Gentleman, how do we educate China about religious tolerance?

Gentleman, how do we educate China about religious tolerance?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QdskvD0yEqA
transnotitia.com/the-matrix-of-terrorism/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

"Chinese"

I think they mean Turkish Imams

Jews are working on it. You see star wars. Next up will be bbc for chink women. Then itll be a lot more bbc/chink porn etcetc.

China is way too homogeneous. 2030 itll be a multiculti nightmare

chinese arent down for that bai zuo bullshit

Thousands of years of incest will do that to a country, user

First off religious freedom is an evil.
Secondly, so is Communism.
Thirdly, so is Islam.

This. They invented a fucking term for these people and it explains itself with it's literal translation "white left"

>US Flag
>the first amendment is evil
Top kek faggot

Remove any kike influence and blockade.

Just because I'm an American doesn't mean I have to like the classical liberal philosophy our nation was founded on.
Without classical liberalism there would be no SJW.
Or put differently, without the heathens Voltaire, Locke, Hobbes, or Jefferson, there would be no Marx or Gramsci.

I get hating muslims, degenerates, and all that, but don't drag a key factor of governing into the argument. No person or their institutions have any right over your opinion, which may as well be your soul.

>I don't like America or its founding father's principles
Sounds like you should pack your bags then and GTFO, faggot

The State has the obligation to be ordered to the truth. What is the purpose of government? It is obvious, from Plato to Aristotle to Aquinas, it is the common good of the people.
First, America is the first secular, godless State in recorded human history.
Because it is secular, it refuses to acknowledge truth as objective.
Because it refuses to acknowledge objective truth, it relegates the same rights to Mahometanism, Buddhism, Christianity, and eve Satanism.
Classical liberalism was never meant to remain that way; how can a philosophy based upon relativism not lead into further relativism? It was inevitable to end up with transgenderism under classical liberalism.
>1000+ years of Christendom: Western civilization
>200 years of secularism: children confused as to which bathroom to use
Take your pick.

I love America, the land of my birth. Doesn't mean that the founding fathers were right nor does it mean the Constitution was inspired of the Holy Ghost and their philosophy was correct.
Classical liberalism is merely the third phase of liberalism; any historian worth his salt knows this. It is a transitional stage.
Theological liberalism in protestantism gave justification for private interpretation and for the separation of kingdoms from Christendom.
The descendants of protestants, growing tired of the subjective, relativistic nature of various protestant sects all claiming to have the truth gave rise to liberalism in philosophy: the Endarkenment.
Liberalism in philosophy became actualized and manifested in society via classical liberalism; which was the final nail in Christendom.
It was the overthrow of altar and throne and the construction of a new order of the ages; the secular State. The hierarchical nature of the universe from the heavenly bodies to microscopic organisms was turned upon its head and society would supposedly be ordered from the bottom up, "people rule."
Theological liberalism begat philosophical liberalism begat classical liberalism which begat socialism and Marxism.
Gramsci of the Frankfurt school understood this. Pic related. Anyone with a firm grasp on history and revolutionary movements understands this. Why the hell don't you?

Voltaire knew though

You'd like the book in pic related. Traces Jewish influence on revolutionary movements from the
crucifixion and the Bar Kokhba rebellion to modern day revolutionary movements. The book is a tome at over 1,000 pages.
Many interviews on youtube about it as well.

This was the longest and most retarded non argument I’ve ever read.

Not a single Imam there is chinese.

t. potato nigger

>that wasn't an argument to you
You don't get use that meme if you're not smart enough to understand when it applies.

Protestants and secularists unite for a State that affords Satanism the same rights as Christianity.

This anyone who has been visiting the syrian general for a good time knows the only muslims that are giving China a pain in the ass are the fucking uyghurs.
Huis are left alone
But the fucking uyghurs are just cancer

>tfw dont understand any of that
>tfw brainlet

Philosophers are, and always have been the biggest fags on the planet. Only a philosopher can say in 3 paragraphs what a normal human can in a sentence, and only a philosopher can say total bullshit and act like he spoke gospel.

Everyone but me gotta learn this is due to communism in china

assimilated uygurs are alright, they also have some of the hottest women in the world

(((chinks)))

What I am saying is that liberalism is a continuity.
Those "Enlightenment" and classical liberal philosophers and civilizational iconoclasts were merely standing on the shoulders of a prior revolution in thought and behavior.
Without the foundations of classical liberalism, there would be no foundation for progressivism today.
Thus, there would be no Marx without a Jefferson, there would be no Jefferson without a Locke or Hobbes, and there would be no Locke or Hobbes without a Fr. Martin Luther.
And, perhaps, there would be no Fr. Martin Luther without a John Hus.

Liberalism is always progressing left and downward. It never stays the same and never returns to an earlier version of itself.
Therefore, for us Americans, there is no return to 1776.

What's the alternative?

Yep totally the hottest women.... NOT!

Chinese civilization has been around for four-thousand-plus years. Not sure if they need any advice from /pol. Let's focus on making Western Europe less religiously tolerant

its called tia chi and its mandatory for exercise purposes. must be done in public to verify participation. the kebabs dont have to be there and china isnt making any exceptions given that the truck of peace thing was beta tested in china. muslims cant even have drivers licenses in china because of those faggots crashing dump trucks into stores

any one wants to throw a fit they will deport 100% of them

NO U STOOPID

I hope China runs them over with tanks of peace.

Is China, lord give me the strength to say this, /our country/?

At this point there is no alternative.
American and French revolution was the actualization of the rejection of the unity of Church and State; the patrimony of Western Civilization.
The antidote is a return to Christendom; whether that be a hard reboot or a slow transformation.
Let's take the National Reform Amendment movement in the 19th century spearheaded by Protestants.
They sought to amend the Constitution to be Confessional: that is, to mention and give honor to Jesus Christ as the nation is a nation of Christians, even though the nation is not a Christian nation (if you caught the distinction).
Congress threw it out as unconstitutional (as it was). The movement fell apart because of the nature of Protestantism itself. They could not come to an agreement amongst themselves on what doctrine should be upheld as "Christian," as it is the nature of Protestantism to be subjective. Every sect is formed in opposition to another.
The well-intentioned attempt at Christianizing America was doomed for failure.
Now, we're in a situation where liberal revolutionary thought has permeated all sectors of society, and even its foremost and natural enemy: the Catholic Church.
At this point I see no solution except for liberalism to run its course, which may very well result in a total collapse at the pace we're headed now. Unbridled usury, constant war, breakdown of morality and thus the family life, the hierarchy of the Church itself confused about its own mission and purpose.
Prayer, study, reparation, and raising wholesome families is the only thing that we as individuals can do. Have children and teach them.
What else is more heroic than a moral family living among a veritable brothel every time we turn on a television or drive down the street. Civilization begins in the home.

who fucking cares, fuck the chinks and gooks vaporize them all

Are you living your life based on these principles?

I'm married with five children and God willing we'll have more. My wife homeschools. We instruct them in religion and, for the older kids, I instruct them in history and philosophy. I work my ass off to provide a living for them.
We go to confession every week because I'm a terrible Christian and sin every day.
We do what we should with what is proper for our state in life.

Hmm. I don't believe you. Somehow I feel like you just want to jump on the bandwagon and say this for approval.

Well I'm definitely not going to post a picture of my family.

Yes. Your "family". It must feel to good to make online culture warrior rants like these and having to show for.

I really don't care if you believe me or not. You asked what the alternative is and I answered it.
The alternative is a return to the order that our ancestors destroyed.

You're more than likely lying about having an upright traditional Christian family, but whatever I guess you have to fit in with Sup Forums right?

The alternative is a return to theocracy and being ruled by the Pope? I'll pass.

they don't listen to advice , kike

>The alternative is a return to theocracy and being ruled by the Pope?
As Americans we're fed this line from birth.
First off, the united Church and State is not what you were told. The State was autonomous when it came to governance of its own, but conformed to the natural and divine law as revealed through the Church.
There are more instances than I can count of a monarch disagreeing and outright refusing the pleas of the reigning pontiff. More often than not, it was Rome that played peace making diplomat between Kingdoms.

Secondly, the current president or prime minister has almost an infinite more authority and power over their nations than any monarch ever could dream of.
The only difference is, I would rather a King that was afraid he would burn in Hell forever if he ruled me badly rather than an temporary elected pseudo-monarch that merely has power ambitions.

So you want a king and the Pope to dictate every facet of your life with no checks and balances?

You want a return to life without any of the progress that you benefit from, which you spit in its face and want to destroy it?

You want the West to be run like Saudi Arabia but with Christianity instead of Islam?

Again, no thank you.

You're forgetting that China is pushing degeneracy onto the west just like the Jews. They have a lot more power over the world than da joos as well.

How do you know China won't corrupt the Jews first?

While I would prefer monarchy, a Constitutional Confessional State would be a great place to start.
Hungary amended its constitution in 2008 (I believe?) to recognize its Christian roots founded upon St. Stephen. It became Confessional. (Side note, aren't Poland and Hungary the only European States that are holdouts on the Mahometan invasion?) The classical liberals and progressives screeched that they'd be throwing sodomites off of buildings and instituting theocracy.
Sorry, that's just not how it works in real life.
The laws would then be amended, slowly, in accordance with the adherence to the Confession.

>mfw i agree with all of this
>it's basically what Evola and Guenon profess in their books
>the West either returns to a theocratic type of government or will end up in ruins because of moral bankruptcy
>if France would revert to being catholic, i'd be celebrating
>It's basically what Iran did
>i'm muslim
A shame there's no foreseeable future where the best of you would ally with the best of us.

Recommending a book by a Frenchman @ pic related. I don't know the French title but it was recently translated into English.
It decimates the logic and practice of democracy, whether that be constitutional democracy or absolute democracy blow-by-blow.

If Christian confessional states are anything like their Muslim counterparts, aka Islamic republics, then that sounds like a dark path.

I don't want a Christian Saudi Arabia or a Christian Iran.

We don't.
We copy them.

You just know, that the Chinese are more than capable of utterly exterminating those dancing muslims, right down to the very last atom if they so wished. And they made that very clear to each and every one of those fuckers. I think they pulled out a graph that detailed that the peaceful brainsurgeons would be shot so fast that they wouldn't even have time to shout Ackbar after Allah. Thats plenty enough tolerance towards an actively hostile horde of rabid sandpeople.

Despite all their bad points, Chinese deserve a great thumbs up for this one.

I'm not a huge fan of China, but Uyghurs are cancer.

high test

The difference is paramount. But, yeah, who would want the framework for Western civilization.
I suppose it's not too bad that pornography is a click away; what harm can it bring my 13 year old son.
What's so wrong about women contracepting from the age of menstruation until their mid 30's, then deciding to marry and *potentially* having children--oh, if they marry, that is.
I suppose it's not too bad that if my 16 year old daughter "slips up" and gets pregnant, she can choose to abort it.
Eh, no-fault divorce can't hurt the family unit that badly, can it?
What does it matter to me that the State allows error to flourish at the same level and precedence as truth? Truth wins out in the marketplace of ideas, anyway, just look at how accepting we are of sodomite marriage. Love is love, right?
Thank God (or the State, or the founding fathers, or the universe) that we live in a secular State where all these magical things are possible. Don't you dare let that flag touch the ground.
And remember, our enemies hate us because we're good.

What's wrong with the Uyghurs?
Aren't they your turkic muslim brethen?

Keeping those organs fit for harvesting time.

>Buffin de Chosal
Monarchist french ex-nobility
yeah right democracy bad for you goy
>it's the regime of least civil discontent, since most get their way.

>ywn force imams in Germany dance the caramel dance
why even live

No need to be rude.

Yeah, i know of this book. It's called "La fin de la démocratie" in French.

I worked on translating an interview from a french guy named Youssef Hindi, in which your following point:
>Now, we're in a situation where liberal revolutionary thought has permeated all sectors of society, and even its foremost and natural enemy: the Catholic Church.
was thouroughly discussed, detailed and analyzed. With historical facts and sources cited.
youtube.com/watch?v=QdskvD0yEqA

The TL;DR of it is:
>jews had a book named the "Zohar" among other stuff
>it gave them a way to apply what would then be known as today's cultural marxism, step by step, with ideological roots deeply engrained in the Kabbalah
>we're not even at the final step of the plan yet
>it succeeded to penetrate christianity right around when Pico della Mirandola became mainstream
>it gave birth to the Cromwellian bloodbaths against catholics and the birth of Protestantism
>it paved the way for the modern judeo-"christian" alliance to happen
>its adherents are focusing on furthering a deeply messianistic agenda

The same thing happened to the muslim world, of course, with Saudi Arabia being its main infiltrated agent. Yet, Shia Islam remained vastly untouched, the same way Orthodoxy managed to mostly distance itself from (((marxist degeneracy))), along with the usual individual exceptions here and there in the Sunni world. Which is basically why Iran and Russia are buddies as of now.

>California votes against sodomite unions
>Judges institute it anyway
>America overwhelmingly against sodomite unions
>Supreme Court decrees it
>most get their way

>China will never be interested in invading the middle east

Lost opportunity.

obv. not a functioning democracy

>yeah right democracy bad for you goy
>implying it isn't the most prolific type of government for influential mafia-type structures to thrive despite the will of the many
>implying just voicing your opinion and waiting for the government to apply it as is isn't the most advanced form of gibs mentality
>implying a wise ruler backed with divine knowledge isn't going to make a better job than a government that's, even in its ideal form, awaiting orders for the highly manipulable masses to form a sound opinion instead of foregoing the long term for the short term every single time

Interesting, I'll check that out.
Prof. E. Michael Jones went to Iran to discuss the fight against feminism and contraception and to reintroduce the concept of Logos.
>remember, it was Persian wise men that came to greet Jesus Christ
EMJ is an amazing historian whose life work is cataloguing Jewish revolutionary behavior and to spread Logos; his last trip to Iran was to reawaken the Muslim mind to Logos.

Ahhh. Yeah. Constitutional republicanism has served us very well.
It's the best government, after all.
cf Our enemies hate us because we're good, you know.

Charles coulombe and pat buchanan agree with u. Go read Konstantin Petrovich Pobeydonostev book reflections of a russian statesmen on church and state he is saying what ubare saying also read Mussolini he made a perdiciton that liberals would destroy themselves and abandon there ideology. I agree with you on church and state except I'm greek orthodox

can't have a democracy without an educated citizenry
>what you're seing here is a corrupt republic
Athenian democracy had its citizens be a soldier,jury and legislator , and only land owners could vote

>Charles coulombe and pat buchanan
Big fans. They're titans who will only be known as such after the complete collapse of liberalism.
I will check that out, thanks.

Which means not everyone desires the right to vote meaning a more authoritarian government shall alwyas be a better answer and solution with limits if course.

This is great thanks. And enjoy there works

"Certainly the most powerful republic of the Romans could scarcely count 480 years, as many years from the expulsion of the kings even to the reign of Julius Caesar. But under the monarchs in the east from Caesar even to the last Constantine, it endured for 1495 years without interruption, in the west, however, from the same Caesar even to Augustulus around 500 years, and from Charlemagne even to the present emperor it has been nearly 800. But for the 480 years that democracy flourished in the Roman Empire, the republic was not always ruled in the same manner: from the beginning yearly consuls were created, a little after they added tribunes, then the consuls and tribunes were taken up, creating the decemviri; after a year these were thrown out, and again the consuls and tribunes were recalled not rarely, even dictators and as many military tribunes were brought in with consular power. Therefore, no one form endured long, nor could they all reach the age of noble kingdoms together"
-Bellarmine

Republicanism is a temporary beast.

Most of them are islamists. Even Erdoğan's government disowned them.

>muslim brethren

Fuck that. No one is my brethren.

ok, just get the populace up to the task with schools, this is my point , then if they don't want to participate let that be upon them

Forgot to link an article about the Kabbalistic penetration into the world of Islam via Saudi Wahhabism:
transnotitia.com/the-matrix-of-terrorism/

There's a lot of good intellectual stuff mostly coming from Russia and the US, nowadays. But France, compared to its demographics, is by far the country for which i have the utmost respect, given its ability to produce top-notch intellectuals and leaders, even in dire times. Italia also has my appreciation, mostly because of Evola.

And yet it didn't stand the test of time. See .

The reason for that is that it simply goes against the natural order, in which the wisest, the closest to God, and the pious are the most capable of not only grasping why Mercy and Justice go hand in hand, but being legitimate enough to apply it.

Nobody spoke against it prior to the French Revolution, in France. And in fact, nobody would ever think of having it any different before a very small minority of uprooted bourgeois Freemasons willed it otherwise.

The philosophical underpinnings of our society will have to drastically be altered.
It's almost not worth even talking about because at this point, every American may as well be a Mason because they're already imbued with the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity. There's no U-turn in sight.
What we have in our future is a barbarism worse than that of the pagans. It is easier to convert a society to something new rather than convert a society to something that is old. A nation of licentious "liberty"-seekers have no use for the moral framework that built Western Civilization.
This is why Hilaire Belloc said the West will fall to Islam if it continues in its neo-pagan secularism. A nation plagued by heresy and apostasy easily falls to Islam.

...

There are a shit ton of different ethnicities in China. Korean and Japan are who need to be Jewed

>true
What we need to do with Sup Forums is bring Eastern Orthodoxy in and make it Western and then make sure the state gives its citizenry the apparatus to crack the media programming set up by jewish subversive elements.

>The reason for that is that it simply goes against the natural order, in which the wisest, the closest to God, and the pious are the most capable of not only grasping why Mercy and Justice go hand in hand, but being legitimate enough to apply it.
Absolutely.
I need to sleep but I enjoyed the conversation. Follow Logos, friend. It will lead you out of the darkness of Islam.
May the one God who revealed Himself to be three Divine Persons; Pater, et Filii, et Spiritu Sancte be with you, guide you, and convert you.
You have my prayers.

>we don't allow you to not only point out the obvious false flaggers amidst your kind, but we also don't allow you to take action against them
>i project the vision that has been given to me of Islam by (((them))) because it plays right into my confirmation bias
I'm not blaming Christianity as a whole by pointing out the "muh liberum examen" fallacy of a subgroup.

When says that:
>What we have in our future is a barbarism worse than that of the pagans
By designating Wahabbism, i can only agree with him. The Shia world resisted being a complete shithole simply because it has a clerical structure sturdy enough to withstand such foreign ideological attacks.

Sleep tight, burger. We both are waiting for Jesus to have the final say on this matter. Let us be patient together.

A physicist can say in a single equation what the entire internet has since it was invented.

t.Physicist

>by (((them)))
Topkek, I'm sure the Jews somehow forced the Islamic conquest for thousands of years, and it's not confirmational bias my western friend it's just drawing conclusion from event in world history, Islam is Arab nationalism, achieving the dream of greater Arabia while destroying everything in its way and pretending nothing existed before if

Its not that its that it will always be a sociopath or a psychopath who will come on top.

>Islam is Arab nationalism
>the goal of an inclusive ideology which precedes nationalism is the wet-dream of an exclusive western-imported ideal based on ethnicity alone
Wew the mental gymnastics.

Let me guess, you also didn't hear of pic related.

hahahahaah!! fucking get um china hahaha

this is a problem, or a megalomaniac like obama

theres a difference betrween first amendment and religons funded by hillary grabbing people by the pussy .

im almost ok with the china centuary if this is how they treat muzzies top kek

>every country that fell to Islam lost its culture for Arab culture
>arabs control the religion through exclusive rights on the kuran and imams
>military like praying towards Arabia
Hmm
>inclusive
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHA, YES YOU ARE INCLUDED OF BEHEAD

Yeah but I think it has to be our psychopath or sociopath to be our dog in the fight. What do you think?

The fact that ((((imams)))) did these things instead of dying for their beliefs is just proof positive they will burn on the Last Day.

I dont know much about Xinjiang dancing but those look like awesome moves.

>conveniently forgots about Shia Islam
>conveniently forgots about historical Sunni Islam
>conveniently cherry picks modern Saudi Arabia
I guess that's why your country ended up with a majority of pagan illiterate street shitters.

This.

>Shia
>Sunni

both are same shit.. just that two groups of followers ended up in different modern nations doesn't make them any different Mahamoud

>begin with 50 kiloton radiation therapy.

>Shia is based and Hwhite
They cut themselves cause a sand nigger got lost in the desert, they are two same sides of the same coin, pic related, and my country ended up pagan because even after 1400 years of Islamic invasions very small number of people chose to convert instead of getting their head cut off

> Islamic conquest for thousands of years

> Thousands

You don't say...

>both are same shit..
>"i am willfully staying in my own shithole of ignorance"
>"i will disregard any and all differences because i am cozy with my confirmation bias"
Maybe all the shitting will force you to step out of it someday.

>What is Pakistan
>What is Bangladesh
>What is Indonesia

Indians pop out of nowhere en masse with their half functioning brain and the thread goes to shit, because it's in their nature. Color me impressed.

Poo in loo also applies to shitposts, pajeets.