Is there a dumber ideology than radical centrism?

Is there a dumber ideology than radical centrism?

Well that depends on quite a few variables, each only understood once you determine the current situation they are in.
So I guess yes, in some cases but in others, perhaps not.

Anarcho fascism

AnCom and Nazbol are both pretty fucking retarded.

>radical centrism

When Sargon said that? Do you have a link?

fascism is the only way to go. anything else is not achievable.

Ancap, Ansyn, communists all get the bullet

I'll say anarcho-capitalism

AnCom is retarded. Everything NazBol wants can be achieved by NatSoc so it works but it’s just D&C.

Neo-Liberalism

He hasn't. He actually chuckled at the term in a video or stream once.

Centrism is complacency manifested as an ideology. It's politics for on-the-fence faggots. With that being said, it warms my heart to see this thread. Maybe we will be once step closer to world peace if we all just acknowledge that centrism is for faggots.

Prerequisites to become le horseshoe theory centrist
>Must lack a backbone
>Must have no convictions
>Have a blase attitude
>Must think Sargoy is based
>Defend Kilroy
>Be sad that Kraut is on suicidewatch
>Be either literal or figurative cuck, or both
>Be one of those people that says "I don't like Hillary Clinton but Donald Drumpf is just as bad"
>Listen to Sam Harris podcast
>Watch debates between Richard Dawkins and le religious freaks

>Nazbol are both pretty fucking retarded.
nazbol is an actual thing outside of here?

I don't think so.
But it's fucking stupid, wherever it is.

It works good to cultivate youtube gibs by appealing to the mainstream majority.

I disagree with him on many things, but Sargon is a bright Man, he would never say something like that.

radical centrism is for the high iq

>but Sargon is a bright Man,
He has an IQ of 110 at most. He's not very smart.

There are definitely dumber ideologies, but nothing annoys me as much as radical fence-sitting

He's said before that he's a classical liberal. He's also said that he's technically a social liberal, but hates calling himself that because most social liberals are insane, and people call themselves other things (like classical liberals) in order to difference themselves.

I was always under the impression that centrists are the majority in America. You need those people to have a balance between the two parties, or else we'll quickly become communists or fascists

Anarcho-monarchism

>another useless e-celeb thread

KYS

It's pretty ironic since "classical liberal" in a modern context would be a libertarian. But sargon is most certainty not a libertarian, so he's a huge hypocrite.

The center is kind of falling out of American politics. You're starting to see people pick sides and grow more extreme in their views.

the "centrists" here are socialists.

The left is the communists and the right is just libertarians. We have no right or left, just far left to center

how can centrism be radical?

>libertarians

I feel like "libertarian" is just the mask that far righters wear in public.

radical centrism is like trying to balance on a board on top of a ball

Yes it's called conservatism.

By being very passionate in advocating that the current status quo is perfect and any change in any discrete direction is evil and is all the same.

70 percent of people are just sheep, ready to be herded by whoever is strongest

the majority of people don't give a shit about politics and know nothing about it. they follow whatever label will make them the most popular.

yes - sticking to some bullshit Idealist political goal that only

that is not radical, that is just semantics

It's more than 70 percent. Very few people are actual leaders, especially as the years go on because of how content we are becoming. If we stripped away the regular comforts of our society, tv, vidya, etc, we would start to see more people taking that leader role.

no, most of them genuinely believe the bullshit that spews out of their mouths. However, once you show them what the communists actually want, it is not very hard to push them further to the right

There was that one russian party in the mid 2000s that got banned

Its around the 98% range for sure, its why very few people actually run for the R or D ticket. Few people want to be leader. You think out of everyone in America, Trump or Hilary would be the best ones to be running it?

Your right. The media is trying to shame conservatives and get their left leaning friends or employers to hate them, so they'll feel pressured into becoming more liberal over time.

underrated fpbp

Anything anarchy is retarded and suicidal.

What about anprim in the context of a post apocalyptic world?

Sorry....What is anprim?

>Is there a dumber ideology than radical centrism?
yes

all the other ideologies

...

Sounds comfy.

...

This is true.

Yes, it's called zionism.
Fuck off, kikes.

>not even knowing what the word radical means

It's bothering me since I got back from work. If certain ideologies use elements from both the left and the right like national socialism or christian socialism it doesn't make them centrist. Then what makes an ideology centrist?

Radical Centrism implies you will tackle any situation with an open mind and pragmatism, it doesn't mean there's always a middle ground. I find that it's a wiser approach than rigidly sticking to an ideology in all circumstances.

there's literally nothing wrong with being centrist

militant nihilism

Anarcho-Snowflakeism, Libertarianism and anything left of Evola.

He is a self hating, self infatuated soul...another one who like the exuberance of his own verbosity..

Obvious bait, but I’ll take it.

Your jew created meme ideology, ancap, and it’s Zionist normie equivalent, (((libertarianism)))

Centrism is the only thing that makes sense because morals are subjective. There is no right or wrong ideals. The best people can do is look at a problem with no biases and come to some sort of conclusion. Every belief with republicans aren't correct and same with democrates.

If morals are subjective, then by definition, centrism can't be the only thing that makes sense. By the way, Sargon isn't a centrist, he's a leftist, and so are American conservatives. A true conservative tries to conserve and return to the monarchy. An American conservative wants to conserve the gains made by the enlightenment and the french revolution.

That's where I am and I see myself as a centrist or slightly on the left.
I'm for strong national security, sovereignty and preservation of culture and national identity (which personally I don't think are necessarily left or right) and economically I am pretty much a socialist.
Lots of little issues I am like that too, I dont care about poofs and think they deserve the same rights as everyone else but I dont think they should be married as my idea of marriage is holy matrimony - HOLY. How can something that is deemed a sin get a blessing from God? Anyway that's just an example.

what you're describing is national socialism.

There's no "true" conservative, in your sense. What you are trying to conserve is subjective from your standpoint (based on your circumstances). Maybe a millenium ago a monarchist would have been described as a conservative. Today you simply say monarchist because the definition of conservative has shifted

Yeah, I think that's what I am but there's going to be a Hitlerite that'll get hard up about racial cleansing and shit and I dont care that much about who is in the nation as long as they live within the bounds of national law and social customs.

There is a true conservatism, and it is monarchism. The conservatives in the US are classical liberals. These are actual definitions muddied by 56%ers and jews.

Not with the religious part.

Also regarding that, I think Immigration should be limited to a certain number that keeps the population stable but it doesn't have to be restrictive to ethnicity or nationality.
Even some heavily vetted refugees are ok.

>that pic
National Socialism and Authoritarian types of Communism are really not that far from each other. Both are incredibly authoritarian and on the economic left, but Communism is more left wing. Centrism is a lot more rational than either but still accepts the idea of a welfare state to some degree and enforces laws against victimless crimes.

The US is centrist. This is a dumb thread.

t. Mort Goldman-Goldberg

The biggest difference etween them imo is that communism (in most of it's forms) is internationalist, where as natsoc is isolationalist.

But... what?

...

nonsense, plenty of communist countries were nationalist. Ever heart of "socialism in one country"?

thats what ancaps are tho

this is so subtle, its genius

they are crypto-monarchists.
Ancaps are neo-reactionaries undercover m8 get on board

Is there anything dumber than blindly following an ideology?

I know it's a real shocker but the political compass is 2d

na dude. They let shit fall where it may, socially and fiscally. If niggers wanna marry fags whatever. If some CEO wants to rape a countryside for some profit, whatever. Right in the fuckin center.
Get
On
My
Level

They were socialist, not communist

Yes - radical leftism is always the fucking worst, but centrism is for frightened faggots afraid of rejection from those who may disagree.

Aarcho islam

Civic nationalism

like ancaps

Radical Centerist is by definition Fascist.

Learn to think.

anarcho-anything

/thread

What does Sup Forums think of communo-capitalism?

Is Anarcho-Nationalism a thing?
Because that's what I identify as tbqh

D-d-daddy Issues!!!

You can be whatever you want to define yourself as, just like gender.

Veganism
Islam

>Black top stockings with white trim
I don't care what they cost, I want a pair for myself

she legit has her head screwed on out of them all

Literally my favorite types. Degenerate daddy sex is best sex

The sheep's ideology that renders left or right ideology.

Hahahhalmfao You are Retarded, she will fucking destroy you m8.

You're drunk, go to work!

Depends which kind of ancap. There are SJW ancaps who believe all races are equal. And there are Hoppean ancaps like me who know that nobody will give us anarcho capitalism without violence. There are way too many insane leftists and radical Muslims for ancapistan to emerge naturally.

...

>Not criticizing a man for wanting to buy an ak47 to murder his next door neighbors and sell their belongings in order to purchase his fifth loli bride along with the newest highschool DXD statuette
It's either all okay or none of it's okay

Fascism and communism.
They are the causes of one another.
Communism causes fascism and vice versa.
If a civil war was fought and if one side wins or the other, the country is still fucked because the ordinary civilians will Always be monitored by the secret police.