderers and armed robbers murder and rob?

he wanted to rival the petrodollar with his gold backed currency that he was going to create, in order to make Libya as an international threat in the market.

my allied niggas were like aY BRUH Whatu DoINg? GDP BETTER THAN NETHERLANDS? my NIGGA NooOOoo u dYING TONIGHTtt!!

and this led to the influx of african migrants to italy. google the "europe will turn black gaddafi", its an extreme black pill. hang our leaders

they also froze his assets as in they made libya untradable with anyone, as they could not sell oil to anyone, which was the main source of income of libya. Gaddafi nationalized the oil and spread the wealth through out the nation to its people.

no oil = no main source of wealth for the people

these arent normal people that he was controlling, there were arabs but there were also african sects that he united that are absouletly fucking retarded in terms of iq and are now flooding to Europe because no authoritarian learder like gaddafi is there to stop them

all for fucking oil

leader* sorry i had a few beers

Wait, wait, Sup Forums. Why are you able to acknowledge how the U.S. fucks over African countries, yet you act as though Blacks ////in African Countries//// are entirely to blame for their current state?

because niggers are just stupid overall, the only notable good african king was mansa musa in 1310 and thats it, from the time of the egyptians to present day, they are still in huts and its embarassing.

Also the mediterrian sect like libya is composed more of arabs than pure africans, also Gaddafi was arab

the most advanced parts of Africa were the most colonized areas by whites, if you ask any black person in Africa why this part isnt good they will actually say its because there was no white influence

its ok to be racist its just being truthful lol

So what was to stop this whole system from falling apart similar to Venezuela when the price of oil dropped?

ding, ding, ding. This is the answer. He was killed, and Rothschild got his central bank.

genuinely curious about this.

Both

came here to say this but got beaten to the punch

Gaddafi was a Corbyn/Chavez/Castro tier socialist. No loss.

Is there an actual source for this leftist garbage? If he literally gave them insane gibsmedats, why the fuck would they rebel? Sounds extremely unlikely to me and I have never heard of anything in pic related outside of the cheap petrol and the no external debt thing.

>no mention of the great manmade river
Gaddafi made Libya the most prosperous and wealthy country in Africa, and turned deserts into massive amounts of arable land with the largest waterworks projects in the world to date
youtube.com/watch?v=K1GK9KhooTY

Look it up you dumb fuck and ask here if there is an actual contestable quote, most appear to be correct

Is this 100% true?
This sounds like a paradise.
If America/Canada (North american union when) gets rid of all the welfare rat niggers, spics and dune coons, we'd surely have enough money from less social spending for grown men to fund shit like this too.

No one rebelled. They were CIA mercenaries.

It's almost like this system works incredibly well when dealing with a homogeneous people! Big reason why this system would never work in the United States.

The only evidence for these statements are on literal fake news sites (a fake CNN site, Global Research, a fake foreign policy journal etc. all spouting the same lies to brainwashed far leftists). Meanwhile back in the real world, we have a brutal, sadistic, pedophilic dictator who not only stole the wealth and lives of his own citizens, but lives of hundreds of Westerners (Lockerbie, etc.)

ibtimes.co.uk/colonel-gaddafi-kidnapped-raped-hundreds-girls-boys-1433861

ibtimes.co.uk/colonel-gaddafi-kidnapped-raped-hundreds-girls-boys-1433861

CIA mercenaries couldn’t fight a civil war by themselves. Somebody had to join them. Also, there is no evidence of signifanct CIA involvement in the inital coup.

he gave his own people gibs, and they returned the favor. same as natsoc germany

the "rebels" are insurgents that were paid by the US in order to topple the regime, and there was rebellion as the tribes of Libya were mad at Gaddafi for no source of income, that was because he was financially choked by NATO

:^)

Jews had to have their bank.

>The only evidence for these statements
Which ones specifically
I already presented evidence for one before even reading your dumbass comment
see >ibtimes.co.uk/colonel-gaddafi-kidnapped-raped-hundreds-girls-boys-1433861
Literally a fake narrative pushed by Hillary Clinton herself after claims of rape for intimidation
foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/06/new-hillary-emails-reveal-true-motive-for-libya-intervention/

You people are beyond stupid. Most of these can be debunked by sheer common sense (i.e. interest free banking). In any case, I’m posting an already made debunking of these lies by Libyan Niz Ben-Essa, since I can’t read arabic and check sources etc.

...

Foreign Policy Journal (do not confuse with Foreign Policy Magazine) is literal fake news, run by some “hacktivist” anonymous type. Do not source them, they are completely not credible.

>Literally CNN talking points defending Hillary after the Benghazi scandal to make her look better
Pathetic
ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-884508
You are acting like he is an actual user and not a paid shill

They used to sell oil for gold. If oil dropped then gold rose, if gold dropped then oil rose. A near perfect balance. Even today when oil dropped gold and silver rose. When oil came back up silver took a 13 percent drop.

There is no evidence any of that is true though.
Why wouldn't there be a black market for subsidized Libyan-bought cars if the government paid for half of it?
How could a government afford to offer a full salary to everyone, while also giving them $50k to have kids, while healthcare and schooling was also free?

Why wouldn't there be widespread immigration to Libya prior to 2011 if all this shit was true?

This utopia was somehow hidden from the world
or
You fell for sand-nigger propaganda (the same ones that claim life under Saddam was great)

CNN iReport is not CNN, it literally says it on the site. This bullshit is made up by major left wingers who don’t understand finance, politics, foreign policy, nor economics.

This. Finally someone with sense and not just blaming le joos on fucking everywthing even where it doesn’t make sense or is factual.

>There is no evidence any of that is true though.
Prove it incorrect, each point specifically
>Why wouldn't there be a black market for subsidized Libyan-bought cars if the government paid for half of it?
Libya paid for cars that were locally produced in Libya specifically (mostly Nissan/Toyota) and less expensive than imported/foreign cars
>How could a government afford to offer a full salary to everyone, while also giving them $50k to have kids, while healthcare and schooling was also free?
The amount depends on government/exchange rate and only applies to the first marriages, divorces are not allowed/rewarded under Islamic laws
>Why wouldn't there be widespread immigration to Libya prior to 2011 if all this shit was true?
Because Libyan border guards shot illegal immigrants and placed landmines, same as the coast guard does which libfags cry about

Yep. The plan was to topple Libya then move weapons from Libya to Syrian rebels. I don't think the US, Saudis or Israel expected Assad to keep it together and get so much Russian and Iranian support. Syria would likely be fine had we not started a civil war there.

This. Libya was the cork in the bottle, protecting Europe from the people smugglers. Now with Libya destroyed, (((their))) plan of destabilizing and ruining Europe is in full effect.
NOTE: America made this happen, on behalf of (((them))). America is NOT the ally of Europe, or anyone else, for that matter.

>CNN iReport is not CNN
>Literally both employed/owned by the CNN corporation and acting in favor of leftists and Hillary Clinton
>Implying in any way this isn't fake news or Hillary talking points

Gaddafi had to go, or we couldn't flood Europe with refugees

Read the points I posted above, it debunks all of the pro-Ghadafi lies. Libyan border guards also didn’t shoot migrants, they just deported them if they were illegal or put them into human trafficking. Also your point justifying how they could pay for everyone’s salary and wedding bux doesn’t work out. Even countries like UAE don’t do that and their oil is more plentiful and better than Libya’s ever was.

Why the fuck would Hillary be espousing pro-Ghaddadi talking points? She was the engineer of NATO assistance to his downfall.

Also, you obviously don’t understand politics beyond American definition of Conservative and Republican, but CNN and Hillary are not really leftists. They are socially liberal, economically centrist, however quite hawkish on foreign policy. Essentially, neoliberals, and far from leftists.

Leftists like Ghaddadi,
CNN and Hillary don’t.

He was also against the trans Syrian pipeline, which would cut out a lot of profits from European oil companies

>Read the points I posted above
I responded to all of them, none are correct
>put them into human trafficking
Another hillshill narrative
> Also your point justifying how they could pay for everyone’s salary and wedding bux doesn’t work out.
Low population and high oil reserves/income
Not hard to figure out
>Even countries like UAE don’t do that
Actually they do, 100K Dirhams and a furnished house
ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-884508
>Why the fuck would Hillary be espousing pro-Ghaddadi talking points?
Your arguments and screencaps against Gaddafi are literally copy pasted from a CNN article
in see >ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-884508

Leftists like Hillary
Make up your mind.

>Actually they do, 100K Dirhams and a furnished house
Wrong link, meant
emirati9.blogspot.com/p/marriage-benefits-in-uae.html

the main route refugees take to get to europe is the lybian sea. it was fiercely protected under gaddafi i.e. all boats were blown out

Go turn on your oven and stick yourself in it.

You responded to two of them and your arguments for both were awful.

Libya’s GDP per capita never exceeded 14k under Ghaddafi, so such benefits would be impossible, if they actually existed. Of course, they didn’t.

You keep linking the same CNN iReport article, saying that I copyed my source from there (I didn’t), and saying that it proves your point about the UAE (it doesn’t). The article merely restates the points made in OP’s pic.

Leftistsmah have eventually liked Hillary because the alternative was Trump. Leftists actually liked Bernie Sanders however, and there is a clear distatse of neoliberals like Hillary shown by Leftists. That was the reason she almost lost in the primaries, barely united the Democtic party, and had true leftists, pro-ghaddafi shills like Assange against her so strongly.

Sorry didn’t see this. Ignore what I said above in terms of this.

Nice argument. I guess I should be thankful you disn’t resort to some whacky conspiracy theory, though.

If it were so great then why did they rebel

gaddafi was keeping dirty africans out of europe

the jews killed his so they would flood into europe

>emirati9.blogspot.com/p/marriage-benefits-in-uae.html
This is a suggestion from some kind of matchmaking service. Not an actual governmental policy.

>You responded to two of them and your arguments for both were awful.
Your arguments proving why anything was false has been nothing, zero sources or viable claims
>Of course, they didn’t.
Baseless conjecture

>13 posts trying to defend against any argument supporting Gaddafi
All i need to know that you are a JIDF piece of shit based on your desperation and rapid posting
filtered

Whatever, you must just not have looked at the arguments I attached.

Unfortunately, all the pro-Ghaddafi arguments generally circle back to ridiculous conspiracy theories about the Clintons, Jews, and NATO, and the great and glorious deeds of Ghaddafi (like Leftists praised Chavez years ago) such as his African currency and miracle economic policies, both of which did not jor would ever exist.

Yeah it worked out really well for scandinavia and western europe. It made the populace so weak and neutered they just allowed the EU to destroy their countries with immigration. Let this be a lesson for the rest of time, socialism doesn't work. It was never needed in small countries with a strong IQ and identity/traditions. You're debasing the population to serve the needs of the weakest and dumbest in society and give them a hand feeding themselves. Any society based around the weakest and not the strongest is doomed.

Hillary should be executed exactly the same way Gaddafi was, especially the part where he was sodomized with sticks

You know I was completely against deposing Gaddafi after we fucked up Iraq but I still haven't seen any proof that any of that shit is true.

There was actually a story in the Jewmedia about how Libya was the only country in the world that was “in the black” to the tune of $5 Trillion dollars on deposit in various banks around the world a week or so before his death. Where did that go? Find out and you will probably find out what happened.