Sup Forums approved books

What books will redpill me?

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/ORTHODOXY-KINGDOM-Father-Spyridon-Bailey/dp/1786979519/ref=la_B00GUGOVJE_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1512333219&sr=1-2
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Untergang_des_Abendlandes#Philosophische_Grundlagen
pdfdrive.net
fpp.co.uk/books/Hitler/2001/HW_Web_dl.pdf
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jLFrSy76YJee-J74BMTGp9ejLkIPs6-F?usp=sharing
unz.com/sfrancis/guilt-trip-over-crusades/
youtube.com/user/RealCrusadeHistory
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I'm currently reading the great gatsby, I was also recomended here on Sup Forums to read Evola

George Orwell is a must.

...

...

They're depressing, though.

The Strange Death of Europe

Also this chart

Reality is depressing you cuck.
Stick to Harry Potter if you can't handle the redpill.

come on user, this should cheer you up

...

>tfw you will never read the 100+ lost plays of Sophocles

...

read this now

amazon.com/ORTHODOXY-KINGDOM-Father-Spyridon-Bailey/dp/1786979519/ref=la_B00GUGOVJE_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1512333219&sr=1-2

Are you retarded? I posted the books. I just added that as a comment.

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Untergang_des_Abendlandes#Philosophische_Grundlagen

only humas are able to read and to understand Spengler . Spengler is a god-like thinker

...

Euripides>Sophocles

Euripides was redpilled as fuck when it came to women

...

This too.

Link please, I can't find it

Read this book

this book looks like a casual collection of nigger hate threads from /pol

Don't read the abridged edition.

ordered this with my christmas money, should arrive in 2 days. i need to finish conquest of gaul before then

In addition to Orwell.

Read your enemies too

>dialectic of enlightenment - Adorno
>a people’s history of the United States - Howard zinn
>postmarxist theory - Goldstein

libgen.pw

and

libgen.io

to freely download all of these books.

Read the fucking Tulmud too if you want to get woke on the JQ

Bumping this for college books. Don’t buy unless you have to

pdfdrive.net

Just finished gallic wars today, civil war drags in some places but overall very insightful. Hope you have a great read user

Haven't you read this when you were 12
when you were 9
Good one but only for certain people
Oswald spengler is great
This although Zinn isn't even that bad
Also read up on Praxis by Deleuze. Antioedipus for example

Many of the really good rightist and marxist works are very complex but the marxist ones have been very influential

>hurr durr i'm so sophisticated
Just because you can read doesn't mean that you can truly understand what you read.
Orwell only begins to make sense after you've learned about history and seen those things in real life.

We were composing a reading list right
Animal farm is an allegory

Somewhat related question. A while back I think I saw a reading list on legal philosophy/jurisprudece. If anyone has it I would appreciate it.

...

git gud

hello world

Prepare for some serious red-pilling on how the jews have rigged the financial system.

Does anyone know a good place to upload these books? I somehow got them all.

And that matters how? You can read it to understand the archetypes of revolution without understanding the history or you can read it in context.

Either way it's still advised political reading.

...

I could only find Goebbels book in German and Degrelle's book in French though.

...

In History and Moral Philosophy class. Learning how force is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived from. Eager to sign up to the military and conquer the galaxy in the name of mankind. Wake up from my daydream in public school, in the twenty first century. Listen to a fat, ugly and illiterate sheboon screeching on about how western civilization is evil. Realize you will never have a teacher as red pilled as Heinlein and as badass as Michael Ironside.

That's a good book as well.

Believe it or not a university lecturer dropped this red pill on our class and didn't refute any of it.

Ethno-nationalism 101.

Sam Francis is probably one of the most underrated political thinkers in American history. He was so perceptive that his columns from 17 years ago read like the headlines of today.

That's a pretty shitty list. Just because some books were important for their time does not mean that they are important now. Like Plato's Republic.
Did you actually read that? It sounds like two school children talking about ideal government. There are huge as fuck logical errors in the book. Plato misses some very basic aspects of human nature. Political theory has gotten a million times better since then.

>George Orwell is a must.
Funny thing about 1984 is that it ranks pretty high on the list of books people lie about reading. As long as you have absolutely no follow up questions, I have read this one too.

...

If you want to really understand racial differences read this book. It predates the genome, but it wasn't refuted by the new findings merely reinforced.

anything John Locke or Thomas Paine. understand true humanistic freedom, anons.

spot the highschooler

I did read Plato's Republic. His criticisms of democracy seem prescient until you realize they were observable even then. The list is more to deal with influential works than perceptive works. Marx and his intellectual descendants got a lot wrong, but their wrongness matters more than Evola's rightness. That being said the list seems okay for now.

Go read Rationalism in Politics by Michael Oakeshott and you will realize what a bunch of horseshit John Locke and Thomas Paine wrote.

fpp.co.uk/books/Hitler/2001/HW_Web_dl.pdf

Who /etiquettepilled/ here?

>Freud's id= shtetl yid
> t. Cuddihy

Sounds like you didn't read it. Plato does not just critisize democracy, but also suggests a whole new system. A system that is worse than even communism.

Hint: Trump could never have become a leader under such a system and pretty much none of his appointed people could either.

Children discuss rights. Adults discuss responsibilities. Downloading that book now.

Disregard Locke and Paine, embrace Hobbes and Burke.

Also Carlyle and de Maistre.

>how to kill your own argument 101
>a book by Denmark

...

This is one of the very best non-technical books on artificial inteligence.

I will be honest the book made me tear up in certain moments. I think I may be too much of a romantic, but yes it is worth the read.

...

I read it with an open mind. He suggests an extremely totalitarian system and his input that women be held in common seemed somewhat bizarre. His acknowledgement of the degeneration from monarchy, to timocracy, to aristocracy, to democracy, and then to tyranny reveal that he himself didn't believe his system was viable in the long run. His criticisms of democracy are merely the most relevant ones today. The ending being a retelling of the experiences in the underworld seemed like a non-sequitur. Also his assertion that everyone should be a specialist seems itself to be unrealistic and contrary to his supposed goal of wisdom. I didn't insult you I disagreed, please understand the difference before you go around accusing people of things they did or did not do.

Excellent book to understand how the masses behave.

I've compiled a short list of books I plan on reading. Of these, which should I get first? Probably going to get paperback on amazon, because I can't be arsed to comb through public libraries or used book stores.

seeto download.

I would begin with the historical, preferably comparative histories, to gain a the perspective needed to understand subsequent philosophies.

...

read this one, if you can find it.

>Disregard Paine
Literally required reading for Americans, friend.

I love coming to nu/pol/ book threads to eventually see this posted every time in the top 10 posts. Babies first philosophy book

I think both Americans and Brits should read this one.

We should both read this too.

muhammed, wtf do you know about freedom and true ideals of it? you literally live in the dystopian state from 1984. so heed Twain's advice, and stfu instead of confirming to the world your stupidity.

>Nineteen Eighty-Four, often published as 1984, is a dystopian novel published in 1949 by English author George Orwell.[2][3] The novel is set in Airstrip One, formerly Great Britain, a province of the superstate Oceania. Oceania is a world of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance and public manipulation. Oceania's residents are dictated by a political regime euphemistically named English Socialism (shortened to "Ingsoc" in Newspeak, the government's invented language). The superstate is under the control of the privileged, elite Inner Party. The Inner Party persecutes individualism and independent thinking known as "thoughtcrimes" and is enforced by the "Thought Police".[4]

These are what I have

I haven't read it yet, but it's on the list.

Econ folder

The only book that can red pill

Where can I download all of this?

Anything by the Hitchens brothers.

Especially because they argue for the polar opposite methods of achieving the same goal of a civil society.

Into the Cannibal's Pot, if you want a glimpse at the future.

I will start uploading them to a google drive and you can pick and choose as they come up. Might take a while to get the whole thing though

drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jLFrSy76YJee-J74BMTGp9ejLkIPs6-F?usp=sharing

There's a part in it where he quotes someone else's story of a scenario where the communists took over Britain and systematically erase our culture by just not teaching it and ostracizing it to the youngest generation. They then try to bring back a Shakespeare play but of course the culture has been destroyed so the new British people just get confused and angry at the play.

Thank God the youth of Britain have not been subjected to something like that haha.... ha...ha....

Personally I have found Christopher Hitchens to be someone who becomes less impressive every time you look back at him. He would do anything to win an argument with or without facts. He carefully walked the line of selling half-truths against whatever he fought.

how did this ugly, deformed fat fucking faggot sad sack of shit manage to become such a party animal and bone so many women?

Peter = WIS
Christopher = INT

Reminds me of this.

unz.com/sfrancis/guilt-trip-over-crusades/
>Yet right or wrong, the fact that modern Westerners can’t even defend the Crusades as a manifestation of Western man and his civilization tells us a good deal about what’s wrong with Western man today. Western man no longer believes in himself or the civilization his ancestors created, crusaded for, and died for. In place of believing in it and defending it, our religious and political leaders are ashamed of it and want to apologize for it—even for those parts no one remembers.

Wow, thank you user. I sincerely appreciate this a lot.

Yeah no worries, anything for someone who wants to read more

THIS. Sup Forums is a Christian board, and the Bible is the final Red Pill.

christopher hitchens is a retarded zionist shill.

He was punched in syria because he was caught defacing symbols of the SSNP. Imagine being such a butthurt kike that you fly to syria to deface swastikas.Thats how stupid he is.

Indeed. If you want actual history about the Crusades (including some debunking of bullshit Leftists say) this YouTube channel is great:

youtube.com/user/RealCrusadeHistory

And this book. (The New Concise History of the Crusades).

>Jewish book
>Redpill

All religious folk are fundamentally traitors to their nation and fellow man. Especially Jews, but none are particularly exempt from being cancerous to civil society.

lol

I'll check it out.

I remember a conversation with Peter when, defending NATO military action (which Peter opposed), said "isn't it strange how when there's nothing to be gained from war the Right turn into pacifists."