Voting rights should be weighed differently

NEETs: 0.25x voting power
Workers: 1.0x voting power
Homeowners: 2.0x voting power
Businessowners: 3.0x voting power

If you don't have a stake in the system, you shouldn't be able to have a say in it.

That's very anti-european.

This is going to be a good thread.

when we find ourselves in position to pull something like that off, we'll just skip the middleman and trash the democratic process as a whole. fyi. but you're on the right track.

Dumbest thing I’ve read all day. Yes let’s let business owners of Fortune 500 vote for everyone that supports their own self-interests and companies, creating a business dominated monopoly on the voting scene. Bist du behindert Hans?

i don't understand what the fuck that even means

Picture fits post very well

Europe is about equality mein freund.

No, there should be a class of people who do all the voting, democracy is gay.

I have a better idea!
>owns land x1 voting power
>has penis x1 voting power
>does not own land = no vote
>no penis = no vote

wives can share their vote with their husband. marriage is a special bond, after all.

This is basically how voting worked back in the 2nd Reich.

Inheritance would ruin that weight system.

In the Us, it would just give Babyboomers double the voting power to enforce a welfare system and not waste money on foreign aide.

It's perfect.

you can't weigh a businessowner who employs people the same way you do an unemployed basement dweller

NEETs are the modern philosopher-kings and should be the only ones allowed to vote

>businesses start selling their votes worth 3x
>op btfo

>business owners of Fortune 500
They're large corporations that are owned by shareholders. Even if they were owned by 1 person, then x3 votes against 299,999,999 votes does very little.

Dumbest thing I've read all day.

>trans people are allowed to vote

What about parents?

Literally all the world's problems would fix themselves if women couldn't vote.

having the same impact on the political system as a leech is no equality. only the tax payers foot the bill.

> Anyone being allowed to vote
Democracy is a mistake.

I've heard worst systems.

I've always been somewhat pissed off that Renters and the like get a say in the people who determine the land taxes in our city. I might not weigh business owners higher than others, just because their capital allows a greater than average say already.

what the fuck is that flag

Belarus you dimwitted eskimo.

non-native immigrants x50 voting power

That way the host population would never want to import them, since they would quickly be out-voted

They have the same european passport don't they?

Why not just make it a neat .5/1/1.5/2 split?

trust a german to be a dumbass communist

>They have the same european passport don't they?
>They all drink water, don't they?

>satanic trips
>dimwitted eskimo

im honoured

>Businessowners
Define. If I'm a neet or a worker can I not just have a small zero profits business and get that 3.0x voting power?

>communist
>OP suggests giving power to business owners

What did the coon mean by this??

trans people don't exist. men, women, and mental illness.

>communist

this is literally the exact opposite of communism you dumbass.

>idpol isnt communism

dumbasses

>dubs

Businesses win again

communism btfo

Only married men can vote

*Married white men with children and above the average income threshold

ftfy

Makes sense to me and I'm a NEET

You're the retard here OP.
-homeowning NEET.

GUBBERMENT WORKERS: 0x voting power

Or we can do like how the Constitution of the US said its suppose to work. Only white land owning males can vote. You guys can do whatever.

Europe is about what ever the majority of European citizens at any given moment is made to think.

>wageslaves aren't allowed to vote

no goy, no. who's gonna vote for the socialist party if not them?

A person could register a business in a couple of days for almost no money. Ripe for abuse

you can literally watch an hour of youtube videos and save up your allowance for a month to get a certification to start working you retard

do it

That's right.

Well we'd be fucked guy because only boomers would be voting.

then they would have to show their expenses over some time to prove that their business is going well

>eat at mcdonalds
>bill it for your business

as a way to keep that from happening, gov't could put like a $5M minimum limit to each 'business' to grant them a 3x vote.

requirements: you have to own a majority stake of >50%. The business needs to be profitable and a minimum liquid equity of 50k.

Homeowners: only the person who purchased the home and has an entry in the cadastre/land register. You can inherit it to your wife/husband.
Inheritance to another generation won't up your voting power!

Business owners shouldn't be allowed to vote. Their lives will be good no matter what so it shouldn't matter to them politics.

>associated with multinational organizations of any sort -5 vote

Then it shall burn and that will be good

We should have a rule that if you are NEET you get 3x the votes.

That's not very tolerant user.

Here's my suggestion:
>People of color: 2x voting power
>Women: 2x voting power
>Queer people: 2x voting power
>Refugees: 1x voting power
>White people: .75 voting power
>Men: .5 voting power

Over what period would it have to be profitable? If you had a bad year for instance would an otherwise fine company loose the vote?

yeah good idea bro
and maybe voting power should be directly correlated to net worth
see how that works out...

Anyone who's >21, homeowner(at least) and white should be allowed to vote

This post is funny because this is already how it works.
Rich people with more influence get more say in a country's future, lobbying, backstabbing, rigging, cheating and what not

It doesn't matter. Business owners donate to the Rs to get tailor-made policies already. This wouldn't change much.

How are shareholders weighed? 3.0x like a business owner?

>Over what period would it have to be profitable?

Does it matter? The tax bill Trump signed will come back to the US as a very rapidly increasing income in a decade

see ------------------------------
if you fail to regain profitablity the next year you lose your right. if this happens more than once within 20 years, you're out for a lifetime

Okay

It's actually much simpler
>your voting power linearly depends on your net worth

yeah voting power for the people is very un-european.

No one should have voting rights. That more masses adhere to certain idea, doesn't make said idea right.

Shut up Juncker

Land owners should be able to choose representatives that help in the selection of, and than report local issues to the Fuhrer.

>being at the mercy of the system means you're not taking part

Voting power should be dependent on civil service.

If you haven't served the state, you don't deserve to partake in it.

I don't vote anyway

Correction
Land owners should be able to compete in local May tournaments to become representatives of their people.

name of the book?

Actually, opposite. Only those who pay the government's bills should have any say in how that government spends the money. Government employees and other parasites should not be permitted to vote.

thats shit

>pays taxes gets 1x vote
>pays no taxes gets 0x votes

eliminates neets, social welfare ticks, and other sucm.

manipulate multipliers accordingly if the result of the elections is not the one you like. e.g Business-owners x100.

Your system is unstable little faggot, aka degenerate, it digresses to another system once you let it operate in the real world.

Then people will either revolt and fuck you, or you will end up with a semi-dictatorship. Which is what you intended all along, but you were too much of a faggot to really propose it.

Hannan, D. (2016) Why vote leave. United Kingdom: Head of Zeus.

Nah, it should be weighed by IQ.
Lower IQ - less voting rights

Being intelligent does not make you automatically useful

...

This... It prevents the problem of having the poor vote the rich out of their stuff.

No.

White land owning males should be the only ones allowed to vote.
Our founding fathers knew that allowing just anyone to vote would create problems.

True. There are many, many intelligent retards that waste their potential of stupid shit like Star Trek or anime. Aka your average reddit user.

Intelligence is useless unless you actually use it.

Simpler method.

Pay taxes - vote.
Don't pay taxes - don't vote.

(((International))) businessmen must be removed entirely. Other than that, seems semi-reasonable. Problem though is with kikery.

Blacks 3/5 a vote
Whites 1 vote

You should be allowed the franchise if you complete these two tasks:
1. Pass a basic civics test
2. Be a parent to at least one child

It's simple really, the civics test is for obvious reasons, and the requirement for children is because, for the most part, those who don't have children have difficulty thinking for long-term interests, that of future generations.

>see pic related for who shouldn't be allowed the franchise

Niggers: 10^-99 voting power

>Implying anyone should be allowed to vote

I fucking hate pirso so fucking much

>Democracy is a mistake.

This, Taiwan's a good example.

Everyone has a say in it though.

Want to require everyone to join the draft? You have to give them a vote

How about only citizens with minimum 4 year military service may vote.

I like the way you back up your argument with a photo of a NEET. Good job, gold star!

I've really quite had it with all this eu-flag jokery.

Christians: 0.125x
Atheists:1.0x
Muslims: 4.0x

We should give oppressed minorities a bonus to level the playing field

Leafs: 0.00 votes

NEETs should get the biggest vote.