Prove you’re not a blind follower and name one criticism of capitalism

Prove you’re not a blind follower and name one criticism of capitalism.

Other urls found in this thread:

simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSDAP_25_points_manifesto
twitter.com/AnonBabble

too make more money you need to make a lot of personal sacrifice and increased risk.

No one wants your alt-centrist socialism under a different name. Get lost.

Capitalism has no safeguards against monopolies, which aren’t conducive to capitalism

>no one wants any alternatives to neoliberalism
>we know because we destroyed all the non neoliberal countries

Hi Chaim

That's where you're wrong, bucko.

simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSDAP_25_points_manifesto

Just one? Alright.

It promotes the interests of corporations over the interests of citizens of the nation.

capitalism makes it almost to easy for people morally objectionable to make a profit on the backs of decent folks, and me being for small government makes it hard for me to swallow how much intervention can we allow for this sort of thing to be dealt with or even if we should stop it at all.

The sons and daughters of the rich will be rich through no merit of their own.

Fascism allows natural monopolies to exist and would amalgamate the quazi-monopolies we have today. They compensate for this capitalist power shift by retaining the right to interfere in all aspects of the corporation.

The NSDAP used this to compel the largest industrial monopolies to produce cheap radios, to give their workers raises, to build new cafeterias, to greenify their plot of land, to regulate the suffering of animals, etc.

Oy vey I’m not sure if I like the sound of this

The NSDAP had big government for sure, but the average working man did not feel the weight of this government. In the 21st century we have big governments that shit on the citizen while letting the big corps do whatever they please.

easily corrupted. must not allow Jews to participate.

>name one criticism of capitalism
That capitalism, while superior in terms of pure wealth and raising that GDP, doesn't itself care about having a healthy society or culture.

For example, porn is bad and fucks people up. It's psychological addicting and allows people to get away with not forming real relationships. But it's still enticing because we have base drives and desires, and so it still sells if it's allowed. This is not benefiting the society, but because it sells, it's therefore "moral" in the only sense of morality that capitalism alone has, which is whether or not it makes money.

The point I'm making is that there are certain things that are "anti-capitalism" that I would gladly employ, even though it would result in loses in GDP, it the protection/cultivation of the health of our society/culture/etc was worth it.

Another example would be women in the workplace. Women working does a few problems
1) drives down cost of labor due to doubling the labor supply
2) makes it hard for pair-bonding to occur, because women naturally only wish to date men who can provide resources, and this dynamic is thrown off when women are making just as much as men.
3) women spending time on careers means they're spending less time at home having children and raising families.

However, (((businesses))) LOVE women in the workplace because the extra labor drives down the value of labor. It's the reason why a father working alone could easily provide for his wife and 6 kids back in the day, but now a family with both the mother and father working full-time can barely afford to raise their 1-2 kids. It's typical tricks.
In my society, I'd implement the "anti-capitalist" policy of not allowing women to work in most fields, with exceptions for certain things that women have traditionally done, like secretaries, nurses, etc

I can talk about the bank printing money and funding our enemies and allies. Creating a false reality powered by magic money.

>Implying I follow (((Capitalism)))

yeah i agree, i think we are reaching the tipping point where the mega corps have more power and reach than the governments do because the checks and balances that keep the power of the government in check which does not apply to corporations like pfizer or time warner cable for instance.
i think at some point we need to have clear guidelines on how much reach a corporation ought to have even if that means cutting back on the idea of capitalism, i think in an ideal world we all want a free market for better or worse with as little regulations as possible, but in a world where intellectual property and copyrights stifling growth and preventing progress due to arbitrary rules set in place to keep companies making fuck loads of money its a real problem that needs to be addressed and this is coming from a centrist libertarian.

It dilutes artistic and intellectual endeavors to worthless levels, replacing it instead with vicious pursuits and vain enterprises where huge profit can be made off of people’s appetitive and base desires. In short, it erodes culture, identity, and art

All three of the symbols in your post are bitch ass movements.

Very likely to lead to a materialistic mindset which can erode spirituality. Being Consumed by William Cavanaugh is a good read.

When a tree becomes overgrown, you do some trimming.
Walmart doesn't need to be destroyed, for example. It can be beautified with careful cuts AND investments.

America is the wealthiest country in the world but it’s a fucking zoo free for all. I used to respect Europe for their identity before they wanted to simply copy America.

It gives OP the chance to be successful

>if you're not a commie or a capitalist you must be a natsoc
Talk about false dichotomies

you can be anything you want, but you'll always be a faggot.

It can be ruined by implementing a welfare system.

Frankfurter Schule had some really great critiques senpai

Free market provides astronomical wages for sport monkeys. They should be taxed as hell

All of your problems are with scarcity, not capitalism. Scarcity is an economic FACT.

You are mistaking capitalism with meritocracy. Capitalism is about own yourself and hence your actions and consequences

We don't practice capitalism. We practice usury via compounding interest, regulated by a central bank, based on a debt-based/created currency. No country has ever practiced capitalism. There is no free market without government interference. As long as everyone falsely believes we practice capitalism, our system will remain broken and the American people will continue to pay interest to a private banking cartel to digitally create our own currency, like idiots. Don't worry, we are not the only idiots, any other country with a central bank under the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), also is falling for this massive wealth transfer scheme.

Remember, both the Fed and the IRS were created in 1913. This way, if they can't screw you with usury/debt, they will get you with taxes.

Scarcity has nothing to do with capitalism’s moral degeneration of society in the name of profit and consumption

No system will save stupid people. Trash deserves the fire it fuels, so burn it all™