This was literally the Hitler of Europe in the 19th century

The dude laid Europe in ashes, killed millions, ravaged lands and civilians. Burned down cities and villages. Dude was pure evil.

They sent him to do gardening on some island after all of it.

Today he is remembered as a great statesman, a superb French citizen and a genius general.

How come?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_and_the_Jews
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because great men are not good men. Also he was more successful than Hitler. Didn't have all his accomplishments obliterated after he lost in the same way.

>Because great men are not good men.
Wow, very true.

Have SJWs already twittered that Napoleon was racist and evil?

/thread
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_and_the_Jews

worthy self /thread

He won and he didn't touch the Chosen

That's literally it. Why do you think Stalin, Che, and Mao are treated as interesting curiosities in the West while Hitler is evil incarnate?

because he fought for enlightenment principles not against them like hitler, so the ruling leftist trash celebrate him while they vilify hitler

>enlightenment principles
Because if it is about enlightment principles, it is totally ok to kill millions according to the left.

He did nothing wrong.

In some religious circles he is believed to have been the first antichrist followed by Hitler and leading to a third who will be the last

The elite will be looking down from their ivory towers when it happens again wondering what went wrong because it looked good from up there. More than a year ago I said Trump would be Americas Dalton and it is looking more likely as each day passes.

>A man does not have himself killed for a half-pence a day or for a petty distinction. You must speak to the soul in order to electrify him

-Napoléon Bonaparte

>He won

He lost in the end, only the UK, Portugal and Russia resisted to Napolean absolute control over europe.

Georges Danton, not Dalton obviously...

who is dalton?

oh thanks

No he didn't lose
He wanted to see the English destroyed and Russia lose what little worth it had
I think he accomplished those goals

Incorrect, he didn't ask for our help past the Louisiana purchase

A typo but also a very interesting man.

This

The energy is there. This place is just one channel of it. A tributary. The real swollen stream is in the hundreds of millions all over the globe whom the communists have bullied into silence.

If He comes again, we will know him as our own at the globe will tremble.

The english won in the end, what was waterloo? and the winter destroyed napoleon troops in russia, in portugal, the portugese and the english also defeated the french troops.

Because he escaped the Gardens rallied the troops and started the wars all over again. Truly a Leader!

Conservatives at the time viewed Napoleon as the AntiChrist. And in a fundamental way he represents the transition from a feudal to the liberal order and thus the current decadence we have today. Napoleon could have also accepted the pre revolutionary borders several times and retained power but insisted in both waging wars of aggression and installing incompetent family members as kings.

That being said he was a military and organizational genius who created a legal code that still exists in France, it's colonies and some parts of the U.S today. Something as simple as odd and even numbers designating locations on opposite sides of the street was invented by Napoleon as well as public works and sanitation on the classical model. Fundamentally Napoleon was riding a wave of nationalism which subsequently spread into the rest of Europe and created the nation states we know today. It's also important to remember that Napoleon guaranteed the settlement of seized lands after the revolution and revocation of manorial duties. This is why he had so much support for most of his career. The peasants had a genuine stake in the French revolution and supporting him.

Let's also not forget that Napoleon was a unabashed misogynist and women are BTFO in the Napoleonic code. He deserves a lot of credit for that alone.

>The dude laid Europe in ashes,
Wrong, the only country Napoléon ever agressively invaded was Russia and it was only because they betrayed their words and provoked a casus belli.
90% of his war were defensive and provoked by outside agression, either austrians, prussians, russians or anglos.
Also he is considered a liberator by a lot of countries like Slovakia or Poland.

>Burned down cities and villages.
Which cities did he burn you lying krautsnake? Only city that burnt was Moscow and that's the russians who did it.

>Today he is remembered as a great statesman, a superb French citizen and a genius general.
Because he is all that.

During the 100 jours he revoked most of that, he was extremely redpilled on the jews after few years as emperor, just read his biography.

Napoléon was the final version of it: the enlightened ruler, not this crappy parliamentary democratic trash we have now where little men rule nations.
Too bad anglos denied it to the world.

Code napoleon.

But Hitler wasn't pure evil, he was a top chad

Look who's still bitter after Napoleon?

>Wrong, the only country Napoléon ever agressively invaded was Russia

OY VEY! Remember the 6 gorilllions of the peninsular war goy

Because he revolutionized warfare by roflstomping nearly every army he met and made a bunch of cucks in robes collectively shit their pants just looking at him. Napoleon was what Hitler strived to be, of course that failed tremendously. His code is still also in use today, though I can't quite agree with everything it says it's significant enough.
It wasn't even that aggressive of an assault, the Grande Armee was more of a show of power, like our Great White Fleet. Hell the only major battles that actually happened were Borodino and Smolensk, and the Russians burned their own cities.

>and leading to a third who will be the last
So that is Trump then? Is the big nuclear button real?

bc hitler is foundation myth of the west. Ask some liberal fuck if they are moral relativist. Then ask them if Hitler was evil. Will boggle their mind.
Every year in burgerland muh holocaust is taught. Force fed every year that hitler is evil and jews dindu nuffin.
The oddest thing though is Germany/Prussia/HRE is not even mentioned in history classes until 1913

HE BROUGHT CIVLIZATION TO THE MESS THAT THE GERMAN AREA WAS. He administered, he modernized, standardized the law ; he even standardized currencies so you barbarian can enter the era of modernity.

BOW AND SAY THANK YOU

>Wrong, the only country Napoléon ever agressively invaded was Russia
So those 1 million dead Austrians and Germans and all those burned villages and towns were just a defensive measure... because they didn't bow to your 19th century Hitler?

>today
How long has it been since N lived? Think about that when you look at history. The big lie people always accept is that Today is different than Yesterday; Current Year is different than Last Year. I think the truth is that technology has always blinded people to the fact that you can't have history until the children of those who experienced the event are dead.
Today we (the west) still must hold Hitler as EVIL. It's not a choice, not an option for us. If we allowed that H wasn't EVIL what does that make us? Especially the US; what does it make us if H wasn't a supreme EVIL?
We had concentration camps. We slaughtered our share. We (the West) did everything Hitler did, but we won. If we allowed for: The camps were the same as our camps for japs, If we allowed for: The Jews declared war on Germany first, If we allowed for: the common man of Germany was wronged on an abhorrent and personal level by the agreements at the end of world war 1.... If we allowed for any of that to be heard, to be aired in public, that would make the West look the villain.
In 2100 Hitler will be another Alexander. He will be another Napoleon. He will not be a victor (he is not their equal in victory, but in how he will be viewed), but he will not be a villain. He will be just a member of history.

>How come?
Because time must pass for something to be distanced enough for it to become distant. Our societies, I think, are similar to the family unit here in the west. An untimely death in the family taints the current generation, but does not taint the next. You feel no need to justify your grandfather's actions, but your father's? Those are too close to you for you to dismiss them. They must be either good or evil. Meanwhile your grandfather is just a grandfather.

>Sure.

France won WWII alongside the other winners of WWII - Allies/United Nations reformulated our current New Order World and history perceiving. Hitler as Axis is bad guy and also a bad goy.

Napoleon make the same mistake caesar , alexander, charlemagne and more recently nixon have made he wanted to emancipate them to make them french but they betray him . The only one out of all the great men who didn't make that mistake is hitler . It's as if there were all isildur and hitler was a frodo