/RWA/ is a place for all right-wing ideologies to come together and discuss current events and debate others' opinions. All right wing minded individuals are welcome. We feature a sizable member base of 260+ users, A book club for discussing various works of literature, bi-weekly structured debates, and best of all, comfy moderators.
Pastebin: bwFPJGT8
Discord: 26BKxn3
Gab: @RightWingAlliance
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
...
kill yourself faggots
no u
sorry
This
Free your country
bump out of interest
The issue with this is that Libertarianism is using the failed ideas of enlightenment era to try to solve the current problems of today. You can't have both capitalist consumerism and a traditional ethnostate at the same time. Markets and profit maximization must necessarily be limited to keep nation borders strong and from cheap subhuman labor from flooding in.
You're correct. But we can worry about market philosophy when we no longer have Schlomo breathing down our neck.
The Fascist conception of liberty merits passing notice. The Duce of Fascism once chose to discuss the theme of "Force or Consent?;" and he concluded that the two terms are inseparable, that the one implies the other and cannot exist apart from the other; that, in other words, the authority of the State and the freedom of the citizen constitute a continuous circle wherein authority presupposes liberty and liberty authority. For freedom can exist only within the State, and the State means authority. But the State is not an entity hovering in the air over the heads of its citizens. It is one with the personality of the citizen. Fascism, indeed, envisages the contrast not as between liberty and authority, but as between a true, a concrete liberty which exists, and an abstract, illusory liberty which cannot exist. Liberalism broke the circle above referred to, setting the individual against the State and liberty against authority. What the liberal desired was liberty as against the State, a liberty which was a limitation of the State; though the liberal had to resign himself, as the lesser of the evils, to a State which was a limitation on liberty. The absurdities inherent in the liberal concept of freedom were apparent to liberals themselves early in the Nineteenth Century. It is no merit of Fascism to have again indicated them. Fascism has its own solution of the paradox of liberty and authority. The authority of the State is absolute. It does not compromise, it does not bargain, it does not surrender any portion of its field to other moral or religious principles which may interfere with the individual conscience. But on the other hand, the State becomes a reality only in the consciousness of its individuals. And the Fascist corporative State supplies a representative system more sincere and more in touch with realities than any other previously devised and is therefore freer than the old liberal State.
bump
>Libertarianism is using the failed ideas of enlightenment era
Modern right-libertarians don't endorse tabula rasa nor utilitarianism.
>Markets and profit maximization must necessarily be limited to keep nation borders strong and from cheap subhuman labor from flooding in
Free markets don't entail weak borders nor mass migration. When there is an institutionalized respect for private property and contracts (i.e. Pinochetian minarchism), borders necessarily remain strong and foreign labor doesn't overtake the local population.
Quick Rundown:
What is FASCISM?:
>Fascism is a conception of life
>Founding monolith "United we are stronger"
>Constant struggle for betterment of the nation / accomplishment of a nation's goals
>Indomitable national will and collective spirit to take action together overcoming all obstacles
>The state invests in the citizen and trains him to be his best self
>Totalitarianism: the citizen and the state are one, the character of the masses create the state.
youtube.com
Unrestrained Capitalism seeks nothing more than materialism. it's ultimate goal IS Globalism. It's bottom line is PROFIT over PEOPLE. Your greatest incentive in the free-market is to CORNER the market. This doesn't unify us. United we are strong. Striving for "Freedom" is just like the left striving for "Equality". They are both abstract concepts. There is no such thing as "Individualism" or "Collectivism", it's a false dichotomy. There is always a hierarchy in society and laws determined by an elite few. Our leaders must have integrity and a will for their nation to succeed. Take a look at the children of Nazi Germany. They were dignified, wholesome, strong, and had character. FASCISM breeds real MEN and WOMEN. Not Transexuals and Whores!
youtube.com
>Fascism is a conception of life
This is the ONLY definition that suits it.
Fascism is a Worldview. A Weltanschauung.
The observance of natural and eternal truth is what fascism is and we merely coalesce and adapt to what works.
Doctrine in fact also puts this forth but not clearly enough IMO there's a lot of misguided folk and idiots who think fascism is the system. Italian Fascism is a system, National Socialism can be construed as such too. But ultimately fascism is the basis, the foundation, the Worldview.
What does one see?
Fascism is that it takes both the material AND immaterial into account. Without the spirit there is no matter and without matter there is no spirit.
>When there is an institutionalized respect for private property and contracts (i.e. Pinochetian minarchism), borders necessarily remain strong and foreign labor doesn't overtake the local population.
So you're saying that the basis to stopping firms from profit maximizing by hiring cheap labor from subhuman nations would be property right law? As in that the subhuman workers would necessarily harm property value in the long run? Because there's been the opposite effect of this. Subhumans flooding in have made rent seeking behavior and property flipping extremely lucrative. It's why Canadians for example have to pay 2 million for a home in Hongcouver for example.
Some of you are okay to debate. Tell me, why isn’t nazbol the superior conservative ideology?
Bolshevism is not conservative.
>not utilitarian
Dropped. Also supporting le based globalist.
Nazbol is. The ussr had morality laws, arguably more so than the US.
What kind of facist economics do you support? From what I gather facists in general aren’t thirdwayists but rather middle of the roadists.
If subhumans won't work for you, who will?
Borders will always stay strong in a libertarian society, the respect for private property makes invaders non-existent.
How? That is not an argument. If you have a Libertarian society that emphasizes not messing with people's maximization of profit, the billionaires are going to push for non whites to enter into your nation for cheap labor. How are you going to stop them if the profit maximization principle is not blocked by law in certain instances?
(checked)
>As in that the subhuman workers would necessarily harm property value in the long run?
The basis of the law would be that, if nobody sells land (house, apartment, etc.) to them, they can't come in, because there are only two options otherwise:
>1. Constantly occupy temporary property (e.g. hotel rooms) by perpetually renting it out. This endeavor cannot be supported by "cheap labor".
>2. Cease to exist, so as not to occupy space that isn't yours.
Although, the tendency of third-worlders to lower property value would certainly disincentivize selling property to them.
>It's why Canadians for example have to pay 2 million for a home in Hongcouver for example.
If I were a rapefugee flipping a house that the government gave me for free, you can bet I'd charge out the ass for it. Solution is to simply enforce property rights (i.e. Locke's conception of them) by (1) not giving away free shit and (2) not letting in anyone who hasn't already purchased land in the country.
>Dropped.
Deontology is the main current amongst us. Have you heard of argumentation ethics?
>Also supporting le based globalist.
Because if there's anything a free-market radical supports, it's a worldwide thief.
>thirdwayists
>middle of the roadists
Same thing.
Pinochet was put to power so that he could sell the copper reserves of chile to globalist corporations. There is nothing nationalist about the guy.
Ok, but the problem still lies: capitalism needs constant growth to justify its existence as a system. At some point they will want to expand their society to be globalist, because this is what would spur more growth.