Reminder: diversity frays the social fabric

>be social scientist working at harvard
>get research that gives bad feels because contradict your liberal biases
>withhold publishing for 6 years
>meanwhile, have findings ignored by mainstream press and peers
>"""science"""

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and_trust_within_communities
jstor.org/stable/2096296
jstor.org/stable/425106?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
jom.sagepub.com/content/23/3/239.short?rss=1&ssource=mfc
academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/112/4/1251/1911732
qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/115/3/847.abstract
nber.org/papers/w8627
econ.ucla.edu/costa/scapital8.pdf
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629804000642
academic.oup.com/esr/article-abstract/21/4/311/556895/Predicting-Cross-National-Levels-of-Social-Trust
americanthinker.com/articles/2005/12/the_new_separate_but_equal.html
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00339.x/full
snsoroka.com/files/2008StolleSorokaJohnston.pdf
academic.oup.com/esr/article-abstract/27/1/70/448535
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00215.x/abstract
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/School-Choice-Universal-Vouchers-and-Native-Flight-from-Local-Schools.pdf
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369183X.2011.545277
arxiv.org/abs/1110.1409
academic.oup.com/sf/article-abstract/89/3/807/2235576/Patterns-of-Racial-Ethnic-Exclusion-by-Internet?redirectedFrom=fulltext
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020715212451987
scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1251240
archive.is/LRe05
pastebin.com/pUibEHBh
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Jewed

post the fucking linl

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and_trust_within_communities

When this study first came.out shitlibs went nuts. And many proceeded to do a study themselves...80% of the time similar results were found.

Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe (1995)
Author: Lincoln Quillian
“I extend and test a theory of prejudice abased on perceived threats to dominant racial or national groups by subordinate groups. Perceived threat is hypothesized to be a function of economic conditions and of the size of the subordinate group relative to the dominant group. I test the group-threat theory using a multilevel model that combines population data with survey results on attitudes towards immigrants and racial minorities from Eurobarometer Survey 30. “Group threat” explains most of the variation in average prejudice scores across the 12 countries in the sample and has a small but statistically significant effect on the influence of certain individual-level variables on prejudice. These results demonstrate the importance of perceived intergroup threat in the formation of prejudicial attitudes and suggest a re-interpretation of past findings on the relations between individual characteristics and expressions of prejudice.”
Source: jstor.org/stable/2096296

Is Collective Violence Correlated with Social Pluralism? (1997)
Author: Rudolph J. Rummel
Increasing social pluralism (diversity) is correlated with increased chance of collective violence.
Source: jstor.org/stable/425106?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite (1997)
Authors: Susan G. Cohen, Diane E. Bailey
Ethnically diverse workplaces have lower cohesion, lower satisfaction and higher turnover.
Source: jom.sagepub.com/content/23/3/239.short?rss=1&ssource=mfc

Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation (1997)
Authors: Stephen Knack, Philip Keefer
“Memberships in formal groups—Putnam's measure of social capital—is not associated with trust or with improved economic performance. We find trust and civic norms are stronger in nations with higher and more equal incomes, with institutions that restrain predatory actions of chief executives, and with better-educated and ethnically homogeneous populations.”
Source: academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/112/4/1251/1911732

Participation in Heterogeneous Communities (2000)
Authors: Alberto Alesina, Eliana La Ferrara
“Using survey data on group membership and data on U. S. localities, we find that, after controlling for many individual characteristics, participation in social activities is significantly lower in more unequal and in more racially or ethnically fragmented localities.”
Source: qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/115/3/847.abstract

Cowards and Heroes: Group Loyalty in the American Civil War (2001)
Authors: Dora L. Costa, Matthew E. Kahn
Homogeneous military units have less desertion than diverse units.
nber.org/papers/w8627

UNDERSTANDING THE AMERICAN DECLINE IN SOCIAL CAPITAL, 1952-1998 (2003)
Authors: Dora L. Costa, Matthew E. Kahn
“Rising community heterogeneity (particularly income inequality) explains the fall in social capital produced outside the home.”
Source: econ.ucla.edu/costa/scapital8.pdf

The persistence of white ethnicity in New England politics (2004)
Author: James G. Gimpela, Wendy K. Tam Cho
As an explanation of recent voting behavior, ethnic origin trumps class differences. “…the political salience of white ethnicity persists, suggesting that ethnic groups do not simply dealign or politically “assimilate” over time.
Source: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629804000642

Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism? (2005)
Authors: Jan Delhey, Kenneth Newton
Ethnic homogeneity and Protestant traditions positively impact individual and societal levels of social trust.
Source: academic.oup.com/esr/article-abstract/21/4/311/556895/Predicting-Cross-National-Levels-of-Social-Trust

The New Separate But Equal (2005)
Author: James Chen
In the most liberal region in the US, San Francisco and surrounding suburbs, White parents are pulling their kids out of public schools that are becoming increasingly asian.
Source: americanthinker.com/articles/2005/12/the_new_separate_but_equal.html

Trust, Inequality and Ethnic Heterogeneity (2006)
Authors: ANDREW LEIGH
“Using a large Australian social survey, combined with precise data on neighbourhood characteristics, I explore the factors that affect trust at a local level (‘localised trust’) and at a national level (‘generalised trust’). Trust is positively associated with the respondent's education, and negatively associated with the amount of time spent commuting. At a neighbourhood level, trust is higher in affluent areas, and lower in ethnically and linguistically heterogeneous communities, with the effect being stronger for linguistic heterogeneity than ethnic heterogeneity. Linguistic heterogeneity reduces localised trust for both natives and immigrants, and reduces generalised trust only for immigrants. Instrumental variables specifications show similar results. In contrast to the USA, there is no apparent relationship between trust and inequality across neighbourhoods in Australia.”
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00339.x/full

When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighborhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions (2008)
Authors: Dietlind Stolle, Stuart Soroka, Richard Johnston
“Our analysis, one of the first controlled cross-national comparisons of small-unit contextual variation, confirms recent findings on the negative effect of neighborhood diversity on white majorities across the two countries.”
Source: snsoroka.com/files/2008StolleSorokaJohnston.pdf

The Effect of Ethnic Diversity and Community Disadvantage on Social Cohesion: A Multi-Level Analysis of Social Capital and Interethnic Relations in UK Communities (2009)
Author: James Laurence
“Our results show that while increasing diversity does have a negative impact on social capital, it simultaneously improves perceptions of, and relations between, ethnic groups. Furthermore, we find that forming ‘bridging’ ties in diverse environments plays a significant role in the positive relationship between diversity and tolerance, and that the presence of ‘bridging’ ties can also reduce the negative impact of diversity on social capital. However, while our results show that diversity has both positive and negative effects on social cohesion, we find that it is disadvantage which has the most detrimental impact, undermining both social capital and interethnic relations.”
Source: academic.oup.com/esr/article-abstract/27/1/70/448535

ETHNIC DIVERSITY AND TRUST (2010)
Author: OGUZHAN C. DINCER
“I find a negative relationship between ethnic polarization and trust and a U-shaped relationship between ethnic fractionalization and trust. According to my estimations, (a) going from an ethnic polarization index (PI) of 0 to an ethnic PI of 1 decreases trust by almost 12% points;”
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00215.x/abstract

School Choice, Universal Vouchers and Native Flight from Local Schools (2010)
Authors: Beatrice Schindler Rangvid
Using data from Copenhagen school registers, researchers found that native Danes opt out of public schools when the immigrant population concentration hits 35% or more.
Source: emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/School-Choice-Universal-Vouchers-and-Native-Flight-from-Local-Schools.pdf

Ethnic, Religious and Economic Diversity in Dutch Neighbourhoods: Explaining Quality of Contact with Neighbours, Trust in the Neighbourhood and Inter-Ethnic Trust (2011)
Authors: Bram Lancee, Jaap Dronkers
“Besides ethnic diversity, we identify economic and religious diversity, as well as language proficiency in the neighbourhood. This study explores data from the Netherlands showing how these four dimensions of diversity in the neighbourhood affect the quality of contact with neighbours, trust in the neighbourhood and inter-ethnic trust for immigrant and native residents. We find that ethnic diversity in the neighbourhood still lowers the quality of contact with neighbours. For natives, ethnic diversity is positively associated with inter-ethnic trust, whereas for immigrants there is no effect. Furthermore, for natives, religious diversity negatively affects the quality of contact with neighbours and inter-ethnic trust, whereas for immigrants this effect is positive. Economic diversity positively impacts on trust in the neighbourhood and inter-ethnic trust. We do not find an effect of language proficiency.”
Source: tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369183X.2011.545277

Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence (2011)
Authors: Alex Rutherford, Dion Harmon, Justin Werfel, Shlomiya Bar-Yam, Alexander Gard-Murray, Andreas Gros, Yaneer Bar-Yam
Borders, not multiculturalism, reduce intergroup violence.
Source: arxiv.org/abs/1110.1409

Patterns of Racial-Ethnic Exclusion by Internet Daters (2011)
Authors: Belinda Robnett, Cynthia Feliciano
Exclusionary dating is a natural consequence of racial diversity.
Source: academic.oup.com/sf/article-abstract/89/3/807/2235576/Patterns-of-Racial-Ethnic-Exclusion-by-Internet?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Disentangling the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’: On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism (2012)
Authors: Tim Reeskens, Wim van Oorschot
“In the present ‘Age of Migration’, public policy as well as social scientists are puzzled by the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’ (Newton, 2007) of finding popular support for welfare programs that have been installed in times of cultural homogeneity… we show that particularly those who favor that welfare benefits should in the first place target the neediest, place the highest restrictions on welfare provisions for immigrants. In addition, the relationship between preferences for welfare redistribution and opinions about immigrants’ access to social welfare is moderated by a national context of cultural heterogeneity.”
Source: journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020715212451987

Ethnic Conflicts: Their Biological Roots in Ethnic Nepotism (2012)
Author: Tatu Vanhanen
“[E]thnic heterogeneity [diversity] explains 55% of the variation in the scale of ethnic conflicts, and the results of regression analysis disclose that the same relationship more or less applies to all 187 countries. … [E]thnic nepotism is the common cross-cultural background factor which supports the persistence of ethnic conflicts in the world as long as there are ethnically divided societies.”
Source: scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1251240

Link these studies whenever politicians and public figures claim that ‘diversity is our strength.’

This isn't even half of the studies I've saved on the issue (Sup Forums thinks some of it's spam so I'm probably just going to stop posting more now), but this is what we should be really pushing - not that immigration is bad because of crime or wages, because they can always post one competent, decent african and say "pol btfo".

When you look at this data, it's clear that all sorts of diversity is bad for literally everything, and it doesn't matter how good the individual immigrant is.

The question is this - do you want a nice, non-corrupt, functioning government and civil society? Then you have to also want a racially and ethnically homogeneous one too. You can't have the first without the latter.

Can you please put the totality into a pastebin? I'd like to update the hate facts db archive.is/LRe05

the fact that this stuff needs to be "studied" in the first place is a travesty in of itself, it's the equivalent of conducting a study whether or not jumping into boiling hot water is bad, it merely enables the lunacy

citation needed

Based anti-shitholean.

Sure.

If you want to find more of these, just put any one study into Google Scholar and click on related articles.

>Scientism will be real term in your lifetime.

pastebin.com/pUibEHBh

Some of this stuff should be on various hatefacts compilations, but it's pretty extensive and I've cleaned out a few shittier studies.

Based ty

bump