Reminder the Ancient Egyptians looked like this

Reminder the Ancient Egyptians looked like this.

Other urls found in this thread:

nature.com/articles/ncomms15694.epdf
igenea.com/forum/threads/the-tutankhamun-dna-project.20/
livescience.com/48384-ancient-redhead-myth.html
youtube.com/watch?v=S9rDLyYxDVc&t=81s
youtube.com/watch?v=gqSLirbFtd0
youtube.com/watch?v=GGwkAotRyqE
youtube.com/channel/UCjAFO7xz5UotUfIzvd_xXDA/videos
newsweek.com/trachilos-footprint-crete-human-evolution-million-658287
ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/do-ica-stones-prove-mankind-coexisted-dinosaurs-advanced-technology-098989
telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/05/incredible-graveyard-5000-year-old-giants-found-china/
ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/giant-7-8-foot-skeletons-uncovered-ecuador-sent-scientific-testing-004119
humansarefree.com/2017/09/fossilised-giant-footprints-discovered.html
blog.world-mysteries.com/ancient-writings/tolkiens-middle-earth-true-history
metmuseum.org/toah/hd/phoe/hd_phoe.htm
anthropology.msu.edu/anp363-ss13/2013/02/27/the-corruption-of-the-priesthood-of-amen
biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-near-eastern-world/the-expulsion-of-the-hyksos
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

fuck you mean honkey dis a cracker, egypt wuz a BLACK land

WE

You wish nigger.

>WE
literally ashkenazi tier

Probably a bit darker like Meds of today, but yeah

Modern Egyptians are the closest thing to ancient Egyptians.

some did

There are many accounts of red-headed people in the Bible and in the history of the Levant and North Africa. Even today there are some in those regions.

Meds (at least southern euros) only get dark when tanned.

Their base skin tone is either extremely pale-white or yellowish-olive.

Meds NEVER have a brown skin tone unless tanned (they tan easy, though)

The ruling caste was European, this is common knowledge. And they would not mingle with the commonry

>Modern Egyptians are the closest thing to ancient Egyptians.
not quite because of the african slave trade. Palestinians and Bedouin people are most like the ancient Egyptians. Still definitely brown people though. Sup Forums is full WE WUZ when it comes to ancient egypt.

It's sad this has to be posted. Niggers just want to claim everything they can get their filthy paws on.

>The ruling caste was European
we have actual DNA samples we get from mummified remains though. Why aren't those samples showing up as distinctly european and instead showing up as ?

inb4
>It's a zog conspiracy to keep the secrets of the hu-white egyptians from the filthy goyim
>posting a picture or scuplture of an egyptian with blue eyes or red hair

We know.

Be careful SWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAH UUHGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH

>Africans are Europeans

Where are those samples from your image sourced from?

Of European ancestry, brainlet leaf

Obviously. I can't even believe we have to have this discussion still, the hatchet has been buried for a pretty long fucking time.

No retard. Ancient Egyptians were entirely devoid of sub-saharan DNA whilst modern Egyptians have a significant proportion of subsaharan DNA. To put it bluntly they were blacked after the (((Hyksos))) exited Egypt slaying every first born son of the Egyptians on the way out.

I had a black woman try to tell me she was black
>Greek
>even Wikipedia says this
Kek

>Egyptians are Africans
>Egyptians speak Afro-Asiatic language
>bb-buht they're EURO-PEEEANS
That doesn't make them Europeans

>egypt was a black land
>no evidence to back his claim
Look man i got the evidence you need to back your claim but im not gonna do it simply because i want to see you try for yourself

And no egypt was not populated by blacks though for a small period of time it was ruled by a few blacks(this is history so there's no point arguing) and no the majority of today's blacks are unrelated to these people just like how eastern europe and western europe are different

You're too fucking dumb to understand anything explained to you

NOT POLITICS SAGE DO NOT REPLY

THEYRE SLIDING THESE THREADS

Read the full study here: nature.com/articles/ncomms15694.epdf
Here's a rundown:
>The team investigated a total of 151 mummies from a site about 100 kilometers south of Cairo. These mummies were excavated in the early 20th century, and radiocarbon dating showed that their lives spanned 1,300 years, or from about 1388 BCE to 426 CE. There was no usable genetic material in any of the remaining soft tissue, but some left in the bones and teeth. Ninety of these mummies had incomplete DNA, and only three retained a completely intact genome. These three mummies are the ones the scientists focused on.

>The team then compared the ancient mummy DNA to the DNA of both ancient and modern people in the same region. It turns out that, on a genetic level, the ancient Egyptians aren’t so different from modern people living in the Near East. In fact, they have more in common with those in the Near East than today’s Egyptians. For example, the mummies didn’t have any DNA from sub-Saharan Africa, whereas about 20 percent of today’s Egyptians have sub-Saharan genes. Study lead author Johannes Krause told Science that the modern-day variation might be because either the spread of Islam or more trade increased contact between the different parts of Africa.

>The DNA sequencing method used in the study makes the results robust. The researchers looked at any DNA in a given sample, and then isolated the genetic material that might be human. The team then looked for patterns of DNA damage we only see in true ancient DNA, allowing them to ignore the DNA that might be from contamination.

>The findings are interesting, but even more promising is the fact that the method could pave the way for even more genetic studies of mummies so we can understand more details about these ancient people.

TL;DR nordcentrists are full of shit, just like we wuz kangerz. Use this info to btfo both of them

Yeah but only the common class, the leaders were all ayys lmaos, now stop appropriating our extraterrestrial culture

Thanks for the source. But this only proves that common people of ancient and modern Egypt are related, as you would expect. This says nothing about the ruling caste.

You're thinking about eh Ptolemaic dynasty.

I think OP's picture was from a movie about Moses.

When i see sources i like

Thanks for the info user

Egypt was raped by Arabs just like every other ethnicity from Pakistan to the Atlantic Ocean, but you can still see some of those ancient Egyptian genes shining through. The Copts are likely the purest representation of ancient Egyptian phenotypes, but they've been undergoing a slow genocide at the hands of the pan-Arab amalgam that spreads across the world bringing desertification and madness wherever it goes. Europe is next.

Are you fucking stupid? Do you think it was common people that got mummified in these elaborate, costly rituals? You're using the same argument a nigger could make, and with no evidence to back it up. You're a nigger.

>muh rape meme
Persians are still Persians
Russians are still Russians
Spanish people are still Spanish

Only the rich and powerful could afford mummification, hence the ruling class

The ruling class were not europeans they looked the same as the regular folk

On Tutankhamun:
>A Swiss genealogy company named IGENEA issued a press release based on a blurry screen-grab from the Discovery documentary. It claimed that the colored peaks on the computer screen proved that Tutankhamun belonged to an ancestral line, or haplogroup, called R1b1a2, that is rare in modern Egypt but common in western Europeans.

Relax shitskin

Mummification was available to rich individuals. That does not mean that they were the ruling class.

Original Egyptians were most likely some Afroasiatic people ... so where their pharaos.
However, in the 16th century BC a technological innovation was introduced into Egypt ... the chariot! These may have been considered the 'tanks' of ancient warfare and gave those who could control them a huge advantage in open field battle.

Now, chariots had originally been an invention of Indoeuropeans and usually elite charioteers were of Indoeuropean stock, at least that had been the case in Persia and India. Charioteer elite mercenaries had a tendency to take over power in the civilizations they served ... Tutankhamuns Y-haplogroup was allegedly R1b1a2, which is a typical marker of Indoeuropeans / people of Pontic-Caspian steppe origin.

>based on a blurry screen-grab from the Discovery documentary.

Really?
...REALLY?

To conclude: Egyptians were Afroasiatic in ancient times. After introduction of the chariot and a possible 'military coup' by the Indoaryan charioteers their pharaoes may have been of Indoeuropean stock, at least in the male lineage ... however, this should not have had a huge impact on the general population. Sub-Saharan African admixture may have happened later, maybe after Islamic conquest.

Also before you continue your nonsensical theories that arent backed by any sources im going to note that your flag indicates you are a southern slav whose people for most of history were ruled by Mediterraneans and arabs

igenea.com/forum/threads/the-tutankhamun-dna-project.20/

Here's their statement

>Ad hominem

Ouch, right where it hurts too.

And where are your sources? You make your claims just the same

god i cant wait until we kill you all

>the rich weren't the ruling class in ancient times
They are brainlets that don't look past headlines. The people that made this claim were selling DNA testing kits for like $300 dollars to find a "match" and offering refunds to western europeans if they were the "missing link"

>Carsten Pusch, a geneticist at Germany's University of Tubingen who was part of the team that unraveled Tut's DNA from samples taken from his mummy and mummies of his family members, said that iGENEA's claims are "simply impossible." Pusch and his colleagues published part of their results, though not the Y-chromosome DNA, in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2010. The Y chromosome is the sex chromosome found only in males, and looking at the genes in this chromosome would show Tut's male lineage.

>Pusch's team used snippets of Y-chromosome DNA to link Tut to his closest relatives, identifying his mom and dad. But they didn't publish the full genetic data that would allow genomics companies like iGENEA to link modern people to the Tutankhamen lineage. According to Scholz, that crucial data is what appeared on the Discovery Channel.

>"Dr. Albert Zink from the EURAC [European Academy of Bolzano, an independent research center] in Bolzano and co-author of the 2010 JAMA publication screened the footage and confirmed that the company acts very unscientific," Pusch wrote in an email to LiveScience. "The Swiss company did not try to get into contact with us prior to launching their new Internet page."

>The alleged Discovery Channel markers put Tut in a genetic profile group, or haplogroup, that also includes more than half of the men in Western Europe. Scholz said the company is now searching for the closest living relatives of Tutankhamen, men who share all 16 genetic markers on the pharaoh's supposed Y chromosome. Exact matches get a refund for their $179 to $399 test and will also get free additional DNA analysis.

>$179 to $399 test

yep lebanese people all have red hair

Watch it, they have learned to move in unpredictable patterns to throw off our aim...

gimme gimme bruh

They literally say they did not have the results.
They just watched some Discovery Channel footage which could be anything.

Did it occur to you that Discovery Channel probably uses stock photos?

>R1b1a2, that is rare in modern Egypt but common in western Europeans.

Explain this then

Ancient Egyptians were Slavs.
Got it.
There's even a change of Adidas track suits in the Pharaoh tombs

Ok that is a huge load of bullcrap there ... 'finding living relatives'

Most likely that exact lineage has died out already ... at least the one with ALL the alleged markers.

Again, I do think the ruling class became (ex-)military. Charioteers. They had pulled off the same 'trick' with the Dravidians and the Mesopotamians. Those crazy, horse-loving fucks...

>the rich weren't the ruling class in ancient times

You're an idiot. I'm talking about the ruling dynasties, not rich individuals. They were not the ruling class.

god why do we even pay attention to leafs

like you people are just fucking absolutely repugnant

you smell like garbage and u claim to be european yet europeans see you as less like them than we are

you are inferior and one day we will eradicate canadians from this planet you fucking stickfighting niggers

I think I have mentioned it three separate times now ... Indoeuropean charioteers. Mercenaries. Military coup. Suddenly, 'Europeanized' pharaoes. Never had an impact on the general population only parts of the elite which they had supplanted.

Show me a RELIABLE source that Tutankhamun was R1b1a2.

Fuck you asshole! Now I have to wipe the tea from my screen.

Ja! Ja! Ja!

Persians are Caucasian and not European
Kurd's are Caucasian and not European
Armenians are Caucasian and not European
Georgians are Caucasian and not European
Ancient Egyptians were a mix of Caucasians and Negro Africans. All humans have African ancestry. Light skin and blue eyes appeared around 8-10 thousand years ago.

>rich people and the ruling class were somehow separate in any ancient society
damn I guess all the egyptian pharaohs were just poorfags right user? makes sense, there is no way a rich person could be an elite or vice versa.

ayy lmaos were white

stop with the word afroasiatic. you give the WE WUZ KANGZ something to be proud of

they were semites plain and simple

You're a fucking idiot

>Light skin and blue eyes appeared around 8-10 thousand years ago.

You ignorant ass, educate yourself better.

And this is exactly what arguing

they're pretty fuckin predictable

There is none, the research team won't release their findings

>In the year 2009 extended DNA-tests had been carried out with the mummy of Tutankamun and other members for his family. These have only partially been published in February 2010. Despite several demands, the results of the Y-DNA tests have been shut away.

They probably looked more like modern Coptic Christians, who mostly haven't racemixed with Arab Muslim invaders.
Pic related. Rami Malek is a Copt.

Light skin and blue eyes first appeared in Siberian hunter-gatherer populations. These were part of the baseline (ANE component, other was Caucasus hunter-gatherer) for the proto-Indoeuropeans. Call them IndoARYANS if you want, the name is irrelevent, it is the same source population, Yamna culture may be their oldest manifestation.

Persians and Kurds are Indoeuropeans (at least in ancestry, lot of Arab admixture from Islamic conquest), they are from the second expansion wave from the Pontic-Caspian steppe (most likely after Indoeuropeans chrashed into BMAC and took over there). R1a is a solid marker for their migration from the Black Sea, as is R1b for the first migration wave into Europe and Mongolia (Tocharian civilization).

Georgians are different, I give you that, closer to the original Caucasus hunter-gatherer population as well as some other 'weird' admixture.

Blacks were present, but in the hieroglyphs appear as slaves to me. Must suck to always be the slave.

>There is none

So stop shouting "WE WUZ..."

But thats wrong , humans originated in Europe.

Who's shouting anything

This is a comically stupid response. If you did kys it would benefit the world.

>a fucking slav can't even into feudalism
You should be embarrassed, brainlet.

Ramses the Great had red hair.

...

Another brainlet posting more bullshit that is easily debunked. Lots of mummified corpses (even of niggers and abbos) have "red" hair. It's just exposure to the elements
livescience.com/48384-ancient-redhead-myth.html
>Hair contains two kinds of pigments, one that produces dark hair and one for red hair. The sun degrades these pigments in a process known as photo-oxidation, but the hair pigment for darker hair isn't as stable as the one for red hair, so hair turns a reddish color when exposed to sunlight for long periods of time. This is why the hair of ancient aboriginal people in Australia has a reddish tint, Tridico said.

>The researchers also found that fungi had invaded many of the hairs they studied. Some of the hairs were "just covered by fungus," Tridico said. When a layer of tiny fungal filaments called hyphae coats a hair, it can give the strand a reddish color, she said. And since fungi need heat and moisture to grow, finding them reveals something about the environment in which an animal lived.

>Sometimes, hair can pick up red pigmentation from its environment. Iron from soil or permafrost can seep into hairs, staining them red, Tridico said. For example, some of the "bog people" who have been found preserved in peat marshes in Northern Europe have reddish hair. But the bogs contain a lot of tannins, the bitter substance in tea or wine, which can degrade the pigments in hair, Tridico said. While she hasn't examined the hairs from the bog people herself, she said, "I strongly suspect tannins have infiltrated them and given them a reddish tinge."

>Like human hair, animal fur can redden after death, too. Some scientists say that woolly mammoth fur was a strawberry-blond color. But "that garish orange color can't possibly be natural," Tridico said. Instead, the animals probably had a layer of colorless hair that soaked up iron from the permafrost, she said.

Fuckin' aliens man.

>blond mummies

Rather stick with Tocharians, pic related, straight from Mongolia (mfw the Finngolian meme is true)

>livescience.com/48384-ancient-redhead-myth.html
fucking nigger moron that just gives a reason for why some hair turns red over time it's not a debunking of red haired ancients. dumbfuck, when he went grey he had his hair dyed lol but he was red haired and came from a family of redheads.

"Microscopic inspection of the roots of Ramesses II's hair proved that the king's hair originally was red, which suggests that he came from a family of redheads."

DURRRR YOU'RE A BRAINLET!! stfu nigger, how does being a nigger feel?

...

again you nordicists cucks will cling to anything as "proof" that all ancient egyptian wuz actually blonde haired blue eyed europeans. Meanwhile DNA testing, scientific studies, geographic data, historical texts from people like the Greeks and Romans (who never once described Egyptians as being like them or having red/blonde hair) will keep proving you wrong time and time again. Again, using nigger tier arguments and grasping at straws and using blogspot/facebook tier infographs is exactly what the wewuz nogs do.

I didn't say all Egyptians were blonde and blue haired but it's obvious their ruling class were of European heritage. Do you really think a bunch of sand/niggers built the pyramids?

So they looked like modern day ameramutts?

youtube.com/watch?v=S9rDLyYxDVc&t=81s

>it's obvious their ruling class were of European heritage
t. brainlet.
made me fall for the bait, forgot how bad aussies were for a second there m8

WE

I mean this in all sincerity you are clueless and to even begin to show you clueless you are would be a monumental task because you actually believe the shit they taught you in school which is all lies for you to know the truth about anything this world would take a format and reboot of your brain and you will roll your eyes and laugh at this because you have no clue how deep in the matrix you are and never will until you actually start looking, which most people will never do because they have no clue they are even in the matrix
youtube.com/watch?v=gqSLirbFtd0

none of you have the faintest clue how deep the deception goes even those that kinda know what we are taught is all bullshit still have not the faintest clue of what they are really hiding and doing to us
youtube.com/watch?v=GGwkAotRyqE

and the really sad part is most of you won't even care or do anything about it so I suppose you get what you deserve in this life, such is karma

yes, common people were also mummified, not all of course. the richest

you weren't royalty if you were buried with 100 people

these people made the largest structures on earth to house 1 individual corpse and maybe servants he wanted to take with him to the afterlife

Sure thing kikeniggerspic.

if anyone actually does want to find the truth it is here start with the playlists it will show you everything, but it takes and dedication to find the truth in this life it is not for everyone
youtube.com/channel/UCjAFO7xz5UotUfIzvd_xXDA/videos

Do you know what dynasty is, brainlet?

you are a moron

read up on your Egyptian history, go through the dynasties. The pharaohs weren't simply rich.

Mummification wasn't the expensive part (taking out someone's organs and binding them), what was expensive was getting your sarcophagus made and a mountain hollowed out to place that sarcophagus along with all the other gold items.

It's like you are comparing people who make 100K per year with Bill Gates or worse

You're again trying to muddy the water. The ruling class was separate from it's subjects

This man speaks the truth.

If you only knew how deep the deception really goes

newsweek.com/trachilos-footprint-crete-human-evolution-million-658287
ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/do-ica-stones-prove-mankind-coexisted-dinosaurs-advanced-technology-098989
telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/05/incredible-graveyard-5000-year-old-giants-found-china/
ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/giant-7-8-foot-skeletons-uncovered-ecuador-sent-scientific-testing-004119
humansarefree.com/2017/09/fossilised-giant-footprints-discovered.html
blog.world-mysteries.com/ancient-writings/tolkiens-middle-earth-true-history

When you realize everything you think you know is all an illusion you then you can begin to start learning the truth

metmuseum.org/toah/hd/phoe/hd_phoe.htm
anthropology.msu.edu/anp363-ss13/2013/02/27/the-corruption-of-the-priesthood-of-amen
biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-near-eastern-world/the-expulsion-of-the-hyksos

...

They looked like Dina Powell. She's Coptic Egyptian

WAZZZ