This is Iraq under Saddam Hussein. Notice the women aren't wearing hijab. There was no ISIS...

This is Iraq under Saddam Hussein. Notice the women aren't wearing hijab. There was no ISIS, there was universal education, healthcare, women's rights, his deputy was a Christian, churches operated freely, not to mention all radical Islamists and kurdish subhuman separatists were swiftly put under the ground whenever they dared show their heads.

Why were we told he was the bad guy?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=lVehcuJXe6I
humansarefree.com/2016/11/only-3-countries-left-without.html?m=0
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

hmmm secular nationalists make Israelis and Jews in general nervous. Really manufactures meditation in my mind

because we need (((oil)))

sad

The US has shitloads of oil though, probably the third largest stockpiles in the world in Alaska alone.

both viable.

He was talking tough to Israel and they got scurred

the same goes for gaddafi. with gaddafi in power there wouldn't be a single immigrant from north africa in europe.

>Why were we told he was the bad guy?
Because he planned on sellig oil in euro instead of dollar

He wanted to stop selling his Oil via the dollar and instead use Euros, he wanted to build pipelines to Europe too which would have freed the EU from its reliance of buying oil through dollars.

He was originally a puppet of the US/Israel to oppose Shiite power in the region by fighting Iran. However as his power over the country became solidified he saw himself as a sovereign leader and not a puppet which was a very grave mistake and as such tried to make his country independent from the petrodollar and also annex Kuwait lands without permission from the USA. Well actually the USA secretly told Saddam he could invade Kuwait and there would be no repercussions, this was a trick however to give USA pretext to support regime change in Iraq and eventually invade.

He was doing more than talking tough. He was funding attacks on Israel. Most unforgivable was that he was a nationalist, and never forget that's only for yids, not the other kids

>there was universal education, healthcare
Just like in USSR. Ameritards being fed the same lies again, again and again.

He literally genocided every minority group and every group that criticized him.

No criticism about Saddam's Iraq can make Islamic State Rule preferable though.

do u understand that if the world teamed up to force regime change in america they would just say that we were genociding our blacks in inner cities like chicago and natives in places like standing rock?

Some of us did, but our government was fighting against it, and now that we have a racist government, the people are fighting it. Sooner or later, the government will resist them violently and that will warrant foreign intervention.

Saddam and his followers were killing all protesters and critics and the international community acted reasonably.

Just like the evil tyrannical Gadaffi was genociding his own people when in reality he was responding in a perfectly understandable way to a foreign Al Qaeda incursion.

Imagine some discontent among the normal American people and some peaceful protests for more democratic rights, but are the hijacked by the worst possible murderous anarchists you can imagine funded by Russia started taking over cities and killing people who oppose them. Don't you think the USA government would kill the shit out them? And then wage war against Russia for sending these proxies against them? Then Russia points to the anarchist proxies being killed and cries that the US government is massacring honest normal American civilians and demands invasion and the entire state of the USA is reduced to death and ruin.

>Imagine some discontent among the normal American people and some peaceful protests for more democratic rights, but are the hijacked by the worst possible murderous anarchists you can imagine funded by Russia started taking over cities and killing people who oppose them.
This didn't happen, you idiot. Both of them were violently dispersing peaceful protests. Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

It happened in Libya and Syria.

Do you even remember the Arab Spring? The Syrian business started off with young left wing democratic protesters calling for Syria to modernise and westernise, even these original protesters will tell you that they got taken over by radicals within the FSA and then the Al Qaeda groups came in like Al Nusra and it became a matter of whoever was the most ruthless rose to the top in the rebellion against the Government forces.

He was lowkey our hero for keeping the islamist in check

>Do you even remember the Arab Spring? The Syrian business started off with young left wing democratic protesters calling for Syria to modernise and westernise, even these original protesters will tell you that they got taken over by radicals within the FSA and then the Al Qaeda groups came in like Al Nusra and it became a matter of whoever was the most ruthless rose to the top in the rebellion against the Government forces.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - JFK
Such an environment is always created when the government violently opposes its own people. Only when it became clear that the people no longer want the regime did the international community step in.

A quote that inspires you is not evidence of objective reality.

but Usay Hussein used to go to schools and take all the little girls home with him and fuck them one after another until they died from it, so it was totally justified to invade the country and drop bunker busters on the civilian air raid shelters and turn the hundreds of women and children inside into a ring of red paint 2/3s of the way up the interior wall of the shelter where the blast waves converged

The discontent in the people is initially created by foreign influence, CIA operations in the region. As well as more general propaganda.

>and also annex Kuwait lands without permission from the USA. Well actually the USA secretly told Saddam he could invade Kuwait and there would be no repercussions,
I was going to correct you but then I kept reading

It's not so much that the US needs oil. The US needs oil to be traded using the USD. Even a bunch of fags like 1990-2016 us government wouldnt spend what they did and kill as many as they did to take a bit of oil. Which they didn't even do.

This is the most underappreciated fact about the Gulf War--that the Americans secretly permitted Saddam to invade Kuwait.

because his central bank needed kiking and he refused

Herr derr its up to thebgubment to make me smart and healthy REEEEEEEEEE

Whats it like to be so weak you cant support yourself with stealing from the working class?

Why are you stating unfounded assumptions as facts? The fact that you want it to be true doesn't make it true, you know

>Why were we told he was the bad guy?
Welcome to Sup Forums. Now, let me tell you about the Jews..

>he believed the "Saddam was secular" meme

Tip top kek

He was the bad guy because he didn't attack the people the US told him to attack.

>anarcho-syndacalist arguing in favor of US military intervention
holy steel rods inserted in penis holes

>he believed the "Saddam was secular" meme

Tip top kek

He was the bad guy because he didn't attack the people the US told him to attack with the weapons they supplied him with.

Yeah. Honestly in retrospect I think it would have been better for Kuwait to source their workers from Iraq rather than India/Pakistan/Sri Lanka/Bangladesh and the Philippines.

Don't be naive, read about the colour revolution business. But if you're genuinely an anarchist you're also a tool of the same forces.

When you don't have freedom you must get it

So we’re going to ignore invading & occupying Kuwait?

please kys

Do you want a real answer or a meme one?

This.

CIA new Bush government wanted a reason for Iraq war. So they gave them one. Then the CIA could smuggle Heroin out of Afghanistan

youtube.com/watch?v=lVehcuJXe6I
Don't pull the thang out, unless you plan to bang
Bombs over Baghdad!
Yeah! Ha ha yeah!
Don't even bang unless you plan to hit something Bombs over Baghdad!
BOB Released: 2000

>911 wtc 2001

Are they having a laugh?

BAATH'IST FUTURISM

The problem is that your "peaceful revolution" in Syria was not possible not because of muh ebil Assad, but because the protesters were always a very small, weak and irrelevant minority, just poster boys for the western media. All the real opposition, the one that had an actual presence and strength was an islamist sunni radicals, the likes of Al-Nusra or ISIS. If Assad was to step down, then the whole country would have been taken over not by the fake opposition like FSA, but by sunni islamists like ISIS and Al-Nusra.

Here is the correct answer.

...

It's about petrodollar, not oil for american consumption.

>muh oil
We get most of our oil from Canada, you fucking retard. None of the wars had anything to do with oil.

Amerishits destroy everything good to replace it with shitskins, muslimes, niggers, feminists and faggots cause it pleases their masters.

God willing every amerimutt and jewmerrican will die in a nuclear fire in our lifetime and we will get to witness it

No one really gives a fuck about Kuwait outside of being a cheap pretext to BTFO of Saddam. The US would have done that with or without Kuwait, but luckily Kuwait offered up it's most prized prostitute tell everyone a "it was real in my imagination" lie about six million babies in gas chamber incubators being shoahed by iraqis.

#KuwaitbelongstoIraq

>no reason...
humansarefree.com/2016/11/only-3-countries-left-without.html?m=0

In the year of 2000 there were eight countries without a Rothschild owned or controlled Central Bank:

Afghanistan
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
Syria

It is not a coincidence that these country, which are listed above were and are still being under attack by the western media, since one of the main reasons these countries have been under attack in the first place is because they do not have a Rothschild owned Central Bank yet.
>feeling sleepy...

Ask the Clintons and follow their trail of money.

this, it's always the winners writing the history books to paint them in a favorable way, and their enemies in the worst way.

how is the China central bank owned by rothschilds?

>muslims don't have free will, everything they do is a result of american intervention