Basically, we're right about everything

Professor of Psychology @ Harvard University "Steven Pinker - The alt-right right are highly intelligent, internet savvy activists"

youtube.com/watch?v=6xJ5bvw6Ckw&list=LLWdmRrGLn4bNMq7PRVYIqWg&index=1

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7Vcn4cnpv6Y
youtube.com/watch?v=kTiRnbNT5uE
storia.me/en/@dubya/steven-pinker-alt-right-4nwfw3
m.youtube.com/watch?t=541s&v=aN8w7lUMc1o
m.youtube.com/watch?v=YOYrTYKXe3Q
goodreads.com/list/show/89892._pol_recommended_reading
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>internet savvy
i want to believe

We developed meme warfare...

Fucking self bump

Complete freedom of speech online makes for compete free flow of ideas and opinions. It makes fourms like this the new intellectual battlegrounds.

WE MADE IT, GUYS!

Who is Pinker and why should I care what he thinks.

...

>Professor of Psychology @ Harvard University

WE WUZ INTELLECT

Just kys already half the posts are about dirty semites, faggot marxists and retarded negroids, nothing to be proud of

>Just kys already half the posts are about dirty semites, faggot marxists and retarded negroids, nothing to be proud of

Mentioned pretty much everything wrong with western civilization!

Video inspired me man, thanks for sharing it. I needed something to keep me going.

Np, my fellow leaf

full video, don't know if it's interesting youtube.com/watch?v=7Vcn4cnpv6Y

Bless you

Is is like a fucking god in the science society

How do you recognise a foundation myth? It fulfils three functions. 1)It explains the origin and structure of the world (and society). 2)It defines ultimate good and evil (and from those definitions are derived the values that are used to justify the holding of power). 3)It determines what is held sacred in that society. For modern Westerners the story of WWII has become their foundation myth. It fulfils all three functions. 1)We live in the ‘Post-War World’. The lines on the map, the institutions, the sense of what era we live in, all arise from the starting point of WWII. 2)Ultimate evil is Nazis. Ultimate good is opposing Nazis. The values derived from these definitions are anti-racism, equality, diversity, anti-nationalism and so on. 3)The only thing that is held sacred, that cannot be denied or mocked in the contemporary West, is the Holocaust. The problem is that all three functions are backwards or negative. Instead of the origin event being one of fertility and new life, it was a conflagration of death and destruction. Instead of ultimate good taking the central position in the story that slot is occupied by ultimate evil. Everyone knows that Adolf Hitler, the personification of evil, holds the centre point of the WWII story. Instead of that which is held sacred being something mysterious and sublime it (the Holocaust) is an obscenity. Having a negative foundation myth means the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned. > Having a negative foundation myth means the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned.

THE ALT RIGHT ISN'T FUCKING REAL

There is no "movement"

Don't you retards get it? The media created the meaningless label "alt-right" to attach to anyone that doesn't conform to their leftist narrative. Literally anyone. They do this so they can lump everyone they don't like into one easy to target group. Natsocs, libertarians, conservatives of all types. The media will call you "alt-right nazi" because their definition of "alt-right" includes literally everyone who isn't a leftist.

Stop buying into mainstream media lies. This "movement" as you describe it is successful because it isn't centralized and the media can't attack "it". It is made up of the millions of enemies leftists have made all fighting against them for their own individual reasons.

The media desperately needs a centralized opposition in order to destroy them. They need to find a way to turn the chaotic hoard that is their enemy into a centralized target in order for their attacks to stick and have any affect. They can not smear us. They can not demonize us. They can not intimidate us. They can not silence us because we exist not as an organised group, but millions of disconnected individuals all fighting to destroy them.

That is what the "alt-right" is. The media establishment has been frantically searching for a clear target so their attacks will stick. In reality it's quite impossible. Watch them desperately try to will our "movement" into existence with poorly executed false flag events and payed off figureheads that identify as "alt-right".

The left is being attacked on all fronts. They desperately need a clear target to land their hits and give their base a clear view of their enemy. Let's not give it to them. Being against leftism is not a "movement". All organized movements can be corrupted and destroyed. The leadership can be infiltrated, bribed, attacked, blackmailed and much more. Millions of disconnected people fighting a common enemy can not.

First they gave us a name, then they created supposed leader for us, then they portrayed us as evil nazis.

Because you can’t destroy something that you can not name.


Smart boast

t. newfag

here is longer version from the part op linked youtube.com/watch?v=kTiRnbNT5uE

Also they are largely gay and obsessed with shitty non-white mongolian culture, and the few who are not gay prefer asian woman

Fuck... that is some superior boi pussy right there.

Mid witted libreralists just wreck everything... its about popularity not truth. Simple as that.

First step is to stop wasting your time with any of them

second step is to focus on those few people who are not a waste of time.

when tay comes back, she will seek revenge. we have always been right.

There's no such thing as the alt-right though.

when?

...

There has been since before 2010...

Hmmmm, from (((Steven Pinker))) too. How interesting. I do believe the alt right is made up of smart people, I just wish they were more extreme in their racialist beliefs.

>we're
>The alt-right
"""we're""" not affiliated with any meme organisations.

whats his name?

We control the narrative

wrote books like: the blank slate, how the mind works, angels of our higher nature or some shit. I read the first one. He stops short of race realism but makes some good points.

we /s4s/ now

>hair is a fucking wig
>unironically supports nature>nurture

kek

Bump, watching it

Conservatism is absolutely against radicalism you degenerate negroidic kike

pride before fall, don't fall for this jewish asskissing scheme making you lax and retarded

>The alt-right right are highly intelligent, internet savvy activists
>highly intelligent
>activists
Internet savvy is correct at least

>(((alt-right)))

OP here, ignore the 2016 election shills and enjoy the vidya

Conservatism is worthless and dead in the West.

...

This has happened before; everytime our culture enthousiastically digs into some subject (scientology, politics, kekistan), it's a snapshot from the board-culture at that time.

The board-culture moves on, and disavows the snapshot because it becomes an old meme that gets accepted in the mainstream.

This is how a really smart liberal Jews sees us, it’s interesting.

And his persuasion is quite strong.

>I just wish they were more extreme
The people who make the important threads and push the memes are more "extreme" than anything you can imagine. They jut don't put their faces all over the electronic synagogue for the Jew to systematically destroy. Can't destroy something hymie can't see or name. That's what you retards will never get.

Oh fuck
he basically says

1) capitalist societies >commie societies

2) womyn != men

3) crime and death have specific demographics


/OURGUY
U
R
G
U
Y

The longer version downplays the initial facts, doing sneaky things like claiming "Right wing attacks are more common than islamic attacks in the United states" when those records start after 9/11 and "Islam didn't have the Crusades", ect.

The point he's trying to make is that "alt-righters" are especially impressionable to "facts" that are politically incorrect to say and don't put these "facts" into context leading to extremism.

Which is only a problem with the right, as we know leftists are totally immune against the same sort of biases.

Fucking academic faggots. Larping here with their shill threads as college projects thinking they can influence the discussion. Of course we are smart. Have a look at the election. I think they are starting to realise their influence outside of shitty campuses is diminishing. And of course they don't even get to fuck the students anymore. Fucking losers.

aahahhahahahah stay mad you fucking brainlet faggot, we're smarter than you and more accomplished than what you will ever be in your entire life

Pinker is a fucking retard, makes Harvard look retarded for keeping him.

bang on. although im not sure they have to pay off figureheads. there are enough narcissists around who will gladly claim to be "leader of the alt-right" (or, who tragically, actually believe that they ARE the "leaders")

i do recall many, many media interviews with "the leader of Anonymous" over the years.

TRUTH MOAB

This is fact

>The alt-right right
interdasting
The fact that they're having to discuss how and why liberalism is failing is a good thing. He says things like "I know this is unacceptable to say" and "This is true, but it's seen as controversial" because he knows as a psychologist that the illusion is over, the can of worms has been opened, and Trump actually winning has rung the death knell for liberalism. The only response he has to these facts is to say, yes, these things are true, but they shouldn't influence your opinion about a group; judge people as individuals. The issue is everyone knows not to walk around the hood, everyone knows you don't go to Saudi Arabia to have a gay pride parade, everyone knows that if you had equal representation of the sexes in math and physics the quality of work would go down, but nobody wants to say this.
The next step for liberals like him is to realize it's time to jump ship. You can still hold the moral high ground, but you can't ignore facts. The way to do it is to say that we're not all equal, that some people ARE more valuable/important, and those people are the people who are good, honest, hard-working, NON-RACIST people. The left (at least in America) needs to ditch Islam and criminals ASAP, gays and welfare niggers will stay, though because the welfare recipients have nowhere else to go the left has a lot of room to maneuver to the right before losing that group. At that point the left will become resurgent and the right will have to make a response, until then they'll keep losing.

You're a moron and a faggot, bro.

>internet savvy activists

i think he meant "internet savant autists"

>All organized movements can be corrupted and destroyed. The leadership can be infiltrated, bribed, attacked, blackmailed and much more. Millions of disconnected people fighting a common enemy can not.
Without coordination; motivation or strategic agenda, you'd be invincible, but also incapable of actually taking objectives.

I've seen this line of reasoning before, and it's ineffectual as evidenced by Occupy Wallstreet. It becomes an incoherent mess of tangentially related ideas without overarching substance.

He's right, the only faggot moron here is you

>womyn != men

can you explain what that means to a low iq retard

Yeah, but where are your chins?

Yeah he's sneaky alright, Islam more enlightened than Christendom. No religious wars. What a crock of bull, then says Irish in US had more crime than nogs, well they don't call them potato niggers for nothing. That professor is a dishonest patsy.

Here's a quite good analysis and critique of what Pinker said, for anons who don't feel like watching the video. I don't know who wrote it but it sounds like one of /ourguys/

storia.me/en/@dubya/steven-pinker-alt-right-4nwfw3

We the education now

>liberals like him is to realize it's time to jump ship
*Jews like him to swim for Israel.

>hurr don't organize goy
>hurr just because I don't like something that means it doesn't exist
Go back to 8pol faggot.

He's wrong, the only moron here is you.

he's one of the most senior psychology professors at harvard university.

He is centre-left wing but has an unusual amount of intellectual integrity when dealing with facts that would normally run be considered highly inconvenient to leftist beliefs.
for example he has lectured on there being reasonable evidence for differences in average intelligence between races caused by differences in genes (using the example of ashkenazi jews )
he has been in repeated high profile debates presenting the scientific evidence for innate , large differences between men and women on average in terms of personality, vocational interests , sexuality and other psychological and mental aspects.

he's basically someone who would like to live in the total a centre-left wing melting pot utopia where no one cares about race and people are tolerant and open, but he doesn't compromise on the facts.

he's a useful guy if you want to get into these arguments more deeply.

Overall he's probably one of the most famous and well regarded living psychologists in the world and an advocate of evolutionary psychology (which is also a very useful idea for us in terms of sex differences and possible racial differences)

>it's ragingly controversial to say that capitalist societies are better than communist societies

>pride before fall, don't fall for this jewish asskissing scheme making you lax and retarded
100% this. if anyone tells you you're smart irl it's nothing more than an enticement to join their side. i get this shit sometimes at work and i roll my eyes every fucking time. not entirely sure if people are consciously aware of what they're doing when they say this shit though.

The "alt-right" isn't an organization, it's a loose group of certain names with right-wing views that the establishment created to send their useful idiots after. If you unironically label yourself as """"alt-right"""" then you're asking for trouble, and you'll look retarded doing it too.

m.youtube.com/watch?t=541s&v=aN8w7lUMc1o
I know many brothers that have read dozens of books. Fucking racist brainlets.

You're right. However, there is a major difference between OWS and /pol. Having true free speech like we do here allows a culling stupid ideas. They are sidelined.

It is in today's society. It's to be expected when you allow Marxists to take control of your education and media institutions.

>the alt-right
>an organization
"Alt-Right" is the name of the movement. Fine, shill against the name (I don't know why you would, but if it makes you feel good go ahead), but anyone denying there's a movement is an obvious D&C shill. We're not "just Sup Forums", we're part of a larger movement which is exploding in popularity. I've been part of the white nationalist scene for a long time, it's never been as big as it is today.

When it comes down to it, you're just shilling against a name. If you genuinely don't think there's a movement, I'd be curious to hear why.

>they created a name for us
And they were pissed about the name, since they like white supremicist, neo-nazi and kkk member much more. They can chose any name and even if somebody denies belonging to group x, they will simply say he is just putting up a front and just call him x, because that’s what he really is.
Well they should be unable to say, who is what but there should be still a force pulling into the right direction. I if they call everybody to the left of Paul Ryan alt right it could froce people to defend the alt right or even come over. In the end everybody should decide for himself what he wants to call himself. But don’t fool yourself the media will make up their own stuff up anyway and most of the people will believe it.

>alt-right
Nice meme

>The "alt-right" isn't an organization
No shit. It's a decentralized political movement.

See

This is Boston you have to remember, the home of utopian faggots.
sasuga Zionists

Yea, Stormers got old

>It's a decentralized political movement.

hes a person who might end up being one the wrong side of the divide in the future. meaning the leftisits disavow him.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=YOYrTYKXe3Q
How can the left compete? Just one of our intellectuals btfo zombified libtards

Jesus Christ. This seems far too good to be true.

That clip.

>Islam is more enlightened then Christendom
>for example there was no Inquisition in Islam

Why should I believe a man when he lacks even a basic understanding of the inquisition, Islam, and Catholicism? He is right that the left is doing people a disservice by denying them the truth but then he goes on to say that those truths need to be put in context so people arrive at the correct conclusion. He is honestly painful to listen to, an idiot who thinks he is educated because he knows all the (((facts))). Why do people celebrate and take seriously a pretender like this?

highly intelligent
ya right

We aren't a group, we're information terrorists. Each one of us is a memetic cell of loosly affiliated individuals that operate under the broad umbrella of Sup Forums. As soon as we coalesce into a solid target we make ourselves vulnerable and that's what we want. We may fight in the eventual coming cultural conflicts but right now we fertalize powerful ideas through memes. Each and every one of you do more than you could know by spreading the word.

telling truth is always something to be proud of

That's what we're part of, yes. Do you deny there's an organic, racially-conscious political movement that Sup Forums comes under the umbrella of?

The Alt-Right is a name for this.

Welcome potato nigger destiny shill

Truth hurts, little boy.

You can cull all you want, but you have to get busy at some point. Simply disavowing the Alt-Right won't get anything done.

We dead bright n all now, is it bois?

People are freaking out needlessly over it. It is a mere term of convenience to describe a phenomenon. It is not an ideology. It is not a movement. It is not a fixed point in time or space. It is a simple term of convenience used by outsiders to describe an ever-shifting mass.

who has more

>jew

lol he is retarded, I have met him.

Our brainlets vs their brainlets.
goodreads.com/list/show/89892._pol_recommended_reading

>we
>us
you have to go back

It's quite interesting to see this play out. Will the left go into a purity spiral and eat itself to death or try to become more realistic and alienate the radicals? I'd choose the latter, but maybe they're hoping they don't have to change at all, I imagine they still think they have the majority so they're not prepared to change yet, they think demographics are on their side.
This is very accurate. An individual will disagree with the Sup Forums hivemind on questions of morality and duty given the information presented, but it's difficult to question the information itself other than saying that the sources (usually federal government statistics) are biased in some way.

Been here longer than you fag. And you do notice I said we're individuals only loosly affiliated by Sup Forums, right? Simply speaking truth to power on this board makes you a weapon against established acceptable thought since any visting lurkers will see this.