Why are you against trans people in the military Sup Forums? Is it just because your bigots?

Why are you against trans people in the military Sup Forums? Is it just because your bigots?

To ignore the physical differences between genders is to show an ignorance that would be very dangerous in a battle situation.

Because I think trannies are mentally ill subhumans who should be euthanized.

The military is a very last resort employment, you really have to go into it accepting that your career will either get you killed or make you a target.

Do you really believe people with bodily dysphoria are up for that?

I have nothing against train people or conductors in particular.

because suicide rates are high enough and the men are already too soft without this mental, effeminate degeneracy

shill thread if I ever saw one

Trannies can't fight worth a shit, have serious medical issues, and are likely to fly off the handle in a serious engagement.

...

I'm not against it. I want their suicide rates to double.

Here's the template

There are about 1,219,510 men in the military. 210,485 women. 15,000 trans (and even that number is too high but whatever)

Is $560 per trans person (This number is bullshit because the average cost of SRS is about $80k across 3 years but whatever). Both Cialis and Viagra combined is $18.75 per person. Who in the FUCK are these numbers comparable? Is the left literally retarded?

I survived 4 combat deployments as a scout. I saw my friend die. GTFO transgender faggots. It’s a hard life. I’ve wanted to kill myself and I didn’t want to cut my dick off. These people have no place in war. If you can’t handle the fact that you’re a dude, you can’t handle putting arms blown off my 50 Cal in MRE boxes. The day of the rope can’t come soon enough.

>dysmorphia
>having a mental illness
>letting the mentally ill join the army

Ok

That number isn't for the US army, but the DoD and VA combined. Also, per capital, it's still more expensive for trannies.

fun fact: transgender people are severely mentally ill, degenerate, and have a suicide rate of over 40% but FUCK BLUMPF they should be commanding our armies so i personally feel better

This doesn't refute Trump at all. It's a waste of money. Trannies join purely to get gibs and don't contribute anything useful to the military.

>implying trans people would make it out of boot camp training
The constant yelling from their Drill Instructors would be too much for them to bear. At best they'll get a desk job or something.

I'm not against it, in fact I think they should be on the front lines used as meat sheilds

There are probably more than 8 times more males with erectyle disfunction than trans in the military so that point is shit

Its called "death from a thousand cuts."
Like spending a few dollars everyday on a cup of coffee isn't anything but a few dollars but for 2-3 cups you can buy a bag of coffee, make your own and have coffee for a week or more.
Get rid of the small shit first, you're trying to save money. Every democratically held city does this wrong. They spend hundreds of thousands and millions on hundreds of petty side programs with no financial or societal gain but can't pay the wages of police officers, fire fighters, teachers and infrastructure projects. Those programs really don't cost that much so they overlook them, its the massive pension deficits and overtime costs that are hurting them.

1. Viagra is used as a bartering chip in the middle East to buy off warlords
2. More people are known Viagra than will use transgender services
3. Viagra can be used to treat heart condition
4. Conditions that Viagra treats don't have a 40% suicide attempt rate
5. Saged

As a CWO4....I don't even really think women belong in the military. Much less women pretending to be men, or men pretending to be women.

The former is bad enough for unit cohesion and capabilities (along with fueling a lot of bullshit trainings that eat up time for real training). The latter will be terrible if it gains enough steam.

I got out just as the navy was adopting its transgender policy, we had to attend a mandatory briefing on what the policy entailed. That briefing is entirely the reason why I'm against trans people in the navy at least, not sure how it works for other services.

If you intend to "transition" you have to inform your chain of command, all the way up to your commanding officer who has the final say on whether or not you can be allowed to go through with the process. Given today's political climate I can't fathom a single reason why a request would be denied however, barring some kind of national emergency on the scale of 9/11 and imminent war. At this point the person transitioning has to attend constant medical/psychiatric evaluations before and after surgery. During this period that person cannot be deployed.

What does this mean to your average sailor? You area losing an able bodied person for at least a year, and that person will not be replaced by someone else since they are still considered "attached" to your command IE "unit." Best example I can give is, you're set to deploy in a year. Tommy decides to become Tammy, and is leaves at this time. They miss the ENTIRE workup/training cycle which is crucial for deployment. and they come back likely on medical status so they won't deploy anyway. Meanwhile you're off on a 10 month deployment eating shit because you're short a person. As a person who has been in charge of departments on deployment and underhanded many times to to different reasons, that fucking sucks.

The only way I can rationalize this working is to give it the same weight as the GI Bill and make it something that is earned after separation from the military.

it's because they are there solely to have their surgeries paid for

...

you trans nigger, stop shooting yourself
in the leg. and btw women should not speak
until spoken too.

...

...

Mentally ill people shouldn't go near weapons.

Bigots

That isn't an argument.

Because someone who is so mentally unfit that they are desirous of surgically mutilating themselves to solve their dysphoria shows such a lack of judgement that they should never be put in a position of authority over a weapon of war.

thanks lol

>Bigot
You mean smart

I don't look away from any of those thing except maybe homelessness, which I rarely think about. Bourgois liberals on the other hand definitely don't care about any of them, being too preoccupied with their perversions, a problem that many socialist thinkers warned us about.

I am not. Send them all to fight ISIS.

The reality is that these are very small prices per soldier and they come at the end of the soldiers career.

For the tranny you are talking about an incredibly high cost per 'soldier', that comes right after they enlist, and results in their being of no deployment (combat) value to the organization.