You have ten seconds to explain why you're not a monarchist

You have ten seconds to explain why you're not a monarchist

I am tho.

Prince Charles.

>flag
You're really shitting on everything your ancestors fought for, if you're a colonial American at least.
Our society is firmly against monarchy.

Monarchies today aren't worth defending.
I see no road to success through Monarchism since almost all royal houses in Europe have been gutted.

Cause i'm not a faggot

Soon I will marry the girl on the left and become one.

I can't.
Democracy is cancer.
The human race is made to be ruled by an all powerful God-Emperor of mankind.
Vast majority of the population is simply too stupid for democracy to work.

That is all, thank you.

Kings are nothing more than faggots by now.

Because I don't get to be royalty.

My family isnt royal.

Why do?

I'm all for monarchy. So long as I am King.

My parents having me and my sister was the joining of King Steven of England's family and Robert the Bruce's family (King of Scotland).

Already in line :^)

Read Thomas Paines Rights of Man.

But I love the monarchy

wat?

My issue with monarchy is that the resulting disconnect between aristocracy and commoners, along with the preference for the aristocracy of different countries intermarrying and thus not even identifying with the host population's ethnicity, leads to a similar situation as with the jews. You have those in power who fundamentally do not give a fuck about the common people, and just see them as pawns in a game of chess to be used. It's not as bad as having jews directly controlling everything as is currently the case, but the same style of problem exists.

This is why I identify more with national socialism rather than monarchy, because I believe the separation of nobility from common people is not good for a nation.

You're right. The majority of poles are too stupid for self-governement.

Paine was a bantmeister

Incest is bad

Because old incest blood is not a requirement of leadership.

I am.
Liberal retards and savages will over throw shit, though. They're hard to convert.

Monarchy is not halal.

>american education
part of the revolution was about the lack of power of the king, that's why your president was given absolute power.

i love Leonor, she is so pretty, i wanna cuddle with her until the end of time

hates the Jews

>that's why your president was given absolute power.
>british education

We didn't fight because we hated the monarchy, we fought to save money, you retard.
But there were Republicans amongst our ranks, and to satisfy them and prevent fights over the rightful king, we became a republic.
We didn't fight solely to become a republic.
By the way, I'm nearly-entirely of colonial English stock.

I guess John Adams should have been burned at the stake for supporting monarchy.

Is there any monarchy in history that has ever claimed incest is a requirement?

Monarchy is for weak retards. Off topic question: Who are these girls? The left one is hot af

...

>My issue with monarchy is that the resulting disconnect between aristocracy and commoners
That's more because of restrictions on their powers. Let them be more involved, and they will be. And it would benefit both sides for it.

Zoroastrian ones?

>Monarchy is for weak retards
Opposite day?

princess of spain and her sister and have some fucking respect

All tyrants must FUCKING HANG.

Spanish /absolutemonarchy/ when?

Good goy. Don't question propaganda.

because I am not a cuckold

hi, anthony

This

Inherited power is mistake. Fitness for leadership must be earned, not awarded by an accident of birth.

because im not a monarch

I am.

>Inherited power is mistake.
It encourages the protecting of that power, though, rather than squandering it.
>Fitness for leadership must be earned,
And indeed would be more likely when inherited. Where it can be practiced from day one. As opposed to deciding later on to develop the fitness to (((possibly))) win a popularity contest.

I am, now find me the REAL bloodline and not the German and Greek pretenders to the throne.

I'll move to Spain if this ever happens. I just want to live under an absolute Catholic monarch in my life. It's all I ask for really.

>Implying good presidents are elected ever

I don't know how it is on UK, but you can't elect fine leaders in Spain.
No one cares about the country. Only about their party, themselfs and their friends.

Our king has a lot of pressure. He isn't allowed to fail.
And he is based as fuck.

Because I see no men fit to be king

Hethen

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Underrated post

>non-democratic
good
>everything else
p. bad

>aristocracy of different countries intermarrying and thus not even identifying with the host population's ethnicity
this

But I am.

...

I'm very happy and proud to have been a part of Jefferson's grand experiment, but I have two hundred years more knowledge to draw from than they did. Jefferson or any of the founders would not have expected you to shut your eyes to the world around you and obediently serve the ideals of the past.
At some point we can say this experiment has been a failure.

>implying winning a popularity contest somehow means someone earned the fitness to lead

Because our queen is a huge fuckign cuck.

I would much prefer a forer

butthurt britfag

I support elective/selective monarchies but i don't want a royal family

TAXATION
IS
THEFT
done

Complete fucking bullshit.
Democratic republicanism has worked well for nearly 200 years. It wasn't until liberals starting bringing in foreign ideologies that it went to shit

he hates jews. fuck the queen ruling over the islamification of britain.

I consider them sex weirdos.

>My issue with monarchy is that the resulting disconnect between aristocracy and commoners
The same thing happens in republics as well. Just look at our last election cycle.
>This is why I identify more with national socialism rather than monarchy,
What would be the succession rule in a natsoc system? Dictatorships are always very unstable after a dictator dies, just look at the USSR after Lenin's death and the purges that occurred.

>America doesn't have taxes

Mi princesa ;)

>Democratic republicanism has worked well for nearly 200 years
No it hasn't. It's kept jews and politicians in power.

Because they just stood by and did nothing.

VIVA LA PRINCESA DE ASTURIAS!

LARGA VIDA A LA FAMILIA REAL!

The system is flawed because the offspring of whoever is in control might not be a fit ruler to the people, but that doesn't matter as he is the son of whoever was king before

Because I don't get to vote for them.

TAXES

I don't believe in god

Aren't taxes higher under democratic rule than ever?

I'm not a cuck

go back to crusader kings

Because I'm not a retard.

they are the only hope we have left in Spain

I will die protecting them

>be monarchist
>"""""royal"""""""" family gets married to a mutt

forgot my pic

Im not retarded

Show me a worthy king. The British royal family is getting blacked and they're owned by Jews. The Swedish royal family is lead by a silly hat wearing buffoon. Saudi Arabia is full of Arabs. Monarchy seems like a pretty dumb system to me.

How is it retarded?

>The system is flawed because the offspring of whoever is in control might not be a fit ruler to the people
But that's less a concern in monarchy than elective rule. A bad king eventually dies. A bad democracy just gets recycled.

Because saying that these fuckers should rule since they were choosen by god is jew-tier.

>president has absolute power
Whoa that British education is woke.

I'm ready to die for an Emperor, I'm just waiting for one worth fighting for.

No one is saying that anymore, though. It's terrible justification for government. Even the Vatican doesn't really work that way, and it's a theocracy.

I am, as long as it's voluntary, covenant-based, and respects the NAP.

>By the way, I'm nearly-entirely of colonial English stock.
Well that explains it. It amazes me how even centuries later you guys are still the same.

Freedom that’s why.

What's wrong with Emperor Trump?

Sure no one is saying that anymore, but this is how the royal families started, if we hand over control to them is the same as saying that they are choosen by god, that is unless we were to choose a new royal family.

I already am, but I don't think it should be absolute.
They should rule alongside a Fascist Dictator to supervise them just like in Late Francoist Spain or Italy.

I am but my grand grandfather agreed to give up all his titles and family name so his head didn't get chopped off.

Because any retard can get the throne just because of "muh bloodline".

>tfw no American Empire

He isn't an Imperialist and he is a civic nationalist.

>tall as fuck, 6,4 ft
>strong chin
>beard of a christian warrior
>powerful blue eyes
>married with a blonde, white spanish woman
>have two perfect daughters that will be the most beautiful woman in Spain when they reach mature age
>still 49 and going strong
>studied law in the best university of spain
>studied abroad
>did military instruction in the army, navy, and airforce
>Captain General of all the military spanish forces

Haha what a cuck.