Iran

So what happens if the Iranians actually oust the ruling dictatorship? I wonder what reaction that'll trigger considering the control of the nuclear weapons program and the nukes that they bought from the black market.

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/rabbitlayla/status/947844126719983616
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Committee_on_United_Europe
telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/27/the-european-union-always-was-a-cia-project-as-brexiteers-discov/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Hello, I am a German.
There is nothing to worry about, America will fix the situation in Iran.
Please do not attempt to intervene in any way.

I am a fan of Americans.
They bring freedom and peace throughout the world.

The United States of America (USA) are the heroes of the world.

Good goy, good goy.

The fate of humanity depends on the decisions of our saviours, the Americans.

America can't do a thing. Trump invades anywhere he loses support from even his own political base and the libtards go bananas.

You feeling alright Hans?

Nothing bad if it's a pro US regime. The Iranian nuclear program doesn't turn to a bomb. Iran will be pro-US and it'll keep its program after revealing whatever information was hidden.

The only anti-US regimes that would come out of Iran would be a socialist/communist regime. But this isn't the cold war anymore. There is no Soviet Union that acts as a sort of cheerleader for such regimes to emerge. There's also a possible secular nationalist Iran that could be anti-US but there's no reason for that regime to emerge.

...

Iran is Israels mortal enemy. We need to protect gods chosen people at any cost! American soldiers need to invade Iran to bring democracy and liberty to the Iranian people.

It's just a scaled up Estes rocket. Nothing to worry about.

Any translation for those who don't speak sandnigger?

Any Germans around to translate?

Iran-Iraq war veterans "just go", yeeah...

They're prepared for a massive civil war since day one and they're gonna win it.

>telling a leaf not to intervene

peace all over the middle east. a normal iran. a wealthy persia. saudi and emirati money will come to iran. a muslim peaceful nato with iranians and saudis but WITHOUT turks

Persian secular nationalists, bit like Baath Hussain&Assad.

>Iranians actually oust the ruling dictatorship
It won't happen. The mass killings by govt forces started last night, within a few days it will all be over except for the mopping up of dissident ethnicities and religions.

When Iran regime falls, Saudi and the new Iran should cooperate against Turkey. The Turks are a sleeping giant. They can become a major world power 20 to 30 years from now and could rule the Mediterranean in the future.

Turkey is already putting troops in a base in Qatar against Saudi and putting troops in Somalia. They are problematic.

this

Fuck off, jew!

Turkey is a multiethnic democracy with independent foreign policy, a functioning economy and (by the standards of the region) civil liberties. It's a much better example for other countries than our attack dogs MBS, Sisi and Netanyahu.

If there's any actual change in Iran (ayatollahs stepping back, anti-corruption purges, nationalist coup) it will make the country more pro-Turkish, not less. From the perspective of people in MENA Turkey looks really good

>Turkey is a multiethnic democracy
Nigga they've been straight up genocidal towards minorities and they're now inciting their own diaspora to destabilise their new homes, not to mention funding ISIS and shit

>Turkey was a multiethnic democracy
FTFY

Why don't we just promote a bipolar authoritarian Middle East with a New Ottoman Empire in the west and a New Persian Empire in the east? Sectarian violence would be dealt with by death/ethnic cleansing. Mecca and Jerusalem would be neutral places under the military control of the New Ottoman Empire. Of course all of this could never happen because sandniggers and kikes are subhuman trash, sadly.

Russia is done for it. A pro-US country is close to the Caucasus. Your Syrian expedition will likely fail after the fall of the Iranian regime because without Iran there is no ground force against the rebels in Syria. Airpower can't win alone and Russia isn't willing to send ground troops there. Putin will suffer a massive political defeat at home.

Maybe Russia will try to make it up by increasing hostilities in eastern Europe. The Poles should get ready.

Ah so now the reactionary idiots like you are pro-turkey? That's hilarious.

I've never believed Turkey to be as anti-democratic as people say but it's irrelevant. Their foreign policy, albeit understandable from a pragmatic perspective, is a problem for America and its allies.

Geopolitics isn't about morals or feelsgood. It's about reality. Israel, Saudi and UAE don't want to create a hegemony, they want a more independent set of countries in the middle east who are pro-US and will trade. Turkey sees chaos on its borders and will, understandably so, try to expand to stabilize thing. This is how politics work. It's not about maddening Turks or muh democracy.

Also, Israel is more democratic and has more civil liberties than Turkey.

And neither Egypt, Saudi or Israel is the US' attack dogs. Name a single war they've done because the US said so? The US doesn't operate like a traditional empire.

Iran will not be pro-Turkey. They either won't care or will oppose. A nationalist Iran will try to "Iranized" the former Iranian territories like Azerbaijan. Nationalist Iranians see them as Turkified Iranians and would want to take those lands backs. Turkey is more pro-Turkic so they'll clash there.

That's a dumb proposal. How about Europe is ruled by the EU in a more authoritarian way? Before wishing for hegemony you should push for one in the West first. Sectarian violence is not a big problem. It'll die out on its own.

Empires are shit. They are not good for business, civil development or anything else instead of violence and slavery.

>being this blatantly Jewish
Ugh.

They get absorbed into the UE and become one of it’s ten horns.

Because the EU isn't a shithole constantly on the brink of war, doesn't have any "Mecca" or "Jerusalem" situations, doesn't have to deal with massive sectarian violence, and can exist in a peaceful state with liberty. If you give any middle easterner (including kikes) any semblance of liberty, they will undoubtedly use that for violence. The only thing that ever kept the sandniggers and kikes in check throughout history has been the iron fist of an empire.

>Israel, Saudi and UAE don't want to create a hegemony
They are a part of US hegemony, you idiot.

Great double-speak you have.

A nationalist Iran would probably genocide all of the Ahwazi Arab minorities in Khuzestan and secure their oil reserves in South Pars Gas Condensate Field better. Also, I think Iran will just annex Iraq.

give it to fucking ISIS. Clean up our cities

Hans, Fritz, I need you to snap out of it.

FAKE NEWS:
twitter.com/rabbitlayla/status/947844126719983616

It's someone claiming to be a high rank military officer, saying that military is with people or some shit

You're an idiot.
Europe isn't under war because of American guarantees. Europeans were massacring each other like there was no end until American hegemony. But it's better to have American hegemony than the EU which is increasingly becoming authoritarian.

There is no Mecca situation, you idiot. It's not contested like Jerusalem. Jerusalem in 1400 years has suffered an astronomical amount of wars compared to the same years of Mecca since it became relevant in Islam.

Sectarian violence comes and goes. It's not the massive problem you're making it out to be.

Your appeal to peace is an idiotic argument because Europe's history is filled with far more violence than the Middle East. The lat 70 years of peace are an exception, not the general trend.

And violence in the Middle East is not your problem. America's goal is to make sure a hegemon doesn't form because one rising up in any part of Asia or Europe is problematic.

jews will install a puppet govt

What part of "create" do you not understand? You're a complete moron.

If there is a US hegemony and they're part of it, then they're not seeking to create a hegemony. So your point of contention is irrelevant.

>A nationalist Iran would probably genocide all of the Ahwazi Arab minorities in Khuzestan and secure their oil reserves in South Pars Gas Condensate Field better. Also, I think Iran will just annex Iraq.

No it won't. It'll just keep the same amount of control the Iranian regime had. But it will make Azerbaijan and other "turkic" areas its enemy as a nationalist Iran sees those territories (rightfully so) as territories where Iranian peoples were natives of before they were Turkified.

Iran won't care about Iraq that much. With a pro US Iran, the Shia militants are done for. Iraq will either have to be a secular democracy or a strongman will have to emerge.

top kek

She's not providing any evidence of the image originating in California. The only decent part of her tweet is that the Jacob Wohl guy doesn't understand Farsi. The defection of this army officer seems legit.

I don't give a fuck. I just want to tell the jew, that everybody hates him.

Listen to this leaf, he is talking actual sense

The EU is an American invention and tool. EU hegemony is American hegemony.

Well Russian Balkanization is closer than ever before.

TRUMP TEAM IS FUCKING THE KREMLIN OLIGARCH SO HARD IN THE ASS, ITS UNWATCHABLE.

Just wait the German Fusion plants. Its over. Its fucking over. Once Russia brakes into little states and freedom brings wealth to their people, no one will want to listen the Kremlin fucks and the entire Middle east will surrender to McDonalds and oil trade wealth under the Dollar Hegemony. Little Saudi Arabias around the pipeline.

Can someone explain what is happening? Citizens revolting against the ultra fundamentalist islamic dictators? If they win does this mean a return to the more moderate Iran of the pre 80s? Or is this just going to be used as an excuse to further destabilize a region.

>dictatorship
Last I checked there was regular elections and opposition parties. Stupid leaf.

Best case scenario we get secular nationalist Iran

It's not. America does tolerate the EU however but there are limits. The EU trying to create an European army has its pros but the cons are larger.

I do think the American politicians and strategists are not taking the EU has too big of a threat because they think, probably rightly so, that the EU will collapse on its own. As soon as Italy gets out of the EU, it'll be over of the EU as people know it.

Yes it is, it's factually an American invention and is utilized as a tool to keep Europe subservient to us. Trump is currently ruining our relationship with them and threatening to leave Europe to deal with Russia by itself, which is why they had to create a contingency plan for an army of their own. Without the EU Germany and Russia would've formed a symbiotic axis and run the continent together.

They have an unelected supreme leader. Commonwealth countries have an unelected governor general and a symbolic queen, but their power is very very limited. Supreme leader of Iran can use his authority to directly control who is allowed to run for office. Iran is a clerical oligarchy, it's not a democracy, republic, or constitutional monarchy.

How is it an American invention? The EU started because of steel companies as a cartel to regulate prices and it was also started as a way to counter American domination.

>A day will come when all nations on our continent will form a European brotherhood ... A day will come when we shall see ... the United States of America and the United States of Europe face to face, reaching out for each other across the seas.
Victor Hugo, International Peace Congress, 1849.

It's built to counter American economic hegemony. But America doesn't consider it as a big threat so they tolerated it. It was preoccupied with the Soviet Union and now America just doesn't see a major threat from Europe because it doesn't see it as holding on in the long run.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Committee_on_United_Europe

Literally a CIA project, a major UK newspaper even touched on the fact

telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/27/the-european-union-always-was-a-cia-project-as-brexiteers-discov/

They don't see europe as a treat because they are still hold down by the petro-dolar.