What if we had a Viking society instead of the greco-roman (Western) one...

What if we had a Viking society instead of the greco-roman (Western) one? Europe would expand their borders and enslave other races until today?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megasthenes#Society
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Good gawd no.
The Vikings were raiders, not an imperial empire like the Romans.

Vikings became the monarch of Europe. So you would have no brother wars, no Islam, and no Christcucking or Jews.

Greco-roman culture's location was a crucial aspect of it's development and influence. Being located on the border of the Mediterranean right by two other cradles of ancient civilization such as North Africa and the Middle East made sure they had constant exchange of ideas, technology, and resources.
Vikings were simply too isolated to form a great civilization, even if they had natural intelligence.

Modern Western culture is a merger of the Germanic and Roman cultures. So there is no instead here.

And Viking culture was essentially Germanic. Geography just meant we did our raiding by ships instead of walking like some landbound German

The Virgin Roman Empire vs The Chad Germanic.

Literally the European equivalent of African warlords you see today

>Vikings were simply too isolated to form a great civilization, even if they had natural intelligence.
This is true.
Human Accomplishment mostly happened in the shaded area.
Not sure why the German National Socialist were such fan boys of the Scandinavians, as nothing much happened there - because they were too isolated and lacked the great cities. Odin also didn't advocate the creation of universities, like the Christianized Romans did.
I would also remind that the version of Christianity the Romans believed was just warmed over Roman paganism. They replaced all the minor gods with "saints", their "Vestal Virgin" believe became The Virgin Mary, their winter solstice became "Christmas" (even though they knew damn well Jesus was born in Spring), etc.

>Not sure why the German National Socialist were such fan boys of the Scandinavians
They actually weren't. Do those banner look Scandinavian? Or more like Ancient Roman? Doesnt the 3rd Reich give you a Rome & Caesar feel?

isn't it funny how cuckolds always have germanic heritage, and in threads about vikangz, you see people acting as if vikangz were powerful or smart, yet they hate niggers, who they acted exactly like.

Yes they were trying to resurrect the Holy Roman Empire en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire

Bu the National Socialists were very interested in Norse/Germanic paganism, rune magic and the occult

Probably because there arent any viking looting parties anymore but there are still niggers

>They actually weren't.
The whole blond hair blue eyed meme in the Hitler youth manual implied that Scandinavians were even more "Aryan" they the Germans themselves. Of course, the whole Aryan story was bullshit propaganda. I mean, descended from poos? They really went there?
Genetically, the Germans were closer to the French, and the Scandinavians were a distinct and separate people who shared the same Germanic root languages.
> Do those banner look Scandinavian? Or more like Ancient Roman? Doesnt the 3rd Reich give you a Rome & Caesar feel?
Exactly.

thats cause they wanted to establish ancient paganism as religion with the roman aesthetics and political structure. It was a good mix honestly

>isn't it funny how cuckolds always have germanic heritage,
I don't see that and I don't see how you can claim that's true.

> and in threads about vikangz, you see people acting as if vikangz were powerful or smart, yet they hate niggers, who they acted exactly like.
I never said Nordics were powerful smart when they went Viking. Human achievement didn't happen in Nordic countries, but in the places they raided. I believe the Nordic people had the genes for intelligence, but lacked the resources to form major cities and the culture to support the concept of learning centers; which is why they became raiders and colonist, and not creators and builders.

descended from poos? you mean indian shitskins?
according to myth whites ruled India in ancient times, and poos were the lower caste. Thats why the swastika is prevalent there and they did that expedition to India

Aryanism has been mostly vindicated by modern genetics research. A hyperborean homeland was just as wrong as it sounds, but the Yamnaya fit the bill. The linguistic link between Indians and Europeans is also backed up by it, with genetics showing an influx of Yamnaya to India ~3000 years ago. Modern Scandinavians also show the highest rates of Yamnaya admixture. It's right on pretty much all counts save the place of origin.

As BASED as the vikings were, they were pretty cuntish to other European tribes. Not insomuch as warfare is concerned but they would pillage undefended churches/villages without official declarations of war.

Why would any non-Scandi European want this? At least the Romans provided roads and opportunity for the taxes they levied on Tribal Europeans..

>Europe would expand their borders and enslave other races until today?
But senpai, that's already what we're doing

they were extremely hostile to Christianity and for a good reason

Typical that our viking ancestors got backstabbed by the khazars before they became (((khazars)))

...

Hitler even admired mussolini and he attempt to rebuilt the roman empire, too bad that that was one of the main reason why he lost, he backed up italy too much.

See Chart. Indians are pretty far away in genetic distance terms. White people spead out and the division happened around Turkey, if I recall correctly.
It was a fine myth but it was propaganda to get the Indians to rebel against the British Empire that conquered them.
>Aryanism has been mostly vindicated by modern genetics research.
Damn it! Coffee again on my screen.

>one of the main reason why he lost, he backed up italy too much.
True this. Mussolini wanted to grab some colonies, went to Africa... and got his ass handed to him. Germany went to help but the blood and treasure would have been better spent defending Germany.

African Warlords have the right idea desu. People will complain about Africa's statistics, and so on, but if you've ever seen pictures or videos of the things those warlords own and enjoy, it's ludicrous. They are incredibly well off, well read, successful, and fully adhere to libertarian principles. They thrive as people.

If the Vikings won, we could be living in an awesome Viking-Africa Warlord broship where both groups beat up on the Mediterranean, one from the north and the other from the south. No eternal jew or muslim terrorist problems.

It could have been beautiful.

>it was propaganda to get the Indians
No, it was a legitimate anthropological theory resulting from the finding of a ton of linguistic similarities. Whether somebody did or did not give it more publicity for political reasons is irrelevant. It came about as an anthropological theory and had a sound basis.

Conquering nations build nothing of their own and pervert what they steal. They are the antithesis of sustained collective action which makes new things from the freedom to challenge the old.

You can't steal what doesn't exist, and it won't exist if all you do is steal.

... and is debunked by modern genetics. It was a tenuous hypothesis to being with, just linking by language.
As I said, the Germans have more in common as a people with the French than they do with the Scandinavians. That, too, was a bad hypothesis based on language similarities.
Western Europeans don't call Poo's Granddad.

Yep. The Nordics went viking about because they had scarce resources. If other people's had not created the resources, they would have died out. They're a very colorful but parasitic culture who were forced into cold, rocky lands.

stopped reading at grecco being a society. No, greek "people" are not a society, not people and not relevant in the future, the past or the present.

>they would have died out
That's not true. There would just have been fewer of us. To claim that Nordic culture is in any shape or form parasitic is pure ignorance, because our culture is the opposite of that.

A burning cross at the top of the church would just make it perfect

Look at the craftsmanship of old Viking boats and tell me that came from the mind of a brute. Ruthless perhaps, but an advanced human being.

why do people worship the vikings? what separates them from niggers today? they built nothing and went around raping and pillaging other cultures' work

they were also shit fighters, pic related

>... and is debunked by modern genetics
No, the "aryan invasion theory" is backed by genetics. There is significant Yamnaya admixture in India, only it was introduced later than it was in Europe.
>Western Europeans don't call Poo's Granddad
>hurr why dere still be mankeys if dat dere evelootens tru
Quit playing retarded.
>That, too, was a bad hypothesis based on language similarities
Only this one turned out correct. I really don't know what the fuck you're on about here. I never said linguistics is the end all be all of anthropology, or should somehow reflect genetic ancestry better than fucking genetics do. I told you what it was based on, at the time. When we didn't have any fucking genetic testing. It was a sound theory given what they had to work with, and it turned out to be right.

>Europe would expand their borders and enslave other races until today?

As opposed to expanding their borders and enslaving other races up to the early 20th century like what actually happened?

>imperial empire

kek

So, you with the JIDF spreading good will and cheer among the white goys or what?

...

They only pillaged,raped and looted.

Even when they came to America,they didnt stay.
Fuck no we would actually devolve if we had vikang society as majority

>To claim that Nordic culture is in any shape or form parasitic is pure ignorance
Dude! Chutzpah! Going viking is pure pirate on other peoples.
I didn't say that the Nordics had the minds of brutes. I said they had the genetics for intelligence, but lacked the resources to create great cities and the culture to support learning. They were very good at making Pirate and Trade ships, yes

>Even when they came to America,they didnt stay.
It appears they may have stayed, and as you say, "devolved" back to a stone age people.

The R1a haplogroup is found among the upper castes of India, this much is true, but the notion that the upper castes who lived 4000 years ago there were anything European is absurd, if that were to be the case then they would have been described as such by the ancient Greeks
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megasthenes#Society
>Because of its large size, India is inhabited by many diverse races, all of which are indigenous. India has no foreign colony, and Indians have not established any colonies outside India.[18] The Indians are of above average stature, because of abundant food, fine water and pure air. They are well-skilled in art.

While I agree the ancient upper caste Indian may been descended from Whites in the early hunter gatherer eras, that's where it ends. Nowhere among the descriptions of the Greeks are poos anything similar to Euros. Stop assuming just cause some genetic traces are there it's anything meaningful, some American niggers have white genes in them, doesn't mean shit.

>vikang
>kang

JEEZ

>At least the Romans provided roads and opportunity for the taxes they levied on Tribal Europeans..
Romans built on the Celtic roads that already existed. Celts loved to travel by carrovan during the seasons.

Vikings were pirates. They became the Christian monarchy. They weren't the entire people, just pirates during a really bad time in Europe.

Tell me how arent they kangz? Literally nordic pirates who act like modern african warlords or somalian pirates
We would lose too much if they had been the main society.

>Tell me how arent they kangz?

Congratulations. Though you didnt discover them during vikang times

Well the Yamnaya surely had some influence given that they parented the Indo-European languages.
>descended from Whites
They weren't exactly white, you know. Modern Europeans are a hodgepodge of neolithic farmers, native hunter gatherers and Yamnaya, this is just one part of that.

True, but we were surprisingly advanced during the Viking times too. Especially our navigation skills ( allowed us to discover America many hundred years before Columbus), our boat-building, our laws, our metallurgy, etc.

I'm not saying we were ever the most advanced, but many people seem to say we contributed very little, which is a blatant lie.

germans liked to appropriate a lot from the scandis there were swastikas all over scandi artifacts and art. I think thats where they got it from actually.

swastika is veeery ancient and found all over the globe not just Scandinavia

Sweden introduced ABBA so there is that.

Seriously, Vikings were a joke, compared to the portuguese, spanish, english and french empires, armies, navy and world influence or impact

...

>empire
>vikings
pick

Difference is one of the cultures evolved while the other just stagnated

>borders
they would probably have just fucked around looting, raping, and generally undermining any possibility of real advancement until some joke empire from the middle east or asia came and took everything over. Vikings were very successful as raiders, not so much at building a civilization

Vikings were slavers that sold Europeans to the middle east for silver.

It would have been better for the Indians if the Vikings had colonized the Americas before the Spaniards.

>Vikings
>Alfred the Great
come on man

I posted Alfred because he killed viking scum.

>Seriously, Vikings were a joke, compared to the portuguese, spanish, english and french empires, armies, navy and world influence or impact
Vikings were their monarchs you fucking pleb.

>they would probably have just fucked around looting, raping, and generally undermining any possibility of real advancement until some joke empire from the middle east or asia came and took everything over. Vikings were very successful as raiders, not so much at building a civilization
Russia's first king asked Vikings to come and teach them civilization. That's traditional Russian history. You're so fucking stupid with your Rothschild confederacy flag you fucking faggot

At no point, ever in Portuguese history, were vikings monarchs of the Portuguese. Ever.

Vikings never existed. Varangians were Warni.
Ascomanni were Yatviags.

>That's traditional Russian history
And that's why its still a shithole eight hundred years later

>Vikings were their monarchs you fucking pleb.
Oh gawd. You can't go more nigger than "we wuz kangs".