FIGHT FOR EQUALITY PEOPLE

FIGHT FOR EQUALITY PEOPLE

EQUAL LOVE FOR ALL!!!

Equality for all, unless you're a straight white male

Only the weakest stump for equality because they know they weren't born equally but want government enforced implemented equality which really ironically just means special privileges so they can feel less weak and pathetic about the sad state of their lives

If love is love, then why are pedophile and incest relationships so discriminated against by the Left?

Equality begins when you SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT HOW DIFFERENT YOU ARE AND ACT LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE!!

...

They support whatever today's consensus is. No actual moral compasses or critical thinking of their own.

Enjoy your mental ilness.

Equality of... what?

This idealistic theory is ruined in the nursery, for there it is made clear the true orientation of life and the universe: Inequality

Some babies wail in discomfort while others are nustled with content. Some are big, others small. Some are strong and heavy while others are sickly and being supported. Some will grow to be gifted prodigy and others will stay shit tier retard all of their lives.

Leftists will never win because they cannot overcome these most basic primordial truths.

do you want it

...

If it's a free market why do some foods have a higher tax than others?

That's only one end of the spectrum. A lot of alpha Chads and Stacys are also very pro equality because they have never felt threatened by competition and know that they stand to gain the most in a world/economy/dating pool with more people in general since they can always rise to the top. They also tend to be highly compassionate from good white breeding over centuries so they are biologically inclined to gravitate to philanthropic causes. For a lot of people it's both a status symbol and/or a big part of who they are to want to protect whom they perceive to be downtrodden.

...

And what about beastiality?
For example fucking niggers?
It's disgusting of course, but so are homos and all the other mentally ill people.

bump

Equality is vital in the philosophical sense. People shouldn't think that requires communism; the important thing is to ensure people have equal protections.
That said, I'm softer on actual communism than I was, since I now understand that taxes are a way to demand infrastructural profits, justified by the government's position in provision of public goods. High taxes are the government insisting on a high rate of return for public goods. Taxes tend to atomize society by generating resentment for the public good, but they can be used in a way that reduces resentment for the public good more than the taxes generate resentment for the public good.

(We really should keep trying to find ways around the "guy seizes your stuff" technology. It's an embarrassment to the peace.)

Equality is a false God except for when we gas all of you equally

Try stepping against the consensus around you, ya blind autistic hypocrite. It's not hard to be counter-persuaded by Sup Forums. It's like people compete to produce the worst possible arguments. I can't really find the joy of it in playing along, but it's fun to watch and complain about.

SLIDE THREAD FOR ALL!
A SAGE OVER HERE AND A SAGE OVER THERE!

Yes, I'm aware it's a rerrible thread. It's not like this place is supposed to be persuasive or anything. Gosh, you guys think you elected a president?

>FIGHT FOR EQUALITY PEOPLE
There is no such thing as equality.

Degenerate, anti-White "lifestyles" do not deserve to be treated "equally"

literally fucking WHY

the weak should FEAR the strong

Some arguments are more persuasive than others just by existing. So, run a jailbreak on your frame, and damn the context: out of this thread, what actually seems to work?

Now try this one on: look at the context anew, and ask, "Which arguments was this context intended to suppress?" Remember that you live in a world where lying about geographic flags is easy, and people gathered together online can manipulate threads at will. Contexts on Sup Forums are even more artificial than contexts on reddit because the threads auto-anchor when they hit a mere three hundred comments. A dozen people conversing could do it; at the speeds Sup Forums actually runs, a dozen people conversing in multiple "origins" could do it swiftly. The numbers can easily exceed a dozen, too.

Relatedly, using the persuasive arguments actually works; that's why the effort at censorship and manipulation is necessary to maintain the artificially suppressed standard of Sup Forums.

Relatedly relatedly, the left sees conservative fear of censorship as intensely hypocritical given that the generally anti-censorship left has barely touched the level of social pressure conservatives feel quite entitled to exert.

Being yourself involves more than a will to resist malign pressures. It also involves an awareness of what malign pressures look like. Society swims in the direction of those who sincerely do not victimize others. The arc of the moral universe bends towards justice.

It's fun watching you guys scatter. You rush off into other threads to get butthurt about the evil outsider who isn't letting you lie freely.

Find one natural good looking "egalitarian". They don't exist.