Denizens of Sup Forums: I submit to you that romanticizing your genetic inheritance of IQ is nothing more than the equivalent boasting of MUH DICK.
A negro person bragging about the size and fortitude of their genitals is no different than you obsessing over your genetic disposition in the IQ bell curve.
Also, I hate to break it to you like this, but if you're really that smart, then you'd realize that having a higher-than-average IQ does NOT guarantee biological success! Another way of putting that is; it doesn't matter how smart you are--as a living organism who reproduces sexually--if your brain can't get you laid, then what good does being smart do for you, really?
Furthermore, among biological traits among humans, IQ is NOT one that nature requires for biological fitness. In fact, there are several more desirable traits, including immune response and adaptability. For example, that indigenous bushman that you all like to lampoon for his dark skin, is physically robust; capable of living in the harshest conditions this planet can muster, including weather, flora, and fauna. This is why almost every continent on this planet had indigenous people living there of color. African slaves in America, for example, had to at times endure deciduous climates--i.e., harsh winters--that were not native to the continent of their origin. The descendants of these slaves went on to dominate American sports and earn great wealth as celebrity athletes.
The brutal irony of it all is that the one ENTIRELY SUPERFICIAL BIOLOGICAL TRAIT that you all seem to swoon over doesn't guarantee that you'll be able to pass your IQ on to your offspring.
>tl;dr Use that alleged genetic IQ of yours to read through my entire post. Also, MUH DICK.
P.S.: George Soros and I created Reddit together in the basement of a pizzeria back in the 80's with Al Gore.
but nice societies aren't built by muh dik, they're built by muh iq
sorry tyrone, try again, maybe do some preliminary research on how to correctly compare and contrast things
Christian Long
thats a bit of a reach dude
Tyler Baker
...
Nathaniel Harris
Iq isn't all there is to white supremacy. Dumbass.
Jace Moore
...
Samuel Jones
"Nice societies" is entirely subjective. Nice to who? Would the African slaves of colonial America consider THEIR society nice?
Also, with all your so-called genetically inclined IQ, people of white skin chose to create nuclear weapons once they discovered the secrets of the atom, instead of perfecting it to replace fossil fuels. And anons here have the nerve to accuse people of color of being violent savages!
Please share that notion with your peers here on Sup Forums, as they seem to argue that notion as if a high IQ is the only virtue that any person requires to live a good life and be a decent, contributing member to society.
Nicholas Garcia
>fuck off kike
>sorry tyrone
>"thou shalt not commit logical fallacies" >See "genetic"
Juan Perez
Perhaps so, but is it wrong for niggers to romanticize those feelings of having a huge dick if it were true? I think you know as well as I that Europeans and Eastern Asians aren’t the same as Africans. Sure there’s genetic variance among race, so someone relatively smart for Africans, and someone relatively dumb for Europeans, could overlap. But unless you have an emotional attachment (like some people do to religion) to Africans you’ll eventually reach the conclusion that yes, 60,000 years of being in isolated populations in 2 drastically different climates did cause more morphological difference than just skin color. You could argue that Europeans are genetically superior and make a strong case. But you could even make a tenuous case Eastern Asians are genetically superior to Europeans.
Brody Rivera
I think the common adage is that, because European nomads elected to flee mother Africa, their brains adapted to challenge nature. But also, along with this adage, the notion that there was also adaptation to harsher winter climate; hence, the loss of skin melanin content. The problem with those notions is that a person of white skin gained no clear advantage for the skin adaptation. Thicker fur (body hair) to resist the cold, sure...but that means that his offspring will have to darken again to adapt back to sub-Saharan and tropical climates. Think about it: Literally almost every continent had people of color living on it before the whites came to colonize. In short, at best, you only gained some brain matter, but sacrificed physical robustness.
Meanwhile, the brain of the indigenous bushman is sharp and clever, geared to outsmart the local creatures that inhabit his environment. He doesn't need a law degree to forage for food, or to understand the basics of quantum physics in order to win a mate. He is perfectly adapted for the harsh conditions of this planet. Ever watch Naked and Afraid? My point is that very few people who enjoy the comforts and privileges of modern society, including access to municipal services like waste and water treatment, would last very long under the same conditions as the indigenous bushman, who, thereby, has a greater chance at passing along his traits to his offspring.
William Martinez
Those were the lucky ones, the others had to stay behind in their shitholes
Charles Martinez
Well heritage is legitimate if there is something to inherit, would be pretty bad if there was.
>genes
Nathan Barnes
Of course! They were treated to such luxuries as >Harsh physical labor >Cruel and unusual punishment >Humiliation >De-humanization >Rape >Torture >Abuse, both mental and physical >Pedophilia >Kidnapping >Isolation from family >Venereal diseases >Poor diet and nutrition >Insufficient housing >Sadism >Public lynching >Civil disenfranchisement Why, if it weren't for the HUGE FAVOR America did or those African slaves, they'd be back in their grass skirts and mud huts hunting wild game with a pointy stick. Fucking savages!
Nathaniel Bennett
kys kikes
It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of border-less, race-less, culture-less, identity-less, subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.
In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and to discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the past and present in that effort.
>No one blames the lazy aristocrats who imported the slaves >Lazy aristocrats easily climb to power off the backs of the proletariat >People still line-up in droves to suck the dicks of the elite Wew!
>In short, at best, you only gained some brain matter, but sacrificed physical robustness. The average IQ of a Somali is 68. To put this in perspective, this is below the classification for "intellectually disabled" (70), meaning by default they get "diminished capacity".
Setting aside racial IQ differences, you still can't win the argument. After all, how does it benefit whites to become minorities in their own homelands? Even if Africans were intellectually superior, would this justify the displacement and/or replacement of whites by Africans? Since life is a struggle for scarce resources, those tribes which exhibit ethnic solidarity are more likely to pass on their genes to the next generation. From this standpoint, white in-group preference makes perfect sense from an evolutionary perspective.
Not to mention the various cultural, historical, aesthetic, and physical differences that differentiate whites from other ethnic groups. Bottom line: do whites want to be colonised by Africans? Should they be allowed to preserve their race, its history, culture, traditions, and accomplishments? If you don't think they should, you are being anti-white and will surely suffer on DOTR (Day of the Rope).
Noah Gomez
For example, the Scientific American article you cited uses the keyword "might", as in there is nothing conclusive. Let me ask you: Was the T-Rex a predator or a scavenger? Strong arguments can be made for both. But one is more likely than the other based on overwhelming evidence. It is simply more likely that the progenitors of humans evolved from Africa.
>The average IQ of a Somali is 68. To put this in perspective, this is below the classification for "intellectually disabled" (70), meaning by default they get "diminished capacity" First of all, fun fact: IQ tests are not a scientific measurement of human aptitude. Google "IQ vs aptitude". Also, you can't measure IQ with the same level of precision and acuity as, say, the speed of light in a vacuum or the amount of energy it takes to heat a cubic centimeter of water by 1 degree Celsius. Lastly, how is this not a different variation of bragging about one's ethnic traits? Ergo, MUH DICK.
>how does it benefit whites to become minorities in their own homelands? Biology will sort it all out, unless the white man builds another mass-genocide weapon, biological or otherwise.
>Even if Africans were intellectually superior, would this justify the displacement and/or replacement of whites by Africans? The same way anons here justify the "Day of the Rope", just because they feel intellectually superior to another human being by way of entirely superficial genetic traits.
>From this standpoint, white in-group preference makes perfect sense from an evolutionary perspective Interesting perspective. So is this why the white man revels in world conquest?
>you are being anti-white and will surely suffer on DOTR (Day of the Rope) Yet I'm sure you haven't accused people of color of being lowly, violent savages. Take the American negro: Ever stop to think that the reason they are so violent is that they are aware that they are a racial minority and are protecting their turf? Much the same way you're suggesting.
Josiah Scott
Seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of 46 subclades in 17 major haplogroups were considered in terms of their base (ancestral) haplotypes and timespans to their common ancestors, for the purposes of designing of time-balanced haplogroup tree. It was found that African haplogroup A (originated 132,000 ± 12,000 years before present) is very remote time-wise from all other haplogroups, which have a separate common ancestor, named β-haplogroup, and originated 64,000 ± 6000 ybp. It includes a family of Europeoid (Caucasoid) haplogroups from F through T that originated 58,000 ± 5000 ybp. A downstream common ancestor for haplogroup A and β-haplogroup, coined the α-haplogroup emerged 160,000 ± 12,000 ybp. A territorial origin of haplogroups α- and β-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south. Haplogroup B is descended from β-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lat- eral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.
>IQ tests are not a scientific measurement of human aptitude Actually, yes they are. In fact, various studies have shown IQ is a better indicator of workplace performance than any other variable. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557354/
>Biology will sort it all out, unless the white man builds another mass-genocide weapon, biological or otherwise. So white men will slowly be bred out of existence and replaced with mullatoes and non-whites? How's that working out in South Africa? Hint: whites are being torn off the land and genocided. Blacks fared much better under apartheid chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/frontline.org.za/Files/PDF/murder_southafrica (5).pdf
Yet you want to import this model to the USA and other white countries? You might as well advocate flooding some low lying cities whilst you're at it, or bombing the continent with Anthrax. After all, biology will take care of it right?
>entirely superficial genetic traits Except we've already established that IQ is strongly correlated with HDI, of which Africans perform at a much lower level. They're also much more inclined towards violence and tend to vote for socialism and bigger government which is antithetical to the ideals of the founders of America which was intended as an ethnostate for "white Americans of good character"
>So is this why the white man revels in world conquest? No, it explains why all tribes have an in-group preference including blacks. In fact, Africans are constantly engaged in inter-tribal warfare. This is not a trait exclusive to whites, we just excelled at it historically due to our naturally higher IQ and creative racial characteristics
>Ever stop to think that the reason they are so violent is that they are aware that they are a racial minority and are protecting their turf?
If that's the case, why did the Irish assimilate but the Africans didn't? After all, the Irish were indentured slaves
Wyatt Carter
That's an awful long way of saying "scientific racism". We get it. You hate black people. Okay.
>That's an awful long way of saying "scientific racism" So its racism to disagree with the out-of-Africa theory?
Ayden Collins
>>Ever stop to think that the reason they are so violent is that they are aware that they are a racial minority and are protecting their turf? You could apply this same argument to any other ethnic group; such as Chinese, Japanese, and Indians. But their crime rates are a miniscule fraction of the black crime rates. Black males represent a mere 6% of the US population yet commit 50% of the violent crimes. Despite massive investment in black communities and affirmative action since the civil rights act was passed.
No. But using a scientific hypothesis to justify racial superiority is.
>Actually, yes they are. In fact, various studies have shown IQ is a better indicator of workplace performance than any other variable >Obviously didn't Google "IQ vs aptitude"
>So white men will slowly be bred out of existence and replaced with mullatoes and non-whites? See what happens when you confuse biological fitness with nationalistic agendas?
>we just excelled at it historically due to our naturally higher IQ and creative racial characteristics So with all your intellect, you CHOSE war and conquest?
>If that's the case, why did the Irish assimilate but the Africans didn't? After all, the Irish were indentured slaves I think the Irish have white skin, and it is thereby easier to mindfuck people into believing one shade of skin is superior to the other when they have the same color as the ruling party. See "useful idiots".
Carson Gomez
The first 3 posts fucking ended this thread.
Stop fucking listing you subhuman easily baited brainlet
William Reyes
>Black males represent a mere 6% of the US population yet commit 50% of the violent crimes And the US dropped an atomic bomb on Japan. And US generals ordered soldiers to spray napalm on innocent civilians in Vietnam. And the pilgrims came in droves and sacked the natives of the Americas. Yet blacks are conveniently scapegoated as the violent ones based on disproportional based on a history of systemic socioeconomic oppression.
I mean, like, wew.
Where is your superior intellect for open debate, user? Why does it fail you?
Aaron Johnson
So where exactly do you think nuclear power plants come from?
Jonathan Myers
...
Leo Hernandez
Get back to fucking your sister Jamal.
Lincoln Collins
>Harsh physical labor >Cruel and unusual punishment >Humiliation >De-humanization >Rape >Torture >Abuse, both mental and physical >Pedophilia >Kidnapping >Isolation from family >Venereal diseases >Poor diet and nutrition >Insufficient housing >Sadism >Public lynching >Civil disenfranchisement Sounds like a typical day in the Middle-East for a non-muslim.
Brayden Gray
Nuclear power plants, yes. And bombs.
>Assuming I'm black >Ad hominem >Projection Also, why be so angry when confronted for intellectual debate? Surely your superior intellect is up for such a paltry challenge...
John Cooper
I mean last time I checked your "dick" didn't build infrastructure of societies, heritage and IQ did though, shut up nigger sympathizer
Andrew Hill
...
Tyler Hall
>But using a scientific hypothesis to justify racial superiority is When did I use a scientific hypothesis to justify racial superiority? I was simply disagreeing with your statement that "European nomads elected to flee mother Africa" when the evidence suggests otherwise. If anything, you're trying to use a scientific hypothesis to justify the faulty assumption that racial differences don't exist or are somehow inconsequential, though that's tangential to the point I was making.
>Obviously didn't Google "IQ vs aptitude" I never claimed IQ tests were a measure of aptitude. I said they were a measure of intelligence. Nice straw man argument though, good job.
>See what happens when you confuse biological fitness with nationalistic agendas? Not really, no? Just spouting bullshit doesn't actually count as an argument, you know that right?
>So with all your intellect, you CHOSE war and conquest? No, we just decided to sit back and enjoy the sunshine. This is probably the most legitimately retarded statement I've ever read on Sup Forums. Not kidding. But that's okay. There's no cure for stupidity so I can't hold it against you.
>I think the Irish have white skin, and it is thereby easier to mindfuck people into believing one shade of skin is superior to the other when they have the same color as the ruling party. See "useful idiots". If that's the case, explain why black crime rates are exponentially higher than every other ethnic group, including Japanese/Chinese/Indians/Pakistanis?
Chase Powell
...
Charles Russell
>the US dropped an atomic bomb on Japan
and yet the Japanese don't run around, chimping out, and ruining everything.
Grayson Cox
It's called dysgenics, and its been caused by 70 years of white-shaming and jewish emasculation of white males since WW2. Also high fructose diets and lack of exercise due to our sedentary lifestyles
Robert Baker
True. But the Germans did against the Jews, and slaughtered them like cattle by the millions. But inner-city blacks? Gotta watch those guys, I tell ya what!
Thomas Morris
>jewish emasculation of white males Ah yes, it's da joos, right?
Jack Flores
>genetic inheritance of IQ is nothing more than the equivalent boasting of MUH DICK.
its not really boasting, mook. the point is to illustrate how deeply our ethnicity reaches into our lives. genetic temperaments, opinions and proclivities guide us a lot more than we wish they did.
>if your brain can't get you laid, then what good does being smart do for you, really?
Selfish gene, newfag. our genetics consider us each phenotypical avatars of our respective breeding populations. they'll kill you on purpose.
besides that, my brain can help my people solve problems, and make their lives better. (take note how biological essentialism doesn't lead to nihilism the way that pan-humanist enlightenment jibber does)
>The brutal irony of it all is that the one ENTIRELY SUPERFICIAL BIOLOGICAL TRAIT that you all seem to swoon over doesn't guarantee that you'll be able to pass your IQ on to your offspring. >Entirely Superficial
lolwut. most any male 130+ should be able to reproduce.
negro man doesn't have his financial fitness assessed since he belongs to a dependant class. with few exceptions its understood that the female will be carrying him.
Andrew Jackson
...
Nicholas Reed
...
Charles Myers
>And the US dropped an atomic bomb on Japan. And US generals ordered soldiers to spray napalm on innocent civilians in Vietnam. And the pilgrims came in droves and sacked the natives of the Americas. Yet blacks are conveniently scapegoated as the violent ones based on disproportional based on a history of systemic socioeconomic oppression.
So because whites have historically been violent in wars (those which you mentioned were both started by Jewish warmongers) that means we should allow blacks to perpetrate violence against us during peacetime? That's really fine logic there, pal
>history of systemic socioeconomic oppression. What socioeconomic oppression do blacks suffer from in modern America compared to say, a Chinese or Indian immigrant? If anything it's the opposite due to affirmative action programs that discriminate against whites. This argument is getting really stale btw
Ryan Barnes
Are there even white people on Sup Forums or are we all just meme'ing?
David Turner
>wh*Tes >people
John Jenkins
>fuck off kike
Dude, at least try to read his thread. He's trying to make a point.
Wyatt Reed
> >"Nice societies" is entirely subjective. Nice to who? Would the African slaves of colonial America consider THEIR society nice?
no its not, quantitative measures exist newfag. ie Human Development Index. Africans are a dependant class, and are burdens everywhere they are. nobody needs to be nice to them. they're slaves of their own incompetence.
>Also, with all your so-called genetically inclined IQ, people of white skin chose to create nuclear weapons once they discovered the secrets of the atom, instead of perfecting it to replace fossil fuels. And anons here have the nerve to accuse people of color of being violent savages!
your just wrong in being generally antiwar and for blaming the weapons. that's a child's view
>they seem to argue that notion as if a high IQ is the only virtue that any person requires to live a good life and be a decent, contributing member to society.
no they don't. they just say that anyone with a high iq is necessarily able whereas someone without a high iq may or may not be able to be a decent contributing member of society
Bentley Wood
...
Ryan Parker
Just memeing
Henry Scott
...
Daniel Sullivan
Yes, it is. I've got a pictures of my grandfather s on both sides who looked like male models. Whilst reasonably attractive, I'm not as attractive as them (less musculature and narrower dental arch). The same goes for most white males when compared to their ancestors, even 50 years ago. The rise and fall of nations correlates with national identity, unity, and purity. Hence why multiculturalism is always a gigantic failure. Intermarriage with alien stocks always leads to racial impoverishment and dysgenics for the superior race if it becomes subsumed by an inferior one, both spiritually and physically.
Robert Cooper
LOL butthurt and cope. You'll be replaced by superior men, Inshallah.
Jonathan Russell
Is he morte?
Colton Reyes
Probably, seeing as how weak wh*Teoids are nowadays.
Colton Walker
wtf i want to kill everyone looking like me now
Brayden Fisher
You are a massive stinking faggot >sage
Wyatt Hill
THE LEFT CANT MEME H E
L E F T
C A N T
M E M E
Luis Kelly
> >>Black males represent a mere 6% of the US population yet commit 50% of the violent crimes >And the US dropped an atomic bomb on Japan. And US generals ordered soldiers to spray napalm on innocent civilians in Vietnam. And the pilgrims came in droves and sacked the natives of the Americas. Yet blacks are conveniently scapegoated as the violent ones based on disproportional based on a history of systemic socioeconomic oppression.
>Yet blacks are conveniently scapegoated as the violent ones based on disproportional based on a history of systemic socioeconomic oppression.
you literally switched excuses in the middle of a sentenced.
blacks are more violent, and they never win shit at the end.
there is no oppression. that's what the iq gap is, dummy. blacks have a lower general ability to solve problems, so are less productive with lower earning ability.
>can’t into civilisation >Ooga booga muh dick >we waz kangz
Lincoln Gray
50/50 logic If the Left can't meme, the Right can't meme too.
Jonathan Clark
>>Harsh physical labor >>Cruel and unusual punishment >>Humiliation >>De-humanization >>Rape >>Torture >>Abuse, both mental and physical >>Pedophilia >>Kidnapping >>Isolation from family >>Venereal diseases >>Poor diet and nutrition >>Insufficient housing >>Sadism >>Public lynching >>Civil disenfranchisement sounds like your average African tribe desu guess burgers wanted them to feel like at home
Charles Ramirez
yep. nigger btfo. /thread sage
Joseph Bailey
balance fallacy you dumb monkey
Jackson Hall
I don't care. If Britain becomes part of the Islamic caliphate I honestly couldn't care less. You inbred mudpeople the jews invited to replace us aren't "superior". Your culture amounts to fucking goats and underage boys. What do I have to be jealous of? What's most embarrassing is that you travelled half way across the world to escape your backward shithole countries (which you ruined) and now you want to do the same thing to ours. If the white man falls, the rest of humanity dies with him
Charles Thomas
Splendid then. CracKKKers need to GTFO our Island!
Brayden Russell
...
Liam Perez
My great granddad fought for Britain in the Indian army then got a job here. We'll be a superpower by 2030.
Jack Flores
Nvious, is that you?
Logan Smith
Iq is merely one of the easiest civilisation promoting figures to tatte off for the uneducated. "Muh dick" is a fig leaf for the wounded egos of niggers. Idk how you could confuse the two. You're probably jewish.
Charles Lopez
>My great granddad fought for Britain in the Indian army then got a job here. We'll be a superpower by 2030. If we're still alive by 2030 you'll be shitting in the street then, just as you are now
Matthew Anderson
Iq is shorthand for g you retarded fuck unironically kys
Brandon Myers
False. India is on the path to ending street shitters. Our GDP per capita is increasing fast too.
Connor Morales
American blacks were selectively bred to be human spades, what's your point?
Isaiah Davis
>the retarded /leftypol/yp strikes again with more unfunny cancerous memes
Jaxon Walker
>blacks are more violent, and they never win shit at the end So build another bomb, right? They never win, but that's why they need to die, right? With all your alleged intellect, your best solution is "Day of the Rope"?
>blacks have a lower general ability to solve problems, They made good with the crack cocaine that the US government planted in their neighborhoods. But do go on...
>so are less productive with lower earning ability >Who built the American infrastructure for 400, Alex? Wew
>they're also lazy I would say that the aristocratic colonial elite in the Southern United States have them beat.
Luis Harris
>India is on the path to ending street shitters Street shitting is your favorite national pastime. You could have the highest GDP in the world and you'd still be shitting in the streets
Xavier Reyes
Whatever man. Time to prep your gf's bull.
Jaxon Barnes
>nice societies are subjective
funny how something so “subjective” makes half the world want to move to countries that have western european culture
but be my guest and go have a machete fight in haiti and eat dirt cookies. To some, im sure it is a good time!
Anthony Williams
To be honest, mate. We're all headed for extinction anyway. If robot AI or nuclear war doesn't exterminate us, the federal reserve ponzi scheme is going to collapse at some point. You might as well take solace in the fact that we're all on the same sinking ship together
Jonathan Wilson
Haaaah nigger.
Juan Stewart
>IQ is not one of the features required for biological fitness In the cold it is. There, it's the difference between being alive and dead.
Robert Hall
This. "Tank you mister, tank you for bringing us here" (sings tribal song) "yeah!!!! the white man"
Ryder Peterson
>blacks make crack (at the obeisience of the feds) which contributes to the destruction of their community Yeah top shelf problem solving >nigger problem solvers
Blake Ramirez
Reasonable.
>In the cold it is. There, it's the difference between being alive and dead. One could say that migrating to a region where you cannot survive by your own immediate physiology is rather counter-intuitive.
>What is "Opioid Crisis" in the US for 400, Alex?
Jose Brooks
>drugs imported to pacify a oppressed people vs >the willful creation and distribution of drugs in your community Niggers literally shit where they eat without a second thought. But I guess that's at the heart of the matter. Niggers have high time preference. They cannot think about the future like europeans and asians can
Christopher Hall
>t. tyrone You can't even hide it nigger
Colton Stewart
Would you say niggers can survive in a Europe that has no social security system?
