Could a nation with little to no taxation work?

Could a nation with little to no taxation work?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=teZK3S91mas
twitter.com/AnonBabble

no

No. They're always retarded failures.

...

yes, but you would have to pay for everything and end up spending the same if not more

>roads could be build by private companies and you pay per mile with an ez pass type set up

Not in a realistic scenario.

if it sells its services as mercenaries, it could be. You will need to train and arm the 90% of your population though.

no because then you wouldn't have welfare and people would starve

Yes. We did it in the United States and it worked. We just have to eliminate most of the government and let people fend for themselves. A military, police force, judicial system, DNR, and some other bureaucracies and we're good to go.

Not if you want your nation to be independent. You'd end up being a proxy state for various large businesses, so the you could actually end up paying way more than you would ever pay in taxes for services that you today take for granted.

Maybe if you got rid of capitalism and formed some sort of commune where goods are freely shared to those who need them, there would be much less need for the various functions a state assumes, and thus less need to levy taxes to provide them. Gosh, I wonder if there's a term for a society like that.

>Implying that people that are dependant on welfare don't deserve to starve

there is, its called famine

barely

America was one all the way up until WWI.

Yeah it is called a fantasy land.

Literally defeats the whole purpose of government.

Haha! Like we could faggot!

>no taxes
Not very well.
>some taxes
Yes. With business volume.

Yes, it's called an offshore tax haven.

>America was one all the way up until WWI.
>Yes. We did it in the United States and it worked. We just have to eliminate most of the government

I know your education is garbage, but surely someone has told you the US before the world wars was a backwater shithole with zero relevancy on the global stage?

It took two complete implosions of Europe for you to be the only ones with a non-bombed manufacturing base that gave you position to rise. Your entire history as a world power and developed nation is post-industralization with high taxes.

Wanting to "go back" is like praying for a return to mud huts.

kill yourself wolf poster faggot
sage you piece of newfag cancerous shit

>US before the world wars was a backwater shithole
Why did millions of yuropoors come to America then?

...

A slump in Europe that sent millions of our most unfortunate looking to establish themselves. Just a promise of free land to farm was enough and better than what they had.

So this is where you have to somehow say you're going to bring back the right to free land and free exploitation in the modern world. Do you realize how short this period was, and that it was motivated by the need to lay physical claims to the country?

How exactly would you revert to that stage? I'm genuinely curious. Will you behead everyone who is rich? Every megacorp needs to be dismantled so people can actually have their shot at starting over? Sounds communist.

>How exactly would you revert to that stage?
cut 90% of government spending
send degenerates back to yurope

Could you actually try? I want to see you seriously think about this.

What do you think happens when you cut that spending?

Yes, but only in aristocratic nations

>What do you think happens when you cut that spending?

Degenerates riot
Degenerates get shot

Well, enjoy death then.

>Could a nation with little to no taxation work?

If there were no Jews it would work fine.

But with jJews you would have them starving in the streets...

Why are all Swedes so cucked?
Why are you afraid of a mob of worthless gibs me dat niggers?

If nations would sack up and cut the useless cunts off of welfare, that would be most western nations.

With little to no taxation you run into the problem of having a government with no real power, thus leaving you in a somewhat anarchic state

Good luck defending yourself against other nations

Who is going to invade a nation with 300 million guns?
It would be a disaster

Where are you going to get the currency to purchase said guns? There is no federal control of currency so nothing is regulated, you'd have a mass influx of multiple currencies that all amount to nothing

No. There has to be taxation to afford the government.

There should not be an income tax, however.

`The only things that that thrive off taxation are parasites on the rest of society.

That really is all you need to know...........

Oh goody a Swedish authority on pre WWI American history.

>>Everyone live in mud huts for fucks sake google Victorian mansion you BORK.

Maybe if all or almost all government administration was automated/computerized and the only humans in the process of government would be elected officials.

Kind of like a factory where instead of 500 workers, you have 490 robots and 10 guys monitoring the robots.

A nation with no taxation couldn't work, at least not without post-scarcity and the abolition of the very concept of money.

>Where are you going to get the currency to purchase said guns?
they already exist
>There is no federal control of currency so nothing is regulated,
What does that have to do with low taxes?
> that all amount to nothing
Not if they are backed by something

>Wanting to "go back" is like praying for a return to mud huts

Mud huts are better than cuckdom desu.

You could privately make the robots, there's no real need for the government at all, it's remmnant of the time of the kangz.

When monarcgy ruled by divine mandate, the time of the deus ex, before metacognition.

You could have private welfare and it "would work".

But do expect it being run by kikes.

>it's remmnant of the time of the kangz.

There actually was never a time of nigger kings...

youtube.com/watch?v=teZK3S91mas

fag

Call them warlords, or whatever, they determined that you required to pay tribute to them and that turned into taxation.

The democratic regimes are just monarchy by other means.

The early stages of the Roman Empire did.

But to cut out taxes you would have to cut out welfare in western society which is like 50% of government spending. The easiest way of cutting that would be to remove the pension and force people to save for retirement.

Welfare unemployment should still stay but be cracked down on people who game the system.

This would drop taxes by 10% easily.

?????

>Swedish Intellectuals
The US made up over 15% of the world market by WWI you mongoloid and was rapidly modernizing its navy and maintaining the Monroe Doctrine. The US was neutral in anything outside the Americas because the scramble for Africa and the Cabinet Wars were just idiotic prestige bullshit that emptied treasuries. You absolute retard.

>Wanting to "go back" is like praying for a return to mud huts.
We want that.

>CNT
supported by the soviet union, used as useful idiots in a proxy war
>YPG/YPJ
supported by America, used as useful idiots in a proxy war
notice a pattern user?

Taxation is basically a protection racket. If the government doesn't tax you, somebody else will fill the void, either a gangster or warlord.

>democratic regimes are just monarchies by another name
imagine being this much of a new fag

Ask the Bedouins