GET IN HERE, THEY ARE VOTING ON IT RIGHT NOW!!!
en.wikipedia.org
GET IN HERE, THEY ARE VOTING ON IT RIGHT NOW!!!
en.wikipedia.org
tall if certain
BUMP
who could be behind this?
...
They should just delete wikipedia and the (((people))) behind it.
The page says that it's getting rid of uncommented and unclarified symbols that lack context or analyzation. They're not removing facts or anything.
*yawn*
>still using wikipedia in 2018
Conservapedia is actually preddy legid
Watch it for them deleting pedo symbols
Pls no ban Pepe :(
So they're just going to censor history now?
>not exclusively using rationalwiki and wookiepedia
stay pleb
conservapedia.com
I'd prefer my facts to be impartial and quite frankly insightful. So both pedias are a no go for me
>Ideology that seems good on the surface but gets corrupted and will turn fascist the second it becomes realised
>Anyone disagreeing will be punished, often by eventual death
>Causes unrest with other countries while creating a desperate people inside
>Polices speech in the name of good
Am I talking about communism or national socialism?
The idiocy of these people enrages me
They're using the fucking SS symbol on an SS related page as an example.
>rationalwiki
>rationalwiki
A x goes to infinity, y goes to zero, to emphasise your picture where everything falls down, you should've set limit x -> 0
bump
What is wrong with that entry?
>en.wikipedia.org
How do we fucking destroy these rats? Is there a way to push them off the site? The subhuman shitstains ruin and infiltrate everything they touch.
THE SYMBOLS ARE UNNEEDED AND DISTRACTING
LET'S REMOVE THEM ALLTOGETHER
THE ARTICLES DISTRACT ME TOO LETS REMOVE EVERY MENTION OF SS FROM THE SITE
REEEEEEEEE
is it a coincidence that this happens just after they collected millions of donations?
>encyclopedia scrubbing history
wew lad, its like they are setting the stage for it all to happen again.
False flag. Just one retard suggesting it, nobody wants it to be.
long of solid
lul wikipedia, noone takes that shit seriously anymore.
Example:
en.wikipedia.org
> killer's motive remains unknown
literally everyone in Slovakia knows the motives, the gypsy family was making it a living hell to live near them and the autohorities couldnt do anything because of "muh racism" and NGOs so he took the justice into his own hands.
The info got slowly, revision by revision, scrubbed from wikipedia. First the info and reports about them being hated by all neighbors was scrubbed word by word, later even the mention that they were romani was first claimed as a false fact by wikipedia, then removed it altogether.
>none of you dotards clicked the link
He's getting shouted down like crazy. Oppose, oppose, oppose. Damn thing won't pass, y'all.
I puked internally when I read that. It was so deliberately smug.
That's only because I am samefagging from 3 different accounts
yup. pure coincidence.
you arent wrong geniuslet
makes me regret donating 20 bucks to them five years ago
Congratulations, you are an idiot.
>russian
checks out
based h0ckkk3rz
The open sourced encyclopedia wants to censor it s users' input? Whodathunkit.
Who is it?
Make every symbol an extremist symbol
>There is a point where the symbol stops being identification and starts being promotion. This threshhold is crossed when the symbol is displayed at a size that is too large.
What kind of brainlet comes up with this shit?
>IF YOU HOST A LARGE IMAGE, YOU ARE PROMOTING THAT IMAGE!
>OY VEY IT'S OVER 100PX, THAT'S PROMOTING KNOT-SEES!
All you need is a bunch of brainlets conniving together to agree that yes muh 100px is the right threshold, and voilà!
Tell me how this isn't fascism? This shit is like Nazi burning books n shit.
fucking kek M8.
>But it's important to keep it at 1000px for gommunism-related shit.
The Left will die.
There is a point where the symbol stops being identification and starts being promotion. This threshhold is crossed when the symbol is displayed at a size that is too large.
>crossed when the symbol is displayed at a size that is too large.
>too large.
>/hr/ is an extremist board
Wikipedia has been shit for a long time. Certain people (usually lefties with no actual life) spend so much time editing pages, they get privileges. And then they use those privileges to push their own histories and ideas on everyone and lock pages when reasonable people disagree. Like when they label someone a "white supremacist" and source it by posting a Vox or CNN article that calls that person a white supremacist without any foundation. Even if the person, like Jared Taylor, has explicitly said that he thinks Asians are superior to whites and this is quoted in the exact same wikipedia article. Do they not know what supremacist means?
>When Richard Dawkins was a young man, he recognized that the complexity of life indicates a designer.
That mischaracterizes Dawkins opinions on the subject. I bet when you were young you sucked a lot of cock but that doesn't mean you still think it's delicious.
he is right tho
this is right too
mankind will always see the transgresion of the other worse than the transgresion of the self
having nazism transgreded jews, ubermenschs
and having communists gulaging themselves
only indoctrinated fucks can think otherwise
KILL THE JEWS. KILL THEM NOW!
Start with the okay sign
Terribly racist
Sad
Every time that I start to wonder if these people really exist, every time I start to wonder if this is just Sup Forums bullshit propaganda, I get proven wrong and find people like this.
These people need to be removed.
Execute Order Okie Doke
>(((Coffman)))
bump
Well they are correct.
Communism is worse.
It looks like majority is opposing censorship, so that's something
If you censor history then its bound to repeat itself.
How can you learn from a mistake if you erase all memory of it?
Strike when?
The guy who made this picture is a mathlet
>Also, there is nothing inherently wrong with communism. A comparison to nazism is rather inappropriate. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
WTF???
save pages before changes
>almost everyone opposing
>telling the SJW that Wikipedia isn't their safespace
>questioning who decides what constitutes an extremist symbol
based wikipedia