How to solve the Homeless problem?
Americans tolerate extreme homelessness. Watching a documentary now by the LA Times on homelessness.
youtube.com
Communists want to give away private property to these lazy drug addicts. Wouldn't creating working camps be more productive? Make them earn their keep.
Other urls found in this thread:
In the old days, you had a choice; Go to the county poor house and work for your keep if you could, or starve.
Yes, the idea that you can be a useless eater and get the house Joe Worker is working his tail off for is absurd.
90% of homeless people are completely insane
8% are somewhat sane and addicted to dope/alcohol after destroying all their relationships with people who care
2% genuinely got screwed by fate
t. Volunteer at soup kitchen
Homeless people often have drug or mental illness problems and free stuff won't necessary fix anything
What liberals think would happen:
>give junkies a free house and they'll turn their lives around
What would actually happen:
>junkies would tear out the pipes and wiring and sell it for scrap to pay for their next hit
Unjew your mind and stop making excuses to not help out your fellow white man
>idea that you can be a useless eater and get the house Joe Worker is working his tail off for is absurd.
Literally we could give every homeless person in your country a cuckshed house and it would solve the problem overnight
This.
Anyone who has had prolonged exposure to the homeless fucking hates them.
>90% of homeless people are completely insane
Many of your countries veterans sacraficed their sanity for the same government that hung them out to dry
>Guy builds houses for his fellow white mans
>(((The City))) (((Seizes))) them
youtube.com
most people are homeless because they are fucked up in some way. If you gave them all homes most of them would just end up trashed
Do what Utah did. House them and have them get help. It costs much less, manages to rehabilitate more of them than leaving them on the streets, and is the humane thing to do.
>"free market capitalism"
i think you mean, keynesian, centrally planned, mixed market.
brainlet.
Being homeless is extremely weird for someone "normal". Normal people have family, friends or even extended-not-spoken-to-in-five-years family who would all be willing to put them up for a while until they get back on their feet.
If you suddenly find yourself homeless and there is nobody, not a single person you can ask for help, then being homeless is actually just the latest in a very long and heavy chain of massive fuck-ups and in that case, well, have fun sleeping in the bed you made (under the bridge).
99% of the homeless you see on the street have some kind of mental disorder.
Give them a house and it will be smeared with shit and trash in a month.
Most normal people feel ashamed and don't want to burden their friends and family.
>"yo dude give other people's property to the poor dude lmao"
We need to help white people who are salvageable.
If you have a mental illness, you should be in an institution. If you can work, work. Otherwise, let the scientists experiment drugs on you.
People who have drug addiction should be sent to rehabilitation centers and then worked to pay off their treatment and eventually transfered to a work camp.
Work camps should provide community, safety, and health services.
Of course this should only be provided for white people.
Niggers can rot in prison.
>We cant have free housing we would end up like Venezuela!
Literally boomer propaganda just so they can justify charging you 3 houses for the price of one
There is enough money in your country to give every single person a cuckshed house and yet you spend it on wars for a (((Greater Israel))
The bank were forced to sell the houses in real capitalism because there would be no state to save their asses if they screw up like they did 2008/2009.
When the US Goverment saved the banks, they also prevented that the prices for houses fall down so no one can afford one now.
OK, as long as they live in your neighborhood and not mine
READ AS: Pedophile homes
Give me one good reason why we shouldn't be giving away sex offender homes to the homeless.
Homeless people are typically mentally ill. There are resources for them, but it's no longer socially acceptable to institutionalize mentally ill people who don't pose a danger to others.
A pedophile would get a house before a drug dealer would in your country though
You can't. Systematic poverty is a very real thing and 99% of Congress are retarded too do anything about it. Try getting a job when you haven't eaten in 4 days
Solution obvious - send all homeless to California
So you want to force pedophiles onto the street? Not sure if that will help any
Yeah that's what the comic should be showing.
Current year poor people make 40k a year.
Sadly we cannot live within our means.
Fucking degenerates. Have to have 70inch tv $50k car payment newest iPhone unlimited data and complain that housing is "too much".
Hurts my head. Op.
Who said anything about letting them back into society?
i believe there was a south park episode about that
Shoot the homeless!
Demand for housing will drop.
Market price to housing will also drop, making it more affordable.
Profit.
>How to solve the Homeless problem?
Scotland has it best, build council housing, new tenant pays rent, once they cover the cost of their council home they own it, each rent payment goes towards ownership, no loans,
>hired for job
>zero concern for others
>don't do most basic job right
>get fired
>become homeless
>cry victim
If we're confiscating wealth and redistributing it for the greater good, why would you give a $300,000+ asset to someone who is probably drug addicted or mentally ill? Why not sell the home and donate the proceeds to a drug addiction clinic.
The problem with this homes and homeless conundrum is that beautiful new homes don't just get built by themselves. Somebody invested their own money into that home, and you can't justify taking it from them because they can't sell it.
I only care about homelessness desu because I found out my Adjunct Professor, who teaches Biochemistry is homeless. She is in the middle of getting her PhD and plans on working in the field once she graduates.
But she is living off her car now.
>some retard leaves his ugly fire traps on the street for druggie niggers and their pitbulls
>WHY IS THE CITY REMOVING THEM???
these vagrant meth heads can eat shit, those eyesores lower the property values of the people who actually live there. and the mohawk faggot wants people to "redirect their anger to the powers that be" but I guarantee he's an open borders moron which is half the reason these people are homeless.
>Wouldn't creating working camps be more productive?
Yes. Arbeit macht frei.
Homes are not really worth $300,000 and new iPhones are not really worth $1000.
All the profit is going to the Jews in charge.
It’s simple. Kill the homeless.
Agreed, unironically. Working gives the homeless a purpose.
In exchange for food, healthcare, housing, and safety, you work at the work camp.
It' s a fair exchange.
most "homeless" people aren't homeless. shit i was living in a big city in down town too, and they all slept together in the same spot when it's cold out. basically,
>most people have a place to live, just are lazy and wants gibs
>actual homeless people are at very small number
>majority of the people who are actually homeless are their because they use drugs and brought it on themselves
Force them to work for free on government projects, and give them basic provisioning and housing. Eventually, after certain experience gained, direct them to employment agencies to set them up with actual jobs.
As they start making income, first switch them off to low income housing, then to normal as their income grows.
All the lazy ones who will refuse to accept job offers will be forced to work until they change their mind or gain valuable skills
This is honestly the best solution.
No more hobos on the streets
Free, to an extent, workforce (Can be free completely if you let charities do their work, and with excess food in our society, it shouldn't be hard)
More skilled workers later on for the economy
Teenage fedora edgelords who say that all homeless should be killed need to realize that they will be killing millions of white people who got fucked over at some point of their lives, nothing more, nothing less
>actually defending kikes
K Y S
and many homeless pretend to be veterans to gain sympathy
Where in that post did I defend kikes, retard? I'm defending the fucking homeowners who have to deal with tent cities popping up in their neighborhood because the kikes care more about importing illegals than making sure the citizens have a fucking place to live.
An good idea, but literally impossible. Unions and government contractors will chimp out if you start having meth-heads pave the roads for 1/10th of what they charge and at twice the speed.
Be honest user
Would you rather a phony war in the middle east for (((Israel))) and a war on drugs for (((Big Pharma)))
Or would you rather state funding go towards helping home americans?
Dont get me fucking wrong, Its not fair to give paul a mansion for free when paul saved up money his entire life to make that pipedream a reality. But a basic small house would be enough for a homeless person as a temporary fix.
>Its not fair to give paul a mansion for free when peter saved up money
typo
Not even a miny home.
We can build giant apartment buildings and each homeless person can be given a studio.
White families can be upgraded into larger apartments.
The main reason why we don't build up is exactly because Jews in real estate make too much money from building single-family homes, which take huge amounts of land.
Make whips a requirement at such work places, and see the difference. State is doing them a favor, so they will have to get a job done on time.
>1/10th of what they charge and at twice the speed.
Then why does mass immigration exist
It took the US over a decade to rebuild the freedom tower.
It would take a year for China to build a functioning city for hundreds of thousands of people.
And also, privatized (((unions))) and (((contractors))) are fucking cancer and should be abolished. I am fine with state based trade union, like german one in 1930's
No one has a right to live anywhere they want. If you want to live by the beach then get a fucking job and some roommates. If not you can get shipped to some flyover shit hole.
THIS MAN KNOWS!
I remember when leftists used to cough and say: "Ah hem, we have a mixed market economy." when touting the success of the US.
Have you ever owned a property you leased to bad behaving tenants who destroyed the property value by their poor treatment and maintenance of the property they feel no ownership or responsibility for?
The problem we have is people using housing as a store of value for their money, like people use bitcoin as a store of value. And property will always be a good investment as long as the population keeps increasing.
...
why would i bother working for my own house as a actual employed individual if estronuats are just giving out free houses to unemployed lazy individuals
Dude you're a fucking moron, real estate Jews make fucking bank off of government kickbacks for low-income housing. For fuck's sake they even make more money from building regular apartments and renting out than they do on detached housing, which is why they keep house prices high to force people into perpetual renting.
Won't stop them being lazy fucks. its why theyre homeless in the first place.
The Fed....I'd be fucking rich too if I could create and lend a country's currency and charge interest.
Socialism, taxes, rich people, empty houses... these are not the issues.
Uneducated people is one way of looking at it.
Some druggies, some hippies, some commies, some lesbian dance majors.... who knows? They should have studied chemistry? Lost causes maybe.
However, I have built small-medium houses all around the $1M mark in California.
Costs total all-in (accountants verified, houses sold)
>50% land
>10% materials
>5% realtor/title fees
>15% labor
>10% engineering
>5% environmental compliance costs
>5% taxes and fees
>+12-24 months for inspections.
So lets think it through in order:
Assume we're going to have some roads and parks, land is land, that's a real cost. We don't want to muddy things and get into a conversation about zoning or socioeconomics right now. So you can't really drop land, labor, or materials. That's 75% of cost.
They could drop engineering, soils testing, storm water runoff, etc. type requirements, but that's not likely to happen in a place where most of the building happening is 3rd party.... not the investor or eventual owner. Corners would be cut, houses fall over.
They could get rid of all the environmental regulation.
California has:
MWELO, T24, Green building, window regulations, insulation regulations.
Diesel smog restrictions and diesel equipment hours usage restrictions
State and local tree protections
Intense landscaping and nature surveying requirements.
Creek and watershed compliance.
Endangered species habitat requirements.
And 100 other things.
Expect +5% costs if you have protected trees, and +10% costs if you have a creek.
I've had to do official surveys and reports on trees that were going to be cut down enough to make me want to die.
If you have endangered species on your property... forget about it. Millions of Californians trying to build houses actively seek out and kill endangered species due to the rules. Have a home or have endangered birds? Choose.
1/2
2 of 2
They could drop real estate taxes and impact fees to zero, and more people would own, but that causes issues with urban sprawl, and income taxes would go up a lot. I am nevertheless in favor of this. Real estate taxes hurt middle-class AND lower class due to rent prices having to include those taxes. They just have to legalize skyscrapers in your town, to mitigate the sprawl issues.
So if not land/labor/materials/engineering/environment.... at best you're 5% taxes...
Except for the delay. 12-24 months of delays caused by the bureaucracy. That's +$50k-$150k LOST RENT for a house in urban Cali. If you understand economics, lost rent is an artificial inflation of prices. That's how premiums are charged for every construction service (good for me!) I estimate +20%-25% cost increase due to delays and fees. We could do all the regulations and more for nearly nothing if the taxes were low and the delay was a month... but all the government departments and whiny socialists want a slice of your profit/house, and to tell you what to do.
So you're saying the reason why we don't have skyscraper housing and fix the unaffordable problem is because greedy kikes don't want their personal property value to go down?
These people don't care about fellow whites, they only care about kikeing the system. They should be ignored.
Basically skyscrapers threaten suburbs.
Suburbs are high-margin machines, feeding lots of jobs.... skyscrapers make few jobs, collect few taxes, they are very efficient.
Its typical luddite/protectionism in another form.
Sure, call it jewish or whatever. I just see it as crony capitalism and economic protectionism.
the homeless problem is a pretty interesting deadlock. it isn't a flaw in capitalism, and will only be subverted into a worse problem with communism
holy shit. California has always been the canary in the coal mine for AZ. if this is there homeless situation then that makes sense why ours has been getting worse over the last 5 years. i see fools living in cars in Walmart parking lots by the dozens.