What's wrong with Strasserism/Nazbol? It sounds great to me. Strong unified culture free of degeneracy and everyone working together and helping one another to build up the nation and individual into success through government investment/opportunity. What's not to like?
Capitalism is divisive by its very nature. It creates competition. Socialism encourages unity. How can a people and nation unite under a capitalist government? Doesn't make sense to me.
For most people here:
>dragon dildoes > society
That’s why nazbol isn’t popular.
...
If you really want to know what is wrong with socialism I recommend:
mises.org
You can get it in hardcover if you wanted, but this is a very detailed well written analysis of Socialism. If you are serious about Socialism as an Idea it behooves you to know what its shortcomings are.
I am trying to be cordial with you and not call you stupid or a looser or insult your sexuality for believing in Socialism.
>600 pages of sophistry
Mises isn’t taken seriously by effectively anyone anymore so his critique of socialism is unlikely to be of use. This is especially true is his argumentative skills are as bad as they’ve been in every other piece of his writings.
Who takes Marx seriously?
Kapital is not The Wealth of Nations.
Marx claimed to be 'scientific' but failed to even visit the factories he wrote about, included hardly any data on working conditions, and the data he did use was a biased subsample of dying industries.
Not even going to go into his personal life, inability to manage his finances, and his contempt for the working class.
>Implying I take marx seriously
> says the sophist
You should really outline why Mises' critique of Marx is not worth reading. Genuinely curious.
'because it's bad' is not an argument, it's sophistry.
You should look up the definition.
I have read some shorter writings of him, and they’ve all been extremely poor. I somewhat doubt that the book is an exception.
Because people are more independent than socialism likes to think, but far less independent then 100% an-caps think. You are not the happy medium between individual and society.
Ok. Again, not an argument.
What was poor about them?
Just name one of his concepts that can be criticised, and explain how.
For example his critique of polylogism. The essay has a very poor structure and no central argument. The only argument that he provides at the end is a strawman.
>2018
>still want to destroy the economy by being a socialist
back to venezuela you go
also honestly, isnt the DPRK like the definition of a nazbol country?
> isn't polylogism fairly easy to refute??
Basic Refutation
All humans are fallible rational actors. They choose the course of action they believe will increase their subjective standard of living at their lowest subjective cost. Differences are not the result of different modes of logic, but rather the result of different subjective values or relative positions within an exchange. The implication is that humans can and do seek out mutually beneficial exchanges and participate in the division of labor for their own benefit
Seems like a valid central argument on which to refute polylogism.
Please don't try to refute subjective nature of value.
I am not talking about whether polylogism is real or not, but rather about how mises is simply a horrible writer. Even your post does a better job of refuting polylogism than an entire essay by mises, which should tell us enough about the worth of reading that book.
Because it's lategame is literally an Orwellian superstate.
Nationalism and capitalism are a perfect combination, as nationalism encourages unity and loving your brothers, and capitalism encourages competition and doing the best you can.
Capitalism is a wild beast, but can be tamed by a nationalist state.
You do realise 1984 is an anarcho communist fantasy right? Do you support things like cucoldry and anti-nationalism, things which the protagonist does?
It's probably what will happen in a couple of hundred years or so, we'll have have so much abundance and AI doing everything for us that we will reach a post scarcity society. This will just increases the reason why we need a strong Fascist government to continue to implement eugenics programs and to ensure degeneracy does not take over and instead we devote our time to leisure and the greater questions of the universe, eventually though with eugenics we may reach such a state where we no longer need a government and we are advanced enough to implement eugenics on consent and mutual agreement alone, that is well over a thousand years away though and Fascism is the only viable solution for the next millennia.
>What is charity
sage
>hurr durr why is there competition and no one gibs money? :DDDD
It's just socialism inside a state. It could be just as degenerate or race mixed as our current system. There's nothing actually ethno about it. 0
Go back to your containment chamber you dicksucking faggot
Please explain to me why you, the national socialist, have such disdain for OP, the national bolshevist.
read
Can’t argue with that!