Why did Iranians choose an ISLAMIC THEOCRACY of all the possible forms of government? The whole "Persians are sophisticated and smart!" kind of falls apart when you consider that fact. Sure, the current protests might be a CIA plot, but... why was Iranian society so fragile and capable of being fractured to begin with? Why an Islamic theocracy of all things?
Why did Iranians choose an ISLAMIC THEOCRACY of all the possible forms of government...
Jaxson Richardson
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
forbes.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
discoveringislam.org
forbes.com
bbc.com
articles.latimes.com
hormozgan96.wordpress.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Adrian Gonzalez
>ISLAMIC THEOCRACY
Most redpilled for of government
It's the only way to prevent Jewish cultural, economic and political subversion
Luke Kelly
the japanese says no
Noah Kelly
You should show some respect, these are the people who lived in flourishing societies while nordniggers hadn't even come up with written language
Noah Rivera
Weeb detected
Nicholas Perry
I mean the US gov't kinda had a hand in it, right?
Parker Johnson
So why are they having such a tough time governing themselves successfully in 2018, if they had such a long civilizational head-start over Western Europeans?
Hunter Scott
>Why did Iranians choose an ISLAMIC THEOCRACY
Because they were fed up and exhausted of the ZOG-CIA government put in power there by America and Israel.
It was the act of a desperate people that escaped Zionist influence.
Israel and the US literally sicced Iraq on them in 1980 in retaliation.
Ryan Long
what happened was that the shah (who was installed by the US/UK after they got rid of mossadegh) was starting to talk back.
Meaing he was installed by the CIA when he was in his late 20s and by the time he was in his 50s he knew who was running shit. Google shah talks about the jewish power.
then they installed Khomeni, why i don't know But that motherfucker landed in iran days after the ((islamic revolution)) via AIR FRANCE!! DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
Evan Jones
Lmao these sandniggers are a low tier civ
Europeans clearly surpassed them without any problems
Ryder Martinez
Stephan talks a bit about that. Never really knew anything about Iranian history myself.
Connor Morgan
All the good and true Persians, the Zoroastrians left Persia for India to escape the lslamic flood. Iran today is a shadow of its former self.
Justin Allen
>Muh Jews
Andrew Morgan
Because jews run the world at the moment and decide who is successful and who is not. (((they))) can destabilize your country with a phonecall or crash your economy with no survivors if you provoke them
John Nelson
Khomeini wasn't installed it was was the will of the revolution or something, the close religious group around him is the key.
Mason Ortiz
wanna go down the rabbit hole buddy boy?
Khomeni's dad was a brit and worked for BP. (anglo iranian oil company). His mom was some India whore.
Benjamin James
nope. his dad was a british agent
Dominic Perry
for those who speak farsi
youtube.com
Owen Price
That changes nothing, he was as anti west as you can be.
There's plenty of things you can say about him, but an enabler of western culture he wasn't.
Luis Nguyen
>he was as anti west as you can be
wonder who benefits from that
Ian Reed
the fuck? the japanese have completely been dominated by Zionist ideology ...so much that they are cucked beyond repair. Try again.
Gavin Martin
He's got a point. Jews are superior superhumans.
Lincoln Scott
There's many things that never worked, but no one benefited really.
Benjamin Kelly
never said he was. but he was installed in iran by UK
Juan Ward
lol have fun with your sandnigger refugee zionist problems.
Iran > Europe.
Israel > Europe
Russia > Europe
America > Europe
lolololol
Brayden Peterson
The anglos always take credit for shit they didn't do.
Henry Miller
At that time France was very influencial in the Middle East, thus Khomeini sought asylum in France, and naturally went back to Iran via France.
After the Iranian Revolution, several Iranian intellectuals also sought asylum in France.
Andrew Ortiz
Christopher Foster
Apparently not.
Adrian Howard
Well I know a lot of Iranians who were in the country around that time, essentially a lot of them were worried they'd end up with communism. The mullahs were crazy, but they never brought the country into the kind of incompetence and starvation that commies almost always bring with them
Dominic Thomas
Pre-Iranian revolution:
-CIA controls Iranian intelligence service Savak
-USG controls Iranian military brass, sells them armaments, has client state relationship with Iran's leader the Shah
-Iran is much like the USGs Persian version of Israel
-CIA stops funneling money to Mullahs around 1977, Mullahs received money as placation after failed 60s revolt
-Mullahs rebel in 1978 after getting their welfare cutoff
-US controlled Iranian military and Savak stand down during revolution, many military leaders are subsequently executed
-Khomeini flys from France for public return from exile, military and political officials do nothing to prevent him from becoming lead figure of anti-regime revolution, he is greeted and welcomed as the leader
-This all goes down around the time the USG learns of the Shah's terminal cancer
-CIA claims it failed to see Iranian revolution happening
-Later it is confirmed US made connections with Khomeini before his return to Iran
More to this of course but it's not a bad start.
Jonathan Campbell
they didn't choose it, the guy who led the 1979 revolution wasn't even Iranian, he was a British Intelligence agent, his father worked for the British Foreign Office and his mother was Indian (Hindi)
Jace Hernandez
Honesty, it wasn't that bad of an outcome. Initially a lot of the support for the revolution was from communist student groups. The fact that the victorious factions eventually coalesced around a fundamentally traditionalist and patriarchal system was a great stroke of luck.
You may not like it, but it's not for you, it's not for white people- it keeps the country stable, every time (((democracy))) is intoduced to a middle eastern country it leads to another million migrants heading straight to white countries.
Benjamin Phillips
wow thats spooky, that is NOT the image i posted, dumb Sup Forums
see attached links
Samuel Cox
>The fact that the victorious factions eventually coalesced around a fundamentally traditionalist and patriarchal system was a great stroke of luck.
(((GREAT STROKE OF LUCK)))
Cooper Martin
persians are indo european aryans you stupid cuck swede
Ian Flores
Why pakistan an islamic theocracy? Why are there indian muslims? Why are there asian muslims? I dont really know but something tells me that mosques are going to be just as prevalent worldwide as churches are cause of cultural liberalism , if not absolutely dominate the rest of the world in 200 years or so...
Austin Stewart
Will look at user, thank you.
Reciprocity:
bbc.com
Charles Morris
Because the Shah stifled all forms of dissent but he left the Ayotollahs alone.
Aiden Bennett
Communism was extremely popular throughout the middle east at that time, and the left is where a lot of the energy was at in the revolution. The country easily could have swung to them instead of a fundamentally right-wing regime, which has been absolutely wonderful when it comes to foreign policy and support of groups like Hezbollah.
Nathaniel Sullivan
>installed in iran by UK
No he wasnt he was just a man who was very aware of their culture and despised it
Brandon Price
During the CIA plot to remove Mosaddegh, Khomeini was observed taking part in the anti-Mosaddegh demonstrations organized by this godfather.
Hmmm as the Shah left he put Bahktiar in charge who was a French-educated Nationalist like Mossadegh. One of his first orders was to release all the political prisoners of the Shah, but by then it was too late. The shah fled the country with bone marrow cancer while the prime minister only lasted a few months, but he was very much pro-democracy, secular, educated at the Sorbonne. Not a Russophile at all, but also not an Anglophile (unlike Khomeini)
Ethan Walker
Say hello to the Sheikh on my behalf.
Ryan Garcia
hormozgan96.wordpress.com
Hindizadeh (Later Ruhollah Khomeini) was born on the 22 or 24 September 1902 in Jalandhar, Punjab. His Father was the British Super-Agent in Persia (since 1890) & adventurer William Richard Williamson(Later Haji Abdullah Al Zobair), his Mother was a Kashmiri Indian.
the young Hendizadeh, failed to make his mark in Najaf and went to the Iranian holy city of Qom, where he studied under Ayatollah Boroujerdi. When family names became a requirement by law under His Majesty Reza Shah, the young man chose the city of his residence, Khomein, as the designator and took on the name Khomeini.
Khomeini’s Father Williamson took holidays in Kashmir and married at least seven times to Arab and Indian women. His sons attended religious schools. Reportedly, one son went to the Iranian holy city of Qom and took the name Khomeini.
British were exploiting the oilfields. Williamson, now a Muslim, joined British Petroleum as political officer. He called himself Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri. The Šâh of Iran wanted to build an empire that he claimed would be the sixth greatest power in the world. To make his dream a reality, he wanted to buy the most modern and sophisticated weapons in the world. To accomplish this, the Šâh spent more than $20 billion in the military field. This was a great concern for the U.S. because this would create an imbalance between Iran and its neighbors.In an interview with U.S. News & World Report, Šâh said that if the U.S. would take an unfriendly attitude towards Iran, then Iran “can hurt you (U.S.) as badly, if not more so, than you can hurt us (Iran). Not just through oil, we can create trouble for you in the region. If you force us to change our friendly attitude, the repercussions will be immeasurable.
Grayson James
>choose
Who said they did choose it? The country had been a mess after the revolution, different groups were fighting for dominance. Usually in such a scenario the most ruthless (or those with the most 'outside support', whatever you prefer) do win and take over control.
Dominic James
The CIA did not want left-wing democrats taking over from the Shah as they might not be easy to control. So, reportedly, the CIA allowed the Ayatollahs to take over.
Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom, the Ayatollah Khomeini received a “monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British.”
On 19 January 1980, the International Herald Tribune reported that the Shah had said, two years before he was overthrown, that he had heard from two different sources connected with oil companies that the regime in Iran would change. ‘We believe that there was a plan to ensure less oil was offered to the world markets in order to bring down the price (of oil). One country was to be chosen for the sacrifice… It seems that the country chosen to drop its oil production was mine’ said the Shah.
According to the Guardian: “Shah- Oil Companies Helped to Oust Him”The Shah’s nationalist policies were making him more popular in Iran and making his country more independent and more powerful. This worried the CIA and MI6.
1. The Šâh bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown’s own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers. Over one and a half million people became land owners, thus ending the old feudal system.
2. The Šâh allowed women the right to vote. He brought an end to the wearing of the veil.
3. He developed plans for a $90 billion nuclear power program.
4. The Šâh signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company.
5. He began to close down the opium industry. This had been created during the days of British influence.
The Šâh also raised the point about the BBC providing its propaganda services to Khomeini and the Islamic fundamentalists in an interview with David Frost while in exile in Panama.
Hudson Morales
The Šâh also raised the point about the BBC providing its propaganda services to Khomeini and the Islamic fundamentalists in an interview with David Frost while in exile in Panama.
He told Frost:
“Do you think that Mr. Khomeini, an uneducated person . . . could have planned all this, masterminded all this, set up all the organizations. I know that one man alone could not have done it. This I know.”
Return to Iran:
1979, Khomeini was flown from France to Iran, with the help of the British Intelligence Service, MI6 to took over Iran. In the Iran-Air aircraft flying Khomeini back from France to Tehran in early 1979, with cameras rolling, a journalist asked: What do you feel about returning to Iran? He replied: Nothing! The question was repeated, and again he replied: khomeini1235Nothing! Shariatmadari was higher in the religious hierarchy than Khomeini. In 1979, after Khomeini took over Iran, he placed Shariatmadari under house arrest. One of the first actions which Khomeini took, within hours of his return to Iran after the Šâh left, was to execute two prominent men who were living proof of his origin and also of his false Ayatollah status. One of these was Gen. Hassan Pakravan, Head of SAVAK, the Imperial Iranian national intelligence and security organization.
Khomeini and his British past:
The CIA & MI6 wanted to topple the Šâh of Iran because of the British-American Oil Intrests. Ruhollah Khomeini was an appropriate agent for this purpose. He had spent time in India and was in contact there with institutions of English colonialism, and this is how he become known by the name `Seyyed Hindi`.
Gavin Nguyen
who cares
FUCK IRAN
Happy new Year 2018
Camden Cooper
Linguists, who studied his public speeches in 1979 and 1980, concluded his Persian vocabulary to be less than 200 words, so not only did he not have Persian blood, he did not even speak the language. With the number of Iranians who have died because of him and his successors over the past 25 years going into the hundreds of thousands, if not well over a million if the death toll from the eight-year Iran-Iraq war is included, this Anglo-Indian may have had no love or compassion for Iranians either.
acts of Khomeini’s Indian past as British Agent:
Hindizadeh (Ruholla Khomeini) was neither born in Iran, nor had any Persian blood in his veins at all, paternally or maternally. He had indian routs and was grown up in a Sikhism surroundings. Khomeini stylized `Allah` (الله) on the post-Revolutionary Iranian flag, bears (according to the conspiracy theorists) “a remarkable similarity to the khanda sikhism symbol,” who’s historic homeland is the Punjab.
Mohammad Rezâ Pahlavi Šâhanšâh of Iran himself asserted that, “If you lift up Khomeini’s beard, you will find MADE IN ENGLAND written under his chin,” in the later days of his reign as monarch. This statement by Pahlavi was an adaptation of another saying, “If you lift a mullah’s beard, you will find ‘Made in Britain’ stamped on his chin.”
source: hormozgan96.wordpress.com
Kevin Perez
Iran was a nation rapidly growing progressive in the 50's, made the mistake of wanting their own oil back from BP, got their progressive leader abducted by Eisenhower as a favor to the British, and had a brutal American-backed dictator installed for them.
The Shah drove out everyone even remotely progressive, the intellectuals fled before getting their shit thrown in the gulag.
As per the usual, the only guys who can persevere under repressive authoritarianism are the really Fundie religious. They finally reach that last straw, slap the Shah's shit, take power, and take American hostages as a get-back for Mossadegh's abduction.
Tyler James
You're correct except that the Shah never ran his own secret police, Mossad and CIA ran SAVAK. This is such public knowledge that it is even on wikipedia.
Landon Robinson
The US gov’t always has a hand in it
Xavier Mitchell
Gosh, why all the sudden interest in fucking up Iran for Israel?
Parker Parker
Redbilles AS FUCK
Totally BASED