If a war were to break out between India and China, who would the United States side with?

If a war were to break out between India and China, who would the United States side with?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ELGIJmYmfXc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Prolly poos

have you been following news at all?

Loos

What does usa not like india now. And no not really.

>Indian camp
>Half the camp is disgusting poo lobby in a big tent
>Ping pong camp
>Dog bones and reused oil everwhere

for sure paj

Chindia

Israel

Depends on the location of battle.

But mostly China might win.

>who would the United States side with

None.

India, similar issues the Nazis had with Russia in winter... but it would be dying of dysentery rather than freezing to death.

Side with both sides so as many chinks and poo die. You can fuck my sister if you do this.

Preferably neither.

Why would India war with China when Pakistan is right there?

>If a war were to break out between two nations separated by one of the worlds's largest mountain range...
fuck you and everyone who thinks that a real war between India and China is possible.

US would likely remain neutral, although everyone else in the anglosphere and England would jump to India's defense since it's a member of the commonwealth.

US would likely back India though, as well if it was forced, just on the basis of ideology alone and rivalry alone.

Poo in loos

Flinging poo at tanks doesn't win wars pajeet.

Poos.

China is a potential threat to the US, India will never be, do the math buddy.

Shut up dirty cuckold faggot

Shut up cuckold faggot

Poos b/c I dislike what the chinese are much more. Not to say I want to wipe china out, but there might be more benifits to having fewer chinese than fewer indians

Poo n sgart alliance while shiessa loving hans builds weapons incorner.......gonna be a shitstorm

>shitstorm

this, war with China isn't economically feasible
India vs Pakistan tensions are more obvious

The Indo-Chinese Wars will happen, but not for quite some time. When I see it happening, the US will have ceased to be big in the world stage.

No dumbass, China and India are economic rivals.
56% intelligence

India. The USA supplies huge amounts of military weapons to India as it is.

Let them destroy each other, as it weakens one in the short term and removes the other entirely in the long run should one prove a decisive winner. Should it end without a decisive victory for either, both are weakened in the short term and forced to shift their strategic resources and focus on to each other in case of a repeat conflict, benefiting us in the long run.

They must be proxy wars if anything? Nuclear warfare is not possible between China and India, but the rest of the world versus itself

>Jew camp
> Palestinian land

this

fucking indians and chineese in australia are scum of earth.

Prolly China unless military is certain we can kill off the Chinese before Kimmy tries to attack us. We need to keep in the Chinese good favors so that they don't side with the Norks when the war eventually happens.

Also someone post the vid of poo army skip march

India would win a 1v1 because of its natural barriers and homefield advantage. Remember, China actually lost territory to Vietnam when they attacked 2 years after the US signed a peace treaty.

However, with allies, and no US or Euro intervention, China would win. If nukes are used, India would win, because Chinese population centers are far more densely packed, and closer to India's airbases in Bhutan and Nepal.

Whoever loses, though, doesn't matter. Everyone else benefits from India and China halving their populations.

Obviously India, since US can sell weapons to india to make some profit, but not to China.

Other than that it`ll not get involved, as only war between India/China could be retarded pointless border conflict.

USA would sell arms to India. Russia would sell to both China and India.

Neither, we have lukewarm relations with both countries at best. Neither of them are military allies of ours (in fact we have a shaky military alliance with India's enemy, Pakistan).

We'd stay out of it and constantly try to negotiate a ceasefire because we do a lot of trade with both countries and we certainly wouldn't want it going nuclear.

China couldn’t even beat Vietnam. At least we left with the high score.

The US would sell arms to fucking Tonga if we could strategically benefit from it. I don't doubt we'd arm both sides with equipment that'd cause the most destruction to the others. IE, give India a bunch of AA-guns and China a bunch of bombers.

Probably stay neutral. Or more likely, sell weapons to both sides.

>Nuclear warfare is not possible between China and India
Why not? Both countries are huge with gigantic populations and only have a few hundred nukes?

We dumped Pakistan for India years ago. The USA sells weapons to India, more than any other country, as well as trains with their airforce and navy.

Hell we even offered them our aircraft carrier tech, we are propping them up to counter China.

...

The way I see it, it will be partially ignited through sheer population clashes. I think proxy wars will be fought in the southeast asia (indochina) as a result. I also think that India might wack Pakistan as a preliminary result of growing pains.

Malnourished rice farmers with an IQ over 80 are better than malnourished street shitters with sub-80 IQ though.

What proxy wars in SE Asia? I can't envision any potential ones.

Myanmar or Sri Lanka is ripe for one.

Officially the US and Pakistan are still allies militarily but its a really strained relationship. But you are right that India has more recently had better relations with us, I guess I'm thinking back decades ago when they were salty with us for recognizing and making an alliance with Pakistan (they sought relationship with the USSR in retaliation for that) But weakening relations with Pakistan (though we still want to have a good relationship with them since they're a nuclear weapon state and if our relationship deteriorates completely we may find our enemies getting access to their nukes) have resulted in warming relations with India.

Every US president has courted India since Bill Clinton. Trump is doing the same. We were retarded for backing Pakistan (thanks Nixon), and have finally turned it around. The whole Osama thing was the final nail in the coffin.

Hell, Lockheed was allowed to offer moving F-16 production to India.

India no doubt. Messy war though. China has a completely untested military, would likely use a panic nuke after suffering heavy losses.

Wonder how many would die from disease. India defeated Alexander the Great with the poo.

>Sikh camp
Bro-tier camp.

As for the war itself, the fundamental issue for its course devolves on the Himalayas; the imposing nature of the mountain chain combined with the lack of infrastructure along most of it means it is a major logistical bottleneck, preventing mass movements of large armies by itself, nevermind the fact the terrain by its very nature precludes such. Essentially, you'll end up with an infantry slogging match very much dependent on air support and resupply. With that said, the winner will be decided by who can best overcome these defaults and gain/hold the strategic territory nearby the mountains:

Siliguri Corridor - As the closest strategic territory to the border and being relatively small in size, the opportunity for China to seize this is greater than India's ability to gain China's strategic position (The Tibetan Plateau). Taking this would give China a ground connection to Bangladesh, thereby cutting off Northwest India from the rest of the nation and allowing China to secure it at its leisure. Such a disaster would force the Indians to the peace table, which would make China the dominant power over Nepal and Bhutan, as well as grant them Arundal Pradesh among other disputed border territories.

Tibet - Should India somehow prevail in the Himalayan fighting, to decisively win would require it to occupy large portions of Tibet, which would prove a daunting task. They could be aided by local uprisings, but such would likely fail to produce major strategic gains. Should they somehow do this, however, they'd be able to cut off China's access to the Yellow and Yangtze rivers. Such would force the already parched nation to the peace table.

Another factor to consider is that India is in position to cut China's SLOCs to the Middle East and Africa, which could cause great commodity price rises within China, forcing them to rely more on Russo-American energy and resource imports, as well as probably forcing them to be more aggressive in the South China Sea.

Well, like I said, that's a bad idea to let pakistan completely slip through your fingers or next thing you know Hamas has nuclear bombs. We never should have built nuclear reactors for sandniggers. Atoms for peace my ass.

u gonna get a shart attack seeing that

If China cut off NE India, the poo lords would start lobbing nukes. Then the dirty ass Pakis would lob theirs at India. Then Ching Chong would retaliate. Shit would get hairy real fast

...

No one will start lobbing nukes for precisely that reason, because it means everyone gets destroyed and, even ignoring that fact, this war wouldn't threaten the total destruction of the other even at its worse (sans nukes); Indians aren't marching on Shanghai and the PLA won't occupy New Delhi.

Unfortunately poop niggers instead of getting rid of 1 trillion niggers easy mode.

There's a brewing clash between Buddhists and Muslims in SE Asia. The Rohingya Crisis in Burma is a good example. As is the ongoing South Thailand Insurgency. Eventually a large Muslim country like Bangladesh or Indonesia could decide to do something about their oppressed brothers. Luckily those countries are poor as shit and can't do much besides throw bodies at problems.

The problem with proxy wars between Indian and China playing out in SE Asia is that none of the countries around there really like India or China. For example, the Vietnamese and Chinese really hate each other even though their both commies. Maybe ASEAN members see themselves, as a bloc, becoming a balancing power between India and China.

Vietnam is quite cozy with us, we are selling them SAMs and Cruise Missile to butthurt China

You got it wrong though, SiliGuri Corridor is well protected as India has all access in Bhutan, Sikkim (India) and Bhutan are actually higher than the bordering Chinese territory which results in China losing an edge there.

India already won a war with China in that region, recently China tried overcoming the natural barrier by trying to build a road in Bhutanese territory, which resulted in the famous Doklam Standoff between PLA and Indian Army.

Are they showing bob in return?

(Couldn't resist)

Nope, they giving us money plus nothing is funnier than the butthurt Chinks

China! For many, many reasons!

> You got it wrong though, SiliGuri Corridor is well protected as India has all access in Bhutan, Sikkim (India) and Bhutan are actually higher than the bordering Chinese territory which results in China losing an edge there.

I have no doubt it's well protected, simply because it has to be. China's edge in the region mainly has to deal with the fact the strategic area is right on the border, and is a very small total area to occupy as compared to what you Indians would have to occupy in Tibet to force them to the table.

> India already won a war with China in that region, recently China tried overcoming the natural barrier by trying to build a road in Bhutanese territory, which resulted in the famous Doklam Standoff between PLA and Indian Army.

The Doklam Standoff seems to have ended in a stalemate, and to call it a war anyway is being charitable with the term. India did, however, pull off a masterful defense in the region by staring China down to a draw.

True enough.

India would be the moral choice, China the political/economic choice.

...sigh. China.

:(

No one can beat vietnam. Not the French, not the Americans, not the Chinese. The determination of Nyugen righteously continuing the 1000 year fight for Vietnamese independence fills him with righteous strength.

Plus we are building new roads and bases in the North East, especially Air Bases.

The government is also making expressways take off/landing friendly so they can be used as runways for refueling during war.

> Forgets the French did beat them in the 19th Century, and the Chinese countless times before that.
> Also ignores the U.S. did beat them, as the 1973 Treaty resulted in the independence of South Vietnam and the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops; American forces were never defeated on the ground.

>what are planes

Excellent strategy then, because air resupply will be critical in any future conflict in the region due to the terrain. Whoever has the best logistics train will win such a war, without a doubt.

Plus Himalayas are way better than the Great Wall of China, even fighter jets struggle crossing them over, which is why India deploys SAMs and Cruise Missiles along the Indo China border in North East, as the terrain is too tough for even tanks.

Tibet is a plateau, which is why most of the Tanks and BMP fleet are stationed in Ladakh region permanently.

We have plenty Hercules and Globemaster Aircrafts to support logistics.

Plus all the Himalayan region is beefed up with Guns like Bofors and Howitzer

Clearly the Poo-In-Loos because we're losing to the Chinese. US foreign policy is simple... just side with whomever is the enemy of your most serious opponent. Unless they're Jewish, in which case you suck their dick.

Plus the New Modi government pro-attack then the previous ones who were pacifist and pro-dialogues.

Bonus Video

youtube.com/watch?v=ELGIJmYmfXc

China is going to pulverize you, sorry. Doesnt matter how many SAMs or jets you have. Better stay with the head down.

PLA is a paper dragon, they know they can beat us, but it will also tell the world how pathetic PLA really is in a real war.

The PLA can take US Army meme will be over, and US would start treating China like a bitch.

Plus China has land dispute with all of its neighbors including Russia, if it goes to a war for a land dispute, it will not be good for them.

Also, ever heard of something called Nukes? Chinese population is majorly concentrated at there coastal areas, we are evenly spread out, in a full scale nuclear war, more Indians would be left than Chinese.

>two economic rivals fight each other
none, or both for profit

You seem not to realize that the US army has become a meme army. We aren't shit compared to what we used to be, and the idea of an invasion of North Korea has the US military leaders terrified. They know it's unwinnable and unsustainable as an occupation of even large parts of North Korea. Their best bet is moving the border a bit further north and hoping that the locals like it enough to be grateful, which they very well might but which isn't worth the cost.

>You seem not to realize that the US army
Its always been shit, only thing you got going for you guys are sheer amount of nukes, high tech weapons and Navy Seals.

Without those, even African Tribals are better fighters than US soldiers, you guys even let manlets and trannies into your army.

Israel

Er, what. China took land from Vietnam. That got the gooks real mad.

What sort of bullshit are you reading?

>Plus China has land dispute with all of its neighbors including Russia,
China has no land disputes with Russia. In fact it has no land disputes with most of its neighbours. Buthan only because Pajeets block the settlement.

Why do you Pajeet niggers always post such blatantly wrong shit that cant even be debated? Whats the point.

Indians love bullshit to the point they literally smoke it, roll in it, and throw it at each other.

Hey, don't knock Navy Seals. Seaworld puts a lot of effort into those guys, and they can balance a ball on their nose for hours if the job requires it.

Stupid question OP
Pajeets are US servants. China on the other hand... China dare to question pax americana.

kek

Why would you want to invade a clusterfuck like India anyway?

Neither. But we will gladly take the top 50% of your war widows. For humanitarian purposes of course.

>If a war were to break out between India and China, who would the United States side with?
Isreal

...