Post your Chads and Virgins

Post your Chads and Virgins

> inb4 mods
it's related to politics, pic related

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/144021001/#q144022999
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

...

...

bump

This one is just stupid.

b

...

...

Those digits be beautiful

what did gookmoot mean by this?

...

...

...

...

...

the virgin centrist

...

nice

Chared Taylor

needs "the wizard cuck of mossad"

...

Antifa are cucks

Checked

This is not political but I love it

Your chad is a total fail

> being autistic about jews

President Johnson, the greatest enemy of the white americans, was a christcuck

Jews would not even be a problem if not for Charlemagne giving them a banking monopoly and the Church creating edicts allowing them to get back whenever a kingdom tried to expel them

One of my fav's

...

>white nikes are the shoes for aspies

The "N" is for Newbalance not Nike

You fucking aspie lol

...

This too

...

I saw this happen. It was epic.
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/144021001/#q144022999

whats wrong with newbalance my podiatrist says they are fine shoes

...

lol gay

This is my favorite

...

...

fucking phoneposters

...

Cropped

...

Not even chad can make bottom left appealing

...

Vxtzvddxvb

Fixing Austrian cucks. Hitler left the first chance he got and your people's best contribution to mankind in the last few decades is Steyr.

...

> Fixing Austrian cucks

gas the phoneposters desktop war now

This is the left memeing everybody

...

...

...

the left can only deconstruct, never create

The reddest pill is that the bottom 15% of men should get nothing, and the top 15% should get their women, one extra wife per man. Regular monogamy for the middle 70%.
The best of both worlds.

According to research cited by the American Association of University Professors, 87% of women and 81% of men reproduce

15 % would actually be generous, 19 % already don't breed

Brb necking self

>the virgin thing I dont like
>the chad thing I do like
I never saw this meme being about what the creator of it liked. It's just funny.

You know that Chads are only another form of normalfags, right? Literally alpha -
So few really get it, but the Chad side was supposed to be just as exaggerated and unhelpful as the virgin side. Just with the focus on getting laid while disregarding politics, culture and everything else.

But that's the point, the inability of the top 20% to scoop up those women that "bottom" 20% are too incompetent to breed with even IN a monogamist system really hurts the soft-eugenic effect that could be gained otherwise.
Also a lot of those in this system able to breed wider are extra-marital womanizers, not necessarily the "top 15-20%", merely those who care enough about sex to make themselves look flashy to whatever standard (((THE MEDIA))) dictates..

So to really break down what I'm suggesting it would be a return to the marital norms of a century ago, with an ENFORCED inability to breed of those who represent the "bottom 15-20%" (precise metrics TBD) with the freedom to legally marry a second time available ONLY to that top 15-20% (precise metrics TBD).

Ultimately, we need some general answer to the following two:
The "sexual socialism" of christianity is dysgenic. Males are expendable for a reason, and the experimental gender can also fish up plenty of genetic errors and failures.
The "hoarded harem" of islam is both dysgenic and socially degenerate. If not enough males get to breed they drop out of the system, rape young boys, etc. When too few men breed then everybody in the village has the same grandpa.

So the answer is "limited polygamy" on some scale.

...

More centrist bullshit while right and left don't change anything either. "Omg I'm gay and deserve special treatment." "Omg the gays are cancer and I'm so inconvenienced because they exist." Let's both of us cry and bitch. Meanwhile I'm Republican and watch centrists with that shit eating grin making fun of demo pussies for their victim tears and make fun of me for Bush, McCain, Romney, and Trump. Tells me "shit's bad are you ready to fix it yet?"
Me: "not while the trannies want special bathrooms and the manlets keep playing videogames."
I'm losing it. It's getting old. All there is to life is work. I just work. Left and Right have the saltiest tears and I hate the centrists cus they're kinda right. But wait hold on I gotta work in the morning. What's the odds that one of the Chads on this board get t-boned in a intersection and die tomorrow? Damn ain't life a bitch? I'll be sure to remember you while I've never heard of your name. All I get is coffee and work every day, kill each other or shut the fuck up.

Not all women deserve to reproduce. The very ugly and the very pretty fail to have kids alike.

Aaah I gotcha now m8

...

>IN a monogamist system
where do you see a monogamist system in modern western world?

>where do you see a monogamist system in modern western world?
In 100.000000% of it. Show me one western nation where any form of polygamy is legal.

for some reason I found it funny

>Show me one western nation where any form of polygamy is legal.
literally any western nation?
women get rewarded for divorce in 99.9% of the cases, no matter what the reason for divorce is
marriage is monogamist in name only

The legality of divorce is a complete non sequitur to whether a society is polygamist/monogamist in nature, EBinland.
Do you need me to break the basics down for you?

NOT SO FAST PIRATEFAGS

>The legality of divorce is a complete non sequitur to whether a society is polygamist/monogamist in nature, EBinland.
when a society doesn't enforce something, such as monogamy, it can't be called a monogamist society
and no western society enforces monogamy anymore. they instead enforce womens' polygamy
>Do you need me to break the basics down for you?
please do

Fucking kek this made me lose my shit.

Nigger, you're retarded and need to read Unwin. Polygamy, in any form, is completely degenerate and even the most beta of men need wives to incentivize societal participation.

>non sequitur: the move: the board game: the post
>please do
No problem friendland, I can see you need help.

>Monogamy
Monos = Alone, Single
+
Gamos = To marry.
Lit: To marry a single.
To have one (concurrent) spouse.

>Polygamy
Polus = Many, Several
+
Gamos = To Marry
Lit: To marry several spouses.


>+1 Husband, -1 Husband, +1 Husband, -1 Husband
>0-1 total spouses
Monogamy, repeated. Not polygamy. One alone single is married. A mono gamos.

>+1 wife, +1 wife
>2 total spouses
The amount of spouses is greater than one. A polus gamos.

What we have in the modern world is not where one man can have a polus of gamos, in fact to breed optimally he needs to have either angamy, bigamy or adultery.
In short, the only way to have multiple breeding partners as a man is to be a nigger who has no wives and no commitment in his life.

the definition of marriage in ancient past =/= the definition of marriage today

>even the most beta of men need wives to incentivize societal participation.
Hence why for for 85% of society in my proposal there will be 1-2 wives a man?

We do not need the contributions of the very bottom 15%, we can either leave them be, have them die in war or kill them ourselves. Not all men need to reproduce for the good of our species. They are flatly dead wood. You're on Sup Forums, what are you doing here with this egalitarian nonsense? You would really have the most craven of a generations effete and idiotic breeding? And you call ME retarded?

>What we have in the modern world is not where one man can have a polus of gamos
but that is exactly what we can have.
it's just not legally binding
but neither is actual "real" legal marriage. both are just as binding
so you're just arguing semantics

...

But that's my point. We both agree that marriage is good for society. I'm just saying the best male examples of a society should be incentivized with an extra wife. The sorts of people who innovate and create.
Whereas we don't need the ""contributions"" of the very very worst, who can at best add menial labors.

My proposal is that we should restore marriage, and that when we do it should be in the way I first suggested. Not merely in the way it was practiced before. If anything letting even the miserable idiots of the serf classes have 7 children a piece was the doom of europe to begin with and created the proletariat yokels that stormed the bastiles and started us on this egalitarian suicide to begin with

but those extra waifus wouldn't come from the bottom 20% of inbreedables you know?
they just skim another 20% off the top of desirable women.
now youre left with maybe minimally less women altogether and a vastly increased amount of men

...

They would, in effect, the new "bottom" of the pyramid would just start at 16% as opposed to 0%. It would drift upwards from there, though. You're absolutely correct that the 10's would be taking 10's AND 0's as waifus.

The 10's would pull the 10's and the 9's the 0's would pull nothing and it would settle in between. And from there soft eugenics would make sure over times the 5's of the current generation were 10's just a century ago.

...

Saddam was too pure for this world. Damn shame that his military was the least intelligent in human history.
>Have tanks
>Don't use them like tanks, use them like self propelled artillery
>Minus the self propelled part, never relocate even when outflanked or being assaulted by infantry
I mean there have been some pretty incompetent armies but the Iraqi army of the late 70s and early 80s was unimagniably incompetent. Such staggering levels of retardation are the main reason Iran drove the Iraqis out despite having less and lower quality equipment while much of the western world tried to prop up Iraq.

If 10's can take two wives they won't blow their whole wad on one other 10 and then have a zero on the side. They're far more likely to go for two 7's, even as opposed to one 10, especially as two multiple mid-range girls will be itching to double up on a top-range guy. 10/10 guys are hit on so heavily by women in our society as it is, so top-tier don't know how to go after 10/10 girls, nor do they have the incentive.

...

...

It often is. The good examples generally do
>Virgin
Things many people do which they are self conscious about
>Chad
The exact opposite of what the virgin does to the point of absurdism

>mumbles during liturgy
pls explain

I made a typo in the first sentence. I forgot the wouldn't. If you read my second sentence that should make that clear. Lemem try again:
>the new "bottom" of the pyramid would just start at 16% as opposed to 0%. It would drift upwards from there, though. You're absolutely correct that the 10's would NOT be taking 10's AND 0's as waifus.
>The 10's would pull the 10's and the 9's the 0's would pull nothing and it would settle in between.


Though you're also right that an interesting edge case would be a 10 decided to pull something like two 7's and cash in on the "wow I'm so lucky to have a guy like this I'll never be an uppity bitch

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Kek'd