Slavic Nazis are absolute cucks

Is there a bigger cuck move than subscribing to a political ideology that regarded you as sub-human? How do eastern Euros rationalize this cuckoldry?

Other urls found in this thread:

hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv2ch02.html
youtube.com/watch?v=3kooAjJ6t28&index=46&list=LLsKUndEJI9R3RvDYI_UkwuQ
youtube.com/watch?v=XkDSMPAt39Y
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

>why would anyone subscribe to a nationalist ideology when a different nation once did?

Obviously Slavic Nazis don't see themselves as subhuman. They view other races as subhuman, and Slavs are the master race. There are even Mongolian Nazis who think Mongolians are the #1 superior nation.

Quote me the passage where hitler calls the slavs "subhuman." I can wait.

Fuck off Dugin

Spencer and Bannon are done! Sup Forums is free of the (((Alt-Right))) EuroAsianists NazBol

When that different nation regarded your people as less than human then yea, it's a cuck move

>Even in Pan-German circles one heard the opinion expressed that the Austrian Germans might very well succeed in Germanizing the Austrian Slavs, if only the Government would be ready to co-operate. Those people did not understand that a policy of Germanization can be carried out only as regards human beings.

Also would love to see that subhuman slav quote source

...

>There are even Mongolian Nazis who think Mongolians are the #1 superior nation.
And Attila’s sons started the recent modern nationalist movement in the midst of Slavic Europe.

So OP just made it up

It's from Mein Kempf mein nigga

hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv2ch02.html

It takes some truly impressive mental gymnastics to pretend that Hitler wasn't extremely prejudiced towards Slavs.

>heard the opinion
How about an actual quote from a commander, or from Adolf himself

The quote was made up before OP ever shit the board with it. Adolf, nor his commanders said anything of the sort, and proof is that the British cracked the enigma code and could read all the transmissions. That's the proof

preposterous, Hitler never made such claims against Russians, in fact fall of Russian empire is one of the reasons Hitler decided to get into politics and persecute the jews

That is from Mein Kempf leaf

...

>Hitler never made such claims against Russians
Yes he did. Check your own personal copy if you wanna make sure

Nowhere does it say sub-human, why lie?

>Those people did not understand that a policy of Germanization can be carried out only as regards human beings.

What do you think this means leaf?

You're retarded, Slavs fought for Hitler. He hated Jews and Soviets.

you do realize he's referring to the Bolsheviks, who were Jewish, but that's not what you want to prove. you want to prove that ALL Slavs were considered sub-human by this one line. And that's where you're wrong.

Hmm

>Slavs fought for Hitler

Blacks fought for confederates but I think we can agree that the confederacy was still extremely prejudiced towards them

>Soviets

Yea the majority of Soviet civilians were Slavs my guy

...

>you do realize he's referring to the Bolsheviks

Incorrect, here's the full quote:

>Even in Pan-German circles one heard the opinion expressed that the Austrian Germans might very well succeed in Germanizing the Austrian Slavs, if only the Government would be ready to co-operate. Those people did not understand that a policy of Germanization can be carried out only as regards human beings

"Those people" he's referring to were the Austrian Slavs

>Prejudiced
Well of course, everyone is and has always been "prejudiced" towards Slavs. That doesn't imply hatred. Germans are Germans. The Slavs fought to protect their homelands. End of story retard.

...

Either people serve ideologies, or ideologies serve people. If it is the latter (which I assume it is for most nazis), then the ideology is functioning as a tool.

>Is there a bigger cuck move

This is therefore like asking if the modern German army is cucked for using radar because the British were using it when they won the war.

The Slavs fought to protect their homelands from the Nazis when they invaded them. Prejudice is one thing but I can't think of any other ideologies that very specifically labeled Slavs in such a manner

nope he didn't, he only made those claims against Bolsheviks who hardly had any slavik bloodline

>but I can't think of any other ideologies that very specifically labeled Slavs in such a manner
zionism?

>This is therefore like asking if the modern German army is cucked for using radar because the British were using it when they won the war.

That's a silly comparison. Germans never regarded the British as sub human. There's a difference between adapting to technology and subscribing to an ideology which regards your own kind as something to look down upon

>he only made those claims against Bolsheviks who hardly had any slavik bloodline

Mate he's clearly talking about Slavs in the quote I posted. It's from Mein Kempf you should READ it

Even Zionism as far as I know never regarded Slavs in such a manner

...

>Even Zionism as far as I know never regarded Slavs in such a manner
actions speak louder than words, bolshevik revolution in russia was revenge for pogroms and the main goal of the bolshevik revolution was to genocide ethic russians and remove russian intelligentsia from positions of power

...

>Even Zionism as far as I know never regarded Slavs in such a manner
Jews hate ethnic Russians. I’m not sure about the other Slavs though.

>actions speak louder than words

I agree which is why the abhorrent civilian casualties inflicted on the Slavs by the Germans should be a pretty good confirmation of their views right?

>"Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party movement regarded Slavic countries (especially Poland, Russia, and Serbia) and their peoples as non-Aryan Untermenschen (subhumans), they were deemed as foreign nations that could not be considered part of the Aryan master race.[1] There were exceptions for some minorities in these states deemed by the Nazis to be descendants of ethnic German settlers and not Slavs who were willing to be Germanized.[10] Hitler considered the Slavs to be inferior, as the Bolshevik Revolution had put the Jews in power over the mass of Slavs, who were, by his own definition, incapable of ruling themselves but instead being ruled by Jewish masters"

the revolution claimed a lot more lives than germans did so your point is moot and kill yourself kike go serve your israel faggot

...

Mate Soviets are just as bad as Nazis. However, that doesn't excuse the Nazis own crimes

>kill yourself kike go serve your israel faggot

Ahhh mate you were doing so well. Why'd you have to sperg like that?

nice try fucking schlomo

*BLOCKS YOUR PATH*
PIC RELATED

because every claim you make against Nazi Germany you claim 2 for israel
like I told kill yourself ameriswine

>you claim 2 for israel

Please explain how I'm doing this

...

the slavs fought the filthy jewish bolsehviks to protect their homelands.
Slavs were the first NatSoc's who fought the commies during the Bolshevik Revolution
LONG LIVE THE WHITE ARMY AND THE THIRD ROME

...

exactly, white guard were the original Russians

>Slavs were the first NatSoc's who fought the commies during the Bolshevik Revolution

lmao I like your fan fiction but the white army who fought the Bolsheviks were royalists for the most part

...

This.
The Russians smashed commie kike scum first before anyone else.
Then the Germans smashed commie scum in the Red Revolution in Germany.
Only thing is that Russia fell first and Germany fell years later.
Hitler knew the communist atrocities that were happening in Bolshevik ruled Russia .

they were still anti-commies that would've loved NatSoc
As do all whites since it's an ideology that protects and advances the white race.

But why did the Wermacht kill so many Russian civilians?

>they were still anti-commies

Yes

>that would've loved NatSoc

No, mate why would they love an ideology that regarded their own kind as subhumans?

>that protects and advances the white race.

Then why did the Nazis kill millions of whites if they were trying to protect it?

> commie partisan scum
is what you meant

Ever read the Barbarossa decree? Their definition of partisan was pretty all encompassing mate

NatSoc never regarded slavs as subhumans, that was Jewish Bolshevism and Communism.

they didn't kill millions of whites on purpose
They defended themselves from Zionist led allied white nations who were brainwashed into fighting their own people.
Hitler never wanted ww2 to happen, but the jews did.

And now look at the allied nations
America is 56% white and declining full of cultural Marxism and degeneracy.
Canada the same, Australia the same, New Zealand the same.
Britain? It lost it's empire after ww2 and it's on it's way of becoming nonwhite in 20 years.
As is all nations across Europe .
All because they defeated the wrong enemy.

partisan is anyone who fights the german army who is not a soldier of war
Geneva conventions do not apply to partisans, they were disposed of as pests, as they should have been, all red scum got karma for what they did to Russia.

>NatSoc never regarded slavs as subhumans

Mate Hitler himself said the following:

>Even in Pan-German circles one heard the opinion expressed that the Austrian Germans might very well succeed in Germanizing the Austrian Slavs, if only the Government would be ready to co-operate. Those people did not understand that a policy of Germanization can be carried out only as regards human beings

hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv2ch02.html

That's from Mein Kemp, it takes some amazing intellectual dishonesty to suggest Hitler was not extremely prejudiced towards Slavs

>they didn't kill millions of whites on purpose

That sorta thing does not happen on accident mate

...

Ok going by your logic all the German civilians killed by the Soviets were justified because they were partisans

...

Eastern Europeans and Meds are tier 2 Aryans as opposed to tier 1 Germans and Scandinavians

Sub Human meme needs to die it was constructed in post war public schools by Jews to dissuade nationalists from taking up Hitler's torch elsewhere in the world

>it was constructed in post war public schools

Hitler himself said it mate it wasn't just made up

you do know that mein kampf was written when hitler was really young and in jail right?

People change opinions overtime.

And That quote in no way says he views slavs as subhumans.
And Slavs look no different than Germanics, they both look the same if you put them side to side.

yes it does
if you are trying to kill me then I will defend myself eventhough I don't want to hurt you

Give me a quote not completely taken out of context

nope.
The Soviets deliberately killed and went after German Civilians when they entered Berlin, thus they had a right to fight back.
The Germans on the other hand did not target normal Russians, or Russian peasants, or Russian civilians when they were making their way to Moscow and passing poor starving villages along the way.
that my fren is the difference.
And the Germans were attacked first by partisan commie scum, which of course made the Germans retaliate.
The Germans only fought the Red Army Soldiers when they entered Berlin BECAUSE they were seeing the slaughter and rape caused by them without any provocation.

Video Below is Russians welcoming their German Liberators from Communist Bolshevik Rule.

youtube.com/watch?v=3kooAjJ6t28&index=46&list=LLsKUndEJI9R3RvDYI_UkwuQ

>People change opinions overtime.

He obviously didn't change his mind considering the enormous civilian casualties inflicted on the Soviets by the Nazis

>And That quote in no way says he views slavs as subhumans.

Mate what do you think this:
>Those people did not understand that a policy of Germanization can be carried out only as regards human beings

means?

>if you are trying to kill me then I will defend myself eventhough I don't want to hurt you

Are you implying the Nazis were only practicing self defense when they invaded Russia?

I posted the source mate you can see for yourself

>The Soviets deliberately killed and went after German Civilians when they entered Berlin

You mean just like the Nazis did to the Russians?

>The Germans on the other hand did not target normal Russians, or Russian peasants, or Russian civilians

Mate:

>On 23 September 1942 the Germans shot in Ukrainian village Kortelisy and 20 other villages 2875 people (1620 of them children).

>In the second half of March 1943 after the Third Battle of Kharkov the Germans arrested and shot 2500 Soviet civilians from Kharkov.

>On 19 October 1943 the Germans killed in three Ukrainian villages (Leninskij, Djjaki and Vdovin Hutor) 1070 soviet civilians.

>On 11 April 1944 the Germans shot in the city of Staryi Krym (Crimea) 584 soviet civilians.

>On 9 April 1944 the Germans shot in the village Kujaljnik of Oblast Odessa up to 400 civilians.

is it all Jewish propaganda or maybe the Nazis did indeed kill Russian civilians

>And the Germans were attacked first by partisan commie scum

Source?

> civilian
nope they did not mass slaughter civilians

that quote does not mean sub-human

> invaded Russia
they invaded the USSR which was not Russia .
Russia was the Russian Empire, the Third Rome that got crushed by the Jewish Bolsheviks.
So Hitler you could say was liberating Russia from the Red Pest.
It's like saying, does that doctor hate the person since he is cutting her open? No, he is doing that to remove the tumor that is within , to try and save her.
Also what is Operation Grozna? Operation Thunderstorm?
The USSR was going to do a massive Blitzkrieg on Western Europe, and Hitler anticipated and attacked first.

>nope they did not mass slaughter civilians

But they had entire groups dedicated to strictly killing civilians like the Einsatzgruppen

>that quote does not mean sub-human

What do you think it means?

>So Hitler you could say was liberating Russia from the Red Pest.

Why did he kill so many civilians if he was trying to liberate them?

>The USSR was going to do a massive Blitzkrieg on Western Europe

There is zero evidence to suggest this

when did the Russians enter Moscow?
they only fought red army soldiers and partisan commies, they never fought normal civilians .

> soviet civilians
another way of hiding that they were PARTISAN fighters that attacked the germans who were passing these villages.

> Sauce

On 22 June 1941, the Council of the Supreme Soviet imposed martial law over Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the Ukraine, White Russia, Karelia, Bessarabia, as well as over the territories of Archangel, Murmansk, Vologda, Leningrad, Kalinin, Ivanovo, Yaroslav, Ryazan-Smolensk, Tula, Kursk, Moscow, Voronezh, Orel, the Crimea, and Krasnodar. General mobilization was ordered in 15 military districts.

Partisan warfare was unleashed one week later. It was a prepared measure in violation of international law for which the Wehrmacht was unprepared.

Furthermore, a “Service Regulation for the Partisan War” had been in effect in the Red Army since 1933. As early as January and February 1941, large scale partisan war games were held in various military districts of the Soviet Union by the “Society for the Encouragement of Defense” (Osowiachim), in which the civilian population also took part, as reported by the Army newspaper “Red Star”. Based on these experiments, the Soviet Communist Party created so-called “Destruction Battalions”, even prior to the beginning of the war. When an area was to be abandoned by the Red Army, these destruction battalions were systematically supposed to destroy all businesses, communications installations, medical installations, etc. of any military or commercial importance, and to being partisan warfare as soon as the front was overrun

>There is zero evidence to suggest this
the attack on finland says otherwise

well looky here
Soviets dressed up as GERMAN SOLDIERS and commited atrocities on Russian Civilians themselves who then blamed it on the Germans who were passing through Russia
my .. my .. my

"
To this purpose, on 17 November 1941, Stalin issued Order no. 428, which, in German journalism, became known as the “Arsonists Order”. In the original, the order was entitled: “The monstrous crimes, cruelties and acts of violence of the German authorities in the occupied districts and territories” and stated as follows: “All settlements occupied by German troops are to be set on fire, to a depth of 40 to 60 km behind the main front line and 20 to 30 km on both sides of the roads. Air Force, Artillery and Partisan divisions groups equipped with bottles of fuel” were assigned to this task.

The order is even said to have contained the following sentence:

“The search and destroy commandos shall carry on the destruction actions in the uniform of the German army and Waffen-SS. Such actions incite hatred against the fascist occupiers and facilitate the recruitment of partisans in the backcountry. At the same time, care should be taken to leave survivors to report on ‘German atrocities’".

>they only fought red army soldiers and partisan commies, they never fought normal civilians .

According to who?

>another way of hiding that they were PARTISAN fighters that attacked the germans who were passing these villages.

I think you're being pretty intellectually dishonest if you believe that every single civilian 100 % without fail was a partisan

>the attack on finland says otherwise

How? How does an attack on Finland indicate he was going to take nearly the entire European continent up to Western Europe?

bc in the next national socialism movement will begin there and will celebrate the diversity within white people

But you just said earlier every single civilian was a partisan. Were they partisans or were they getting slaughtered by Red Army troops cosplaying as Wermacht troops?

Operation Grozna aka Tunderstorm

youtube.com/watch?v=XkDSMPAt39Y

I'm getting nothing when I google this so I guess I'll just ask you. Where was this document found? Is it corrobarated by any other evidence?

according to the video I just showed you and soviet documents themselves

Germans were ordered not to kill or rape innocent civilians, if they did they were shot on the spot or hanged.
Germans were very disciplined and thought that torturing civilians was subhuman and not german-like, unlike the communits scum.

The one's that the Germans KILLED were not civilians but partisans.

the Partisans dressed up as GERMAN SOLDIERS and then killed normal civilians and left many alive to tell other people that the Germans did these things to them.

hope this is clear enough

>according to the video

That video was unsourced footage of something that could just as easily be Poles or Lithuanians. There is zero evidence to suggest the Nazis were trying to liberate the Russians

>soviet documents themselves

Please post the source for the documents themselves

> Germans were ordered not to kill or rape innocent civilians, if they did they were shot on the spot or hanged.

Citation Required

So Amerimuts fit the subhuman cathegory?

just watch the god damn video
the files are out there but it's very hard to get ahold of them
that top ranking soviet official has them as you can see in the video I posted

>The one's that the Germans KILLED were not civilians but partisans.

So you think the only civilians killed on the Eastern Front where 100 % partisan without fail?

>the Partisans dressed up as GERMAN SOLDIERS and then killed normal civilians and left many alive to tell other people that the Germans did these things to them.

Citation Required

>just watch the god damn video

I did and from what I've seen this evidence cannot be corroborated

>the files are out there but it's very hard to get ahold of them

So you have no source?

Yeah, poles or Lithuanians are orthodox and they have orthodox cathedrals right?
kek you're grasping at straws right now

There were 100s of thousands russians who fought along side of the wehrmacht and the SS.
Look up general Vlasov and ROA. Nobody was going to genocide anybody! It's pure lies and propaganda.

Also Hitler created Slavic countries such as Slovakia and Croatia. next thing you'll tell me is that the holocaust was real.

Polish national socialism produces best music so suck it niggers

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't national socialism an ideology any group of people can follow and apply to their national, ethnic, or racial group's goals?

Shhhhhh dont make the muttt confused or he sperg out and bomb some middle east clay in rage.

>Also Hitler created Slavic countries such as Slovakia and Croatia
What?

German Nationalism/Nazism has nothing to do with Russian Nationalism/Nazism.

Genetically Balkans are not slav and hitler thought of Croats as ostroghots. And makes sense since they are tall and look more Germanic. Croatia, Bulgaria and Slovakia were on hitlers side. Only one who would be worse off if Germany won are Poles, Russians and Serbs

He means established them as states from larger conglomerations of Slavs
-Slovakia from Czechoslovakia
Croatia from Yugoslavia (Technically this would also mean that Serbia and Montenegro were also 'created' by Hitler)

It's mostly russians

>He means established them as states from larger conglomerations of Slavs
I see, but Croatian identity existed long before the Independent State of Croatia was established. I though he meant that Hitler artificially created Croatia (and Slovakia)