...
Now that's a headline
Other urls found in this thread:
thegoldwater.com
iheart.com
usatoday.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
shaping up be an even crazier year.
>alt right rises
>start making batshit insane claims pedogate etc...
>news headlines start getting weirder
If I were her, I wouldn't have even entertained your childish bullshit.
That's exactly what a satan worshiper would say.
Checked
she was conversing with the twitter account of the Church of Satan
why would she be doing that?
Don't be so obvious now
what's so bad about worshipping satan?
nick bougas, the creator of the jew picture that gets posted in every thread here, was an important member in church of satan.
What did she mean by this in August?
...
>implying pedogate isn't verifiable and ostensibly real.
thegoldwater.com
>What is abundantly clear at this point, is that “Pedogate” is a one-hundred percent reality, not just in America, but spanning the entire globe.
Soon you'll realize it was -you- who were "Childish" my misinformed friend.
...
>i've never been in a church with a Lucifer statue.
this unfuckable bitch is so disconnected, how empty and robotic can she be?
-HILLarious
trump tweet @anything
Autistic Screeching, REEEE, racist, Impeach now!!!!
Daughter of Clinton’s tweet @ church of Satan, he was a good boy he dindu nuffin...
You alt-right shit tards, overreact to everything, (((we))) need to ban them from using oxygen
ofc it is real...
in the '50 and '60 it was called op brownstone but in this day of moral degradation extra marital affairs or even homo affairs just do not cut it any more...
bump
bump for ropes
What's with this family and inverted crosses? Is there a blue-pilled answer? Like some bullhorn explanation that it's still a Christian symbol?
sorry, no blue pill available here.. check /x for more info
also happening now.. clinton home in NY is burning
usatoday.com
when bleach just doesn't cut it
she denies it
>implying
Gotta get rid of evidence somehow. It worked with wtc7...
This is obviously some kind of satanic ritual
Quick make more official accusations so she has to publically respond
bumpin
>ostensibly
>meaning purportedly but perhaps not actually
it is ostensible in the sense we do not have verified evidence of clintons eating babies, but we've got plenty of evidence some kind of fuckery is going on. figured it was the correct vernacular.
The inverted cross could also be the cross of St. Peter, but with those vultures who knows
en.wikipedia.org
denies it
Could we have asked for a better timeline, lads?
...