Why do men collectively forget that women fought in wars too?

Why do men collectively forget that women fought in wars too?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=zeedcWiM4e8
youtube.com/watch?v=p1jCOkyuzCs
youtube.com/watch?v=cxzd7kKm91c
youtube.com/watch?v=0BzqwOBneC4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Eger_(1552)
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

because no women who fought lived to tell their tale

Because they didnt?

this

We forget because the number of women who actually fought in Wars is low. Any time a woman does fight, she’s later meme’d into a propaganda tool and her deeds are inflated.

shieldmaiden didn't fight in war, they just carried shields for men

Whoa... I'm glad we still have pictures from the viking era, so we can prove all those misogynists wrong...

WE

They didn't exist.

they didn't. women are resource.

There were around 300 women on the beaches of Normandy. They were one of the first to get there actually

Any proof at all?

Keep your stupidity to yourself and do some research you filthy ignorant nigger.
Over 2000 women served as snipers during the battle of stalingrad. Also, over 7 mil Russian women served due to lack of man power.

Women in the military is jewish. Letting them in the US military was a move towards an israeli style ZOG military. Also it gets woman away from home and ensures they won't be having children during prime breeding age.

you don't risk the baby makers. whatever society did that is retarded.

We never did, it's an important part of our narrative.

youtube.com/watch?v=zeedcWiM4e8

Maybe you saw the recent documentary, but a single Israeli woman turned the tide against the Germans during WW1.

why did women forget how to fight?

this

bullshit
proof...

Some women fighting =/= women fight

Shield maidens protected their homes. They didn't fight in wars. Only a small handful fought in raids, most women present in sagas or chronicles didn't fight anyone.

Because they never won any

Lagertha is my dream woman

>300
>Out of 160,000
>0.18%
Roastie rounding error

because they all surrendered and then rightly kept as sex slaves

because it sucks for men to think about how their enemies will rape women after lost battles. Its just a prize for the enemy and a liability to the other men. Please stay at home ladies.

No, 2000 women became snipers in all of the ussr, not all served at Stalingrad. Next using women as warriors for propoganda was a Russian tactic even in WW1 so I'm willing to bet most female snipers are greatly exaggerated.

Someone needed to blow the Germans manning those pillboxs on the beaches

women are lucky to have the place they do in western culture, go east and theyre literal cumdumpsters and nothing more

Fpbp

kek

She cucks ragnar with a slave, a king, and kills her former lover.

Yeah she's your dream woman alright.

>2000 women snipers
>over a million male snipers
Negligible numbers m8

>FPBP
>Leaf
>MFW

That was a pretty compelling documentary.

I have no doubt that throughout history many women did end up fighting in all kinds of situations whether they wanted to or not.
What exactly do you want me to do with that? Do you want a plaque? I think that you can probably handle making your own if so.

>1 post by this ID

It's for the same reason women collectively forget that they are not competent warriors.

They broke up before she did all of that.

Leaf bringing the bants

youtube.com/watch?v=p1jCOkyuzCs

youtube.com/watch?v=cxzd7kKm91c

espionage is a different story, but actual combat? hell no

BBC is a magical thing that domesticates the fiercest female warrior.

Ragnar was the one who asked the slave if he wanted to hit it. It's clearly being shown as part of their culture. She killed her former lover who was trying to steal Kattegat. Be afraid of alpha women faggot.

...

...

In real life, their faces would not have been this delicate.

Because the virtually did not, for every case of a woman fighting in a battle there are 100,000 men who fought in battle.

It’s so lopsided it defies explanation, until very recently women had a natural disadvantage in warfare, they are weaker, slower, less brutal and easier to take down.

Women have and always will be a burden in a physical fight.

They could man planes and ships and stuff but actually infantry fighting? Absolutely not.

women didn't do shit in the wars they fought in. Only die or let men die first and then die after men did most of the work.

Because while there are some women who indeed fight, they're and always had been a minority of fighters, a very small minority.

because they didn't, though it's smart of them to know how defend themselves if they need too.

When you create a breeding system counter to the One man plus one woman (started by the Catholic Church,) you end up drifting back to the 80/20 rule. The top 20% of males breed with 80% of the females. That means there are a lot of males who will have no hope of getting a wife or even a girlfriend. They get very restless and have no roots to care about (few marriages are bad for the village) and can simply go on their merry way to where ever they want. They can even become very dangerous to women and wealthy males. It's not like they have a nagging wife to keep an eye on them. Nor do they have much wealth so they have very little to lose by being evil.

All this adds up to women generally being seen as people who chase the highest status males (to produce better offspring) and not respected. Ain't life a bitch?

no... they didn't...
only women in the military in wwii were medics and other forms of support

Over history there must have been 0.0000001% of women actually fighting on the battlefields, and this is a kind estimate.

Fake. There were nurses, yes, but they certainly didn't land in the middle of the fights, let alone at the beginning.

...

Why do women want so desperately to be men?

Ya im gonna need some source on that bud

because 99% of women in the military are literal cum dumpsters for the men that are only allowed to work desk jobs.

I remember this. They were killing nazis with their exoframe battle suits. When the men finally landed on Normandy they didn't have anything to do so they staged an event and filmed it to make it look like they did something.

they're jealous of the natural authority of men compared to women, but do not and can not handle the burden that comes with it.

True

All what women do in the military is sucking dick and shuffling papers. They are completely redundant.

because only stupid country uses woman to fight. 1man can impregnate few woman.

>cum dumpsters
yeah right
enjoy getting dishonorably discharged for sexual assault
women in the military have all the choice and the power in any inter-military relationships because threat of expulsion only applies to males

L.O.L. those swords look way too heavy for them. Disgraceful.

T.B.H., is that a scene from a movie, O.P.? I kind of want to see them get slaughtered.

Because they were usually an extreme minority and had no overall effect on large scale conflict. There are always outliers, the majority of active combatants and deaths in war are always men.

That is actually not true.

It's from The History Channel's t.v series "Vikings." One of the few programs that network has left which is actually about history.

Women fight as the very last desperate resort of a nation about to fall apart

This.

You mean American men who don't know anything about history beyond their civil war.

No country which invaded at Normandy allowed women in combat positions. Almost no country in the world at that time allowed women in combat positions.

They really are fond of and admire the strength of men, and they think everyone thinks this way (but most men see the strength of other men simply as useful and sometimes even threatening) so they, sometimes, believe that being men will make them be loveable as well.

I wouldn't necessarily call this want to be desperate though it does seem, in a way, pathetic. It seems naive.

What?

Propaganda.
They are very susceptible to it.

WUZ

They don't it's just rare or when so.eone defends their own territorty against incursion.

Didn't they bring in an Oriental to be one of the brides of the lead character (in Scandinavia)? It doesn't seem realistic, lad.

...

Post tits or gtfo

A small number of women picked up rifles when they had no other chjoice because the enemy came to them.

Yeah right, because ancient warfare was always all out slaughter.
Even roman battles more often then not were the Romans in formation while the enemy clased a bit but eventually fled or surendered when they couldn't do shit. This video gives you an idea how most tribal pre roman warfare more likely looked like.

youtube.com/watch?v=0BzqwOBneC4

Women may indeed participated in such "clashes" as cheering on the sideways.

History is not empty of female heroes even if their share is low overall and some of them were prophetic in a way.Its uneducated at best,you know,that not knowing about Jeanne d'Arc for example...

L.O.L. What was her kill count?

"Mama always said, that if you don't have anything true to say, don't say anything at all"
All fields.

>Revolution where even the army was on your side
>Actual war
Nice try, but no.

UMA DELICIA

Bro, the BBC is a tax payer funded TV station. Unless you're talking about some weird porn thing? In that case, welcome Shlomo!

...

Because we're the superior sex and they subconsciously know it?
Only a few exceptionnal female individuals ever exceeded their normal, weaker, prideful state of mind.

I dont think there is a kill count outside of video games.
>brainlet
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Eger_(1552)

Some intense dick-sucking occurred after both of those videos were filmed

Never said the show was perfect. It's still a show about history.

I think the main reason they forget is because women didn't fight in wars.

It’s more like a liberal interpretation of sagas pretending to be history when it is really just drama with combat scenes thrown in between who’s fucking who. The show was pretty good at first but then it went off the deep end. It is not history, unless ou consider harry turtledove to be history.

No.

>I dont think there is a kill count outside of video games.
This, coming from someone who was talking about "uneducated" only a moment earlier.

>hungarian education

Weapons and shields are found in the graves of Skandinavian women, therefore they must have been warriors.
Let's just ignore the fact the the Vikings themselves makes no mention of this, nor does any historian from the time.