Do you think James will win the lawsuit? If so will google have to admit they have been censoring conservative voices? Could this potentially alleviate all of Alphabets censorship issues on Google and Youtube?
What is Googles end game? What are they trying to really achieve by silencing their political dissenters?
I thought that bitch on the left was tara mccarthy before I clicked on the pic and zoomed in
>I thought that bitch on the left was tara mccarthy
im going to assume this is a porn actress??
Someone put him on suicide watch.
>Do you think James will win the lawsuit?
no fucking way
but the MSM will talk about it
If he can subpoena the right people / evidence.
So no, google will fucking rape him.
>What is Googles end game? What are they trying to really achieve by silencing their political dissenters?
Google is just a very powerful company that is run by Jews who are using it to push for their racial interests. It's not surprising therefore that whites are finding themselves attacked and persecuted by it.
The root is always Jews.
They don't have much a choice. Their insane leftist world view wouldn't survive if the other side was allowed to speak.
they don't think they're doing anything wrong. they're trying to achieve their political goals which they view as benevolent. they're in for a rude awakening.
> run by Jews
got a source on that?
no she's an e-celeb
Google will settle out of court for an undisclosed amount.
Screencap this faggots
No she's James Damore's lawyer
>Do you think James will win the lawsuit?
i did not follow that much cause dgf. but i did see a bit of his interview with a good professor.
imo he cant win a thing if he takes google to court. it is a private company that has internal culture which employee will either adjust to or move on. you do not tell your employer how to run their own business. still i think google is shit and no money would convince me to work for them.
i saw the complaint. even if the complaint gets dismissed outright, he still brought to light a lot of shit that was going on within google's internal messageboards, and some of it was honestly pretty shocking, i expected more from google.
scribd.com
the second half of it are all facebook posts and memes.
google is going to try really hard to get this complaint dismissed. if not, they'll have to pay out millions to settle the suit, which is chump change to them - but to a casual observer it is still an implicit admission of fault.
There's no way in hell he'll win against Skynet, but at the very least hopefully this gets people talking more about Leftist tyranny in the workplace.
>Sergey Brin
Brin was born in Moscow in the Soviet Union, to Russian Jewish parents, Yevgenia and Mikhail Brin, both graduates of Moscow State University (MSU).[10][11] His father is a mathematics professor at the University of Maryland, and his mother a researcher at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.[1][12][13]
Google that shit you fat nigger
The Daily Stormer
IT'S A FISHING EXPEDITION TO EMBARRASS GOOGLE IN FRONT OF STOCKHOLDERS
Honestly seems like a stunt suit given the woman doing it is straight up part of the RNC.
>What are they trying to really achieve by silencing their political dissenters?
At a certain point you have enough money and start trying to use your power to control the world. Google (and other tech companies) want to be literal Big Brother.
You can't sue for this, he has no chance of winning.
Pic related
Yes yes but what about the jews james? fucking shill
hes suing for labor code violations and FEHA retaliation shit
Your pic is actually completely unrelated to employment laws. Like, how could you be so stupid?
They even put a jew in charge of youtube, look it up faggot
Checked
Your employer can fire you for whatever reason they want. It's their company, not yours. Welcome to the real world.
you guys should take a look at that complaint actually... once you get the legal jargon on the first couple of pages, the back story and allegation he's making are pretty shocking. i know you're not supposed to file frivolous complaints, sure they may be embellished for dramatic effect but ultimately still have to be rooted in reality.
scribd.com
He'll get some jewess judge and she'll give him nada. And make him pay court costs.
It's not like judges are using some impartial legal code to guide them now days.
You don't seem to understand what's going on. This is the dude who got fired from Google for sending a memo. He is making a discrimination case. This would be 14th amendment, not 1st
"i know what im talking about I visit reddit" the post
ever hear of the labor code?
You can't be discriminated for having political views. It's not a protected class. Only race, sex, religion and gender apply.
Ever hear of 'at-will' employment?
Don't think tech giants are all powerful, newfag.
A recent lawsuit against Zuck from Facebook had him quickly cave and settle because there was the risk of the Delaware Court getting to read the juicy emails and conversations over Zuck trying to scheme a bizarre Facebook stock structure that still gave him control over everything even though he plans to sell most of his stock.
hes making a race and gender claim in the complaint. you should really look the stuff over before spouting off bullshit.
California law is different.
He won't settle. He already comes from a fairly wealthy family.
Being able to force Google to turn over even more internal emails and conversations is too good an opportunity to pass over.
That's the thing though. OP asked if he will win the lawsuit. To me, in this case settling =/= winning. If he gets the chance to subpoena the evidence, he will win the case, i do not think he will get that far.
Here's hoping.
The info we have already is deeply disturbing but i've not heard one iota about it other than 'muh mystical mysoginy memo man back at it again'
and he wasn't employed at will/zero hour contract.
It's not like bullying and harassment never existed in workplaces before.
And Silicon Valley is the place where people drink carrot juice until their skin turns orange and drink everything raw, including "raw water".
federal law > state law
Google owns California anyways
Google never fired him for his race or gender, they fired him for being a conservative moron.
and its not like a lawsuit against workplace bullying and harassment was never won. what the fuck are you even doing, jesus christ
Well, Google managers were named in the lawsuit as evidenced by the screencaps.
If Google is forced to turn over more emails, the chance for higher ranking Google employees to be caught in this mess, goes even higher, until it reaches CEO or board of chairmen level.
This is why Google will want to settle because exposing all their dirty laundry to the court would cause a scar that would never heal.
federal law trumps state law under the supremacy clause only when state and federal law are in direct conflict. states are free to regulate whatever they want as long as its not federally regulated or their regulation does not contradict federal regulation.
he may be fired for being a conservative moron, but that's what he's claiming in the complaint. its up to the court to decide how much of that complaint, if any, is true, but arguably he does have adequate grounds to at least bring forth this lawsuit.
There's no federal law saying your political position can't be a state-protected class.
If you are a Youtuber who is demonetized or kicked off of Youtube due to your political speech but do not break any rules of Youtube could you sue? This also applies to twitter or any other platform. Would that be considered discrimination?
I remember those gay people who wanted that cake made by that christian baker and they sued him and won so even though those companies are private businesses shouldn't they be held to the same standards of discrimination?
Google risks trying to move the case to the federal courts though.
The Supreme Court may even be involved since the Supreme Court is being much more direct and active these days.
just shut up and try to learn something for a change, you've already proven yourself to be a moron in 4 posts. i doubt the next 4 will be enlightening.
this is going to the Supreme Court senpai, Silicon Valley will be BTFO, digits confirm
Seems possible, if you're in California, at least. YouTube could be considered an employer.
...
i think you would certainly have a cause of action to sue, but their primary defense would be that you were never a youtube employee, just an independent contractor, and therefore are subject to different rules about being demonetized.
lol no. unless he has undeniable proof, even then less then 1% chance of winning.
You realize he's Jewish anyways, right? So what do you care? Doesn't this board hate Jewish people or something? Lol
That's entirely subjective. Unless someone calls you the n-word and then fires you, it's pretty difficult to prove you were let go based on your race. Keep dreaming though for your little white safe space.
The dude from The Verve did NOTHING WRONG
the lawsuit hasnt gotten to the stage where anyone needs to prove anything yet, it's still in the complaint and answer stage, it's all allegations and theatrics at this point. he can bring the suit, but whether he can prove his claims is another discussion altogether.
don't post xkcd please, it still hurts that someone so smart can stumble when it matters most.
>it's pretty difficult to prove you were let go based on your race.
That's why you present a lawsuit, and if you have enough circumstantial or related evidence to make your accusation (fired because of your ethnicity) likely, they go ahead and can then subpoena shit to prove their case, shit that would otherwise be obscured or unreachable.
Except this is in California, where political views are a protected class under state law.
And the CEO said this is why he was fired:
blog.google
That HR let him say that in an official capacity in California of all places shows they're all brain-dead.
No one is going to protect you conservative morons in California of all places. Better luck in Alabama, Cletus.
>it's all allegations and theatrics at this point
Right, so why even talk about it. You're like old ladies on Facebook.
> I don't know anything about laws, but I'm going to keep googling frantically to hide that fact so I don't have to look and feel like such a cunt for just repeating irrelevant shit I've heard other hipsters say which I don't actually even understand
Except it's not purely California's courts making this decision, the NLRB is involved. If they determine local law has been violated, Google is up shit creek.
>why even talk about it.
because it could potentially be precedent setting litigation in its infancy stages. pretty exciting shit IMO.
Possible but very slim chance of it happening. At best he will get a lot of money as a settlement. He will most likely take that should it be in the tens of millions if the evidence he has is indeed strong enough.
uh isnt damore jewish? look at that fucking shnozz. wtf is going on?
> YOU CANT PROVE YOUR CLAIM SO WHY EVEN SUE IN THE FIRST PLACE!?
> Well you sue so you can have access to evidence to prove your claim.
> REEEEEEEEE
literally you.
From my post here: , I believe this applies to you
>It's just that the people listening think you're an asshole
>And they're showing you the door.
Not to mention that while the chair position is currently vacant for the NLRB, Trump would be the person who nominates the new chair.
>That HR let him say that in an official capacity in California of all places shows they're all brain-dead.
HR are probably women so it's a given.
Even if he was grand motza of the hasidic rabbinical league i'd stand behind him if it meant cucking google.
> There's always a bigger nose.
why are you taking it so personally? do you have a stake in the outcome of this litigation? and we are just talking about the law here, none of us have said anything that hints at where we stand politically. you can seriously save yourself the embarrassment and stop typing and responding. you lost. you were put in your place by people who knew more than you. its unpleasant but ultimately it will make you a better person.
>it's already California law
>it could set precedence
You guys need to get your story straight. Make up your mind, which one is it. Oh right, you don't know then stfu.
Set up my protonmail account today, by the way. It was really easy and they have apps for android and ios. Installing on android couldn't have been simpler. I assume ios will be the same once I get my hands on a used iphone.
I also made firefox my default browser, canceled my google music and youtube red subscriptions, and then signed up with their competitors instead.
I'm done letting some shitty corporate monopoly hunch over my life so it can try to be the de facto government.
Jesus fucking christ you're a moron.
You could write a law saying its illegal to walk down the street, if no one actually prosecuted it for 100 years then one guy decides to prosecute someone for it, the judgement sets precedent even if it's already a law.
Are you literally 12?
My point is it's not purely the California courts that enforce labor disputes like this. It's both their courts and the federally-controlled NLRB, which will refer to local labor laws.
Seeing as the NLRB is now de-facto Trump-controlled, it will happily use California state law to hang Google with its own rope.
Yeah, except as anons have already explained to you repeatedly, it's irrelevant. Are you honestly this dumb?
TL;DR - Live by the SJW Sword, Die by the SJW Sword
What's the particularly egregious part?
So many delicious (You) in this thread. Thank you conservative morons for playing along. It's hilarious using you brainlets as my play thing for my entertainment. I suppose such is life in this food chain, the bigger fish always eats the little, dumber fish. I have to go to bed now. Goodnight you infantile simpletons.
Anons....
bitter sweet, symphony
Google environment was a completely cancerous shitshow, and everyone is going to read about it.
Skim his lawyer's document.
>oh but i was trolling this whole time lawlll
have a good evening.
The CEO in that memo confirmed he was fired because of the views stated in that memo. Those views are protected under California State Labor Law.
Normally, HR would say they just fired him because they felt like it, because you can legally do that. You can't legally fire someone in California for having a particular political view. But the CEO said, in an official statement, that they did it because of Damore's views.
TL;DR - Google has no defense at all on this point. Their official, legally binding statement is that he was fired for political reasons, which is illegal in the State of California.
all you've proven from the depths of your gnorance that this is still a suit worth exploring
You can't fight Google and win, the only one who might have the power and wit to fight Google and win is Donald Trump. Everyone else will burn
Ah, thank you.
KYS
I see this going to the supreme court and being dragged on for many years.
Good thing Trump controls the NLRB then.
FYI, we all know that you're actually just some retard who is now trying to save face.
but Trump doesn't care about some geek getting fired from google.
>This board
Reddit...
actually I was just playing the character of a pompous liberal. then I decided to leave you goys with one last Elliot Rodgers-esque post and you all took the bait. kek you newfags make it too easy. have a blackpill for your troubles
Probably not, but if he gets to knock google down a peg it's a political win.
Everyone here thinks you are total faggot.
Go to bed.
Now you're trying to feel not such a fucking idiot by larping as babby's first shill, except you either need to lurk moar or you never belonged here because you're stupid.
We all see through you, and I'm really not just saying that.
