Those studies are from 1997 and 1965. As Ive said, outdated.
The link I showed provides evidence that dietary carbohydrates are responsible for mortality, which is accurate.
Large study from a few months ago shows its carbs and not fat that is detrimental
google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/large-study-suggests-carbs-not-fats-bad-for-you/
The idea that fat is bad comes from the 1950s when food lobbies who produced grain based and sugar based products bought out scientists responsible for government dietary guidelines. The suggestion that you imply that limiting carbs is associated with mortality is complete nonsense, carbohydrates, especially refined increase mortality.
Unlike fat, they get processed very fast in the body and cause insuline spikes which is unhealthy.
Even ancient anthropological evidence shows that hunter and gatherers (high fat low carb diets) were much healthier than early farmers who were on a grain based diet.
blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/17/early-farmers-were-sicker-and-shorter-than-their-forager-ancestors/
>
>No, meat contains cholesterol, saturated fat and hormones. You should eat it very sparingly or not at all.
Once again, out dates nonsense. Saturated fat is not bad for you, only when combined with diets high in carbs. Dietary cholesterol is not bad for you at all.
When the british were in africa they'd often hire maasai warriors to fight for them because of their physical strength and endurance. The maasai eat meat, milk and blood. They were much stronger than their more vegetarian neighbors.
Its been known for ages that meat is tied to physical strength. The problem is whats eaten with the meat in our modern diet, which is carbs and sugar. No one is buying this 1900's nonsense about fat being bad for you. Everyday there are more studies showing carbs and sugar to be the cause od everything from obesity to imflammation, to cancer.